Minimally-invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation: systematic review and metanalysis of short-term outcomes

Laparoscopic pancreatic enucleation: how far should we go for parenchyma preservation? A study by the French National Association of Surgery

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic enucleation is indicated for selected patients and tumours with very low oncological risk to preserve a maximum of healthy pancreatic parenchyma. Minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation (MIPE) is increasingly performed. This study aims to assess the impact of tumor location and center experience on textbook outcomes (TBO) in patients undergoing MIPE.

METHODS

Retrospective nationwide multicentric cohort study including MIPE performed between 2010 and 2021. Tumor localization was classified as head/uncus, neck or body/tail (results are presented in this order). Centers were classified according to a mean volume of MI pancreatectomies performed per year: lower (< 5/year), intermediate (5 to 10/year) and higher volume (≥ 10/year). TBO was defined as meeting all 6 criteria: no postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), no post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH), no bile leak, no readmission, no mortality, and no severe morbidity.

RESULTS

27 participating centers performed 200 MIPE located in head/uncus (n = 65, 33%), neck (n = 26, 13%) and body/tail (n = 109, 55%), 8% of them performed by robotic approach. Mortality reached 1.5% (n = 3). Head/uncus lesions were larger (p = 0.03), frequently BD-IPMN (p = 0.04), with significant longer operative time (p = 0.002). TBO achievement was high across all tumor locations (52 vs. 73 vs. 67%, p = 0.09) with higher PPH (p = 0.03) or bile leaks (p = 0.03) for head/uncus lesions. In multivariate analysis, overweight (OR 0.49), preoperative biopsy (OR 0.41) and head/uncus lesion (OR 0.34) were independently associated with lower TBO. No independent risk factor was found for POPF or severe morbidity. While expertise level influenced indications, with more cystic lesions (p = 0.002), larger tumors (p = 0.003), 3D use (p = 0.001), and head/uncus lesions (p = 0.04) in high volume centers, TBO was not significantly different (p = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

MIPE is feasible with 1.5% mortality whatever its localization with higher morbidity for head/uncus lesions, justified by the will to avoid pancreaticoduodenectomy. High volume centers push the limits of MIPE without increasing morbidity.

The short-term outcomes of laparoscopic enucleation of pancreatic tumors with exposing the Wirsung duct

BACKGROUND

It is widely believed that the prerequisite for safely performing enucleation is that the distance between the tumor and the main pancreatic duct (MPD) is at least 2-3 mm. However, enucleating a deep pancreatic tumor adjacent to the MPD remains challenging, particularly when exposure or repair of the MPD is necessary. This study reported our initial experience with this procedure and demonstrated the feasibility and safety of the MPD exposure or repair.

METHODS

Patients who underwent laparoscopic enucleation (LapEN) with exposing the MPD from January 2017 to August 2023 were collected and analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Data from procedures of laparoscopic middle pancreatectomy (LMP) and LapEN for superficial tumors were collected for comparative analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients were enrolled, 27 tumors were enucleated. Tumor located in the pancreatic head and neck (n = 20), and the body (n = 7). The mean tumor size, operating time, and blood loss were 2.3 cm, 163 min, and 63 ml, respectively. MPD injuries occurred in 8 cases due to the need for complete tumor resection, which were repaired or reconstructed using 6-0 PDS-II with or not inserting a plastic stent. 10 cases (38.5%) developed surgical-related complications, seven (26.9%) were classified as Clavien-Dindo grade I, and three (11.5%) were Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa. Biochemical leakage occurred in 16 cases (61.5%), clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) occurred in 10 cases (38.5%). Two patients (7.7%) experienced post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage. Further analyses indicated LapEN with MPD exposure had a longer operating time and higher incidence of CR-POPF compared to LapEN for superficial tumors, but a shorter operating time and less blood loss compared to LMP (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic enucleation with exposing the MPD is feasible and safe with the support of precise preoperative assessments, meticulous intraoperative dissection, well familiarity with the anatomy of the MPD, and excellent surgical skills.

