1
|
Franklin O, Sugawara T, Ross RB, Rodriguez Franco S, Colborn K, Karam S, Schulick RD, Del Chiaro M. Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Multiagent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15157-4. [PMID: 38789615 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15157-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved pancreatic cancer survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. However, whether adjuvant treatment should include radiotherapy is unclear in this setting. METHODS This study queried the National Cancer Database for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative resection after multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2010 and 2019 and received adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (external beam, 45-50.4 gray) was compared with adjuvant chemotherapy alone. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression was used to assess survival associations. Analyses were repeated in a propensity score-matched subgroup. RESULTS Of 1983 patients who received adjuvant treatment after multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection, 1502 (75.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy alone and 481 (24.3%) received concomitant adjuvant radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy). The patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were younger, were treated at non-academic facilities more often, and had higher rates of lymph node metastasis (ypN1-2), positive resection margins (R1), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI+). The median survival was shorter for the chemoradiotherapy-treated patients according to the unadjusted analysis (26.8 vs 33.2 months; p = 0.0017). After adjustment for confounders, chemoradiotherapy was associated with better outcomes in the multivariable model (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.93; p = 0.008). The association between chemoradiotherapy and improved outcomes was stronger for the patients with grade III tumors (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74) or LVI+ tumors (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75). In a subgroup of 396 propensity-matched patients, chemoradiotherapy was associated with a survival benefit only for the patients with LVI+ or grade III tumors. CONCLUSION After multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for pancreatic cancer, additional adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy alone is associated with improved survival for patients with LVI+ or grade III tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oskar Franklin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Toshitaka Sugawara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard Blake Ross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Salvador Rodriguez Franco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathryn Colborn
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sana Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seelen LWF, Doppenberg D, Stoop TF, Nagelhout A, Brada LJH, Bosscha K, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, den Dulk M, Daams F, van Dieren S, van Eijck CHJ, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, Haj Mohammad N, de Hingh IHJT, Lips DJ, Los M, de Meijer VE, Patijn GA, Polée MB, Stommel MWJ, Walma MS, de Wilde RF, Wilmink JW, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG. Minimum and Optimal CA19-9 Response After Two Months Induction Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Nationwide Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2024; 279:832-841. [PMID: 37477009 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This nationwide multicenter study aimed to define clinically relevant thresholds of relative serum CA19-9 response after 2 months of induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). BACKGROUND CA19-9 is seen as leading biomarker for response evaluation in patients with LAPC, but early clinically useful cut-offs are lacking. METHODS All consecutive patients with LAPC after 4 cycles (m)FOLFIRINOX or 2 cycles gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel induction chemotherapy (±radiotherapy) with CA19-9 ≥5 U/mL at baseline were analyzed (2015-2019). The association of CA19-9 response with median OS (mOS) was evaluated for different CA19-9 cut-off points. Minimum and optimal CA19-9 response were established via log-rank test. Predictors for OS were analyzed using COX regression analysis. RESULTS Overall, 212 patients were included, of whom 42 (19.8%) underwent resection. Minimum CA19-9 response demonstrating a clinically significant median OS difference (12.7 vs. 19.6 months) was seen at ≥40% CA19-9 decrease. The optimal cutoff for CA19-9 response was ≥60% decrease (21.7 vs. 14.0 mo, P =0.021). Only for patients with elevated CA19-9 levels at baseline (n=184), CA19-9 decrease ≥60% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.59, 95% CI, 0.36-0.98, P =0.042] was independently associated with prolonged OS, as were SBRT (HR=0.42, 95% CI, 0.25-0.70; P =0.001), and resection (HR=0.25, 95% CI, 0.14-0.46, P <0.001), and duration of chemotherapy (HR=0.75, 95% CI, 0.69-0.82, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS CA19-9 decrease of ≥60% following induction chemotherapy as optimal response cut-off in patients with LAPC is an independent predictor for OS when CA19-9 is increased at baseline. Furthermore, ≥40% is the minimum cut-off demonstrating survival benefit. These cut-offs may be used when discussing treatment strategies during early response evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard W F Seelen
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Deesje Doppenberg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anne Nagelhout
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lilly J H Brada
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Germany
| | - Freek Daams
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Marco B Polée
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke S Walma
