"We are so close; yet too far": perceived barriers to smartphone-based telerehabilitation among healthcare providers and patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in India

Smartphone delivered social media-based rehabilitation for people with COPD in Thar Desert, India: A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary telerehabilitation offers an accessible and cost-effective therapy option for patients with chronic respiratory diseases. In the Thar Desert, home to 16.6 million people with a population density of 83 persons per square kilometre, transportation barriers to tertiary care increase the demand for telerehabilitation services.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of smartphone and social media-based rehabilitation for COPD patients in the Thar Desert, India.

METHODS

COPD patients were recruited from a tertiary hospital's outpatient department. Rehabilitation videos in Hindi were provided through smartphones via social media. Key assessments included the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), EQ-5D-3L, mMRC dyspnoea scale, 6-minute walk test and 30-second sit-to-stand test at baseline and 8 weeks. Usability, acceptability and adherence were measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) at 8 weeks, with follow-up on exercise adherence after 1 year.

RESULTS

Of the 54 COPD patients assessed, 45 were recruited (mean age 64.18, 86.7% male). Statistically significant improvements (P < 0.05) were observed in mMRC, EQ-5D-3L, CAT and 6-minute walk test scores. High acceptability was noted, with a mean SUS score of 81.5/100 and TAM score of 93.93/128. After 8 weeks, 75.5% of participants were exercising, with 58% maintaining routines 1 year later.

CONCLUSION

Smartphone-based pulmonary telerehabilitation is feasible for COPD patients in the Thar Desert, demonstrating high acceptability even in low-literacy populations. Further trials in diverse settings are recommended.

Nair A, Agrawal D, Zadey S, Surendran G, George Joseph R, Dayma G, Rafeekh L, Saha S, Sharma S, Prakash SS, Sankarapandian V, John P, Patel V. Barriers and facilitators for the use of telehealth by healthcare providers in India-A systematic review

It is widely assumed that telehealth tools like mHealth (mobile health), telemedicine, and tele-education can supplement the efficiency of Healthcare Providers (HCPs). We conducted a systematic review of evidence on the barriers and facilitators associated with the use of telehealth by HCPs in India. A systematic literature search following a pre-registered protocol (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KQ3U9 [PROTOCOL DOI]) was conducted on PubMed. The search strategy, inclusion, and exclusion criteria were based on the World Health Organization's action framework on Human Resources for Health (HRH) and Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in India with a specific focus on telehealth tools. Eligible articles published in English from 1st January 2001 to 17th February 2022 were included. One hundred and six studies were included in the review. Of these, 53 studies (50%) involved mHealth interventions, 25 (23.6%) involved telemedicine interventions whereas the remaining 28 (26.4%) involved the use of tele-education interventions by HCPs in India. In each category, most of the studies followed a quantitative study design and were mostly published in the last 5 years. The study sites were more commonly present in states in south India. The facilitators and barriers related to each type of intervention were analyzed under the following sub-headings- 1) Human resource related, 2) Application related 3) Technical, and 4) Others. The interventions were most commonly used for improving the management of mental health, non-communicable diseases, and maternal and child health. The use of telehealth has not been uniformly studied in India. The facilitators and barriers to telehealth use need to be kept in mind while designing the intervention. Future studies should focus on looking at region-specific, intervention-specific, and health cadre-specific barriers and facilitators for the use of telehealth.

Healthcare professionals' beliefs, attitudes, and thoughts toward cardiopulmonary telerehabilitation: A mixed-methods study

Healthcare professionals' opinions, attitudes, and thoughts toward new digital healthcare are often overlooked. However, they play a crucial role in accepting new digital care strategies. This research aimed to understand the perceptions of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation professionals towards telerehabilitation by conducting a mixed-method study at various Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi centers in Italy. A total of 14 healthcare workers, including 7 experts in telerehabilitation, participated through surveys and semi-structured focus groups, covering 12 thematic areas derived from the Theoretical Domains Framework (knowledge; professional role; beliefs about capabilities; beliefs about consequences; optimism; reinforcement, goals; memory, attention, and decision process; environmental context and resources; social influences; emotions; ideal patient's profile). Participants (mean age = 45.00 ± 9.06; M:F = 3:11) shared diverse experiences and views on telerehabilitation. All participants had a good knowledge of telerehabilitation. While non-experts indicated technological expertise and preserved cognitive level as a prerequisite for telerehabilitation use, experts believed that no ideal patient exists and that all people can benefit from it. They converged in defining it as a new delivery path of rehabilitation with the same objective of face-to-face rehabilitation services, enhancing the patient's quality of life. Environmental, infrastructural, and institutional resources are needed to enhance accessibility. Positive attitude, optimism, and expectation were reported, but uncertainties about how to manage safety issues and increased workload were mentioned. The study showed a complex picture of staff rehabilitation beliefs about telerehabilitation. Overall, telerehabilitation was considered a great opportunity for patients who face barriers to in-person clinical interventions.

