Lung transplantation as standard of care for advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease

Long-Term Assessment of Antibody Response to COVID-19 Vaccination in People with Cystic Fibrosis and Solid Organ Transplantation

With the worldwide spread of SARS-CoV-2 disease, people with cystic fibrosis (CF), especially solid organ transplant recipients, have quickly been identified as a risk group for severe disease. Studies have shown low antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in recipients of solid organ transplant compared to the healthy population. Information on immune response in CF patients with solid organ transplantation is limited, especially regarding long-term efficacy. The aim of this real-world study was a long-term assessment of humoral immune response induced by three and four doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. S1RBD and IgG antibodies were measured every 12 weeks over a period of 27 months in twelve CF patients (five liver and seven lung transplantation recipients). A total of 83.3% of our patients showed a positive antibody response after three doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. A sustained immune response was observed in both groups over the observation period, with liver transplant recipients showing higher levels than lung transplant recipients. This study is among the first to show long-term data with constantly elevated or even increasing antibody levels. We conclude that this effect is most likely associated with repeated boostering in terms of infections and booster vaccinations.

Is There a Difference in Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination between Liver and Lung Transplant Patients with Cystic Fibrosis?

People with Cystic Fibrosis (CF), especially solid organ transplant recipients, have been prioritized in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program. This study assesses antibody response of patients with CF who have undergone liver (CF-LI) or lung (CF-LU) transplantation, and compares results to published data of patients with solid organ transplantation without CF as underlying disease. Antibodies against the spike receptor-binding domain were measured within the routine visits at the CF Centre in Innsbruck, Austria, after the second and third doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. We report on 13 adult CF patients who are recipients of solid organ transplant, including five CF-LI and eight CF-LU. Overall, 69% had measurable antibody response after two, and 83% after three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In CF-LI, positive serological response amounted to 100% after two and three doses, while CF-LU showed only a 50% and a 71% response rate, respectively. Clear differences are seen between the CF-LI and CF-LU groups in our cohort, with worse response rate for lung transplant recipients. Immune response between CF-LI and CF-LU, therefore, must be considered in a differentiated manner, and the importance of booster vaccination is once more emphasized with these data.

Outcomes following lung re-transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis

PURPOSE

We examined cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and compared their clinical status at the time of primary versus double lung re-transplantation (re-DLTx) in order to better understand lung retransplant practice patterns.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS Database identifying CF patients ≥18 years old undergoing re-DLTx (5/4/2005 and 12/4/2020). Baseline and clinical variables at the primary and re-DLTx were compared utilizing the paired student t-test. Graft survival was defined as time from surgery to retransplant and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

277 CF patients who underwent re-DLTx experienced a significantly worse 5-year survival when compared to the primary DLTx cohort (47.9% vs 58.8%, p = 0.00012). The following differences were observed comparing CF re-DLTx group to their primary DLTx: higher LAS score at the time of listing (50.66 vs 42.15, p < 0.001) and transplant (62.19 vs 48.20, p < 0.001), and increase LAS from the time of listing to transplant (+12.22 vs +7.23, p = 0.002). While serum albumin and total bilirubin were similar, CF patients had a higher creatinine (1.05 vs 0.74, p < 0.001), dialysis (4.4% vs 0.6%, p < 0.001), ECMO bridge to transplant rates (7.6% vs 4.0%, p < 0.001), and higher oxygen requirements (5.95 vs 3.93, p < 0.001) at the time of listing for a re-DLTx.

CONCLUSION

Compared to their initial transplant, CF patients experience significant clinical decline in renal, cardiac, and pulmonary function at the time of lung retransplantation. This may indicate that an earlier evaluation and rehabilitation process may be necessary to identify patients earlier for lung retransplantation prior significant clinical decline.