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schouten TJ, van Goor IWJM, Dorland GA, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, Brosens LAA, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, van Dam RM, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Intven MPW, Kazemier G, Liem MSL, van Lienden KP, Los M, de Meijer VE, Patijn GA, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, van Tienhoven GJ, Verdonk RC, Verkooijen HM, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Daamen LA. The Value of Biological and Conditional Factors for Staging of Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Upfront Resection: A Nationwide Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15070-w. [PMID: 38386198 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15070-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Novel definitions suggest that resectability status for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) should be assessed beyond anatomical criteria, considering both biological and conditional factors. This has, however, yet to be validated on a nationwide scale. This study evaluated the prognostic value of biological and conditional factors for staging of patients with resectable PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS A nationwide observational cohort study was performed, including all consecutive patients who underwent upfront resection of National Comprehensive Cancer Network resectable PDAC in the Netherlands (2014-2019) with complete information on preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. PDAC was considered biologically unfavorable (RB+) if CA19-9 ≥ 500 U/mL and favorable (RB-) otherwise. ECOG ≥ 2 was considered conditionally unfavorable (RC+) and favorable otherwise (RC-). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional hazard analysis, presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Overall, 688 patients were analyzed with a median overall survival (OS) of 20 months (95% CI 19-23). OS was 14 months (95% CI 10 months-median not reached) in 20 RB+C+ patients (3%; HR 1.61, 95% CI 0.86-2.70), 13 months (95% CI 11-15) in 156 RB+C- patients (23%; HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.50-2.31), and 21 months (95% CI 12-41) in 47 RB-C+ patients (7%; HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.62) compared with 24 months (95% CI 22-27) in 465 patients with RB-C- PDAC (68%; reference). CONCLUSIONS Survival after upfront resection of anatomically resectable PDAC is worse in patients with CA19-9 ≥ 500 U/mL, while performance status had no impact. This supports consideration of CA19-9 in preoperative staging of resectable PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs J Schouten
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris W J M van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Galina A Dorland
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+,, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Jan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stoop TF, Theijse RT, Seelen LWF, Groot Koerkamp B, van Eijck CHJ, Wolfgang CL, van Tienhoven G, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Wilmink JW, Del Chiaro M, Katz MHG, Hackert T, Besselink MG. Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical decision-making in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 21:101-124. [PMID: 38036745 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-023-00856-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection combined with systemic chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Upfront surgery is considered suboptimal in cases with extensive vascular involvement, which can be classified as either borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In these patients, FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy is currently used as preoperative chemotherapy and is eventually combined with radiotherapy. Thus, more patients might reach 5-year overall survival. Patient selection for chemotherapy, radiotherapy and subsequent surgery is based on anatomical, biological and conditional parameters. Current guidelines and clinical practices vary considerably regarding preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, response evaluation, and indications for surgery. In this Review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence regarding disease staging, preoperative therapy, response evaluation and surgery in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, a clinical work-up is proposed based on the available evidence and guidelines. We identify knowledge gaps and outline a proposed research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rutger T Theijse
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Leonard W F Seelen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stoop TF, Bergquist E, Theijse RT, Hempel S, van Dieren S, Sparrelid E, Distler M, Hackert T, Besselink MG, Del Chiaro M, Ghorbani P. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Role of Total Pancreatectomy as an Alternative to Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients at High Risk for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Is it a Justifiable Indication? Ann Surg 2023; 278:e702-e711. [PMID: 37161977 PMCID: PMC10481933 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Examine the potential benefit of total pancreatectomy (TP) as an alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in patients at high risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA TP is mentioned as an alternative to PD in patients at high risk for POPF, but a systematic review is lacking. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analyses using Pubmed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library to identify studies published up to October 2022, comparing elective single-stage TP for any indication versus PD in patients at high risk for POPF. The primary endpoint was short-term mortality. Secondary endpoints were major morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) on the short-term and quality of life. RESULTS After screening 1212 unique records, five studies with 707 patients (334 TP and 373 high-risk PD) met the eligibility criteria, comprising one randomized controlled trial and four observational studies. The 90-day mortality after TP and PD did not differ (6.3% vs. 6.2%; RR=1.04 [95%CI 0.56-1.93]). Major morbidity rate was lower after TP compared to PD (26.7% vs. 38.3%; RR=0.65 [95%CI 0.48-0.89]), but no significance was seen in matched/randomized studies (29.0% vs. 36.9%; RR = 0.73 [95%CI 0.48-1.10]). Two studies investigated quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) at a median of 30-52 months, demonstrating comparable global health status after TP and PD (77% [±15] vs. 76% [±20]; P =0.857). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis found no reduction in short-term mortality and major morbidity after TP as compared to PD in patients at high risk for POPF. However, if TP is used as a bail-out procedure, the comparable long-term quality of life is reassuring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F. Stoop
