Effectiveness and safety of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of integrating consolidative thoracic radiotherapy with immunochemotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective analysis

Background

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains a challenging malignancy with a poor prognosis. The integration of immunochemotherapy and combined consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) presents a potential paradigm shift in treatment. This study aims to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of this approach.

Methods

In a single-center retrospective study conducted at Shandong Cancer Hospital, electronic medical records of 828 ES-SCLC patients treated between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023, were reviewed. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on treatment strategies: chemoradiotherapy (cohort A), immunochemotherapy without/with cTRT (cohort B/C). Propensity score matching was utilized to adjust for baseline differences. The primary outcomes were real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included the incidence and severity of specific interested adverse events (AEs).

Results

Of the 374 patients analyzed, cohort C showed significant improvements in rwPFS and OS compared to cohort A. The median rwPFS in cohort C (10.9 months) was longer than that of cohorts A (7.6 months) and B (8.0 months). The 12-month rwPFS rate was highest in cohort C (41%), compared to cohorts A (19%) and B (34%). The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was comparable across cohorts, with myelosuppression being the most common. However, the incidence of grade 3 or higher pneumonitis was notably higher in cohorts B and C, aligning with previous reports.

Conclusions

The combination of cTRT with immunochemotherapy for ES-SCLC showed improved rwPFS and OS, indicating potential benefit in this population. The overall safety profile remained manageable. These findings highlight the need for further prospective studies to confirm the optimal integration of cTRT in ES-SCLC treatment strategies.

Progress of research on PD-L1 inhibitor adebrelimab usage in malignant tumors

Adebrelimab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and is also a novel immune checkpoint inhibitor, which has been used in the first-line treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with its unique mechanism of action and good clinical efficacy. Significant progress has been made in the treatment of adebrelimab in other malignancies such as non-small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and the treatment of SCLC at different stages is also being explored. Therefore, adebrelimab emerges as a promising new treatment option for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other types of malignant tumors.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of imported and domestic immune checkpoint inhibitors in China: A systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Multiple brands of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including domestic and imported agents, have been approved as front-line therapy in China. However, little is known about the difference in efficacy and safety of these agents of different origins. This study aims to systematically compare the difference between National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved domestic and imported ICIs regarding their efficacy, safety, and price.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central, from inception to July 1st, 2023, for phase III trials evaluating ICIs as first- or second-line settings that have available hazard ratio (HR) for Asians or non-Asians. Studies of domestic and imported ICIs were screened and paired by the matching clinical characteristics as mirror groups. The primary endpoint was to assess the difference in efficacy between domestic and imported ICIs regarding overall survival. An effect size was derived from each mirror group and then pooled across all groups using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics. Monthly treatment costs for each drug were calculated based on dosing information on National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) label and prices extracted from INSIGHT database. The difference in monthly treatment costs was compared by unpaired T-test. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42024580753.

RESULTS

Overall, domestic ICIs exhibited better efficacy regarding overall survival (HR, 0.87; 95 % CI, 0.79-0.97; P < 0.05; I2 = 0) compared with imported agents. No difference was observed regarding benefits in progression free survival (HR, 0.95; 95 % CI, 0.82-1.09; P > 0.05; I2 = 0). Consistent results were obtained through frequentists and Bayesian approaches. The differences in safety; measured by relative risk of treatment-related adverse events (TARE) of any grade, TARE of grade 3 or higher, immune-related adverse events(irAE) of any grade, irAE of grade 3 or higher, discontinuation due to treatment, and death due to treatment; were also similar between domestic and imported ICIs. Moreover, in current Chinese market, the monthly treatment prices of domestic ICIs was statistically lower than that of imported ICIs (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our research provides an essential reference of cost-effectiveness of ICIs manufactured in China for clinicians in routine practice of cancer care as well as public health authorities for decision making process.

Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs and RWSs

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWS).

METHODS

By scanning PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and other relevant clinical information public databases, nine RCTs and eight RWSs involving 5205 patients were included in the study. We directly compared the differences between chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy, and determined the optimal treatment strategy through network meta-analysis (NMA).

RESULTS

Compared to chemotherapy, the addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improves the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) in SCLC patients. Regarding safety, both RCTs and RWSs indicated no significant difference in grade 3-4 adverse events between chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy. NMA showed serplulimab plus chemotherapy (Serp_Chemo) appears to provide the best OS, PFS, and ORR benefit, while nivolumab plus chemotherapy shows higher toxicity than other regimens. In subgroup analysis, for elderly patients (age ≥65) and non-elderly (age <65) patients, the most promising quality regimens for achieving better OS extension are atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (Atez_Chemo) and Serp_Chemo, respectively. For patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > upper limit of normal (ULN), there is no apparent OS benefit from immune therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In ES-SCLC treatment, adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to standard chemotherapy improves OS, PFS, and ORR, with Serp_Chemo shows the most promise. Atez_Chemo and Serp_Chemo provided better survival for elderly and non-elderly patients, respectively.

