Quality of race and ethnicity data in Medicare

Medigap Protection and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees With Cancer

Importance

An increasing number of Medicare beneficiaries with cancer report Medicare Advantage (MA) coverage, but certain features of MA (eg, utilization management) may impede access to cancer care. MA beneficiaries may desire to switch to traditional Medicare (TM), which imposes little to no utilization restrictions, but switching may be challenging because access to Medigap-providing financial protections against high cost sharing in TM-is limited by medical underwriting of beneficiaries applying after initial Medicare enrollment in most states.

Objective

To examine associations of Medigap guaranteed issue protections that prohibit medical underwriting with MA disenrollment among beneficiaries newly diagnosed with cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study examined Medicare beneficiaries 69 years and older who were newly diagnosed with cancer from 2014 to 2019 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-linked Medicare database. Beneficiaries continuously enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B for 4 years before to 1 year after diagnosis were included. Data were analyzed from October 2024 to April 2025.

Exposure

A new cancer diagnosis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcome was switching to TM. Among those who were initially enrolled in MA, a difference-in-differences design was implemented to compare changes in the probability of MA disenrollment between beneficiaries diagnosed in 3 guaranteed issue states (New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts) vs other 13 states contributing to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program registry, before and after diagnosis.

Results

The study included 180 057 MA beneficiaries 69 years and older who were newly diagnosed with cancer (44.5% diagnosed at age 69-75 years; 51.5% male; 8.0% Hispanic; 7.4% non-Hispanic Black; 78.5% non-Hispanic White; and 6.1% another or unknown race and ethnicity). The rate of switching in guaranteed issue states increased from 2.1% to 4.7% following diagnosis but remained unchanged in other states (1.8% to 1.7%), corresponding to a difference-in-differences of 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, 1.9-3.2 percentage points; P < .001), or a 120% relative change. This differential increase was concentrated among beneficiaries who were younger, non-Hispanic White, diagnosed with distant-stage or rarer cancers, or enrolled in plans with more generous coverage (eg, PPO plans) or lower plan star ratings.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, state Medigap guaranteed issue protections were associated with higher rates of switching to TM among MA beneficiaries newly diagnosed with cancer. These findings underscore the protective association of state Medigap regulations in facilitating a switch to TM (especially among beneficiaries who likely desired more flexibility in accessing and receiving care) and illuminate potential disparities in switching that may reflect unequal abilities to compare and afford plans.

Racial and ethnic disparities in the uptake of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes and heart failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, 2013-2019

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to investigate racial and ethnic disparities in the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor antagonists (GLP-1RAs) among older adults with type 2 diabetes and cardiorenal conditions.

METHODS

Using Medicare fee-for-service data (2013-2019), this retrospective cohort study identified older adults (≥65 years) with type 2 diabetes initiating second-line therapies (SGLT2is, GLP1-RAs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors [DPP4is] and sulfonylureas [SUs]) with (1) heart failure (HF), (2) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), (3) chronic kidney disease (CKD) and (4) no recorded cardiorenal conditions. Participants were classified as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic. Multinomial regressions, adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical and county-level characteristics, were used to model the odds of initiating SGLT2is or GLP-1RAs within each cohort.

