Lung Transplant Outcome following Donation after Euthanasia

Short and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation from brain death vs. circulatory death donors: A meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

To investigate through a meta-analysis of comparative studies the impact of donor type (brain death DBD vs circulatory death DCD) on the short- and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation(LTx).

METHODS

Literature search (terms "lung transplantation" AND "donation after circulatory death") was performed up to July 2022 and studies comparing outcomes of LTx from DCD versus DBD were selected. Primary endpoints were early and long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes included primary graft dysfunction (PGD),acute rejection and postoperative complications. The long-term survival was analyzed by retrieving data from each available Kaplan-Meier and restricted mean survival time difference between DBD and DCD for long-term survival was estimated.

RESULTS

21 studies were included comprising 60105 patients (DBD=58548 DCD=1557). Recipient and donor baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. No significant publication bias was observed. The estimated pooled odds ratio of early mortality favored DBD (OR=0.75,CI=0.56-1.00, I2=0%). No statistically significant difference was observed in the risk of acute rejection (OR=1.33, CI=0.82-2.17), and PGD grade 2-3 (OR=0.88, CI=0.69-1.13). One- and 5-year survival were 82.1% and 51.2%, and 86.2% and 62.7% for DBD and DCD groups, respectively (Log-rank,p<0.0001). Unadjusted hazard ratio was 0.693, with DCD as reference. DCD lungs demonstrated improved survival by 4.82% over 5-years when compared to DBD lungs.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of comparative studies between DCD and DBD demonstrates significant long-term survival advantage of DCD LTx despite an initial small but statistically significant increased mortality risk in the short-term. Data supports the continued implementation of DCD to increase the lung donor pool.

Kidney Transplant Outcome Following Donation After Euthanasia

Importance

In the Netherlands, organ donation after euthanasia (donation after circulatory death type V [DCD-V]) has been increasingly performed since 2012. However, the outcomes of DCD-V kidney grafts have not been thoroughly investigated. It is critical to assess the outcomes of these kidney grafts to ascertain whether DCD-V is a safe and valuable way to increase the kidney donor pool.

Objectives

To investigate the outcomes of DCD-V kidney transplantation and compare them with outcomes of kidney transplantation after circulatory death after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (DCD type III [DCD-III]) and donation after brain death (DBD).

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the database from the Dutch Transplant Foundation. All kidney transplants in the Netherlands between January 2012 (start of the euthanasia program) and July 2023 were included. Follow-up was obtained through 5 years after transplantation. Data analysis was performed from November 2023 until February 2024.

Exposures

Kidney transplantation with a DCD-V graft compared with DCD-III and DBD grafts.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was death-censored graft survival until 5 years after transplantation. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), permanent nonfunction (PNF), serum creatinine concentration, and patient survival until 5 years after kidney transplantation.

Results

A total of 145 DCD-V kidney transplants were compared with 1936 DCD-III and 1255 DBD kidney transplants. Median (IQR) recipient age was 59 (46-66) years in the DCD-V cohort, compared with 61 (50-68) years in the DCD-III cohort and 61 (50-68) years in the DBD cohort. The incidence of DGF with DCD-V kidney transplants (26%) was significantly less than that with DCD-III kidney transplants (49%; P < .001) and similar to that with DBD kidney transplants (22%; P = .46). PNF occurrence with DCD-V kidneys (6%) was similar to that with DCD-III kidneys (6%; P = .79) and higher than in DBD kidneys (4%; P < .001). There was no difference in 5-year death-censored graft survival between DCD-V grafts (82%) and DCD-III (86%; P = .99) or DBD (84%; P = .99) grafts. There was no difference in 5-year patient survival between DCD-V kidney transplants (69%) and DCD-III (76%; P = .45) or DBD (73%; P = .74) kidney transplants. A propensity score analysis was performed to match the DCD-V and DCD-III cohort, showing results similar to those of the unmatched cohort.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that DCD-V kidney transplantation yielded a lower incidence of DGF compared with DCD-III kidney transplantation and yielded long-term results similar to those of DCD-III and DBD kidney transplantation. The findings suggest that DCD-V is a safe and valuable way to increase the kidney donor pool.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2022 Part I: Lung Transplantation

