Short- and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation for patients with multiple primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a propensity matching analysis

Ultrasound-guided intraoperative liver ablation - retrospective review of indications and outcomes

AIM

To define the indications and outcomes of intraoperative ablation of hepatic malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study comprises 27 patients (male/female: 19/8; mean age: 56 ± 13) undergoing intraoperative ablation (IOA) of liver tumours between July 2001 and August 2021 for 42 tumours, including colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) (n = 27), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)(n = 14), and ovarian cancer metastasis (n = 1). The mean tumour diameter was 2.1 cm ± 1.3 (range, 0.6-5.6 cm). The median imaging follow-up was 26.3 months ± 25.6 (range: 0.13-161.6). Technical success (TS), local tumour progression (LTP), and local progression-free survival (LPFS) were calculated leveraging the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (AE) were categorised according to SIR guidelines.

RESULTS

Indications for IOA include concurrent partial hepatectomy (n = 9), intraoperative detection of a new tumour (n = 4), lack of a safe percutaneous trajectory (n = 3) or clamp of hilum (n = 1). In 7 patients, surgeons made independent decisions for IOA not based on established criteria. Of 32 ablated tumours among 25 patients with available follow-up, TS was achieved for 31 tumours (97%). LTP was detected in 32% of cases at a median of 13.7 months. LPFS at 1,2,3,5 years were 82%, 60%, 51%, 51%. AE rate was 55.5% addressed with minimal or no interventions in 80% of cases. One patient with HCC died of liver failure.

CONCLUSION

The indications for IOA are concurrent partial hepatectomy, intraoperative detection of a new tumour, and suboptimal percutaneous ablation. IOA is effective with high TS. LTP is high. AE rate is relatively high; however, no significant treatment is required in most cases.

Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound improved hepatic recurrence-free survival in initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the role of Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) with perfluorobutane microbubbles (Sonazoid) in improving the prognosis of patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

A total of 130 Patients with unresectable CRLM who underwent curative hepatic resection at our institute were retrospectively analyzed. Of these 130 enrolled patients, 67 underwent intraoperative ultrasound alone (IOUS group); 63 underwent additional CE-IOUS and IOUS (CE-IOUS group). Normalized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to balance baseline characteristics between groups. Hepatic recurrence-free survival (HRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared.

RESULTS

The treatment strategy was altered in 25 patients (25/63, 39.9%) due to the additional use of CE-IOUS. After applying IPTW, the CE-IOUS group exhibited a significantly lower rate of hepatic recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.95; P = 0.032). Subgroup analysis showed that CE-IOUS provided a significant benefit over IOUS in patients with bilobar liver metastases (P = 0.007), or with a number of live tumors < 3 (P = 0.021), or without DLM (P = 0.018), or with extrahepatic metastasis (P = 0.034), or with a minimum of 6 cycles of systemic therapy (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

CE-IOUS is necessary for unresectable CRLM after preoperative chemotherapy, as it enhances detection accuracy and improves the prognosis of unresectable CRLM patients.

How Can We Improve the Survival of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Thermal Ablation?

Thermal ablation has been widely used for patients with small colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), even for resectable cases; however, solid evidence has been scarce. (1) Thermal ablation versus liver resection. Some propensity-score matching studies using patients with balanced baseline characteristics have confirmed less invasiveness and the comparable survival benefits of thermal ablation to liver resection. A more recent pivotal randomized controlled trial comparing thermal ablation and liver resection was presented during the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2024 meeting. Diameter ≤ 3 cm, ten or fewer resectable and ablatable CRLMs were assigned to thermal ablation or liver resection. No differences were observed in the overall survival and local and distant progression-free survival with less morbidity. (2) Combination of thermal ablation and liver resection. Four matching studies demonstrated comparable data between the combination and liver resection alone groups in the long-term survival and recurrence rates without increasing the postoperative complication rates. The selection of the two approaches depends primarily on the number, size, and location of the CRLMs. (3) Chemotherapy in combination with thermal ablation. A propensity-score matching study comparing thermal ablation ± neoadjuvant chemotherapy was conducted. The addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was an independent predictive factor for good progression-free survival without increasing morbidity. Two randomized controlled trials demonstrated that additional thermal ablation to systemic chemotherapy can improve the overall survival for initially unresectable CRLMs. (4) Conclusions. Thermal ablation can provide survival benefits for patients with CRLMs in various situations, keeping adequate indications.

