1
|
Khanthavudh C, Grealish A, Tzouvara V, Leamy M. Supporting healthcare in rural communities in Thailand: An exploratory qualitative study to understand the role and current mental health practices of village health volunteers. PLoS One 2025; 20:e0320559. [PMID: 40146743 PMCID: PMC11949336 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Village health volunteers (VHVs) are the backbone of primary healthcare in many low-and-middle-income countries, including Thailand, where healthcare professionals are scarce. Previous studies looking at their role have been broader and lacked a specific mental health focus. In 2019, Thailand introduced a policy endorsing a recovery orientation in mental health care, however, the potential for VHVs to implement the approach remains underexplored. This study aims to: [1] describe VHVs' mental health practices, [2] explore stakeholders' perspectives on these practices, and [3] understand stakeholders' views on their potential to deliver recovery-oriented community care. METHOD This exploratory qualitative study involved nineteen semi-structured interviews conducted between August 2023 and March 2024 in a rural subdistrict of Northern Thailand. Participants included ten VHVs, four nurses, four caregivers, and one individual with mental health conditions. Purposeful and snowball sampling techniques were used. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse interview data. Official documents related to VHVs' job descriptions, training, and recruitment policies were also examined to understand the scope of the role. RESULTS The analysis identified three main themes: [1] Mental health practices and roles perceptions, highlighting variability among VHVs; [2] Organisational constraints on mental health practice in the community, demonstrating limited policy support and training for VHVs; and [3] Factors influencing the implementation of recovery-oriented approaches by VHVs, including barriers such as stigma and workload, and enabling factors such as specialist training and professional support. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals that VHVs in Thai rural communities prioritise physical health due to policy adopting a biomedical approach and limited training on providing mental health care. A range of culturally adapted approaches are needed to expand and enhance the contribution that VHVs can make to improving the quality of life of individuals experiencing mental health conditions in rural communities in Thailand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chonmanan Khanthavudh
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Annmarie Grealish
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Vasiliki Tzouvara
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Leamy
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jongdeepaisal M, Khonputsa P, Prasert O, Maneenate S, Sirimatayanant M, Sopa P, Saisong A, Charoensup I, Kamsri T, Tipmontree R, Sudathip P, Liverani M, Maude RJ, Pell C. Expanding the roles of malaria post workers in Thailand: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0003670. [PMID: 39288113 PMCID: PMC11407649 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Abstract
In Thailand, since the 2000s, malaria post (MP) workers have been tasked with promptly detecting and treating all malaria cases to prevent onward transmission in the communities. Expanding their roles to provide health services beyond malaria has been proposed as a strategy to sustain their activities until elimination is reached. This article examines the perspectives of stakeholders on community-based malaria care to assess prospects for expanding the role of MPs. The study incorporated in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs). In forested communities and local health facilities in northeast Thailand bordering Lao PDR and Cambodia, where malaria transmission is low, IDIs were conducted with 13 MPs and 23 community members. An additional 14 policymakers and implementers across the health sector in Thailand were interviewed. The respondents highlighted how in these border areas population groups most at risk of malaria, namely forest goers and migrants, are reluctant to visit public health facilities. In these areas, MP workers are well integrated in their communities and remain relevant although the communities no longer see malaria as spriority. Common conditions such as dengue, diabetes, insect bites, diarrhea, mental illness and substance abuse, were identified as local health concerns needing potential add-on services from MP workers. Although challenges in terms of training, supervision, and financing were raised, opportunities included additional funds from local administrative offices to maintain and integrate malaria activities with other health programmes. Changes to the roles of MPs should be adapted to changing local needs, some of which were identified in this study, should avoid duplication and potential tensions with other local health programmes, and need to build on the capacity of the community and primary care system. These enabling factors are worthy of consideration by any malaria programmes looking into maintaining their village malaria workers in the Greater Mekong Subregion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monnaphat Jongdeepaisal
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Panarasri Khonputsa
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Orathai Prasert
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Supitsara Maneenate
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Massaya Sirimatayanant