CFTR Modulator Therapy and Its Impact on Lung Transplantation in Cystic Fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common autosomal recessive disorder in Caucasian people and is caused by mutations in the gene encoding for the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. It is a multisystem disorder; however, CF lung disease causes most of its morbidity and mortality. Although survival for CF has improved over time due to a multifaceted symptomatic management approach, CF remains a life-limiting disease. For individuals with progressive advanced CF lung disease (ACFLD), lung transplantation is considered the ultimate treatment option if compatible with goals of care. Since 2012, newer drugs, called CFTR modulators, have gradually become available, revolutionizing CF care, as these small-molecule drugs target the underlying defect in CF that causes decreased CFTR protein synthesis, function, or stability. Because of their extremely high efficacy and overall respectable tolerability, CFTR modulator drugs have already proven to have a substantial positive impact on the lives of individuals with CF. Individuals with ACFLD have generally been excluded from initial clinical trials. Now, however, these drugs are being used in clinical practice in selected individuals with ACFLD, showing promising results, although randomized controlled trial data for CFTR modulators in this subgroup of patients are lacking. Such data need to be gathered, ideally in randomized controlled trials including patients with ACFLD. Furthermore, the efficacy and tolerability of the newer modulator therapies in individuals with ACFLD need to be monitored, and their impact on lung disease progression and the need for lung transplantation as the ultimate therapy call for an objective evaluation in larger patient cohorts. As of today, guidelines for referral and listing of lung transplant candidates with CF have not incorporated the status of the new CFTR modulator therapies in the referral and listing process. The purpose of this review article, therefore, is threefold: first, to describe the effects of new therapies, with a focus on the subgroup of individuals with ACFLD; second, to provide an update on the recent outcomes after lung transplantation for individuals with CF; and third, to discuss the referral, evaluation, and timing for lung transplantation as the ultimate therapeutic option in view of the new treatments available in CF.

ERS International Congress 2020: highlights from the Thoracic Surgery and Transplantation Assembly

The Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Assembly of the European Respiratory Society is delighted to present the highlights from the 2020 Virtual International Congress. We have selected four sessions that discussed recent advances in a wide range of topics. From the use of robotic surgery in thoracic surgery and extracorporeal life support as a bridge to lung transplantation, to lung transplantation in the era of new drugs. The sessions are summarised by early career members in close collaboration with the assembly leadership. We aim to give the reader an update on the highlights of the conference in the fields of thoracic surgery and lung transplantation.

The first “virtual” #ERSCongress was a great success, with very diverse and important sessions on innovation and the state of the art in thoracic surgery and lung transplantation, summarised in this articlehttps://bit.ly/392uwUA

Recommended shielding against COVID-19 impacts physical activity levels in adults with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Severe acute respiratory syndrome - coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic threatening the life of people with chronic respiratory diseases including cystic fibrosis (CF). This study was designed to investigate health-related aspects of individuals with CF, with and without lung transplantation (LTX), their communication with their specialist healthcare providers during the pandemic, potential changes in peoples' individual therapy regimes and daily physical activity levels.

METHODS

A web-based survey was conducted among Swiss adults with CF with and without LTX, study period from March 16th, 2020 - the day the "extraordinary situation" was officially declared in Switzerland introducing stringent measures protecting the public - until May 16th, 2020.

RESULTS

327 individuals (25% LTX recipients) were included, 45 individuals reported coronavirus-2019 disease (COVID-19) like symptoms. Of 28 subjects tested, only three subjects were tested positive, all with mild symptoms, no hospitalization required. Almost half of the survey respondents (45%) reported undertaking less physical activity during the lockdown, while 79% and 91% of participants reported no change in traditional airway clearance and inhalation therapies, respectively. Distress regarding a potential SARS-CoV-2 infection or worsening of lung disease were no major concerns for subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals that the direct impact of SARS-CoV-2 on clinical outcomes of individuals with CF was mild although people with chronic lung diseases like CF are considered a high-risk population; overall, this is reassuring. However, strict lockdown measures substantially affected peoples' physical activity levels, a vital cornerstone of CF therapy; and this is worrisome.