These highlights focus on the research in lung transplantation (LTX) that was published in 2022 and includes the assessment and optimization of candidates for LTX, donor optimization, the use of organs from donation after circulatory death, and outcomes when using marginal or novel donors; recipient factors affecting LTX, including age, disease, the use of extracorporeal life support; and special situations, such as coronavirus disease2019, pediatric LTX, and retransplantation. The remainder of the article focuses on the perioperative management of LTX, including the perioperative risk factors for acute renal failure (acute kidney injury); the incidence and management of phrenic nerve injury, delirium, and pain; and the postoperative management of hyperammonemia, early postoperative infections, and the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA to detect rejection.

Promising Results of Kidney Transplantation From Donors Following Euthanasia During 10-Year Follow-Up: A Nationwide Cohort Study

The outcome of kidneys transplanted following organ donation after euthanasia (ODE) remains unclear. This study analyzed all kidney transplantations in the Netherlands from January 2012 to December 2021, comparing the outcomes following ODE, donation after circulatory death (DCD-III), and donation after brain death (DBD). 9,208 kidney transplantations were performed: 148 ODE, 2118 DCD-III, and 1845 DBD. Initial graft function was compared between these categories. Immediate graft function, delayed graft function and primary non-function in ODE kidney recipients were 76%, 22%, and 2%, respectively, 47%, 50% and 3% in DCD-III kidney recipients and 73%, 25%, and 2% in DBD kidney recipients (overall p-value: p < 0.001). The number of kidneys transplanted over a median follow-up period of 4.0 years (IQR 2.0-6.6), was 1810, including 72 ODE, 958 DCD-III and 780 DBD kidneys. In this period, 213 grafts (11.8%) failed [7 grafts (9.7%) from ODE donors, 93 grafts (9.7%) from DCD-III donors, and 113 grafts (14.5%) from DBD donors]. Kidneys transplanted after euthanasia have a good immediate graft function, a comparable longitudinal 10 years eGFR, and similar graft failure hazard to kidneys from DCD-III and DBD. Kidney transplantation following ODE is a valuable and safe contribution to the donor pool.

Comparing right- versus left-first implantation in off-pump sequential double-lung transplantation: an observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Historically, the perfusion-guided sequence suggests to first transplant the side with lowest lung perfusion. This sequence is thought to limit right ventricular afterload and prevent acute heart failure after first pneumonectomy. As a paradigm shift, we adopted the right-first implantation sequence, irrespective of lung perfusion. The right donor lung generally accommodates a larger proportion of the cardiac output. We hypothesized that the right-first sequence reduces the likelihood of oedema formation in the firstly transplanted graft during second-lung implantation. Our objective was to compare the perfusion-guided and right-first sequence for intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) need and primary graft dysfunction (PGD).

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre cohort study (2008-2021) including double-lung transplant cases (N = 696) started without ECMO was performed. Primary end-points were intraoperative ECMO cannulation and PGD grade 3 (PGD3) at 72 h. Secondary end-points were patient and chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival. In cases with native left lung perfusion ≤50% propensity score adjusted comparison of the perfusion-guided and right-first sequence was performed.

RESULTS

When left lung perfusion was ≤50%, right-first implantation was done in 219 and left-first in 189 cases. Intraoperative escalation to ECMO support was observed in 10.96% of right-first versus 19.05% of left-first cases (odds ratio 0.448; 95% confidence interval 0.229-0.0.878; P = 0.0193). PGD3 at 72 h was observed in 8.02% of right-first versus 15.64% of left-first cases (0.566; 0.263-1.217; P = 0.1452). Right-first implantation did not affect patient or chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The right-first implantation sequence in off-pump double-lung transplantation reduces need for intraoperative ECMO cannulation with a trend towards less PGD grade 3.