Rehabilitation clinicians' use of mainstream wireless technologies in practice: a scoping review

PURPOSE

This scoping review was conducted to understand the barriers, facilitators, and education and training needs of rehabilitation clinicians in their use of mainstream wireless technologies (MWT) to support people with disabilities and older adults. It was also conducted to understand the functional skills of clients that were targeted with MWT use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This scoping review was reported using PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) and the Population (or Participants)/Concept/Context) framework. We searched PubMed; ProQuest to access APA PsycINFO; Web of Science Core Collection; and EBSCOhost to access Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Ovid MEDLINE ALL, and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC). Articles published between 2015-2022 were retrieved.

RESULTS

A total of 90 articles were included. Most interventions were apps, smartphones, and tablets; were geared toward adults; and targeted motor, cognitive and speech skills. An infographic on barriers and facilitators was generated as a decision support tool for clinicians when implementing MWT. The topic, format, timing, and source of information clinicians need are also delineated.

CONCLUSION

MWT such as apps, smartphones and tablets are being used by rehabilitation clinicians to address motor, cognitive, and speech skills, most commonly in adults. Clinicians voice a need for more education and training. Barriers and facilitators exist at the clinician-, technology-, client-, institution-, and policy levels.

Facilitators and Barriers for Telemedicine Systems in India from Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives and Settings: A Systematic Review

Background: Telemedicine is viewed as a crucial tool for addressing the challenges of limited medical resources at health care facilities. However, its adoption in health care is not entirely realized due to perceived barriers. This systematic review outlines the critical facilitators and barriers that influence the implementation of telemedicine in the Indian health care system, observed at the infrastructural, sociocultural, regulatory, and financial levels, from the perspectives of health care providers, patients, patient caregivers, society, health organizations, and the government. Methods: This review complies with the current Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015. A total of 2,706 peer-reviewed studies published from December 2016 to September 2023 in the PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo databases were considered for the title and abstract screening, after which 334 articles were chosen for the full-text review. In the end, 46 studies were selected for data synthesis. Results: Analysis of the literature revealed key barriers such as data privacy and security concerns, doctor and patient resistance to information and communications technology (ICT), infrastructure issues, and ICT training gaps. Facilitators included reduced health care delivery costs, enhanced patient access to health care in remote areas, and shorter patient wait times. The real-world experiences of Indian telemedicine practitioners and pioneers are also explored to complement literature-based perspectives on telemedicine implementation. Both stress the need for reliable internet connectivity, technological adoption, comprehensive ICT training, positive sociocultural attitudes, stringent data privacy measures, and viable business models as crucial for effective telemedicine adoption, with experts emphasizing practical adaptability alongside the literature-recognized facilitators.

Factors Facilitating and Inhibiting the Implementation of Telerehabilitation-A Scoping Review

Due to the coronavirus pandemic, telerehabilitation has become increasingly important worldwide. While the effectiveness of telerehabilitation is considered proven for many indications, there is comparatively little knowledge about the implementation conditions. Therefore, this scoping review summarises the current state of facilitating and inhibiting factors that may influence the uptake of telerehabilitation. The review follows the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The article search was carried out in five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane and Psyndex) in May 2022, with an update in October 2023. Two independent researchers identified relevant studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research served as the theoretical basis for the categorisation of the facilitating and inhibiting criteria in the organisational context. A total of 28 studies (timespan 2012 to 2023) have been included. The most relevant barriers identified are technical issues and a lack of technical skills. The factors considered most favourable for implementation are patients' motivation and the involvement of high-level leaders. The results provide clear indications of factors that inhibit and facilitate implementation, but also show that further research is needed.

Effectiveness of Telemedicine Interventions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Yoga Therapy and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Over Three Months

Background Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an integral part of non-pharmacological therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Yoga therapy (YT) has been shown to be beneficial in COPD, but the lack of large well-designed trials and standardized modules restricts its acceptability. This randomized control trial compares these two modalities in COPD patients via supervised tele-intervention. Objectives The primary objective of the study is to compare a 45-minute, five-days-per-week series of tele-YT (T-YT) with tele-PR (T-PR) for three months in terms of exercise capacity (6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)) in COPD patients. Methods COPD patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to T-YT or T-PR groups in a parallel-arm single-blinded controlled trial. The primary outcome is 6MWD recorded at baseline and after three months and secondary outcomes were symptom scores, Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), health-related quality of life (HrQoL), and depression and anxiety scores. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at the end of the three-month study period with a sample size of 75 in each group. Results A total of 150 consecutive patients with COPD were randomly assigned to either the T-YT (n = 75) or T-PR (n = 75) group. Their mean ± SD ages was 62.5 ± 7.0 years. The T-YT group had 55.5% males and 34.47% females, whereas the T-PR group had 44.5% males and 61.53% females. The trial was completed by 123 patients; 88% in the T-YT group and 76% in the T-PR group. Pre-intervention, the median (range) of 6MWD in T-YT and T-PR groups was 240 (120-600) m and 240 (120-660) m, respectively. There was statistically significant improvement in both groups respectively (p<0.001) post intervention from baseline but no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.486). A similar trend was seen in secondary outcomes with significant intragroup improvements and non-significant inter-group differences except FEV1%, which showed neither intragroup nor intergroup significant improvement. Conclusion Using a validated module, a three-month T-YT improves exercise capacity, symptom scores, HrQoL, and depression and anxiety scores similar to T-PR. T-YT is an acceptable alternative to T-PR in the management of COPD.

