The interplay of hypertension, ACE-2 and SARS-CoV-2: Emerging data as the "Ariadne's thread" for the "labyrinth" of COVID-19

The Role of Glycemic Control in Inflammation Markers and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Severe COVID-19

Background and Objectives: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at a heightened risk of adverse outcomes from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the influence of glycemic control on systemic inflammation and clinical severity remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to compare inflammatory markers, composite severity scores, and clinical outcomes between T2DM patients with COVID-19 who had well-controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c < 7%) versus those with poorly controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c ≥ 7%). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 181 adult patients with T2DM and severe COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary hospital between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: well-controlled (n = 117) and poorly controlled (n = 64) T2DM. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, ferritin, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, platelets, and calculated indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] and systemic immune-inflammation index [SII]) were collected. Composite severity scores (APACHE II, CURB-65, and NEWS) and clinical outcomes (ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, mortality, and length of stay) were compared. Statistical tests used included Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical variables, with p < 0.05 deemed significant. Results: The two groups did not differ significantly in age or duration of diabetes (p = 0.40 and p = 0.75, respectively). Patients with poorly controlled T2DM exhibited higher inflammatory markers (mean CRP of 93.4 mg/L vs. 78.6 mg/L, p = 0.002; IL-6 of 64.2 pg/mL vs. 52.8 pg/mL, p = 0.004) and elevated severity scores (APACHE II of 16.8 vs. 14.1, p = 0.001). Poor glycemic control was associated with higher ICU admissions (39.1% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.02) and mortality (14.1% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: In T2DM patients hospitalized with COVID-19, poor glycemic control correlates with heightened inflammatory responses, worse composite severity scores, and increased rates of unfavorable outcomes. These findings underscore the necessity of stringent glucose management to mitigate inflammation and improve prognoses in this vulnerable patient population.

Coronary Implications of COVID-19

Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection carry an increased risk of cardiovascular disease encompassing various implications, including acute myocardial injury or infarction, myocarditis, heart failure, and arrhythmias. A growing volume of evidence correlates SARS-CoV-2 infection with myocardial injury, exposing patients to higher mortality risk. SARS-CoV-2 attacks the coronary arterial bed with various mechanisms including thrombosis/rupture of preexisting atherosclerotic plaque, de novo coronary thrombosis, endotheliitis, microvascular dysfunction, vasculitis, vasospasm, and ectasia/aneurysm formation. The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor plays pivotal role on the cardiovascular homeostasis and the unfolding of COVID-19. The activation of immune system, mediated by proinflammatory cytokines along with the dysregulation of the coagulation system, can pose an insult on the coronary artery, which usually manifests as an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Electrocardiogram, echocardiography, cardiac biomarkers, and coronary angiography are essential tools to set the diagnosis. Revascularization is the first-line treatment in all patients with ACS and obstructed coronary arteries, whereas in type 2 myocardial infarction treatment of hypoxia, anemia and systemic inflammation are indicated. In patients presenting with coronary vasospasm, nitrates and calcium channel blockers are preferred, while treatment of coronary ectasia/aneurysm mandates the use of antiplatelets/anticoagulants, corticosteroids, immunoglobulin, and biologic agents. It is crucial to untangle the exact mechanisms of coronary involvement in COVID-19 in order to ensure timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment. We have reviewed the current literature and provide a detailed overview of the pathophysiology and clinical spectrum associated with coronary implications of SARS-COV-2 infection. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection carry an increased risk of cardiovascular disease encompassing various implications, including acute myocardial injury or infarction, myocarditis, heart failure, and arrhythmias. A growing volume of evidence correlates SARS-CoV-2 infection with myocardial injury, exposing patients to higher mortality risk. SARS-CoV-2 attacks the coronary arterial bed with various mechanisms including thrombosis/rupture of preexisting atherosclerotic plaque, de novo coronary thrombosis, endotheliitis, microvascular dysfunction, vasculitis, vasospasm, and ectasia/aneurysm formation. The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor plays pivotal role on the cardiovascular homeostasis and the unfolding of COVID-19. The activation of immune system, mediated by proinflammatory cytokines along with the dysregulation of the coagulation system, can pose an insult on the coronary artery, which usually manifests as an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Electrocardiogram, echocardiography, cardiac biomarkers, and coronary angiography are essential tools to set the diagnosis. Revascularization is the first-line treatment in all patients with ACS and obstructed coronary arteries, whereas in type 2 myocardial infarction treatment of hypoxia, anemia and systemic inflammation are indicated. In patients presenting with coronary vasospasm, nitrates and calcium channel blockers are preferred, while treatment of coronary ectasia/aneurysm mandates the use of antiplatelets/anticoagulants, corticosteroids, immunoglobulin, and biologic agents. It is crucial to untangle the exact mechanisms of coronary involvement in COVID-19 in order to ensure timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment. We have reviewed the current literature and provide a detailed overview of the pathophysiology and clinical spectrum associated with coronary implications of SARS-COV-2 infection.