How do we expand the lung donor pool?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung transplantation activity continues to be limited by the availability of timely quality donor lungs. It is apparent though that progress has been made. The steady evolution of clinical practice, combined with painstaking scientific discovery and innovation are described.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been successful studies reporting innovations in the wider use and broader consideration of donation after circulatory death donor lungs, including an increasing number of transplants from each of the controlled, uncontrolled and medically assisted dying donor descriptive categories. Donors beyond age 70 years are providing better than expected long-term outcomes. Hepatitis C PCR positive donor lungs can be safely used if treated postoperatively with appropriate antivirals. Donor lung perfusion at a constant 10 degrees appears capable of significantly improving donor logistics and ex-vivo lung perfusion offers the potential of an ever-increasing number of novel donor management roles. Bioartificial and xenografts remain distant possibilities only at present.

SUMMARY

Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust and combined with clinical, scientific and engineering innovations, the realizable lung donor pool is proving to be larger than previously thought.

Advances in lung transplantation: 60 years on

Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment for advanced lung disease, improving survival and quality of life. Over the last 60 years all aspects of lung transplantation have evolved significantly and exponential growth in transplant volume. This has been particularly evident over the last decade with a substantial increase in lung transplant numbers as a result of innovations in donor utilization procurement, including the use donation after circulatory death and ex-vivo lung perfusion organs. Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust, and therefore the donor pool is actually larger than previously thought. Parallel to this, lung transplant outcomes have continued to improve with improved acute management as well as microbiological and immunological insights and innovations. The management of lung transplant recipients continues to be complex and heavily dependent on a tertiary care multidisciplinary paradigm. Whilst long term outcomes continue to be limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction improvements in diagnostics, mechanistic understanding and evolutions in treatment paradigms have all contributed to a median survival that in some centres approaches 10 years. As ongoing studies build on developing novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment of transplant complications and improvements in donor utilization more individuals will have the opportunity to benefit from lung transplantation. As has always been the case, early referral for transplant consideration is important to achieve best results.

Extended ischemic time (>15 hours) using controlled hypothermic storage in lung transplantation: A multicenter experience

Static ice storage has long been the standard-of-care for lung preservation, although freezing injury limits ischemic time (IT). Controlled hypothermic storage (CHS) at elevated temperature could safely extend IT. This retrospective analysis assesses feasibility and safety of CHS with IT > 15 hours. Three lung transplant (LuTx) centers (April-October 2023) included demographics, storage details, IT, and short-term outcome from 13 LuTx recipients (8 male, 59 years old). Donor lungs were preserved in a portable CHS device at 7 (5-9.3)°C. Indication was overnight bridging and/or long-distance transport. IT of second-implanted lung was 17.3 (15.1-22) hours. LuTx were successful, 4/13 exhibited primary graft dysfunction grade 3 within 72 hours and 0/13 at 72 hours. Post-LuTx mechanical ventilation was 29 (7-442) hours. Intensive care unit stay was 9 (5-28) and hospital stay 30 (16-90) days. Four patients needed postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). One patient died (day 7) following malpositioning of an ECMO cannula. This multicenter experience demonstrates the possibility of safely extending IT > 15 hours by CHS.

Simultaneous Lung-abdominal Organ Procurement From Donation After Circulatory Death Donors Reduces Donor Hepatectomy Time

BACKGROUND

Prolonged organ procurement time impairs the outcome of donation after circulatory death (DCD) and liver transplantation (LiT). Our transplant team developed a simultaneous, rather than sequential, lung-abdominal organ explantation strategy for DCD donation to prioritize liver procurement. We evaluated whether this change in strategy effectively reduced donor hepatectomy time (dHT), without affecting donor pneumonectomy time (dPT), and influenced LiT and lung transplantation outcome.

METHODS

All lung-abdominal and abdominal-only transplant procedures between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Relationships were assessed between the year of transplant and dHT and dPT (univariate linear regression), 1-y patient and graft survival, primary graft dysfunction, and nonanastomotic biliary strictures (univariate logistic regression).

