CFTR modulator use in post lung transplant recipients

Year in Review 2023: Noteworthy Literature in Cardiothoracic Transplantation

This review highlights key studies examining perioperative management of cardiothoracic transplantation published in 2023. Articles were manually screened after searching Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases for manuscripts related to cardiothoracic transplantation, which yielded 343 papers with 15 qualitatively selected as the most salient for readers. Overarching themes include differences in outcomes across the various etiologies of end-stage lung disease, novel developments to expand the donor pool, and multi-organ transplantation.

Advances in lung transplantation: 60 years on

Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment for advanced lung disease, improving survival and quality of life. Over the last 60 years all aspects of lung transplantation have evolved significantly and exponential growth in transplant volume. This has been particularly evident over the last decade with a substantial increase in lung transplant numbers as a result of innovations in donor utilization procurement, including the use donation after circulatory death and ex-vivo lung perfusion organs. Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust, and therefore the donor pool is actually larger than previously thought. Parallel to this, lung transplant outcomes have continued to improve with improved acute management as well as microbiological and immunological insights and innovations. The management of lung transplant recipients continues to be complex and heavily dependent on a tertiary care multidisciplinary paradigm. Whilst long term outcomes continue to be limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction improvements in diagnostics, mechanistic understanding and evolutions in treatment paradigms have all contributed to a median survival that in some centres approaches 10 years. As ongoing studies build on developing novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment of transplant complications and improvements in donor utilization more individuals will have the opportunity to benefit from lung transplantation. As has always been the case, early referral for transplant consideration is important to achieve best results.

Unmet challenges in cystic fibrosis treatment with modulators

INTRODUCTION

'Highly effective' modulator therapies (HEMTs) have radically changed the Cystic Fibrosis (CF) therapeutic landscape.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive search strategy was undertaken to assess impact of HEMT in life of pwCF, treatment challenges in specific populations such as very young children, and current knowledge gaps.

EXPERT OPINION

HEMTs are prescribed for pwCF with definite genotypes. The heterogeneity of variants complicates treatment possibilities and around 10% of pwCF worldwide remains ineligible. Genotype-specific treatments are prompting theratyping and personalized medicine strategies. Improvement in lung function and quality of life increase survival rates, shifting CF from a pediatric to an adult disease. This implies new studies addressing long-term efficacy, side effects, emergence of adult co-morbidities and possible drug-drug interactions. More sensitive and predictive biomarkers for both efficacy and toxicity are warranted. As HEMTs cross the placenta and are found in breast milk, studies addressing the potential consequences of treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding are urgently needed. Finally, although the treatment and expected outcomes of CF have improved dramatically in high- and middle-income countries, lack of access in low-income countries to these life-changing medicines highlights inequity of care worldwide.

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in liver or kidney transplanted people with cystic fibrosis using tacrolimus, a drug-drug interaction study

BACKGROUND

The use of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) after solid organ transplantation is controversial because of potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) with tacrolimus. We aimed to improve insight into the safety and clinical benefits of co-administration of ETI and tacrolimus in liver or kidney transplanted adult pwCF.

METHODS

In 5 pwCF, tacrolimus concentrations were monitored during 2 weeks before and 4 weeks after starting ETI treatment. Trough levels, area under the curve (AUC) and clinical effect of ETI were investigated. During the study (6 weeks in total) adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

The DDI between tacrolimus and ETI resulted in an increased exposure of tacrolimus in all subjects, the dose adjusted AUC0-24h was 1.79 (median) times higher at the end of the study. Five dose adjustments were performed in 4 subjects in order to attain tacrolimus target range. No adverse events were reported and all subjects showed clinical improvement during ETI treatment.

CONCLUSION

The clinical value of ETI treatment in kidney and liver transplanted pwCF is clear. The use of ETI may increase tacrolimus levels moderately. Therefore, we recommend close monitoring of tacrolimus trough levels in patients who start ETI.