RESULTS

Black participants with HF, ASCVD, CKD or no recorded cardiorenal conditions had 35% (adjusted OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.61, 0.68]), 33% (0.67 [0.64, 0.69]), 32% (0.68 [0.64, 0.72]) and 24% (0.76 [0.74, 0.79]) lower odds of initiating SGLT2is, respectively, than White participants. Disparities ameliorated from 50-60% lower odds in 2013 to 17-18% in 2019. Similar patterns were observed for GLP-1RA uptake among Black participants. By contrast, Hispanic participants had similar odds of SGLT2i initiation in the HF and CKD cohorts as White participants, but 6% (0.94 [0.91, 0.98]) lower odds in the ASCVD cohort. Notable disparities for Hispanic participants compared with White participants were observed for GLP-1RA uptake in the HF, ASCVD, CKD and no cardiorenal conditions cohorts: 11% (0.89 [0.84, 0.94]), 16% (0.84 [0.81, 0.87]), 16% (0.84 [0.80, 0.89]) and 25% (0.75 [0.72, 0.78]) lower odds, respectively. Participants had greater odds than White participants of initiating DPP4is, which confer no cardiorenal benefits, across all cohorts (HF 1.25 [1.19, 1.31]; ASCVD 1.36 [1.32, 1.40]; CKD 1.32 [1.26, 1.38). Adjustment for social determinants of health did not meaningfully change the study findings.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Compared with White participants, disparities in the uptake of SGLT2is were evident for Black participants, and in the uptake of GLP-1RAs for both Black and Hispanic participants. This study highlights how type 2 diabetes management is evolving, while underscoring historical imbalances that have shown signs of abatement.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Importance

The influence of race and ethnicity on initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is relatively understudied in Medicare data.

Objective

To investigate disparities in the initiation of DOACs compared with warfarin by race, ethnicity, and social vulnerability.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study used a 50% sample of Medicare fee-for-service data from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019 (mean patient enrollment duration, 7.7 years). Analysis took place between January 2023 and February 2024. A cohort of older adults (aged ≥65 years) with atrial fibrillation who newly initiated warfarin or DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) was identified.

Exposure

Patients were classified as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The likelihood of starting use of DOACs compared with warfarin was modeled, adjusting for race, ethnicity, age, sex, county-level social vulnerability, and other clinical factors.

Results

Among 950 698 anticoagulation initiations, consisting of 680 974 DOAC users and 269 724 warfarin users (mean [SD] age, 78.5 [7.6] years; 52.6% female), 5.2% were Black, 4.3% were Hispanic, and 86.7% were White. During the 10-year study period, DOAC use increased for all demographic groups. After adjustment, compared with White patients, Black patients were 23% less likely (adjusted odds ratio [AOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.75-0.79) and Hispanic patients were 13% less likely (AOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.89) to initiate DOAC use. Disparities in DOAC initiation were greatest among Black patients in the earlier years but attenuated during the study period. For instance, in 2010, the OR of Black patients initiating DOACs was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50-0.57), attenuating linearly over time to 0.69 by 2013 (95% CI, 0.65-0.74) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.89) by 2017. By 2019, these differences became nonsignificant (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.99-1.18).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to initiate DOACs for atrial fibrillation, although these differences diminished over time. Identifying the factors behind these early disparities is crucial for ensuring equitable access to novel therapies as they emerge for Black and Hispanic populations.

Medicare Transitional Care Management Program and Changes in Timely Postdischarge Follow-Up

Importance

In 2013, Medicare implemented payments for transitional care management (TCM) services, which provide increased reimbursement to clinicians providing ambulatory care to patients after discharge from medical facilities to the community.

Objective

To determine whether the introduction of TCM payments was associated with an increase in timely postdischarge follow-up.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional interrupted time-series study assessed quarterly postdischarge visit rates before (2010-2012) and after (2013-2019) TCM implementation 100% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged to the community after a hospital or skilled nursing facility stay. Data analyses were performed February 1 to December 15, 2023.

Exposure

Implementation of payments for TCM.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Timely postdischarge primary care follow-up, defined as receipt of a primary care ambulatory visit within 14 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes included receipt of a TCM visit and specialty care follow-up.