RESULTS

Fifty-two lung-abdominal and 110 abdominal-only DCD procedures were analyzed. A significant decrease in dHT was noted in lung-abdominal (slope -1.14 [-2.14; -0.15], P = 0.026) but not in abdominal-only procedures; dPT did not increase. There were no significant associations between the year of transplant and nonanastomotic biliary strictures frequency, primary graft dysfunction incidence, 1-y patient, and graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous organ procurement in multiorgan lung-abdominal DCD procedures is feasible, and effectively shortened dHT without affecting lung transplantation outcome. No impact on LiT outcome was observed; however, larger multicenter studies are needed.

Expanding Donor Options for Lung Transplant: Extended Criteria, Donation After Circulatory Death, ABO Incompatibility, and Evolution of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion

Only using brain-dead donors with standard criteria, the existing donor shortage has never improved in lung transplantation. Currently, clinical efforts have sought the means to use cohorts of untapped donors, such as extended criteria donors, donation after circulatory death, and donors that are ABO blood group incompatible, and establish the evidence for their potential contribution to the lung transplant needs. Also, technical maturation for using those lungs may eliminate immediate concerns about the early posttransplant course, such as primary graft dysfunction or hyperacute rejection. In addition, recent clinical and preclinical advances in ex vivo lung perfusion techniques have allowed the safer use of lungs from high-risk donors and graft modification to match grafts to recipients and may improve posttransplant outcomes. This review summarizes recent trends and accomplishments and future applications for expanding the donor pool in lung transplantation.

Directed Organ Donation After Euthanasia

Organ donation after euthanasia is performed in Belgium, the Netherlands, Canada and Spain. Directed deceased organ donation is currently possible under strict conditions in a limited number of countries, while it is currently not possible to opt for directed donation following euthanasia. While organ donation after euthanasia is a deceased donation procedure, directed organ donation after euthanasia could be seen as a deceased donation procedure with a living donation consent process. Therefore, directed organ donation after euthanasia is feasible on medical and ethical grounds. Strict safeguards should be in place, including the requirement of a pre-existing familial or personal relationship with the proposed recipient, without any evidence of coercion or financial gain.

Expanding the Lung Donor Pool: Donation After Circulatory Death, Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion and Hepatitis C Donors

"Organ shortage remains a limiting factor in lung transplantation. Traditionally, donation after brain death has been the main source of lungs used for transplantation; however, to meet the demand of patients requiring lung transplantation it is crucial to find innovative methods for organ donation. The implementation of extended donors, lung donation after cardiac death (DCD), the use of ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) systems, and more recently the acceptance of hepatitis C donors have started to close the gap between organ donors and recipients in need of lung transplantation. This article focuses on the expansion of donor lungs for transplantation after DCD, the use of EVLP in evaluating extended criteria lungs, and the use of lung grafts from donors with hepatitis C."

Utility of Islet Cell Preparations From Donor Pancreases After Euthanasia

Patients fulfilling criteria for euthanasia can choose to donate their organs after circulatory death [donors after euthanasia (DCD V)]. This study assesses the outcome of islet cell isolation from DCD V pancreases. A procedure for DCD V procurement provided 13 pancreases preserved in Institut Georges Lopez-1 preservation solution and following acirculatory warm ischemia time under 10 minutes. Islet cell isolation outcomes are compared with those from reference donors after brain death (DBD, n = 234) and a cohort of donors after controlled circulatory death (DCD III, n = 29) procured under the same conditions. Islet cell isolation from DCD V organs resulted in better in vitro outcome than for selected DCD III or reference DBD organs. A 50% higher average beta cell number before and after culture and a higher average beta cell purity (35% vs 24% and 25%) was observed, which led to more frequent selection for our clinical protocol (77% of isolates vs 50%). The functional capacity of a DCD V islet cell preparation was illustrated by its in vivo effect following intraportal transplantation in a type 1 diabetes patient: injection of 2 million beta cells/kg body weight (1,900 IEQ/kg body weight) at 39% insulin purity resulted in an implant with functional beta cell mass that represented 30% of that in non-diabetic controls. In conclusion, this study describes procurement and preservation conditions for donor organs after euthanasia, which allow preparation of cultured islet cells, that more frequently meet criteria for clinical use than those from DBD or DCD III organs.