Left Upper Lobe Multi-Segmentectomy Vs Lobectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Comparison of survival between lobectomy and trisegmentectomy for clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer in the left upper segment of the lung

Left upper trisegmentectomy is expected to be as curative as lobectomy for lung cancer because the left upper lobe is anatomically the same as the combined upper and middle lobes of the right lung and the procedure can provide a sufficient surgical margin. In the present multicenter study, we compared the results of trisegmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 left upper lung cancer. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 lung cancer in the left upper segment who underwent lobectomy or trisegmentectomy between January 2006 and June 2022. The trisegmentectomy group (S group) and lobectomy group (L group) comprised 33 and 132 patients, respectively. Comparisons of postoperative survival revealed no significant differences in overall survival (p = 0.761) or disease-free survival (p = 0.508) between the two groups. There were also no significant differences in survival after adjustment for clinical factors by Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score matching. Local recurrence was significantly more predominant in the S group than in the L group (p = 0.006). The S group had a worse postoperative survival than the L group when the tumor was located in anterior segment. Trisegmentectomy can provide an equivalent postoperative survive to lobectomy in patients with clinical stage T1c-2aN0M0 left upper segment lung cancer except in patients with tumor in anterior segment.

Comparison of 5-Year Survival and Disease Recurrence After Trisegmentectomy or Left Upper Lobectomy: A Propensity Score Analysis of the National GEVATS Database

INTRODUCTION

Trisegmentectomy, or resection of the upper subdivision of the left upper lobe with preservation of the lingula, is considered by some authors to be equivalent to right upper lobectomy with middle lobe preservation. Our objective was to compare survival and recurrence after trisegmentectomy versus left upper lobectomy procedures registered in the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery group (GEVATS) database.

METHODS

We compared mortality, survival and recurrence in patients with left upper lobectomy or trisegmentectomy after propensity score matching for the following variables: age, smoking habit, tumor size, histologic type, radiological density of tumor, surgical access, forced expiratory volume in one second, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, hypertension, chronic heart failure, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmia, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes and pre-surgery nodal status by positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

RESULTS

A total of 540 left upper lobectomies and 83 trisegmentectomies were registered in the GEVATS database. After propensity score matching, 134 left upper lobectomies and 67 trisegmentectomies were selected. Survival outcomes were similar, but differences were found for recurrence (21.5% for trisegmentectomies vs. 35.4% for left upper lobectomies, p=0.05). Moreover, the recurrence patterns differed, with the lobectomy group showing a greater tendency to distant dissemination.

CONCLUSIONS

Trisegmentectomy and left upper lobectomy show similar 5-year survival rates. In our database, recurrence after trisegmentectomy was lower than after left upper lobectomy, while the recurrence pattern differed among the 2 surgical approaches, with a greater tendency to distant metastasis after left upper lobectomy.

The clinical effect of thoracoscopic segmentectomy in the treatment of lung malignancies less than 2CM in diameter

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of thoracoscopic segmentectomy in the treatment of lung malignancies less than 2CM in diameter.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 103 patients with lung cancer who received outpatient or inpatient treatment from December 2020 to May 2022 were selected and divided into the lobectomy group (n = 48) and the segmentectomy group (n = 55) according to different surgical methods. The lobectomy group was treated with thoracoscopic lobectomy, while the segmentectomy group was treated with thoracoscopic segmentectomy. The prognostic effect, complications, blood gas level and respiratory function indexes of the two groups were observed and compared.

RESULTS

The general data of the two groups of patients, such as gender, age, course of disease, body mass index, lesion diameter, lesion site and pathological type, were analyzed by statistical software. There was no statistical significance in the operation time and the number of lymph node dissection between the two groups (P > 0.05), while the drainage volume and intraoperative blood loss in the segmentectomy group were lower than those in the lobectomy group, and the drainage time and hospital stay were shorter than those in the lobectomy group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in various lung function indexes between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the values of FVC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC in each group had different amplitude changes, and the values of FVC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC in the segmentectomy group were significantly higher than those in the lobectomy group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Thoracoscopic segmentectomy showed a lower incidence of respiratory complications (P = 0.042) and higher pulmonary air leak (P = 0.023) than thoracoscopic lobectomy. After propensity score-matched analysis, respiratory complications remained significantly higher in thoracoscopic segmentectomy (P = 0.017). However, the difference in the total complication rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There were no differences during the 2-year follow-up (median follow-up in months: 18.4; interquartile range, 14.8-21.3) in terms of overall survival (P = 0.49) and disease-free survival (P = 0.34) between groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with lung cancer less than 2 cm in diameter, thoracoscopic segmentectomy can achieve good short-term efficacy, with rapid postoperative recovery and little impact on lung function, which may be helpful to improve patients' postoperative quality of life.