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Paradorn Sopa
- Ubon Ratchathani Provincial Health Office, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
| | | | | | - Tanong Kamsri
- Ubon Ratchathani Provincial Health Office, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
- Phibun Mangsahan Hospital, Phibun, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
| | - Rungrawee Tipmontree
- Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Prayuth Sudathip
- Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Marco Liverani
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
- Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Richard J Maude
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Pell
- Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre for Social Science and Global Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Basu S, Desai M, Karan A, Bhardwaj S, Negandhi H, Jadhav N, Maske A, Zodpey S. COVID-19 Resilience and Risk Reduction Intervention in Rural Populations of Western India: Retrospective Evaluation. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024; 10:e47520. [PMID: 39073851 PMCID: PMC11319881 DOI: 10.2196/47520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, especially in the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), rural populations were more susceptible to the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic due to lower levels of community awareness, poor hygiene, and health literacy accompanying pre-existing weak public health systems. Consequently, various community-based interventions were engineered in rural regions worldwide to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic by empowering people to mount both individual and collective public health responses against the pandemic. However, to date, there is paucity of information on the effectiveness of any large-scale community intervention in controlling and mitigating the effects of COVID-19, especially from the perspective of LMICs. OBJECTIVE This retrospective impact evaluation study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a large-scale rural community-based intervention, the COVID-Free Village Program (CFVP), on COVID-19 resilience and control in rural populations in Maharashtra, India. METHODS The intervention site was the rural areas of the Pune district where CFVP was implemented from August 2021 to February 2022, while the adjoining district, Satara, represented the control district where the COVID-Free Village Scheme was implemented. Data were collected during April-May 2022 from 3500 sample households in villages across intervention and comparison arms by using the 2-stage stratified random sampling through face-to-face interviews followed by developing a matched sample using propensity score matching methods. RESULTS The participants in Pune had a significantly higher combined COVID-19 awareness index by 0.43 (95% CI 0.29-0.58) points than those in Satara. Furthermore, the adherence to COVID-appropriate behaviors, including handwashing, was 23% (95% CI 3%-45%) and masking was 17% (0%-38%) higher in Pune compared to those in Satara. The probability of perception of COVID as a serious illness in patients with heart disease was 22% (95% CI 1.036-1.439) higher in Pune compared to that in Satara. The awareness index of COVID-19 variants and preventive measures were also higher in Pune by 0.88 (95% CI 0.674-1.089) points. In the subgroup analysis, when the highest household educational level was restricted to middle school, the awareness about the COVID-control program was 0.69 (95% CI 0.36-1.021) points higher in Pune, while the awareness index of COVID-19 variants and preventive measures was higher by 0.45 (95% CI 0.236-0.671) points. We did not observe any significant changes in the overall COVID-19 vaccination coverage due to CFVP implementation. Furthermore, the number of COVID-19 deaths in both the sampled populations were very low. The probability of observing COVID-19-related stigma or discrimination in Pune was 68% (95% CI 0.133-0.191) lower than that in Satara. CONCLUSIONS CFVP contributed to improved awareness and sustainability of COVID-appropriate behaviors in a large population although there was no evidence of higher COVID-19 vaccination coverage or reduction in mortality, signifying potential applicability in future pandemic preparedness, especially in resource-constrained settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurav Basu
- Indian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India
| | - Meghana Desai
- Department of Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning, Bharatiya Jain Sangathana, Shantilal Muttha Foundation, Pune, India
| | - Anup Karan
- Indian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India
| | - Surbhi Bhardwaj
- Indian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India
| | - Himanshu Negandhi
- Indian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India
| | - Nitin Jadhav
- Department of Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning, Bharatiya Jain Sangathana, Shantilal Muttha Foundation, Pune, India
| | - Amar Maske
- Department of Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning, Bharatiya Jain Sangathana, Shantilal Muttha Foundation, Pune, India
| | - Sanjay Zodpey