Evaluation of Oxidative Stress and Endothelial Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients

Background and Objectives: Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are stress proteins. The endogenous nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor asymmetric dimethyl arginine (ADMA) is a mediator of endothelial dysfunction. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus causes endothelial dysfunction and coagulopathy through severe inflammation and oxidative stress. Using these markers, we analyzed the prognostic value of serum ADMA and HSP-90 levels for early prediction of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 76 COVID-19 patients and 35 healthy control subjects were included in this case-control study. COVID-19 patients were divided into two groups: mild and severe. Results: Serum ADMA and HSP-90 levels were significantly higher in the COVID-19 patients compared to the control subjects (p < 0.001). Additionally, serum ADMA and HSP-90 levels were determined to be higher in a statistically significant way in severe COVID-19 compared to mild COVID-19 (p < 0.001). Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that ADMA and HSP-90, respectively, were independent predictors of severe disease in COVID-19 patients (ADMA (OR = 1.099, 95% CI = 1.048-1.152, p < 0.001) and HSP-90 (OR = 5.296, 95% CI = 1.719-16.316, p = 0.004)). When the cut-off value for ADMA was determined as 208.94 for the prediction of the severity of COVID-19 patients, the sensitivity was 72.9% and the specificity was 100% (AUC = 0.938, 95%CI = 0.858-0.981, p < 0.001). When the cut-off value for HSP-90 was determined as 12.68 for the prediction of the severity of COVID-19 patients, the sensitivity was 88.1% and the specificity was 100% (AUC = 0.975, 95% CI= 0.910-0.997, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Increased levels of Heat shock proteins-90 (HSP-90) and ADMA were positively correlated with increased endothelial damage in COVID-19 patients, suggesting that treatments focused on preventing and improving endothelial dysfunction could significantly improve the outcomes and reduce the mortality rate of COVID-19. ADMA and HSP-90 might be simple, useful, and prognostic biomarkers that can be utilized to predict patients who are at high risk of severe disease due to COVID-19.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with diabetes mellitus in East Java, Indonesia: A cross-sectional study

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus has been perceived as the worsening factor for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), where diabetes mellitus patients with pre-existing inflammatory condition could develop acute respiratory disease syndrome as well as multi-organ dysfunction. Managing diabetes mellitus amidst severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is also a matter of concern as several antidiabetic therapies could affect the progression of COVID-19. This study aimed to provide the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with both COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus receiving blood glucose lowering therapies and COVID-19 symptomatic treatments. Methods: This retrospective study was performed on 260 medical records of patients hospitalized between May 2020 to February 2021 in East Java, Indonesia. Patients were confirmed COVID-19 positive based on the results from real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using nasal swab samples collected on hospital admission. Data included were demographic characteristics, COVID-19 symptoms, severity of COVID-19, comorbidities (other than diabetes mellitus), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and 2-hours post-prandial blood glucose (2hPBG), and outcomes. Results: Most of the patients had age range of 41-60 years old (76.1%) with more than a half of the subjects (60%) were obese. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes were distributed evenly among the COVID-19 severities (74.3% in asymptomatic group, 73.6% in mild group, and 74.1% in moderate group). There were reductions in FBG and 2hPBG levels measured before (210.75±81.38 and 271.19±100.7 mg/dL, respectively) and after the treatment (181.03±68.9 and 222.01±86.96 mg/dL, respectively). All patients received multivitamin and symptomatic treatment for COVID-19. Oral antidiabetic drug (57.6%) and insulin (28.8%) were administered to lower the blood glucose level of the patients. As many as 96.9% patients survived, while 3.1% died. Conclusion: COVID-19 could affect the blood glucose level, suggesting the importance of antihyperglycemic therapies among patients with both COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus.

