Plasma proteome of brain-dead organ donors predicts heart transplant outcome

Contribution of Proteomics in Transplantation: Identification of Injury and Rejection Markers

Solid organ transplantation saves thousands of lives suffering from end-stage diseases. Although early transplants experienced acute organ injury, medical breakthroughs, such as tissue typing, and use of immunosuppressive agents have considerably improved graft survival. However, the overall incidence of allograft injury and chronic rejection remains high. Often the clinical manifestations of organ injury or rejection are nonspecific and late. Current requirement for successful organ transplantation is the identification of reliable, accurate, disease-specific, noninvasive methods for the early diagnosis of graft injury or rejection. Development of noninvasive techniques is important to allow routine follow-ups without the discomfort and risks associated with a graft biopsy. Multiple biofluids have been successfully tested for the presence of potential proteomic biomarkers; these include serum, plasma, urine, and whole blood. Kidney transplant research has provided significant evidence to the potential of proteomics-based biomarkers for acute and chronic kidney rejection, delayed graft function, early detection of declining allograft health. Multiple proteins have been implicated as biomarkers; however, recent observations implicate the use of similar canonical pathways and biofunctions associated with graft injury/rejection with altered proteins as potential biomarkers. Unfortunately, the current biomarker studies lack high sensitivity and specificity, adding to the complexity of their utility in the clinical space. In this review, we first describe the high-throughput proteomics technologies and then discuss the outcomes of proteomics profiling studies in the transplantation of several organs. Existing literature provides hope that novel biomarkers will emerge from ongoing efforts and guide physicians in delivering specific therapies to prolong graft survival.

Necroptosis in Organ Transplantation: Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Targets

Organ transplantation remains the only treatment option for patients with end-stage organ dysfunction. However, there are numerous limitations that challenge its clinical application, including the shortage of organ donations, the quality of donated organs, injury during organ preservation and reperfusion, primary and chronic graft dysfunction, acute and chronic rejection, infection, and carcinogenesis in post-transplantation patients. Acute and chronic inflammation and cell death are two major underlying mechanisms for graft injury. Necroptosis is a type of programmed cell death involved in many diseases and has been studied in the setting of all major solid organ transplants, including the kidney, heart, liver, and lung. It is determined by the underlying donor organ conditions (e.g., age, alcohol consumption, fatty liver, hemorrhage shock, donation after circulatory death, etc.), preservation conditions and reperfusion, and allograft rejection. The specific molecular mechanisms of necroptosis have been uncovered in the organ transplantation setting, and potential targeting drugs have been identified. We hope this review article will promote more clinical research to determine the role of necroptosis and other types of programmed cell death in solid organ transplantation to alleviate the clinical burden of ischemia-reperfusion injury and graft rejection.

Primary Graft Dysfunction Is Associated With Development of Early Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy, but Not Other Immune-mediated Complications, After Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

We investigated associations between primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and development of acute cellular rejection (ACR), de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after heart transplantation (HT).

METHODS

A total of 381 consecutive adult HT patients from January 2015 to July 2020 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was incidence of treated ACR (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 2R or 3R) and de novo DSA (mean fluorescence intensity >500) within 1 y post-HT. Secondary outcomes included median gene expression profiling score and donor-derived cell-free DNA level within 1 y and incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) within 3 y post-HT.

RESULTS

When adjusted for death as a competing risk, the estimated cumulative incidence of ACR (PGD 0.13 versus no PGD 0.21; P  = 0.28), median gene expression profiling score (30 [interquartile range, 25-32] versus 30 [interquartile range, 25-33]; P  = 0.34), and median donor-derived cell-free DNA levels was similar in patients with and without PGD. After adjusting for death as a competing risk, estimated cumulative incidence of de novo DSA within 1 y post-HT in patients with PGD was similar to those without PGD (0.29 versus 0.26; P  = 0.10) with a similar DSA profile based on HLA loci. There was increased incidence of CAV in patients with PGD compared with patients without PGD (52.6% versus 24.8%; P  = 0.01) within the first 3 y post-HT.

CONCLUSIONS

During the first year after HT, patients with PGD had a similar incidence of ACR and development of de novo DSA, but a higher incidence of CAV when compared with patients without PGD.

Urinary Proteomic Profile of Arterial Stiffness Is Associated With Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes

Background

The underlying mechanisms of arterial stiffness remain not fully understood. This study aimed to identify a urinary proteomic profile to illuminate its pathogenesis and to determine the prognostic value of the profile for adverse outcomes.

Methods and Results

We measured aortic stiffness using pulse wave velocity (PWV) and analyzed urinary proteome using capillary electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry in 669 randomly recruited Flemish patients (mean age, 50.2 years; 51.1% women). We developed a PWV‐derived urinary proteomic score (PWV‐UP) by modeling PWV with proteomics data at baseline through orthogonal projections to latent structures. PWV‐UP that consisted of 2336 peptides explained the 65% variance of PWV, higher than 36% explained by clinical risk factors. PWV‐UP was significantly associated with PWV (adjusted β=0.73 [95% CI, 0.67–0.79]; P<0.0001). Over 9.2 years (median), 36 participants died, and 75 experienced cardiovascular events. The adjusted hazard ratios (+1 SD) were 1.46 (95% CI, 1.08–1.97) for all‐cause mortality, 2.04 (95% CI, 1.07–3.87) for cardiovascular mortality, and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.11–1.74) for cardiovascular events (P≤0.031). For PWV, the corresponding estimates were 1.25 (95% CI, 0.97–1.60), 1.35 (95% CI, 0.85–2.15), and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.02–1.47), respectively (P≥0.033). Pathway analysis revealed that the peptides in PWV‐UP mostly involved multiple pathways, including collagen turnover, cell adhesion, inflammation, and lipid metabolism.

Conclusions

PWV‐UP was highly associated with PWV and could be used as a biomarker of arterial stiffness. PWV‐UP, but not PWV, was associated with all‐cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, implying that PWV‐UP–associated peptides may be multifaceted and involved in diverse pathological processes beyond arterial stiffness.