355

Everolimus: an update on the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and recent clinical trials

BACKGROUND

A growing body of evidence suggests that everolimus might offer effective immunosuppressive activity together with antiproliferative effects that may address some of the unmet needs in the long-term therapeutic management of the post-transplant patient.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the emerging evidence for employing everolimus-based immunosuppression.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of the Medline, Embase and Renal Health Library (Cochrane Collaboration) databases, and of the summary publications from international transplant meetings and congresses during 2000-2008.

RESULTS

This article summarizes this analysis, with special focus on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of everolimus and on the results of its use in renal transplantation. Some data has also been included about the efficacy of the drug in other solid organ transplantation and in tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus is an immunosuppressant drug with proven efficacy in transplantation. When used in combination with cyclosporin, better results are obtained in renal function with low cyclosporin doses. Adverse events related to this drug are frequent and lead to moderate dropout rates.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of everolimus versus azathioprine and placebo to maintain steroid-induced remission in patients with moderate-to-severe active Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVES

A prospective study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of everolimus versus azathioprine or placebo in maintaining steroid-induced remission in active Crohn's disease (CD) and assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of everolimus.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study in adults with moderate-to-severe active CD. The patients received oral steroids for a rapid induction of remission plus everolimus 6 mg/day, azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/day, or placebo as maintenance treatment. The main outcome measure was the treatment success, defined as a steroid-free remission by the end of month 3 and maintained until study cutoff without the use of prohibited efficacy treatments.

RESULTS

Following an interim analysis, the study was terminated before enrollment was completed due to the lack of efficacy. The full intent-to-treat population comprised 138 patients. Only 96 patients who entered the study > or =7 months prior to data cutoff were included in the primary efficacy population. The treatment success was achieved in 13 of 38 everolimus patients, 22 of 36 azathioprine patients, and 8 of 22 placebo patients. Using the Kaplan-Meier estimates at month 7, the incidence of treatment success was 22.0% with everolimus group (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.7-37.3%, P= 0.610 vs placebo), 38.3% with azathioprine group (95% CI 20.6-55.9%, P= 0.500 vs placebo), and 28.8% with placebo group (95% CI 7.7-49.9%). The type and incidence of adverse events in the everolimus cohort were similar to those reported in the approved transplantation indications.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and tolerability of everolimus (6 mg/day) in patients with active CD were comparable to azathioprine. At this dose, everolimus is not more efficacious in achieving a steroid-free remission in active CD than the comparators.

Proliferation signal inhibitors in cardiac transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Standard immunosuppression after cardiac transplantation includes a calcineurin inhibitor in combination with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine and corticosteroids. These agents have led to excellent outcomes but have shortcomings in terms of efficacy and toxicity. A new class of immunosuppressants, proliferation signal inhibitors, may meet some of these shortcomings.

RECENT FINDINGS

The efficacy of the available proliferation signal inhibitors - sirolimus and its derivative everolimus - has been compared with azathioprine in three randomized clinical trials. Sirolimus or everolimus use was associated with lower rates of acute rejection and reduced development of chronic allograft vasculopathy. Sirolimus was not found to be superior to mycophenolate mofetil in a randomized trial. Proliferation signal inhibitors have been reported to be effective in refractory recurrent acute rejection. Nonrandomized studies have demonstrated that proliferation signal inhibitor-based immunosuppression enables recovery from renal dysfunction secondary to calcineurin inhibitor treatment. Proliferation signal inhibitor-based treatment is associated with a lower risk of malignancy than calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Proliferation signal inhibitors have significant adverse effects that may limit widespread use.

SUMMARY

Proliferation signal inhibitors are important new immunosuppressive agents that have added considerably to the armamentarium allowing further tailored immunosuppression to individualize patient care after heart transplantation.