Highly sensitized patients in cardiac transplantation: Early outcomes from the Canadian Prioritized Organ Sharing Program

Serum dilutions as a predictive biomarker for peri-operative desensitization: An exploratory approach to transplanting sensitized heart candidates

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of cardiac allografts mediated by anti-HLA Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) is one of the major barriers to successful transplantation for the treatment of end-stage heart failure. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a first-line treatment for pre-transplant desensitization. However, indications for treatment regimens and treatment end-points have not been well established. In this study, we investigated how sera dilutions could guide TPE regimens for effective peri-operative desensitization and early AMR treatment. Our data show that 1:16 dilutions of EDTA-treated sera and 1.5 volume TPE reduce anti-HLA class I and class II antibody levels in the same manner and, therefore, allows to predict which antibodies would respond to peri-operative TPE. We successfully applied this approach to transplanting three highly sensitized cardiac recipients (CPRA 85-93%) with peri-operative desensitization based on a virtual crossmatch performed on 1:16 diluted serum. Furthermore, we have used sera dilutions to guide DSA treatment post-transplant. Although these findings have to be confirmed in a larger prospective study, our data suggest that serum dilutions can serve as a predictive biomarker to guide peri-operative desensitization and post-transplant immunologic management.

Does the Canadian allocation system for highly sensitized patients work?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The number of sensitized heart transplant candidates is rising. Highly sensitized patients are disadvantaged because they encounter longer waiting times to heart transplant. Strategies to reduce their waiting times include waitlist prioritization and desensitization therapies. The purpose of this review is to describe the listing category for highly sensitized patients in the Canadian allocation system, examine the advantages and limitations of this strategy and provide an approach to the management of the highly sensitized patient awaiting heart transplant.

RECENT FINDINGS

Analysis of data from the United Network of Organ Sharing shows that the incidence of death or removal from the waitlist in patients listed for heart transplant increases as the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) increases and is independent of medical urgency. In the Canadian allocation system, patients with cPRA more than 80% have a similar incidence of death on the waitlist as less sensitized patients, suggesting they survive to be transplanted. Furthermore, prioritizing and transplanting highly sensitized patients has been associated with acceptable post-transplant outcomes.

SUMMARY

The Canadian allocation system prioritizes highly sensitized patients to increase equity and access to transplantation while maintaining good post-transplant outcomes. Not all highly sensitized patients can wait for an organ, even if prioritized. A pragmatic individualized approach would consider the medical stability of the patient, the likelihood of transplant with a negative crossmatch and then determine whether waitlist prioritization or desensitization is the more appropriate strategy.

Anesthesia for Heart Transplantation

This article seeks to evaluate current practices in heart transplantation. The goals of this article were to review current practices for heart transplantation and its anesthesia management. The article reviews current demographics and discusses the current criteria for candidacy for heart transplantation. The process for donor and receipt selection is reviewed. This is followed by a review of mechanical circulatory support devices as they pertain to heart transplantation. The preanesthesia and intraoperative considerations are also discussed. Finally, management after transplantation is also reviewed.

cPRA Increases With DQA, DPA, and DPB Unacceptable Antigens in the Canadian cPRA Calculator

A calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) estimates the percentage of donors with unacceptable antigens (UA) for a recipient. cPRA may be underestimated in transplant candidates with UA to DQA, DPA, and DPB if these are not included in the calculation program. To serve the National Canadian Transplant Programs, a cPRA calculator was developed with complete molecular typing for all donors at HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/4/5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1, all resolved to serologic equivalents. The prevalence of UA at DQA, DPA and DPB was evaluated in a sensitized regional population. The impact of adding these additional UA to cPRA was calculated alone and in combination, and compared to the baseline cPRA for UA at A, B, C, DR, DR51/52/53, and DQ. Of 740 sensitized transplant candidates, 18% of total and 32% with cPRA≥95% had DQA UA. Twenty-seven percent of total and 54% with cPRA≥95% had DPB UA. Of 280/740 subjects with these UA, 36/280 (13%) had cPRA increase of >20% when they were included, 7% increased cPRA to ≥80% and 6% to ≥95%. Inclusion of DQA, DPA, and DPB UA in Canadian cPRA calculations improves the accuracy of cPRA where these are relevant in allocation.

Allosensitization in heart transplantation: an overview

Transplant candidates might manifest circulating antibodies against human leukocyte antigens and nonhuman leukocyte antigens, a condition termed allosensitization. The presence of these antibodies decreases a given candidate's possible donor pool, thereby prolonging the time to transplantation. They are also associated with poorer posttransplant outcomes including increased morbidity and mortality. With the increasing use of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation, the prevalence of allosensitized transplant candidates has increased. This has implications for transplant programs in terms of donor-recipient matching and managing transplant-related complications, which are more common in this high risk cohort. Controversy exists as to the best approach in managing sensitized patients, before and after transplantation. Transplant centres have used various strategies to reduce antibody loads with mixed results being reported; moreover, it remains unclear as to whether attempts at desensitization translate into better posttransplant outcomes. As an alternative management approach, some centres participate in large organ sharing strategies and allocate organs based on the probability of finding a successful donor-recipient match. In this article, the immunological basis of allosensitization, its causes, implications, and therapeutic strategies to manage sensitized patients are reviewed. The literature in relation to desensitization therapies in heart transplant candidates is also reviewed.