Trends and overall survival after combined liver resection and thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a nationwide population-based propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

In colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients, combination of liver resection and ablation permit a more parenchymal-sparing approach. This study assessed trends in use of combined resection and ablation, outcomes, and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This population-based study included all CRLM patients who underwent liver resection between 2014 and 2022. To assess OS, data was linked to two databases containing date of death for patients treated between 2014 and 2018. Hospital variation in the use of combined minor liver resection and ablation versus major liver resection alone in patients with 2-3 CRLM and ≤3 cm was assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

This study included 3593 patients, of whom 1336 (37.2%) underwent combined resection and ablation. Combined resection increased from 31.7% in 2014 to 47.9% in 2022. Significant hospital variation (range 5.9-53.8%) was observed in the use of combined minor liver resection and ablation. PSM resulted in 1005 patients in each group. Major morbidity was not different (11.6% vs. 5%, P = 1.00). Liver failure occurred less often after combined resection and ablation (1.9% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.017). Five-year OS rates were not different (39.3% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.145).

CONCLUSION

Combined resection and ablation should be available and considered as an alternative to resection alone in any patient with multiple metastases.

Combined ablation and resection (CARe) for resectable colorectal cancer liver Metastases-A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of combining ablation and resection (CARe) in treating unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) was well established. This study aimed to investigate the surgical and oncological outcomes of CARe strategy focusing on initially resectable CRLM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 971 patients with resectable CRLM from a retrospective database of 1414 CRLM patients were enrolled, including 120 in the CARe group and 851 in the hepatectomy alone group. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between groups using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 96 matched pairs of patients from each group were included. General characteristics of primary tumour and liver metastases were not statistically different between the CARe group and hepatectomy alone group. Disease-free survival (p = 0.257), intrahepatic recurrence-free survival (p = 0.329), and overall survival (p = 0.358) were similar between the two groups. Patients in CARe group had significantly reduced rate of major hepatectomy (5.2% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.001), lower incidence of postoperative hepatic insufficiency (0.0% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.023), and shortened postoperative hospital stay (7 d vs. 8 d, p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis showed that surgical approach did not affect oncologic outcome; liver metastasis with diameter >3 cm was an independent prognostic factor for hepatic recurrence-free and disease-free survival, and RAS status and lymph node metastasis at the primary site were independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

For patients with resectable CRLM, CARe may be a better treatment strategy than hepatectomy alone, as it could avoid major hepatectomy and get better surgical outcomes, while providing the similar oncologic results.

Survival after combined resection and ablation is not inferior to that after resection alone, in patients with four or more colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are the predominant factor limiting survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Multimodal treatment strategies are frequently necessary to achieve total tumor elimination. This study examines the efficacy of liver resection combined with local ablative therapy in comparison to liver resection only, in the treatment of patients with ≥ 4 CRLM.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany. Patients with ≥ 4 CRLM in preoperative imaging, who underwent curative resection between 2010-2021, were included. Recurrent resections and deaths in the early postoperative phase were excluded. Ablation modalities included radiofrequency or microwave ablation, and irreversible electroporation. Differences in overall- (OS) and recurrence-free-survival (RFS) between patients undergoing combined resection-ablation vs. resection only, were examined.

RESULTS

Of 178 included patients, 46 (27%) underwent combined resection-ablation and 132 (73%) resection only. Apart from increased rates of adjuvant chemotherapy in the first group (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.014), there were no differences in perioperative systemic therapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test analyses showed no statistically significant differences in median OS (36 months for both, p = 0.638) or RFS (9 months for combined resection-ablation vs. 8 months, p = 0.921). Cox regression analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.891 (p = 0.642) for OS and 0.981 (p = 0.924) for RFS, for patients undergoing resection only.

CONCLUSION

For patients with ≥ 4 CRLM, combined resection-ablation is a viable option in terms of OS and RFS. Therefore, combined resection-ablation should be considered for complete tumor clearance, in patients with multifocal disease.