The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: evaluating based on reconstructed individual patient data

Objective

Selecting between programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor or programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients urgently needs to be answered.

Methods

Eligible phase 3 randomized clinical trials evaluating regimens based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment in ES-SCLC patients were systematically searched on the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases and major international conferences from 01/01/2018 to 18/09/2023. The individual patient data (IPD) were recuperated from the Kaplan-Meier curves of the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the included studies using the IPDfromKM method. The reconstructed data were pooled into unified arms, including the PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy group (PD-L1 group), PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy group (PD-1 group), and PD-1 (L1) inhibitor and chemotherapy plus other (anlotinib group, tiragolumab group, and tremelimumab group). Subsequently, the PD-L1 group was indirectly compared with the other groups. A standard statistical analysis was conducted using the "survival" package for the time-to-event endpoint. The primary outcomes were the OS and PFS of the PD-L1 group and the PD-1 inhibitor group. The secondary outcomes included safety and the 12- and 24-month restricted mean survival time (RMST) of the PD-L1 group and PD-1 group.

Results

A total of 9 studies including 11 immunotherapy cohorts were included. No significant difference in PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-1.06), OS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.84-1.05), and 12-month and 24-month RMST for OS (P = 0.198 and P = 0.216, respectively) was observed between the PD-L1 group and the PD-1 group. In contrast, the anlotinib group showed significantly better OS (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.89), PFS (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58-0.83), and RMST for OS compared to the PD-L1 group. The tiragolumab group showed similar efficacy to the PD-L1 group. However, the tremelimumab group exhibited inferior efficacy than the PD-L1 group. The incidence of ≥grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was significantly higher in the PD-1 group compared to the PD-L1 group (85.4% vs. 69.6%, P <.001), whereas the incidence of irAEs was similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

This reconstructed IPD analysis revealed that PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy achieved similar efficacy to PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in ES-SCLC patients, whereas PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy had a better safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of different immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressants combined with chemotherapy in treating patients with small-cell lung cancer (extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer, limited-disease small-cell lung cancer and relapsed small-cell lung cancer) are still unknown, and there are no reports directly comparing the efficacy and safety of other immunotherapies.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Method

We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for relevant articles published from inception to November 11, 2020. The risk of bias of the included studies was conducted using the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool. Multiple Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. They conducted data analysis using R Studio and STATA version 15.1. The outcomes comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), stability of response (SOR), duration of response (DOR) and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (AE grade≥3). A 95% confidence interval (CI) was provided for each estimate.

Results

This meta-analysis included 16 RCT studies with 5898 patients. For OS, relative to chemotherapy (MD=-4.49; 95%CI [-7.97, -1.03]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (MD=-4.62; 95%CI [-9.08, -0.11]), ipilimumab (MD=-4.26; 95%CI [-8.01, -0.3]) and nivolumab(MD=-5.66; 95%CI [-10.44, -1.11]) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (MD=-4.56; 95%CI [-8.7, -0.1]), serplulimab can significantly increase the OS of SCLC patients. There was no significant difference between PFS, SOR and DOR. Analysis of AE showed that different immunotherapy combined chemotherapy regimens were similar to single chemotherapy regarding the overall incidence of AE grade≥3. However, after the cumulative ranking of the common symptoms of different adverse reactions, it was found that nivolumab ranked first in the occurrence probability of anemia (99.08%), fatigue (84.78%), and decreased appetite (89.66%). durvalumab was the most likely in nausea (75.4%). Pembrolizumab (76.24%) was most likely to cause pruritus. Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy caused less diarrhea than chemotherapy alone (80.16%).

Conclusions

According to our analysis, serplulimab combined with chemotherapy is more likely to show better efficacy with a manageable safety profile for small-cell lung cancer. However, the evidence for this comparison shows some limitations due to the number of literature.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023486053.

Serplulimab monotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with brain metastasis: a case report

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer with limited treatment options, especially for extensive-stage (ES) patients. We present a case of a 70-year-old male with ES-SCLC and asymptomatic brain metastasis who opted for immune monotherapy with serplulimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody). After four cycles, the patient achieved a confirmed partial response and a progression-free survival of over 1 year. Moreover, we observed a consistent decline in tumor biomarkers, and brain MRI indicated reduced metastatic activity. Remarkably, the patient tolerated the treatment well, with only mild diarrhea. This case highlights serplulimab's potential as a first-line treatment in select ES-SCLC patients, emphasizing the importance of further research on immunotherapy predictive biomarkers.

The DC-T cell axis is an effective target for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

The dendritic cell (DC)-T cell axis is a bridge that connects innate and adaptive immunities. The initial immune response against tumors is mainly induced by mature antigen-presenting DCs. Enhancing the crosstalk between DCs and T cells may be an effective approach to improve the immune response to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this article, a review was made of the interaction between DCs and T cells in the treatment of NSCLC and how this interaction affects the treatment outcome.