Impact of robotic-assisted surgery on length of hospital stay in Paris public hospitals: a retrospective analysis

The number of available hospital beds is decreasing in many countries. Reducing the length of hospital stay (LOS) and increasing bed turnover could improve patient flow. We evaluated whether robot-assisted surgery (RAS) had a beneficial impact on the LOS in a French hospital trust with a long-established robotic program (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP). We extracted data from "Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information" to determine the median LOS for adults in our trust after RAS versus laparoscopy and open surgery in 2021-2022 for eight target procedures, and compared data nationally and at similar academic centres (same database). We also calculated the number of hospitalisation days 'saved' using RAS. Overall, 9326 target procedures were performed at AP-HP: 3864 (41.4%) RAS, 2978 (31.9%) laparoscopies, and 2484 (26.6%) open surgeries. The median LOS for RAS was lower than laparoscopy and open surgery for all procedures, apart from hysterectomy and colectomy (equivalent to laparoscopy). Results for urological procedures at AP-HP reflected national values. The equivalent of 5390 hospitalisation days was saved in 2021-2022 using RAS instead of open surgery or laparoscopy at AP-HP; of these, 86% represented hospitalisation days saved using RAS in urological procedures. Using RAS instead of open surgery or laparoscopy (particularly in urological procedures) reduced the median LOS and may save thousands of hospitalisation days every year. This should help to increase patient turnover and facilitate patient flow.

Outcomes of minimally invasive vs. open pancreatoduodenectomies in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: analysis of ACS-NSQIP data

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a significant challenge owing to its aggressive nature. Traditionally performed as open surgery, the advent of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) including laparoscopic and robotic techniques, offers a potential alternative. This study assessed the use and outcomes of MIS and open PD for PDAC treatment.

METHODS

We analyzed ACS-NSQIP data (2015-2021) using regression models to compare patient outcomes across open PD, MIS PD, and conversions from MIS to open (MIS-O).

RESULTS

Of 19,812 PDAC patients, 1,293 (6.53%) underwent MIS, 18,116 (91.44%) underwent open PD, and 403 (2.03%) underwent MIS converted to open PD (MIS-O). The MIS rate increased from 6.1% to 9.2%. Black patients had a higher MIS-O rate (RR, 1.55; p = 0.025). Open PD was associated with more severe conditions (ASA ≥ III, malnutrition) and prior radiation therapy. MIS patients more often had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Complex procedures, such as vein resection, favored open PD. Need for arterial resection was associated with MIS-O (RR, 2.11; p = 0.012), and operative time was significantly associated with MIS (OR: 4.32, 95% CI: 3.43-5.43, p-value: < 0.001) No differences in the overall morbidity or 30-day mortality were observed. MIS led to shorter stays but higher risks of reoperation and pulmonary embolism. MIS-O increased the delayed gastric emptying rate (RR, 1.79; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

During 2015-2021, an increasing number of patients with PDAC are undergoing MIS PD. Morbidity and mortality did not differ between open and MIS PD. MIS was performed more frequently in patients with better nutritional status and lower ASA, or when vascular resection was not anticipated. In well selected patients, short-term outcomes of MIS and open PD seem similar.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic limited resections of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours of the uncinate process: Report of six cases and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for limited resections for pancreatic uncinate lesions is not widely performed but can adequately treat benign or low-grade malignant lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of MIS-limited pancreatic resections for patients with suspected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of six consecutive patients who underwent MIS for PNET within a single institution between 2017 and 2022.

RESULTS

Six patients underwent limited pancreas-preserving MIS of the uncinate process (uncinectomy or enucleation), of which two were performed through the robotic approach and four through laparoscopic approach. The median operation time was 212.5 (175-338.75) min, and the median blood loss was 50 (50-112.5) ml. The median post-operative hospital length of stay was 5.5 (3.75-11.5) days. Two patients (33.3%) had major post-operative morbidities (Clavien-Dindo ≥Grade 3). There were no open conversions or post-operative mortalities. Five patients had histologically proven Grade 1 neuroendocrine tumours. One was T2 and four were T1.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that limited MIS resections of pancreatic uncinate PNETs are a feasible procedure with good patient outcomes. It offers a safe alternative to radical surgical resections like pancreatoduodenectomies in selected patients with low-grade malignant or benign tumours.

Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy versus open central pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Central pancreatectomy is a surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant tumors which located in the neck and proximal body of the pancreas that facilitates the preservation of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine functions but has a high morbidity rate, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness between minimally invasive central pancreatectomy (MICP) and open central pancreatectomy (OCP) basing on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

An extensive literature search to compare MICP and OCP was conducted from October 2003 to October 2023 on PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Fixed-effect models or random effects were selected based on heterogeneity, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies with a total of 510 patients were included. There was no significant difference in POPF between MICP and OCP (OR = 0.95; 95% CI [0.64, 1.43]; P = 0.82), whereas intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 125.13; 95% CI [- 194.77, -55.49]; P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (MD = - 2.86; 95% CI [- 5.00, - 0.72]; P = 0.009) were in favor of MICP compared to OCP, and there was a strong trend toward a lower intraoperative transfusion rate in MICP than in OCP (MD = 0.34; 95% CI [0.11, 1.00]; P = 0.05). There was no significant difference in other outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

MICP was as safe and effective as OCP and had less intraoperative blood loss and a shorter length of hospital stay. However, further studies are needed to confirm the results.

Inferior vena cava hemangioma resected using a novel Toumai robotic surgical platform

This study aims to investigate the significance of using the Toumai robotic platform for the resection of inferior vena cava (IVC) hemangiomas. Our objective is to provide information on the potential benefits of this innovative approach in managing these uncommon vascular tumors and to contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the field of surgical oncology and vascular surgery. A 37-year-old female patient with an incidental finding of a right retroperitoneal mass underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, which confirmed the diagnosis of an IVC hemangioma. Due to the rarity and complexity of this vascular tumor, the medical team opted for a novel approach using the Toumai robotic surgical platform (Shanghai MicroPort MedBot Group Co, Ltd). Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position, and the robotic arms were controlled remotely through the Toumai platform. A transperitoneal approach was adopted, and the surgeon meticulously resected the tumor while preserving the integrity of the IVC. The use of the Toumai robotic platform facilitated precise tumor resection, minimizing the risk of damage to surrounding structures. The minimally invasive nature of the robotic surgery contributed to a reduced incidence of postoperative complications and accelerated patient recovery. Furthermore, the remote fifth-generation mobile network surgical capabilities of the Toumai platform allow for expert care to be provided to patients despite geographic barriers. The robotic-assisted surgical approach using the Toumai platform demonstrates its potential benefits in managing rare and complex vascular tumors such as IVC hemangiomas. Robotic technology has the potential to revolutionize the field of surgical oncology and vascular surgery, leading to improved patient outcomes and healthcare delivery. However, more extensive clinical studies and larger case series are needed to validate the long-term safety and efficacy of this innovative surgical approach. Continued research and collaboration between clinicians and robotic technology experts are essential to fully realize the potential of robotic-assisted surgery for the benefit of patients with rare and challenging medical conditions.

[Robotic enucleation of pancreatic insulinoma]

We demonstrate robot-assisted treatment of a patient with benign pancreatic insulinoma. A 31-year-old patient suffered from attacks of weakness, numbness of the fingertips and «turbidity of consciousness» for 2 years. These symptoms occurred on an empty stomach and regressed after eating. We found pancreatic insulinoma. The patient underwent robotic enucleation of pancreatic tumor. Surgery time was 145 min. Postoperative period proceeded without complications. Hyperglycemia up to 10.5 mmol/l on the first postoperative day was followed by normalization after 4 days. The patient was discharged in 6 days after surgery. Minimally invasive robotic enucleation of insulinoma minimizes surgical trauma and provides precise resection of tumor. The key aspect of safe enucleation is localization of tumor at a distance of at least 2 mm from the pancreatic duct.