Preoperative transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) in patients undergoing conversional hepatectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis

OBJECTIVES

Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent hepatic resection after conversion therapy had a high recurrence rate of nearly 90%. Preoperative DEB-TACE has the potential to prevent postoperative recurrence which has not been elucidated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative DEB-TACE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with CRLM who underwent liver resection from June 1, 2016, to June 30, 2021, were collected and those who received conversional hepatectomy were included in this study. Patients with preoperative DEB-TACE were propensity-score matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients without preoperative DEB-TACE. Short-term outcomes and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, 44 patients were included in each group. The toxicities of DEB-TACE were mild and could be managed by conservative treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) of conversion therapy (75.0% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.437) and postoperative complication of hepatic resection (27.3% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.453) were similar between the two groups. The median RFS of the DEB-TACE group (10.7 months, 95%CI: 6.6-14.8 months) was significantly longer than that of the control group (8.1 months, 95%CI: 3.4-12.8 months) (HR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.37-0.95, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who became resectable after conversion therapy, preoperative DEB-TACE might be a safe option to achieve longer RFS.

KEY POINTS

• This is a propensity-score matching study comparing patients who underwent conversional hepatectomy with or without preoperative DEB-TACE. • The preoperative DEB-TACE was safe and with mild toxicities (without toxicities more than CTCAE grade 3). • The preoperative DEB-TACE significantly prolonged the RFS of those patients who underwent conversional hepatectomy (10.7 vs. 8.1 months, p = 0.027).

Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to discuss the use, comparative efficacy, and research progress of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), alone or in combination with other therapies, for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHOD

To search and summarize the basic and clinical studies of RFA in recent years.

RESULTS

RFA is one of the radical treatment methods listed in the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC. It has the characteristics of being minimally invasive and safe and can obtain good local tumor control, and it can improve the local immune ability, improve the tumor microenvironment and enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs. It is commonly used for HCC treatment before liver transplantation and combined ALPPS and hepatectomy for HCC. In addition, the technology of RFA is constantly developing. The birth of noninvasive, no-touch RFA technology and equipment and the precise RFA concept have improved the therapeutic effect of RFA.

CONCLUSION

RFA has good local tumor control ability, is minimally invasive, is safe and has other beneficial characteristics. It plays an increasingly important role in the comprehensive treatment strategy of HCC. Whether RFA alone or combined with other technologies expands the surgical indications of patients with HCC and provides more benefits for HCC patients needs to be determined.

Evaluation of 3D-CEUS in the Recurrence of Liver Cancer after Radiofrequency Ablation

Background

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has the similar curative effects to surgery, but RFA will lead to higher postoperative local recurrence rate. 3D-CEUS is a minimally invasive examination method, which is used to analyze the sensitivity to postoperative recurrence in this study.

Methods

The clinical data of 60 patients with liver cancer admitted to our hospital (February 2018-February 2020) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with RFA and were followed up with 3D-CEUS, MRI, and enhanced CT examination after surgery. The ROC curve was used to analyze the differences of different examination methods in judging postoperative recurrence.

Results

For the 60 patients, 52 patients (86.7%) had a single lesion and 8 patients (13.3%) had multiple lesions, with a total of 72 lesions. After RFA, 56 lesions (77.8%) were completely inactivated and 16 lesions (22.2%) remained. Totally inactivated lesions were detected as follows: 51 (91.1%) by 3D-CEUS, 42 (75.0%) by MRI, and 50 (89.3%) by enhanced CT. During a 2-year follow-up, a total of 26 recurrent lesions were detected, 24 (92.3%) by 3D-CEUS, 12 (46.2%) by MRI, and 25 (96.2%) by enhanced CT, indicating that the sensitivity of 3D-CEUS and enhanced CT was obviously higher than that of MRI (P < 0.001), without conspicuous difference between sensitivity of 3D-CEUS and enhanced CT (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

As a new imaging examination method based on artificial intelligence, 3D-CEUS has a high sensitivity in patients with liver cancer who underwent RFA, which can effectively judge the recurrence after surgery and should be widely used in practice.