- Indian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khatri RB, Endalamaw A, Erku D, Wolka E, Nigatu F, Zewdie A, Assefa Y. Preparedness, impacts, and responses of public health emergencies towards health security: qualitative synthesis of evidence. Arch Public Health 2023; 81:208. [PMID: 38037151 PMCID: PMC10687930 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01223-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Natural and human-made public health emergencies (PHEs), such as armed conflicts, floods, and disease outbreaks, influence health systems including interruption of delivery and utilization of health services, and increased health service needs. However, the intensity and types of impacts of these PHEs vary across countries due to several associated factors. This scoping review aimed to synthesise available evidence on PHEs, their preparedness, impacts, and responses. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of published evidence. Studies were identified using search terms related to two concepts: health security and primary health care. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to select studies. We adapted the review framework of Arksey and O'Malley. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach and explained under three stages of PHEs: preparedness, impacts, and responses. RESULTS A total of 64 studies were included in this review. Health systems of many low- and middle-income countries had inadequate preparedness to absorb the shocks of PHEs, limited surveillance, and monitoring of risks. Health systems have been overburdened with interrupted health services, increased need for health services, poor health resilience, and health inequities. Strategies of response to the impact of PHEs included integrated services such as public health and primary care, communication and partnership across sectors, use of digital tools, multisectoral coordination and actions, system approach to responses, multidisciplinary providers, and planning for resilient health systems. CONCLUSIONS Public health emergencies have high impacts in countries with weak health systems, inadequate preparedness, and inadequate surveillance mechanisms. Better health system preparedness is required to absorb the impact, respond to the consequences, and adapt for future PHEs. Some potential response strategies could be ensuring need-based health services, monitoring and surveillance of post-emergency outbreaks, and multisectoral actions to engage sectors to address the collateral impacts of PHEs. Mitigation strategies for future PHEs could include risk assessment, disaster preparedness, and setting digital alarm systems for monitoring and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Resham B Khatri
- Health Social Science and Development Research Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal.
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Aklilu Endalamaw
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | - Daniel Erku
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Eskinder Wolka
- International Institute for Primary Health Care-Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Frehiwot Nigatu
- International Institute for Primary Health Care-Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Anteneh Zewdie
- International Institute for Primary Health Care-Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Yibeltal Assefa
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tangcharoensathien V, Vandelaer J, Brown R, Suphanchaimat R, Boonsuk P, Patcharanarumol W. Learning from pandemic responses: Informing a resilient and equitable health system recovery in Thailand. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1065883. [PMID: 36761120 PMCID: PMC9906810 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1065883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
This article is part of the Research Topic 'Health Systems Recovery in the Context of COVID-19 and Protracted Conflict'. The third quarter of 2022 saw COVID-19 cases and deaths in Thailand reduced significantly, and high levels of COVID-19 vaccine coverage. COVID-19 was declared an "endemic" disease, and economic activities resumed. This paper reviews pre-pandemic health systems capacity and identifies pandemic response strengths, weaknesses and lessons that guided resilient and equitable health system recovery. Robust health systems and adaptive strategies drive an effective pandemic response. To support health system recovery Thailand should (1) minimize vulnerability and extend universal health coverage to include migrant workers and dependents; (2) sustain provincial primary healthcare (PHC) capacity and strengthen PHC in greater Bangkok; (3) leverage information technology for telemedicine and teleconsultation; (4) enhance and extend case and event-based surveillance of notifiable diseases, and for public health threats, including pathogens with pandemic potential in wildlife and domesticated animals. This requires policy and financial commitment across successive governments, adequate numbers of committed and competent health workforce at all levels supported by over a million village health volunteers, strong social capital and community resilience. A strengthened global health architecture and international collaboration also have critical roles in establishing local capacities to develop and manufacture pandemic response products through transfer of technology and know-how. Countries should engage in the ongoing Inter-government Negotiating Body to ensure a legally binding instrument to safeguard the world from catastrophic impacts of future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viroj Tangcharoensathien
- International Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand,*Correspondence: Viroj Tangcharoensathien ✉
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|