Use of CFTR modulators in special populations, part 3: Solid organ transplant

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF) may benefit from the pulmonary and extrapulmonary benefits associated with CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators. Nevertheless, evolution of modulator safety and efficacy data prompts consideration.

METHODS

The search terms "transplant" AND "ivacaftor"(IVA) OR "lumacaftor"(LUM) OR "tezacaftor" (TEZ) OR "elexacaftor" (ELX) were utilized to conduct a scoping review of English articles from the period of January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022. Search results from PubMed and Embase databases were reviewed by title and abstract for relevance. Included studies reported efficacy and safety outcomes of modulators in SOT recipients.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-six patients from one cohort study (90 lung transplant recipients) and eight case reports and series (29 lung transplant recipients, 16 liver transplant recipients and one lung/liver transplant patient) were included. Post-modulator initiation, 33 patients did not necessitate tacrolimus dose adjustments, 10 required dose uptitration, and 43 required dose reductions. Moreover, LUM/IVA use with azole antifungals may lead to subtherapeutic levels but opposing effects sustained tacrolimus levels. Liver transplant recipients were more likely to experience elevations in transaminases requiring pharmacologic or medical interventions. Majority of patients experienced improvements in pulmonary function, fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin, body mass index, and rhinosinusitis symptoms. However, intolerance or lack of benefit prompted discontinuation of ELX/TEZ/IVA in over 40% of lung-transplant recipients in one study.

CONCLUSION

Modulator therapy has been reported to produce pulmonary and extra-pulmonary benefits in the CF population with SOT. Considerations for modulator therapy initiation ought to include modulator pharmacokinetics, concomitant medications, and transplant type due to the complex nature of SOT recipients.

Patient perspectives on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor after lung transplant

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, including elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), significantly improve outcomes and quality of life for people with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, little is known about how lung transplant recipients (LTRs) perceive the use of ETI. We conducted a survey to assess perspectives on ETI among LTRs with CF at our lung transplant program. Of 81 CF LTRs, 46 participants (58 %) responded. The majority of respondents (88 %) were aware of ETI. Over 80 % considered treating non-lung symptoms of CF to be very important. Concerns regarding ETI included potential drug interactions with transplant medications (77 %), side effects (53 %), cost of medication (49 %), and lack of clinical trial data for LTRs (43 %). Half reported they would only consider taking ETI if their CF or transplant doctor recommended it. The findings suggest that CF LTRs seek informational support and shared decision-making about ETI from their clinicians.

Lung Transplantation in a New Era in the Field of Cystic Fibrosis

Lung transplantation for people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) is a critical therapeutic option, in a disease without a cure to this day, and its overall success in this population is evident. The medical advancements in knowledge, treatment, and clinical care in the field of cystic fibrosis (CF) rapidly expanded and improved over the last several decades, starting from early pathology reports of CF organ involvement in 1938, to the identification of the CF gene in 1989. Lung transplantation for CF has been performed since 1983, and CF now accounts for about 17% of pre-transplantation diagnoses in lung transplantation recipients. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators have been the latest new therapeutic modality addressing the underlying CF protein defect with the first modulator, ivacaftor, approved in 2012. Fast forward to today, and we now have a growing CF population. More than half of PwCF are now adults, and younger patients face a better life expectancy than they ever did before. Unfortunately, CFTR modulator therapy is not effective in all patients, and efficacy varies among patients; it is not a cure, and CF remains a progressive disease that leads predominantly to respiratory failure. Lung transplantation remains a lifesaving treatment for this disease. Here, we reviewed the current knowledge of lung transplantation in PwCF, the challenges associated with its implementation, and the ongoing changes to the field as we enter a new era in the care of PwCF. Improved life expectancy in PwCF will surely influence the role of transplantation in patient care and may even lead to a change in the demographics of which people benefit most from transplantation.