Endothelial dysfunction in acute and long standing COVID-19: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is implicated by active endotheliitis, and cardiovascular morbidity. The long-COVID-19 syndrome implications in atherosclerosis have not been elucidated yet. We assessed the immediate, intermediate, and long-term effects of COVID-19 on endothelial function.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at the medical ward or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were enrolled and followed up to 6 months post-hospital discharge. Medical history and laboratory examinations were performed while the endothelial function was assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Comparison with propensity score-matched cohort (control group) was performed at the acute (upon hospital admission) and follow-up (1 and 6 months) stages.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (37% admitted in ICU) were recruited. FMD was significantly (p < 0.001) impaired in the COVID-19 group (1.65 ± 2.31%) compared to the control (6.51 ± 2.91%). ICU-treated subjects presented significantly impaired (p = 0.001) FMD (0.48 ± 1.01%) compared to those treated in the medical ward (2.33 ± 2.57%). During hospitalization, FMD was inversely associated with Interleukin-6 and Troponin I (p < 0.05 for all). Although, a significant improvement in FMD was noted during the follow-up (acute: 1.75 ± 2.19% vs. 1 month: 4.23 ± 2.02%, vs. 6 months: 5.24 ± 1.62%; p = 0.001), FMD remained impaired compared to control (6.48 ± 3.08%) at 1 month (p < 0.001) and 6 months (p = 0.01) post-hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 patients develop a notable endothelial dysfunction, which is progressively improved over a 6-month follow-up but remains impaired compared to healthy controls subjects. Whether chronic dysregulation of endothelial function following COVID-19 could be accompanied by a residual risk for cardiovascular and thrombotic events merits further research.

Relationship of SARS-CoV-2 and chronic diseases of nutritional origin

The worldwide spread of the virus has claimed multiple lives, especially in vulnerable groups. Therefore, an investigation was carried out to present a viable solution for health personnel using the “JES” algorithm. The present study used the research to determine the possible complications presented by the sick individual, providing a viable and accessible healthcare personnel solution through the proposed “JES” algorithm. A non-experimental, descriptive, correlational, and explanatory research is presented. According to pathologies of interest, the articles were taken virtually from scientific journals present in Google Scholar and PubMed. The excluded publications were: articles that do not detail the established protocol for detecting SARS-CoV-2, studies that do not present a significant number of people with Covid-19 disease, articles that the person has the covid-19 disease but no underlying diseases of nutritional origin. It focused on the vulnerable or higher risk population group, including scientific information from children (over five years old), adults (over 18 years old), and older adults (over 65 years old) found in countries of the Asian and American continents. The R program analyzed the scientific articles using the ggplot2 package with a pie and bar diagram. A higher prevalence in men than women (56% vs. 44%) stood out. Likewise, arterial hypertension was presented in the first place with 40.82%, followed by diabetes with 30.61%, obesity with 12.24%, overweight and dyslipidemia with 6.12%, malnutrition with 4.08%. There was a higher prevalence of stable individuals (29%) within the health facility than those admitted to the ICU (20%). Adults with 69.39%, followed by older adults with 16.33%, and mixed ages with 14.29%. Comorbidities stand out as risk factors in people infected with SARS-CoV-2, regardless of age. A more significant contagion was observed in the male versus female population; since men do not develop a rapid immune response and have a high content of cytokines that at the time of infection are released more quickly and can cause more significant damage