Sex-Specific Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes After a Cardiac Event: A Cohort Study Examining the Role of Depression, Worry and Autonomic Function

Heart Rate Variability Modulation Through Slow-Paced Breathing in Health Care Workers with Long COVID: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Long COVID is a syndrome persisting 12+ weeks after COVID-19 infection, impacting life and work ability. Autonomic nervous system imbalance has been hypothesized as the cause. This study aims to investigate cardiovascular autonomic function in health care workers (HCWs) with Long COVID and the effectiveness of slow-paced breathing (SPB) on autonomic modulation.

METHODS

From December 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023, 6655 HCWs of the University Hospitals of Trieste (Northeast Italy) were asked to participate in the study by company-email. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were assessed. Global health status and psychosomatic disorders were evaluated through validated questionnaires. Heart rate variability was assessed by finger-photoplethysmography during spontaneous breathing and SPB, which stimulate vagal response. Long COVID HCWs (G1) were contrasted with Never infected (G2) and Fully recovered COVID-19 workers (G3).

RESULTS

There were 126 HCWs evaluated. The 58 Long COVID were assessed at a median time because COVID-19 of 419.5 days (interquartile range 269-730) and had significantly more psychosomatic symptoms and lower detectability of spontaneous systolic pressure oscillation at 0.1 Hz (Mayer wave - baroreflex arc) during spontaneous breathing compared with 53 never-infected and 14 fully-recovered HCWs (19%, 42%, and 40%, respectively, P = .027). During SPB, the increase in this parameter was close to controls (91.2%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, P = .09). No other differences in heart rate variability parameters were found among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Resting vascular modulation was reduced in Long COVID, while during SPB, baroreflex sensitivity effectively improved. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate whether multiple sessions of breathing exercises can restore basal vascular reactivity and reduce cardiovascular risk in these patients.

Sex Differences in the Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Two Generations (Absorb and Magmaris) of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds

Background: Despite the developments in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), women are still more likely than men to have unfavorable outcomes after PCI performed in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The mechanisms of this phenomena are not fully understood. Potential benefits of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) may be particularly expressed in the female population. Nevertheless, the data available currently are inconsistent and limited. This study evaluated the gender-related differences in the short-term clinical outcomes in ACS patients treated with implantation of two generations of BRS (first generation, Absorb; second generation, Magmaris). Methods: The study was divided into two arms. To the first one, we qualified 160 patients with ACS treated with PCI who received 210 Absorb scaffolds. The second arm was composed of 193 patients with ACS who underwent PCI with Magmaris implantation. Results: There were no significant sex-related differences in primary endpoints (cardiovascular-death, myocardial infarction, in-stent thrombosis) or principal secondary endpoints (of target-lesion failure, scaffold restenosis, death from any reason, other cardiovascular events) in either generation of BRS in a 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: Both genders tended to have a similar outcome in routine clinical practice following BRS implantation due to ACS. The magnesium bioresorbable scaffold (Magmaris) early outcome seemed to be more favorable in comparison to the Absorb scaffold.