Elevated pre-transplant left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increases primary graft dysfunction risk in double lung transplant recipients

Post Lung Transplant Primary Graft Dysfunction

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major source of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation, presenting as acute lung injury within 72 hours post-transplantation. Despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, the complex interplay of donor, recipient, and perioperative factors contributes to its development, underscoring the multifactorial nature of PGD. Clinical management of recipients with PGD relies on supportive care strategies, including lung-protective ventilation, inhaled nitric oxide, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Severe cases of PGD may result in significant short- and long-term adverse outcomes, including early mortality. Even for patients who recover from PGD, there is also an associated increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, further compounding its clinical impact. This review provides a brief review of current knowledge regarding PGD, detailing risk factors, diagnostic criteria, and management approaches while identifying critical gaps in understanding its pathophysiology. Ongoing research is essential to develop innovative therapeutic strategies and improve outcomes for lung transplant recipients.

Impact of Pre-Transplant Left Ventricular Diastolic Pressure on Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Lung transplantation (LT) constitutes the last therapeutic option for selected patients with end-stage respiratory disease. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of severe lung injury, occurring in the first 72 h following LT and constitutes the most common cause of early death after LT. The presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been reported to favor PGD development, with a negative impact on patients' outcomes while complicating medical management. Although several studies have suggested a potential association between pre-LT left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and PGD occurrence, the underlying mechanisms of such an association remain elusive. Importantly, the heterogeneity of the study protocols and the various inclusion criteria used to define the diastolic dysfunction in those patients prevents solid conclusions from being drawn. In this review, we aim at summarizing PGD mechanisms, risk factors, and diagnostic criteria, with a further focus on the interplay between LVDD and PGD development. Finally, we explore the predictive value of several diastolic dysfunction diagnostic parameters to predict PGD occurrence and severity.

Impact of lung transplantation on diastolic dysfunction in recipients with pretransplant pulmonary hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary hypertension can cause left ventricular diastolic dysfunction through ventricular interdependence. Moreover, diastolic dysfunction has been linked to adverse outcomes after lung transplant. The impact of lung transplant on diastolic dysfunction in recipients with pretransplant pulmonary hypertension is not defined. In this cohort, we aimed to assess the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction, the change in diastolic dysfunction after lung transplant, and the impact of diastolic dysfunction on lung transplant outcomes.

METHODS

In a large, single-center database from January 2011 to September 2021, single or bilateral lung transplant recipients with pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure > 20 mm Hg) were retrospectively identified. Those without a pre- or post-transplant echocardiogram within 1 year were excluded. Diastolic dysfunction was diagnosed and graded according to the American Society of Echocardiography 2016 guideline on assessment of diastolic dysfunction (present, absent, indeterminate). McNemar's test was used to examine association between diastolic dysfunction pre- and post-transplant. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to assess associations between pre-lung transplant diastolic dysfunction and post-lung transplant 1-year outcomes, including mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome grade 1 or higher-free survival.

RESULTS

Of 476 primary lung transplant recipients, 205 with pulmonary hypertension formed the study cohort (mean age, 56.6 ± 11.9 years, men 61.5%, mean pulmonary artery pressure 30.5 ± 9.8 mm Hg, left ventricular ejection fraction < 55% 9 [4.3%]). Pretransplant, diastolic dysfunction was present in 93 patients (45.4%) (grade I = 8, II = 84, III = 1), absent in 16 patients (7.8%), and indeterminate in 89 patients (43.4%), and 7 patients (3.4%) had missing data. Post-transplant, diastolic dysfunction was present in 7 patients (3.4%) (grade I = 2, II = 5, III = 0), absent in 164 patients (80.0%), and indeterminate in 15 patients (7.3%), and 19 patients (9.3%) had missing data. For those with diastolic dysfunction grades in both time periods (n = 180), there was a significant decrease in diastolic dysfunction post-transplant (148/169 patients with resolved diastolic dysfunction; McNemar's test P < .001). Pretransplant diastolic dysfunction was not associated with major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08, 95% CI, 0.72-1.62; P = .71), bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome-free survival (HR, 0.67, 95% CI, 0.39-1.56; P = .15), or mortality (HR, 0.70, 95% CI, 0.33-1.46; P = .34) at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Diastolic dysfunction is highly prevalent in lung transplant candidates with normal left ventricular systolic function and pulmonary hypertension, and resolves in most patients after lung transplant regardless of patient characteristics. Pre-lung transplant diastolic dysfunction was not associated with adverse lung or cardiac outcomes after lung transplant. Collectively, these findings suggest that the presence of diastolic dysfunction in lung transplant recipients with pulmonary hypertension has no prognostic significance, and as such diastolic dysfunction and the associated clinical syndrome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction should not be considered a relative contraindication to lung transplant in such patients.

Primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation: From pathogenesis to future frontiers

Lung transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage lung disease. Currently, just under 5000 lung transplants are performed worldwide annually. However, a major scourge leading to 90-d and 1-year mortality remains primary graft dysfunction. It is a spectrum of lung injury ranging from mild to severe depending on the level of hypoxaemia and lung injury post-transplant. This review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the epidemiology, patho physiology, risk factors, outcomes, and future frontiers involved in mitigating primary graft dysfunction. The current diagnostic criteria are examined alongside changes from the previous definition. We also highlight the issues surrounding chronic lung allograft dysfunction and identify the novel therapies available for ex-vivo lung perfusion. Although primary graft dysfunction remains a significant contributor to 90-d and 1-year mortality, ongoing research and development abreast with current technological advancements have shed some light on the issue in pursuit of future diagnostic and therapeutic tools.

Primary graft dysfunction: what we know

Many advances in lung transplant have occurred over the last few decades in the understanding of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) though effective prevention and treatment remain elusive. This review will cover prior understanding of PGD, recent findings, and directions for future research. A consensus statement updating the definition of PGD in 2016 highlights the growing complexity of lung transplant perioperative care taking into account the increasing use of high flow oxygen delivery and pulmonary vasodilators in the current era. PGD, particularly more severe grades, is associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes after transplant such as chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Growing experience have helped identify recipient, donor, and intraoperative risk factors for PGD. Understanding the pathophysiology of PGD has advanced with increasing knowledge of the role of innate immune response, humoral cell immunity, and epithelial cell injury. Supportive care post-transplant with technological advances in extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) remain the mainstay of treatment for severe PGD. Future directions include the evolving utility of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) both in PGD research and potential pre-transplant treatment applications. PGD remains an important outcome in lung transplant and the future holds a lot of potential for improvement in understanding its pathophysiology as well as development of preventative therapies and treatment.

Primary graft dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a devastating complication in the acute postoperative lung transplant period, associated with high short-term mortality and chronic rejection. We review its definition, pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, treatment strategies, and future research directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

New analyses suggest donation after circulatory death and donation after brain death donors have similar PGD rates, whereas donors >55 years are not associated with increased PGD risk. Recipient pretransplant diastolic dysfunction and overweight or obese recipients with predominant abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue have increased PGD risk. Newly identified recipient biomarkers and donor and recipient genes increase PGD risk, but their clinical utility remains unclear. Mixed data still exists regarding cold ischemic time and PGD risk, and increased PGD risk with cardiopulmonary bypass remains confounded by transfusions. Portable ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) may prevent PGD, but its use is limited to a handful of centers. Although updates to current PGD treatment are lacking, future therapies are promising with targeted therapy and the use of EVLP to pharmacologically recondition donor lungs.

SUMMARY

There is significant progress in defining PGD and identifying its several risk factors, but effective prevention and treatment strategies are needed.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplantation Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2019

The highlights in cardiothoracic transplantation focus on the recent research pertaining to heart and lung transplantation, including expansion of the donor pool, the optimization of donors and recipients, the use of mechanical support, the perioperative and long-term outcomes in these patient populations, and the use of transthoracic echocardiography to diagnose rejection.

Effect of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction on development of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is one of the most common complications after lung transplant and is associated with significant early and late morbidity and mortality. The cause of primary graft dysfunction is often multifactorial involving patient, donor, and operational factors. Diastolic dysfunction is increasingly recognized as an important risk factor for development of PGD after lung transplant and here we examine recent evidence on the topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with end-stage lung disease are more likely to suffer from cardiovascular disease including diastolic dysfunction. PGD as result of ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplant is exacerbated by increased left atrial pressure and pulmonary venous congestion impacted by diastolic dysfunction. Recent studies on relationship between diastolic dysfunction and PGD after lung transplant show that patients with diastolic dysfunction are more likely to develop PGD with worse survival outcome and complicated hospital course.

SUMMARY

Patients with diastolic dysfunction is more likely to suffer from PGD after lung transplant. From the lung transplant candidate selection to perioperative and posttransplant care, thorough evaluation and documentation diastolic dysfunction to guide patient care are imperative.