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Erik Bergquist
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rutger T. Theijse
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Hempel
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marius Distler
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Poya Ghorbani
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sumiyoshi T, Uemura K, Shintakuya R, Okada K, Otsuka H, Baba K, Serikawa M, Ishii Y, Tsuboi T, Arihiro K, Murakami Y, Murashita J, Takahashi S. Prognostic factor in patient with recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:347. [PMID: 37658871 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03073-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To elucidate prognostic factors for post-recurrence survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS Patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for PDAC between January 2014 and May 2020 were identified. Among them, patients who had postoperative recurrences and received chemotherapy were retrospectively investigated. Independent prognostic factors for survival after recurrence were investigated using multivariate analyses. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of the identified prognostic factors, and survival times after recurrence were compared. RESULTS Eighty-four patients with recurrent PDAC were included. Multivariate analysis showed that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (HR, 2.80; p = 0.0051), low albumin level (HR, 1.84; p = 0.0402), and high carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level at recurrence (HR, 2.11; p = 0.0258) were significant predictors of shorter survival after recurrence. The median survival times after recurrence in the transfusion and non-transfusion groups were 5.5 vs. 18.1 months (p < 0.0001), respectively; those in the low and normal albumin groups were 10.1 vs. 18.7 months (p = 0.0049), and those in the high and normal CA19-9 groups were 11.5 vs. 22.6 months (p = 0.0023), respectively. CONCLUSIONS RBC transfusion, low albumin, and high CA19-9 levels at recurrence negatively affected survival after recurrence in patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuaki Sumiyoshi
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Uemura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Ryuta Shintakuya
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Okada
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Otsuka
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Kenta Baba
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Masahiro Serikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Ishii
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomofumi Tsuboi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Koji Arihiro
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Murakami
- Digestive Disease Center, Hiroshima Memorial Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Shinya Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Murakawa M, Kawahara S, Takahashi D, Kamioka Y, Yamamoto N, Kobayashi S, Ueno M, Morimoto M, Sawazaki S, Tamagawa H, Ohshima T, Yukawa N, Rino Y, Morinaga S. Risk factors for early recurrence in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:263. [PMID: 37620940 PMCID: PMC10463749 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03141-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers, and surgical resection is the only potentially curative approach. However, the rate of recurrence remains high, particularly within the first 6 months, and is associated with a poor prognosis. The present study evaluated the clinical characteristics and risk factors for early recurrence in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients who underwent curative resection, regardless of the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, to identify predictive factors associated with early recurrence and poor outcomes as well as to determine the optimal treatment strategy for patients at high risk of early recurrence after surgical resection. METHODS Patients who underwent pancreatic resection for PDAC at our institution from 2013 to 2021 were included in this study. We investigated the clinicopathological features of patients in groups: those with recurrence within 6 months, recurrence between 6 and 12 months, and recurrence beyond 12 months or no recurrence. A logistic regression analysis identified covariates associated with early recurrence at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS The study included 403 patients with a median follow-up of 25.7 months. Recurrence was observed in 279 patients, with 14.6% recurring within 6 months, 23.3% within 6-12 months, and 62% after 12 months or not at all. The preoperative CA19-9 level, modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and positive peritoneal cytology were significant risk factors for early recurrence within 6 months, while positive peritoneal cytology, lymph node metastasis, and the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy were significant risk factors for recurrence within 12 months. For patients who received preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, the preoperative CA19-9 level, mGPS, and positive peritoneal cytology were significant independent risk factors for early recurrence within 6 months, while positive peritoneal cytology, lymph node metastasis, and the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy were significant independent risk factors for recurrence within 12 months. The study concluded that the overall survival after surgical resection for potentially resectable PDAC worsened according to the number of risk factors present in the patient. CONCLUSIONS We clarified that preoperative CA19-9, positive peritoneal cytology, and the lack of adjuvant chemotherapy were consistent predictors for early recurrence within 6 and 12 months. In addition, an increased number of risk factors affecting the patient was associated with a poorer overall survival after potentially curable resection. Calculating the number of risk factors for early recurrence may be an essential predictive factor when considering treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaaki Murakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama City, 241-8515, Japan.
