Using the appropriate formula for QT measurement can save lives

Evaluating cardiac electrophysiological markers for predicting arrhythmic risk in hypothyroid patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of hypothyroidism and levothyroxine (LT4) treatment on arrhythmic risk by concurrently analyzing multiple electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters such as the Index of Cardio-Electrophysiological Balance (iCEB), frontal QRS-T angle, Tpeak-Tend (Tp-e) interval/QT interval ratio, and QT dispersion (QTd).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 132 adult patients with primary hypothyroidism who had been receiving LT4 treatment, and 132 demographically matched healthy controls. The hypothyroid group was also stratified by thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels (subclinical <4.5 and overt ≥ 4.5). Participants underwent a series of thyroid function and ECG measurements.

RESULTS

The hypothyroid and healthy control groups were matched for age and gender (p = 0.080; p = 0.176). Participants with hypothyroidism had higher Tp-e/QT ratios, iCEB, median frontal QRS-T angle, and corrected QT dispersion (cQTd) than healthy controls (p = 0.004; p = 0.025; p = 0.004; p = 0.004, respectively). In the overt group, the Tp-e/QT ratio, iCEB, and median frontal QRS-T angles were all higher (p = 0.012, p = 0.037, and p = 0.016, respectively). Logistic regression analysis indicated that a higher iCEB score (β = 0.60, p = 0.003) was significant for the detection of arrhythmia risk. ROC analysis showed that iCEB had the highest sensitivity (0.80), moderate specificity (0.60), and AUC 0.70.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hypothyroidism have a higher risk of arrhythmia. To assess this risk, it is important to analyze the Tp-e interval, iCEB, frontal QRS-T angle, and QTd. Differentiating between patients with subclinical and overt hypothyroidism can help minimize the risk of arrhythmia. iCEB is the most effective method for identifying arrhythmic risk. Using all these parameters can improve the accuracy of arrhythmic risk detection in patients with hypothyroidism.

Association between QT prolongation and cardiovascular mortality in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients' vulnerability to QT prolongation contradicts certain anti-cancer drug usage. Until now, the QT prolongation's impact on CV mortality in cancer patients remains unclear, potentially biasing therapeutic decisions.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort included adult cancer patients with an electrocardiogram (ECG) performed in a tertiary hospital in Taiwan. The first performed ECGs after cancer diagnosis (n = 59,568) were analyzed. The corrected QT intervals by Bazett (QTcB), Fridericia (QTcFri), and Framingham (QTcFra) formulae were used to predict the 90-day and one-year CV mortality according to the Taiwan death registry.

RESULTS

The AUC of QTcB (90 days: 0.70, 1 year: 0.68) for predicting CV mortality was better than QTcFri and QTcFra (90 days: 0.63 and 0.50, 1 year: 0.65 and 0.56). Using the restricted cubic spline regression model adjusted by age and comorbidities, QTcB increased a significant but trivial risk of CV mortality at 90 days (hazard ratio, 1.007, P = 0.02) and one year (1.006, P < 0.01). Compared to those with QTcB < 500ms, the patients with QTcB ≥ 500ms were older and had more comorbidities and mortalities within one year. The incidence of sudden death and ventricular arrhythmias was only 0.2%. After adjusting for comorbidities, QTcB was neither associated with 90-day nor one-year CV mortality. In the patients already with QTcB ≥ 500ms, the patients receiving the unexpected uses of QT-prolonging drugs were not associated with higher one-year CV mortality than those without (P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Rather than a prolonged QT interval per se, comorbidities contributed to CV mortality and irreversible outcomes in cancer patients.

Comparison of different QT correction methods for nonclinical safety assessment in ketamine-anesthetized Indian rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

Rhesus monkeys are a non-rodent species employed in the preclinical safety evaluation of pharmaceuticals and biologics. These nonhuman primate species have been increasingly used in biomedical research because of the similarity in their ionic mechanisms of repolarization with humans. Heart rate and QT interval are two primary endpoints in determining the pro-arrhythmic risk of drugs. As heart rate and QT interval have an inverse relationship, any change in heart rate causes a subsequent change in QT interval. This warrants for calculation of a corrected QT interval. This study aimed to identify an appropriate formula that best corrected QT for change in heart rate. We employed seven formulas based on source-species type, clinical relevance, and requirements of various international regulatory guidelines. Data showed that corrected QT interval values varied drastically for different correction formulas. Equations were compared on their slope values based on QTc versus RR plots. The rank order of the slope for different formulas was (closest to farthest from zero) QTcNAK, QTcHAS, QTcBZT, QTcFRD, QTcVDW, QTcHDG, and QTcFRM. QTcNAK emerged to be the best correcting formula in this study. It showed the least correlation with the RR interval (r = -0.01) and displayed no significant difference amongst the sexes. As there is no universally recognized formula for preclinical use, the authors recommend developing a best-case scenario model for specific study designs and individual organizations. The data from this research will be helpful in deciding an appropriate QT correction formula for the safety assessment of new pharmaceuticals and biologics.

Association of QTc Formula With the Clinical Management of Patients With Cancer

Importance

Monitoring of the corrected QT interval (QTc) for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy is not standardized. Selection of QTc formula may be associated with adverse event grading and chemotherapy delivery.

Objective

To describe the association of QTc formula selection with adverse event grading and chemotherapy delivery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective observational cohort study used data from January 2010 to April 2020 and included adult patients seen at the University of North Carolina Cancer Hospital who had an electrocardiogram (ECG) performed.

Exposures

Adjusted QTc using the Bazett, Fridericia, and Framingham formulae.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was QTc prolongation using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Consistency between formulae was evaluated. Subsequently, appropriateness of clinical management due to prolonged QTc was assessed for a subset of patients being treated with chemotherapy agents associated with a prolonged QT interval. We hypothesized that use of the Bazett formula would be associated with higher rates of QTc prolongation and inappropriate modifications to chemotherapy.

Results

A total of 19 955 ECGs from 6881 adult patients (3055 [44.4%] women, 3826 [55.6%] men; median [IQR] age at first ECG, 60 [47-68] years) were analyzed. The percentage of ECGs with grade 3 QTc prolongation differed by formula (all patients: Framingham, 1.8%; Fridericia, 2.8%; and Bazett, 9.0%; patients receiving QT-prolonging chemotherapy [2340 ECGs]: Framingham, 2.7%; Fridericia, 4.5%; and Bazett, 12.5%). The Bazett formula resulted in a median QTc value 26.4 milliseconds higher than Fridericia and 27.8 milliseconds higher than Framingham. Of the 1786 ECGs classified as grade 3 by Bazett, 1446 (81.0%) were grade 2 or less by either Fridericia or Framingham. A total of 5 of 28 (17.9%) evaluated clinical changes associated with prolonged QTc were deemed inappropriate when using either Fridericia or Framingham formula.

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings of this cohort study suggest that the Bazett formula resulted in higher QTc values associated with a 3-fold increase in grade 3 CTCAE toxic effects compared with other common formulae. Use of the Bazett formula likely was associated with inappropriate changes in clinical management. These data support the use of a standard QTc formula (such as Fridericia or Framingham) for QTc correction in oncology.