Perspectives of Patients With Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Medical Professionals on Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Pune, India: Qualitative Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality worldwide and in India. Access to nonpharmacological options, such as pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), are, however, limited. Given the difference between need and availability, exploring PR, specifically remotely delivered PR, in a resource-poor setting, will help inform future work.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored the perceptions, experiences, needs, and challenges of patients with CRDs and the potential of and the need for PR from the perspective of patients as well as medical professionals involved in the referral (doctors) and delivery (physiotherapists) of PR.

METHODS

In-depth qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted among 20 individuals diagnosed with CRDs and 9 medical professionals. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used as we sought to identify the meanings shared both within and across the 2 participant groups.

RESULTS

The 20 patients considered lifestyle choices (smoking and drinking), a lack of physical activity, mental stress, and heredity as the triggering factors for their CRDs. All of them equated the disease with breathlessness and a lack of physical strength, consulting multiple doctors about their physical symptoms. The most commonly cited treatment choice was an inhaler. Most of them believed that yoga and exercise are good self-management strategies, and some were performing yoga postures and breathing exercises, as advised by friends or family members or learned from a televised program or YouTube videos. None of them identified with the term "pulmonary rehabilitation," but many were aware of the exercise component and its benefits. Despite being naive to smartphone technology or having difficulty in reading, most of them were enthusiastic about enrolling in an application-based remotely delivered digital PR program. The 9 medical professionals were, however, reluctant to depend on a PR program delivered entirely online. They recommended that patients with CRDs be supported by their family to use technology, with some time spent with a medical professional during the program.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CRDs in India currently manage their disease with nonguided strategies but are eager to improve and would benefit from a guided PR program to feel better. A home-based PR program, with delivery facilitated by digital solutions, would be welcomed by patients and health care professionals involved in their care, as it would reduce the need for travel, specialist equipment, and setup. However, low digital literacy, low resource availability, and a lack of expertise are of concern to health care professionals. For India, including yoga could be a way of making PR "culturally congruent" and more successful. The digital PR intervention should be flexible to individual patient needs and should be complemented with physical sessions and a feedback mechanism for both practitioners as well as patients for better uptake and adherence.

Outcomes of Emergency Trauma Patients After the Implementation of Web Application Operating Systems

PURPOSE

Trauma has significant impacts on the livelihoods and well-being of patients. Prompt emergency, medical, and nursing care is the key to reducing mortality rates. Digital platforms have become important for patient care. This research aimed to evaluate patient outcomes after implementing a novel web application operating system in trauma care.

METHODS

A descriptive comparative study was conducted on trauma patients. The patients were divided into two groups: those who used the developed application (n = 70) and those who did not (n = 70). The patients' characteristics, the time of the trauma team's arrival at the emergency department (ED) and the length of stay in the ED, and patients' outcomes were collected from electronic medical records and the application database. A statistical analysis was performed to evaluate this data. Sixty registered nurses who used the application completed the survey on the feasibility of the application.

RESULTS

The activated trauma intervals for the non-application-used group and the application-used group were 5.0 ± 1.1 and 3.1 ± 0.4 minutes, respectively (p = .010). The length of stay in the ED for the non-application-used group and the application-used group were 30.1 ± 5.1 and 18.3 ± 6.2 minutes, respectively. A high level of agreement confirms the feasibility of the application.

CONCLUSIONS

This application improves patient outcomes in terms of length of stay. This mobile application can improve the cooperation and communication and efficacy of the trauma care team.

Competencies required by patients and health professionals regarding telerehabilitation: A scoping review

Background

Telerehabilitation offers patients alternative access to therapy and has become more prominent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the increasing attractiveness of such programs, there are research gaps regarding the required competencies in the demand-oriented technology use in rehabilitative care.

Objective

The study aims at collecting evidence on competencies required by patients and health professionals for using telerehabilitation. We analyse tasks and requirements associated with telerehabilitation and derive and systematise relevant competencies.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review and analysed MEDLINE, Psyndex, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for empirical studies and grey literature from 2017 to May 2022. Articles had to be in English/German and refer to medical rehabilitation accompanied by health professionals taking place in the patient's home.

Results

One hundred ten articles were included, covering video conferencing systems, applications with video, audio, or visual therapy content, or wearables. Depending on the program, tasks before, during, and after therapy sessions differ, as do whether these are performed by health professionals, patients, or the technology. Users need digital, health-related, social, personal, and health professionals also professional competencies. This comprises telerehabilitation, technical, health-related, and clinical knowledge, a range of physical, cognitive, social-interactive, technical, and clinical skills, a positive attitude towards telerehabilitation and experience. Whether sociodemographic factors promote successful use is unclear.

Conclusions

Telerehabilitation requires a variety of different competencies from patients and health professionals - going beyond the sphere of technical skills. This highlights the need for an evaluation of existing programs for promoting competencies in the use of telerehabilitation and refinement of the programs in line with demands.