Craniosynostosis: A multidisciplinary approach based on medical, social and demographic factors in a developing country

Craniosynostosis: Experience From a Single Tertiary Center in India

Introduction Premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures results in a diverse set of conditions collectively known as craniosynostosis. It is primarily responsible for cosmetic issues and occasionally associated with complications like brain growth restriction, raised intracranial pressure (ICP), and blindness. Management ranges from conservative surgical procedures such as suturectomies to more extensive procedures, including frontal bone remodeling with fronto-orbital advancement (FBR with FOA) and total calvarial reconstructions (TCVR). Currently, there is no consensus on an ideal procedure for a particular type of surgery for this condition. Methods A retrospective review of 26 consecutive patients treated at a single tertiary center in India was performed. Sloan's surgical outcome class and parent satisfaction score to compare different forms of intervention. Transfusion requirements, length of hospital, and increase in head circumference post-operation were also used. Results The mean age in our cohort was 10.9 months, with a ratio of 9:4 male-to-female. The overall assessment of pre- vs. post-operative head circumference revealed a strong significant mean improvement from 42.85 cm to 44.73 cm (p<0.001). A comparison of measured variables for all 26 patients revealed a significant difference in Sloan's surgical outcomes class (5.4 vs 1.2, p<0.001), Parent satisfaction score (5.1 vs 9.1, p<0.001) and increase in head circumference (cm) post-operation (0.74 vs 2.39, p<0.001) when comparing suturectomies vs extensive procedure like FBR with FOA and TCVR.  Conclusion Our results favored FBR with FOA and TCVR over simple suturectomies for more satisfactory and long-lasting results with acceptable mortality and morbidity.

Low-Cost Desktop-Based Three-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Craniofacial Models in Surgical Counseling, Consent Taking, and Education of Parent of Craniosynostosis Patients: A Comparison With Conventional Visual Explanation Modalities

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis is a complex craniofacial deformity. Surgical decision, if needed, is always hard on the parent and requires the use of multimodalities of explanation. To the authors' knowledge, there have been no studies tackling family counseling about the deformity and surgical decision-making process with the use of low-cost patient-specific three-dimensional (3D)-printed models.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study investigating the utility of patient-specific 3D-printed models using a desktop-based 3D printer. Questionnaire was constructed and validated screening the demographics, knowledge, expectation, and surgical decision-making process supplied using Likert. Data were collected consecutively from each parent first after explanation with conventional 3D computed tomography (CT) images, and then repeated after the 3D-printed model has been presented.

RESULTS

Fourteen parents were screened. Majority of parents considered the pathology to have a potential effect of child's functional and aesthetic outcomes. After using the 3D-printed models, the participants had a clear vision and needed not to read any more about the condition (P = 0.05, P = 0.019, respectively). Agreement for surgical management was in favor of the 3D-printed models compared with CT images (P = 0.028). Explanation with CT images yielded higher mean score in knowledge about potential complications compared with 3D models (P value = 0.007). For the 3D models, average printing time was 26 hours, and a mean cost of 5.2$.

CONCLUSION

The utility of desktop 3D printing is an affordable modality to provide adequate information about craniosynostosis and can assist surgical decision-making. Knowledge and adaptation of such cheap technology represents a great skill aiding clinical practice.