European multicenter study on the real-world use and clinical impact of extracorporeal photopheresis after heart transplantation

Evolutions in Combined Heart-Kidney Transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes management practices, outcomes, and allocation policies in candidates for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT).

RECENT FINDINGS

In patients with heart failure and concomitant kidney disease, SHKT confers a survival advantage over heart transplantation (HT) alone in patients with dialysis dependence or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2. However, when compared to kidney transplantation (KT) alone, SHKT is associated with worse patient and kidney allograft survival. In September 2023, the United Network of Organ Sharing adopted a new organ allocation policy, with strict eligibility criteria for SHKT and a safety net for patients requiring KT after HT alone. While the impact of the policy change on SHKT outcomes remains to be seen, strategies to prevent and slow development of kidney disease in patients with heart failure and to prevent kidney dysfunction after HT and SHKT are necessary.

Extracorporeal photopheresis reduces inflammation and joint damage in a rheumatoid arthritis murine model

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by inflammatory reactions and tissue damage in the joints. Long-term drug use in clinical practice is often accompanied by adverse reactions. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory therapy with few side effects, offering a potential and safe therapeutic alternative for RA through the induction of immune tolerance. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of ECP on RA using a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) murine model, as well as to explore its immunomodulatory effects in vivo. Additionally, particular attention was given to the significant role of monocytes during the ECP process.

METHODS

A murine model of rheumatoid arthritis was established by administering two injections of bovine type II collagen to DBA/1J mice. ECP, ECP-MD (mononuclear cells were depleted during the ECP), MTX, and PBS treatment were applied to the CIA mice. During the treatment process, clinical scores and body weight changes of CIA mice were closely monitored. After six treatment sessions, micro-CT images of the hind paws from live mice were captured. Ankle joints and paws of the mice were collected and processed for histological evaluation. Spleen samples were collected to measure the Th17/Treg cells ratio, and serum samples were collected to assess cytokine and anti-type II collagen IgG levels. Monocytes and dendritic cells populations before and after ECP in vitro were detected by flow cytometry.

RESULT

ECP therapy significantly attenuated the progression of CIA, alleviated the severity of clinical symptoms in CIA mice and effectively suppressed synovial hyperplasia, inflammation, and cartilage damage. There was an expansion in the percentage of CD3 + CD4 + CD25 + FoxP3 + Tregs and a decrease in CD3 + CD4 + IL17A + Th17 cells in vivo. Furthermore, ECP reduced the serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 (53.47 ± 7.074 pg/mL vs 5.142 ± 1.779 pg/mL, P < 0.05) and IL-17A (3.077 ± 0.401 pg/mL vs 0.238 ± 0.082 pg/mlL, P < 0.0001) compared with PBS. Interestingly, the depletion of monocytes during the ECP process did not lead to any improvement in clinical symptoms or histological scores in CIA mice. Moreover, the imbalance in the Th17/Treg cells ratio became even more pronounced, accompanied by an augmented secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-17A. In vitro, compared with cells without ECP treatment, the proportion of CD11b + cells were significantly reduced (P < 0.01), the proportion of CD11c + cells were significantly elevated (P < 0.001) 24 h after ECP treatment. Additionally, the expression of MHC II (P < 0.0001), CD80 (P < 0.01), and CD86 (P < 0.001) was downregulated in CD11c + cells 24 h after ECP treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that ECP exhibits a therapeutic effect comparable to conventional therapy in CIA mice, and the protective mechanisms of ECP against RA involve Th17/Treg cells ratio, which result in decreased IL-6 and IL-17A. Notably, monocytes derived from CIA mice are an indispensable part to the efficacy of ECP treatment, and the proportion of monocytes decreased and the proportion of tolerogenic dendritic cells increased after ECP treatment in vitro.

The use of extracorporeal photopheresis in solid organ transplantation-current status and future directions

Prevention and management of allograft rejection urgently require more effective therapeutic solutions. Current immunosuppressive therapies used in solid organ transplantation, while effective in reducing the risk of acute rejection, are associated with substantial adverse effects. There is, therefore, a need for agents that can provide immunomodulation, supporting graft tolerance, while minimizing the need for immunosuppression. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory therapy currently recommended in international guidelines as an adjunctive treatment for the prevention and management of organ rejection in heart and lung transplantations. This article reviews clinical experience and ongoing research with ECP for organ rejection in heart and lung transplantations, as well as emerging findings in kidney and liver transplantation. ECP, due to its immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive-sparing effects, offers a potential therapeutic option in these settings, particularly in high-risk patients with comorbidities, infectious complications, or malignancies.

Rejection Requiring Treatment within the First Year following Heart Transplantation: The UNOS Insight

(1) Background: Heart failure is an extremely impactful health issue from both a social and quality-of-life point of view and the rate of patients with this condition is destined to rise in the next few years. Transplantation remains the mainstay of treatment for end-stage heart failure, but a shortage of organs represents a significant problem that prolongs time spent on the waiting list. In view of this, the selection of donor and recipient must be extremely meticulous, considering all factors that could predispose to organ failure. One of the main considerations regarding heart transplants is the risk of graft rejection and the need for immunosuppression therapy to mitigate that risk. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics of patients who need immunosuppression treatment for rejection within one year of heart transplantation and its impact on mid-term and long-term mortality. (2) Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry was queried to identify patients who solely underwent a heart transplant in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to the need for anti-rejection treatment within one year of heart transplantation. Patients' characteristics in the two groups were assessed, and 1 year and 10 year mortality rates were compared. (3) Results: A total of 43,763 patients underwent isolated heart transplantation in the study period, and 9946 (22.7%) needed anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Patients who required treatment for rejection within one year after transplant were more frequently younger (49 ± 14 vs. 52 ± 14 years, p < 0.001), women (31% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), and had a higher CPRA value (14 ± 26 vs. 11 ± 23, p < 0.001). Also, the rate of prior cardiac surgery was more than double in this group (27% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), while prior LVAD (12% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and IABP (10% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) were more frequent in patients who did not receive anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Finally, pre-transplantation creatinine was significantly higher in patients who did not need treatment for rejection in the first year (1.4 vs. 1.3, p < 0.01). Most patients who did not require anti-rejection treatment underwent heart transplantation during the new allocation era, while less than half of the patients who required treatment underwent transplantation after the new allocation policy implementation (65% vs. 49%, p < 0.001). Patients who needed rejection treatment in the first year had a higher risk of unadjusted 1 year (HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.88-2.70; p < 0.001), 5 year (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.60-1.79; p < 0.001), and 10 year (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.41-1.54, p < 0.001) mortality, and this was confirmed at the adjusted analysis at all three time-points. (4) Conclusions: Medical treatment of acute rejection was associated with significantly increased 1 year mortality compared to patients who did not require anti-rejection therapy. The higher risk of mortality was confirmed at a 10 year follow-up. Further studies and newer follow-up data are required to investigate the role of anti-rejection therapy in the heart transplant population.