Results

The study sample comprised 79 125 965 eligible discharges. Of these, 55.4% were female; 1.5% were Asian, 12.1% Black, 5.6% Hispanic, and 79.0% were White individuals; and 79.6% were beneficiaries aged 65 years and older. Timely primary care follow-up increased from 31.5% in 2010 to 38.8% in 2019 (absolute increase 7.3%), whereas specialist follow-up increased from 27.6% to 30.8% (absolute increase 3.2%). By 2019, 11.3% of eligible patients received TCM services. Interrupted time-series analyses demonstrated an increased slope of timely primary care follow-up after the introduction of TCM services (pre-TCM slope, 0.12% per quarter vs post-TCM slope, 0.29% per quarter; difference, 0.13%; 95% CI, 0.02% to 0.22%). Receipt of timely follow-up increased for all demographic groups; however, Black, Hispanic, and Medicaid dual-eligible patients and patients residing in urban areas and counties with high-level social deprivation were less likely to receive follow-up during the study period. These disparities widened for Black patients (difference-in-differences in pre-TCM vs post-TCM slope, -0.14%; 95% CI, -0.25% to -0.2%) and patients who were Medicaid dual-eligible (difference-in-differences pre-TCM vs post-TCM slope, -0.21%; 95% CI, -0.35% to -0.07%).

Conclusions

These findings indicate that Medicare's introduction of payments for TCM services was associated with a persistent increase in the rate of timely postdischarge primary care but did not narrow demographic or socioeconomic disparities. Most beneficiaries did not receive timely primary care follow-up.

Assessing the validity of race and ethnicity coding in administrative Medicare data for reporting outcomes among Medicare advantage beneficiaries from 2015 to 2017

OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity of race/ethnicity coding in Medicare data and whether misclassification errors lead to biased outcome reporting by race/ethnicity among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

In this national study of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, we analyzed individual-level data from the Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) and the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), race/ethnicity codes from the Medicare Master Beneficiary Summary File (MBSF), and outcomes from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) files from 2015 to 2017.

STUDY DESIGN

We used self-reported beneficiary race/ethnicity to validate the Medicare Enrollment Database (EDB) and Research Triangle Institute (RTI) race/ethnicity codes. We measured the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Medicare EDB and RTI codes compared to self-report. For outcomes, we compared annualized hospital admission, 30-day, and 90-day readmission rates.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Data for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries who completed either the HOS or CAHPS survey were linked to MBSF and MedPAR files. Validity was assessed for both self-reported multiracial and single-race beneficiaries.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

For beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage, the EDB and RTI race/ethnicity codes have high validity for identifying non-Hispanic White or Black beneficiaries, but lower sensitivity for beneficiaries self-reported Hispanic any race (EDB: 28.3%, RTI: 85.9%) or non-Hispanic Asian American or Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander (EDB: 56.1%, RTI: 72.1%). Only 8.7% of beneficiaries self-reported non-Hispanic American Indian Alaska Native are correctly identified by either Medicare code, resulting in underreported annualized hospitalization rates (EDB: 31.5%, RTI: 31.6% vs. self-report: 34.6%). We find variation in 30-day readmission rates for Hispanic beneficiaries across race categories, which is not measured by Medicare race/ethnicity coding.

CONCLUSIONS

Current Medicare race/ethnicity codes misclassify and bias outcomes for non-Hispanic AIAN beneficiaries, who are more likely to select multiple racial identities. Revisions to race/ethnicity categories are needed to better represent multiracial/ethnic identities among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.

Examining the role of race and quality of home health agencies in delayed initiation of home health services for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD)

INTRODUCTION

We examined differences in the timeliness of the initiation of home health care by race and the quality of home health agencies (HHA) among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

METHODS

Medicare claims and home health assessment data were used for the study cohort: individuals aged ≥65 years with ADRD, and discharged from the hospital. Home health latency was defined as patients receiving home health care after 2 days following hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Of 251,887 patients with ADRD, 57% received home health within 2 days following hospital discharge. Black patients were significantly more likely to experience home health latency (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-1.19) compared to White patients. Home health latency was significantly higher for Black patients in low-rating HHA (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.22-1.37) compared to White patients in high-rating HHA.

DISCUSSION

Black patients are more likely to experience a delay in home health care initiation than White patients.