The Effects of Elexacaftor, Tezacaftor, and Ivacaftor (ETI) on Blood Glucose in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder resulting from defects in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, which in turn results in a multi-systemic disorder. There are numerous known CF alleles associated with different mutations of the CFTR gene, with the most common CF allele being a three-base-pair deletion known as ΔF508. One common manifestation of CF is glycemic dysregulation associated with decreased insulin secretion, often progressing into a distinct form of diabetes known as cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD). In the past decade, a class of drugs known as CFTR modulators has entered clinical practice. These drugs interact with the CFTR protein to restore its function, with different modulators (or combinations of modulators) suitable for patients with different CFTR mutations. Previous research has established that the modulator ivacaftor is effective in decreasing blood glucose and sometimes resolving CFRD in patients with certain CFTR mutations (class III mutations). However, early modulator therapies for individuals with the common ΔF508 mutation (e.g., a combination of the modulators lumacaftor and ivacaftor) have largely proven ineffective in improving glucose regulation. More recently, a combination therapy of three modulators, namely elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ETI), has entered clinical practice for patients with the ΔF508 mutation. However, it is not clear whether this therapy is effective in treating dysglycemia. We searched for studies of any design that examined the effects of ETI on measures of blood glucose. All available studies were observational studies comparing patients before and after initiating ETI therapy. Measures of daily-life blood glucose (those obtained with continuous glucose monitoring systems or by measuring glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)) and post-prandial glucose spikes from oral glucose tolerance tests showed significant improvements in at least some studies. The majority of studies showed significant improvements from pre- to post-ETI in one or more blood glucose measures. While the interpretation of this evidence is complicated by the lack of randomized controlled trials, it appears that ETI therapy is associated with improved glucose regulation for at least some patients with the ΔF508 mutation.

Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict Drug-Drug Interactions between Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor and Tacrolimus in Lung Transplant Recipients

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) treatment has potential benefits in lung transplant recipients, including improvements in extrapulmonary manifestations, such as gastrointestinal and sinus disease; however, ivacaftor is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and may, therefore, pose a risk for elevated systemic exposure to tacrolimus. The aim of this investigation is to determine the impact of ETI on tacrolimus exposure and devise an appropriate dosing regimen to manage the risk of this drug-drug interaction (DDI). The CYP3A-mediated DDI of ivacaftor-tacrolimus was evaluated using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach, incorporating CYP3A4 inhibition parameters of ivacaftor and in vitro enzyme kinetic parameters of tacrolimus. To further support the findings in PBPK modeling, we present a case series of lung transplant patients who received both ETI and tacrolimus. We predicted a 2.36-fold increase in tacrolimus exposure when co-administered with ivacaftor, which would require a 50% dose reduction of tacrolimus upon initiation of ETI treatment to avoid the risk of elevated systemic exposure. Clinical cases (N = 13) indicate a median 32% (IQR: -14.30, 63.80) increase in the dose-normalized tacrolimus trough level (trough concentration/weight-normalized daily dose) after starting ETI. These results indicate that the concomitant administration of tacrolimus and ETI may lead to a clinically significant DDI, requiring the dose adjustment of tacrolimus.

Position paper: Models of post-transplant care for individuals with cystic fibrosis

There is no consensus on the best model of care for individuals with CF to manage the non-pulmonary complications that persist after lung transplant. The CF Foundation virtually convened a group of international experts in CF and lung-transplant care. The committee reviewed literature and shared the post-lung transplant model of care practiced by their programs. The committee then developed a survey that was distributed internationally to both the clinical and individual with CF/family audiences to determine the strengths, weaknesses, and preferences for various models of transplant care. Discussion generated two models to accomplish optimal CF care after transplant. The first model incorporates the CF team into care and proposes delineation of responsibilities for the CF and transplant teams. This model is reliant on outstanding communication between the teams, while leveraging the expertise of the CF team for management of the non-pulmonary manifestations of CF. The transplant team manages all aspects of the transplant, including pulmonary concerns and management of immunosuppression. The second model consolidates care in one center and may be more practical for transplant programs that have expertise managing CF and have access to CF multidisciplinary care team members (e.g., located in the same institution). The best model for each program is influenced by several factors and model selection needs to be decided between the transplant and the CF center and may vary from center to center. In either model, CF lung transplant recipients require a clear delineation of the roles and responsibilities of their providers and mechanisms for effective communication.

Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor: A Life-Changing Triple Combination of CFTR Modulator Drugs for Cystic Fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a potentially fatal monogenic disease that causes a progressive multisystemic pathology. Over the last decade, the introduction of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator drugs into clinical practice has profoundly modified the lives of many people with CF (PwCF) by targeting the fundamental cause of the disease. These drugs consist of the potentiator ivacaftor (VX-770) and the correctors lumacaftor (VX-809), tezacaftor (VX-661), and elexacaftor (VX-445). In particular, the triple combination of CFTR modulators composed of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ETI) represents a life-changing therapy for the majority of PwCF worldwide. A growing number of clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ETI therapy in both short- and long-term (up to two years of follow-up to date) and its ability to significantly reduce pulmonary and gastrointestinal manifestations, sweat chloride concentration, exocrine pancreatic dysfunction, and infertility/subfertility, among other disease signs and symptoms. Nevertheless, ETI therapy-related adverse effects have also been reported, and close monitoring by a multidisciplinary healthcare team remains vital. This review aims to address and discuss the major therapeutic benefits and adverse effects reported by the clinical use of ETI therapy for PwCF.

Outcome of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis and solid organ transplantation

We report a case series of four patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and previous solid organ transplantation (SOT) receiving elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor therapy for 6 months or more. Data was collected retrospectively. The treatment was well tolerated and all patients reported subjective improvements.

Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor improve Gastro-Oesophageal reflux and Sinonasal symptoms in advanced cystic fibrosis

Upper gastrointestinal and upper airway disease are common in cystic fibrosis (CF) and may contribute to lower airway infection and inflammation. In a longitudinal cohort study of 32 patients (23 men; median age 32.5 years) with advanced CF lung disease (median FEV₁ 24.8% predicted) starting elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, the reflux symptom index score fell from a pre-treatment median (IQR) of 15 (11-23) to 5 (2.8-7.3) (p<0.001), the Hull airway reflux score fell from a median of 26.5 (16.3-39) to 7.5 (4-12) (p<0.001), and the sinonasal outcome score from a median of 36.5 (22-24) to 20 (10-32) (p<0.001) at 6 months on treatment. Mean FEV₁% predicted rose by 9.2 points, the median respiratory domain score of the CF Questionnaire-Revised rose by 27.8 points and mean body mass index rose by 2.6 kg/m². In addition to improving lung function and weight, CFTR modulators improve upper airway and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in advanced CF.

Cystic fibrosis year in review 2021

People with cystic fibrosis (CF) have an amazing outlook with the treatment availability of highly effective modulators. Unfortunately, not all people with CF are eligible for modulators leading to continued pulmonary exacerbations and advanced lung disease. Additionally, optimizing diagnosis and evaluation for CF in the newborn period continues to be an area of focus for research. This review article will work to cover articles published in 2021 with high clinical relevance related to the above topics; however, due to the extensive body of research published, this review will not be comprehensive.

Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor as a Bridge to Lung Retransplant in a Recipient With Cystic Fibrosis

The triple-combination cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator elexacaftor/- tezacaftor/ivacaftor is known to improve lung function and have extrapulmonary benefits in people with cystic fibrosis. However, there is limited evidence for its use in patients with cystic fibrosis after lung transplant, where the donor lung expresses normal levels of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. We describe the use of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor as a bridge to potential lung retransplant in a 37-year-old man with cystic fibrosis and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Although forced expiratory volume in 1 second did not improve, the patient had decreased sputum volume, no pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis, and no longer required continuous antibiotic therapy. Pancreatic function, revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire scores, sinus symptoms, weight, and corticosteroid dependence significantly improved. There were no reported side effects attributable to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. However, the patient exhibited declined renal function, which had been initially attributed to lability in cyclosporin levels but which were corrected after lithotripsy for renal calculi. Triple-combination modulators of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator may offer benefits to carefully selected individuals awaiting retransplant, balanced against the risk of worsened immunosuppressant level control.