Slow Pathway Radiofrequency Ablation Using Magnetic Navigation: A Description of Technique and Retrospective Case Analysis

Randomized trial of intracardiac echocardiography-guided slow pathway ablation

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the slow pathway (SP) in atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is highly effective; however, it may require prolonged fluoroscopy and RF time. We postulated that visualization of the SP region with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) could decrease ablation time, minimize radiation exposure, and facilitate SP ablation compared to the standard, fluoroscopy-guided approach.

METHODS

In our study, we randomized 91 patients undergoing electrophysiologic study and SP ablation for AVNRT into 2 groups: fluoroscopy-only (n = 48) or ICE-guided (n = 43) group. Crossover to ICE-guidance was allowed after 8 unsuccessful RF applications.

RESULTS

Mapping plus ablation time (mean ± standard deviation: 18.8 ± 16.1 min vs 11.6 ± 15.0 min, p = 0.031), fluoroscopy time (median [interquartile range]: 4.9 [2.93-8.13] min vs. 1.8 [1.2-2.8] min, p < 0.001), and total ablation time (144 [104-196] s vs. 81 [60-159] s, p = 0.001) were significantly shorter in the ICE group. ICE-guidance was associated with reduced radiation exposure (13.2 [8.2-13.4] mGy vs. 3.7 [1.5-5.8] mGy, p < 0.001). The sum of delivered RF energy (3866 [2786-5656] Ws vs. 2283 [1694-4284] Ws, p = 0.002) and number of RF applications (8 [4.25-12.75] vs. 4 [2-7], p = 0.001) were also lower with ICE-guidance. Twelve (25%) patients crossed over to the ICE-guided group. All were treated successfully thereafter with similar number, time, and cumulative energy of RF applications compared to the ICE group. No recurrence occurred during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

ICE-guidance during SP ablation significantly reduces mapping and ablation time, radiation exposure, and RF delivery in comparison to fluoroscopy-only procedures. Moreover, early switching to ICE-guided ablation seems to be an optimal choice in challenging cases.

Reduction of Radiation Exposure in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Ablations Using an Electroanatomical Mapping System With Fluoroscopy Integration Module

Introduction: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a common supraventricular tachycardia. Current guidelines recommend electrophysiology study (EPS) and ablation, which have been proven to show high success rates with very low complication rates. Usually, ablation of AVNRT is performed conventionally using only fluoroscopy. Electroanatomical mapping systems (EMS) are widely used in complex arrhythmias. One of their advantages is their potential in decreasing the need of fluoroscopy time (FT). In this study we analyzed patients undergoing either conventional AVNRT ablation or by using an EMS with a fluoroscopy integrating system (FIS).

Materials and Methods: We included 119 patients who underwent AVNRT ablation in our study. Eighty-nine patients were ablated conventionally using only fluoroscopy, 30 patients were ablated using EMS + FIS.

Results: We found that the use of EMS + FIS led to a significant reduction of FT (449.90 ± 217.21 vs. 136.93 ± 109.28 sec., p < 0.001) and dose-area-product (DAP, 268.27 ± 265.20 vs. 41.07 ± 27.89 μGym², p < 0.001) without affecting the procedure time (PT, 66.55 ± 13.3 vs. 67.33 ± 13.81 min, p = 0.783). Furthermore, we found no significance with regard to complications.

Conclusion: The use of EMS+FIS is safe and feasible. It leads to a significant reduction of both FT and DAP without affecting PT and safety. Hence, EMS + FIS is beneficial for both the operator and the patients by reducing the radiation exposure.

Effectiveness of a 3D mapping benchmark for ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Avoiding excessively fast junctional rhythm (JR) during slow pathway (SP) modification for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) helps prevent serious atrioventricular block. This study investigated the usefulness of a predictive ablation point that lies near the boundary line between appropriate and excessively fast JRs with three-dimensional (3D) electroanatomical mapping in AVNRT patients.

METHODS

Participants were 141 consecutive patients with common AVNRT who received anatomical ablation to an antegrade SP at our institution between August 2013 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A, treated using a location marker that predicts successful ablation sites in a 3D mapping system, and Group B, treated prior to the development of this marker and therefore without it.

RESULTS

The average age was 61.9 ± 16.9 years, and 41.1% of patients were male. Excessively fast JRs appeared less frequently in Group A than in Group B, though this difference did not reach significance. The distance from the His bundle to the successful ablation point was significantly longer in Group A than in Group B (13.4 ± 4.5 vs 10.8 ± 4.4 mm, P < .01). The number of ablations near the successful ablation point was significantly lower in Group A (6.5 ± 5.2 vs 11.4 ± 9.9, P < .01), and a greater number of accelerated JRs at the successful ablation point were observed in Group A (46.9 ± 29.2 vs 32.8 ± 19.2, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Using our benchmark for a predictive successful ablation point in 3D mapping simplifies and improves common AVNRT ablation procedures.