Budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 promotes cell proliferation, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling in glioblastoma

Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies BUB1 kinase as a druggable vulnerability in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare yet highly aggressive malignancy with a severe prognosis. Compounded by the lack of effective treatment modalities, MPM remains a formidable health challenge. Therefore, the identification of actionable liabilities is critical for advancing precision medicine to combat this lethal disease. Here, we exploit an unbiased genome-wide CRISPR screen, integrating and cross-comparing three MPM cell lines with nonmalignant mesothelial cells, to selectively map the gene targets whose depletion indicates a common dependency in MPM cells. This systematic approach unveils a cohort of verifiable genes, among which BUB1, a mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine kinase, emerges as a high-confidence hit in cancer cells. Cellular and molecular studies demonstrate that genetic depletion or pharmacological inhibition of BUB1 profoundly impairs MPM cell survival and growth while inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest, cellular senescence, and apoptosis, and attenuating functional hallmarks of aggressive cancer cells. Transcriptomic profiling of BUB1-depleted cells discloses differential gene expression signatures congruent with cell fate phenotypes, including the reprogramming of mitotic network genes. Mechanistically, BUB1 is indispensable for the proper localization of essential mitotic regulators MAD1, MAD2, and Shugoshin (SGO1), thereby ensuring the functionality of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). Furthermore, BUB1 ablation leads to cytokinesis failure and multinucleation, a phenotype characterized by the downregulation of CDC20, Cyclin A, and Cyclin B, and a reciprocal upregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21. Clinically, MPM tumors exhibit elevated levels of BUB1, and high BUB1 expression is associated with shorter patient survival. Our novel findings accentuate comparative CRISPR screens as a powerful platform to explore tumor cell-selective gene essentiality and propose BUB1 kinase as a potential marker and druggable vulnerability with therapeutic implications for MPM.

The Predictive Value of BUB1 in the Prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common type of malignant tumour in the oral cavity, and it is known for its poor prognosis. Budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 (BUB1) may be related to cancer prognosis; however, the specific relationship between BUB1 and OSCC prognosis remains largely unexplored.

METHODS

The mRNA levels of BUB1 were analysed using data from the TCGA_OSCC and GSE23558 cohorts. OSCC samples from the TCGA_OSCC dataset were divided into low- and high-BUB1 expression groups based on the median BUB1 level. Furthermore, results of survival analysis, tumour mutation burden (TMB), gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) pathways, and drug-sensitivity analysis were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Based on the data from the TCGA_OSCC and GSE23558 cohorts, BUB1 mRNA levels were significantly upregulated in OSCC tissues compared to healthy controls. Moreover, high expression of BUB1 may serve as an independent indicator of poor prognosis in OSCC. Additionally, patients with high BUB1 expression also exhibited increased levels of immune checkpoints and TMB, suggesting that patients with high BUB1 expression may benefit from immunotherapy. Mechanistically, transcription factors ZFP64, TCF3, and ZNF281 were found to potentially bind to the promoter region of BUB1, thereby regulating its gene expression. Furthermore, GSEA results showed that BUB1 expression was closely related to cell cycle and tumour-related pathways in OSCC. Drug-sensitivity analysis showed that patients with high BUB1 expression may be more sensitive to gemcitabine, paclitaxel, or imatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, results demonstrated that high BUB1 levels may be related to a poor prognosis of OSCC, highlighting its potential as a novel prognostic biomarker for OSCC.

Old drugs, new challenges: reassigning drugs for cancer therapies

The "War on Cancer" began with the National Cancer Act of 1971 and despite more than 50 years of effort and numerous successes, there still remains much more work to be done. The major challenge remains the complexity and intrinsic polygenicity of neoplastic diseases. Furthermore, the safety of the antitumor therapies still remains a concern given their often off-target effects. Although the amount of money invested in research and development required to introduce a novel FDA-approved drug has continuously increased, the likelihood for a new cancer drug's approval remains limited. One interesting alternative approach, however, is the idea of repurposing of old drugs, which is both faster and less costly than developing new drugs. Repurposed drugs have the potential to address the shortage of new drugs with the added benefit that the safety concerns are already established. That being said, their interactions with other new drugs in combination therapies, however, should be tested. In this review, we discuss the history of repurposed drugs, some successes and failures, as well as the multiple challenges and obstacles that need to be addressed in order to enhance repurposed drugs' potential for new cancer therapies.

Drug repurposing for cancer therapy

Cancer, a complex and multifactorial disease, presents a significant challenge to global health. Despite significant advances in surgical, radiotherapeutic and immunological approaches, which have improved cancer treatment outcomes, drug therapy continues to serve as a key therapeutic strategy. However, the clinical efficacy of drug therapy is often constrained by drug resistance and severe toxic side effects, and thus there remains a critical need to develop novel cancer therapeutics. One promising strategy that has received widespread attention in recent years is drug repurposing: the identification of new applications for existing, clinically approved drugs. Drug repurposing possesses several inherent advantages in the context of cancer treatment since repurposed drugs are typically cost-effective, proven to be safe, and can significantly expedite the drug development process due to their already established safety profiles. In light of this, the present review offers a comprehensive overview of the various methods employed in drug repurposing, specifically focusing on the repurposing of drugs to treat cancer. We describe the antitumor properties of candidate drugs, and discuss in detail how they target both the hallmarks of cancer in tumor cells and the surrounding tumor microenvironment. In addition, we examine the innovative strategy of integrating drug repurposing with nanotechnology to enhance topical drug delivery. We also emphasize the critical role that repurposed drugs can play when used as part of a combination therapy regimen. To conclude, we outline the challenges associated with repurposing drugs and consider the future prospects of these repurposed drugs transitioning into clinical application.

Knockdown of HNRNPM inhibits the progression of glioma through inducing ferroptosis

PURPOSE

Ferroptosis acts as an important regulator in diverse human tumors, including the glioma. This study aimed to screen potential ferroptosis-related genes involved in the progression of glioma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Differently expressed genes (DEGs) were screened based on GSE31262 and GSE12657 datasets, and ferroptosis-related genes were separated. Among the important hub genes in the protein-protein interaction networks, HNRNPM was selected as a research target. Following the knockdown of HNRNPM, the viability, migration, and invasion were detected by CCK8, wound healing, and transwell assays, respectively. The role of HNRNPM knockdown was also verified in a xenograft tumor model in mice. Immunohistochemistry detected the expression levels of HNRNPM and Ki67. Moreover, the ferroptosis was evaluated according to the levels of iron, glutathione peroxidase (GSH), and malondialdehyde (MDA), as well as the expression of PTGS2, GPX4, and FTH1.

RESULTS

Total 41 overlapping DEGs relating with ferroptosis and glioma were screened, among which 4 up-regulated hub genes (HNRNPM, HNRNPA3, RUVBL1, and SNRPPF) were determined. The up-regulation of HNRNPM presented a certain predictive value for glioma. In addition, knockdown of HNRNPM inhibited the viability, migration, and invasion of glioma cells in vitro, and also the tumor growth in mice. Notably, knockdown of HNRNPM enhanced the ferroptosis in glioma cells. Furthermore, HNRNPM was positively associated with SMARCA4 in glioma.

CONCLUSIONS

Knockdown of HNRNPM inhibits the progression of glioma via inducing ferroptosis. HNRNPM is a promising molecular target for the treatment of glioma via inducing ferroptosis. We provided new insights of glioma progression and potential therapeutic guidance.