| | - Shinnosuke Kawahara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama City, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Daishi Takahashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama City, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Yuto Kamioka
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama City, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Naoto Yamamoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama City, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Manabu Morimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Sho Sawazaki
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tamagawa
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takashi Ohshima
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama City, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Norio Yukawa
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yasushi Rino
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Soichiro Morinaga
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama City, 241-8515, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xiang F, He X, Liu X, Li X, Zhang X, Fan Y, Yan S. Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Early Recurrence after Upfront Surgery in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Integrating Deep Learning and Radiological Variables. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3543. [PMID: 37509206 PMCID: PMC10377149 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Around 80% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients experience recurrence after curative resection. We aimed to develop a deep-learning model based on preoperative CT images to predict early recurrence (recurrence within 12 months) in PDAC patients. The retrospective study included 435 patients with PDAC from two independent centers. A modified 3D-ResNet18 network was used for a deep learning model construction. A nomogram was constructed by incorporating deep learning model outputs and independent preoperative radiological predictors. The deep learning model provided the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) values of 0.836, 0.736, and 0.720 in the development, internal, and external validation datasets for early recurrence prediction, respectively. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that higher deep learning model outputs (odds ratio [OR]: 1.675; 95% CI: 1.467, 1.950; p < 0.001), cN1/2 stage (OR: 1.964; 95% CI: 1.036, 3.774; p = 0.040), and arterial involvement (OR: 2.207; 95% CI: 1.043, 4.873; p = 0.043) were independent risk factors associated with early recurrence and were used to build an integrated nomogram. The nomogram yielded AUC values of 0.855, 0.752, and 0.741 in the development, internal, and external validation datasets. In conclusion, the proposed nomogram may help predict early recurrence in PDAC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Xiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xiang He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery I, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - Xingyu Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xinming Li
- Department of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - Xuchang Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - Yingfang Fan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery I, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - Sheng Yan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Doppenberg D, Lagerwaard FJ, van Dieren S, Meijerink MR, van der Vliet JJ, Besselink MG, van Tienhoven G, Versteijne E, Slotman BJ, Wilmink JW, Kazemier G, Bruynzeel AME. Optimizing patient selection for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer after initial chemotherapy - a single center prospective cohort. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1149961. [PMID: 37324027 PMCID: PMC10264658 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1149961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The role of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) as local treatment option after chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is evolving. However adequate patient selection criteria for SABR in patients with LAPC are lacking. Methods A prospective institutional database collected data of patients with LAPC treated with chemotherapy, mainly FOLFIRINOX, followed by SABR, which was delivered using magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy, 40 Gy in 5 fractions within two weeks. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for OS. Results Overall, 74 patients were included, median age 66 years, 45.9% had a KPS score of ≥90. Median OS was 19.6 months from diagnosis and 12.1 months from start of SABR. Local control was 90% at one year. Multivariable Cox regression analyses identified KPS ≥90, age <70, and absence of pain prior to SABR as independent favorable predictors for OS. The rate of grade ≥3 fatigue and late gastro-intestinal toxicity was 2.7%. Conclusions SABR is a well-tolerated treatment in patients with unresectable LAPC following chemotherapy, with better outcomes when applied in patients with higher performance score, age <70 years and absence of pain. Future randomized trials will have to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Doppenberg
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - F. J. Lagerwaard
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S. van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - M. R. Meijerink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department Intervention Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - J. J. van der Vliet
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- LAVA Therapeutics, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - M. G. Besselink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - G. van Tienhoven
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - E. Versteijne
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - B. J. Slotman
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - J. W. Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - G. Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - A. M. E. Bruynzeel
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hata T, Chiba K, Mizuma M, Masuda K, Ohtsuka H, Nakagawa K, Morikawa T, Hayashi H, Motoi F, Unno M. Levels of tumor markers
CEA
/
CA
19–9 in serum and peritoneal lavage predict postoperative recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2022; 6:862-872. [PMID: 36338582 PMCID: PMC9628216 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of tumor markers from peritoneal lavage in selecting patients with a high risk of recurrence and predicting site‐specific recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods The levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19–9 (sCEA/sCA 19–9) and paired peritoneal lavage CEA and CA 19–9 (pCEA/pCA 19–9) were measured in 90 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgery. Using the cutoff values determined by maximally selected rank statistics for disease‐free survival (DFS), the risk of recurrence and its patterns were evaluated in combination with different markers and different test specimens. Results In univariate and multivariate analysis, an elevated pCA 19–9 level (>1.3 U/mL) was an independent prognostic marker for both DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.391; P = .018) and overall survival (HR, 3.194; P = .033). Combination analyses contributed to further stratification of a very high risk of recurrence. Of the 58 patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection, elevated pCA19–9 was also associated with inferior DFS and overall survival (OS). Patients with elevated pCA 19–9 levels were more likely to have an earlier onset of peritoneal recurrence than those with normal pCA 19–9 levels (P = .048, Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon test). Conclusion pCA 19–9 is a reliable marker for predicting postoperative recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer after surgery. Further risk stratification can be achieved by using combination assays. The combination of pCA 19–9 and sCA19–9 also serves as a predictor of recurrence site‐specific recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuo Hata
- Department of Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan
| | - Kazuharu Chiba
- Department of Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan
| | - Masamichi Mizuma
- Department of Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan
| | - Kunihiro Masuda
- Department of Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan
| | - Hideo Ohtsuka
- Department of Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan
| | - Kei Nakagawa
- Department of Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan
| | - Takanori Morikawa
- Department of Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan
| | - Hiroki Hayashi
- Department of Surgery Sendai Medical Center Sendai Japan
| | - Fuyuhiko Motoi
- Department of Surgery I Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science Yamagata Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan
| |
Collapse
|