National adoption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: paradigm shift in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Metabolic response during preoperative chemotherapy can predict prognosis in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

With the evolving treatment paradigms for pancreatic cancer, there is an increasing need for reliable markers to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative chemotherapy. Due to the limitations of current indicators, this study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of metabolic response based on the changes in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

METHODS

This study included 210 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent post-chemotherapy curative surgery between 2013 and 2022. Using maximally selected rank statistics for survival, the metabolic response was defined as follows: metabolic responder (%ΔSUVmax >75%), metabolic stable disease (15%-75%), and metabolic non-responder (≤15%).

RESULTS

Among patients, 15.7%, 66.7%, and 11.6% were categorized into the metabolic responder, metabolic stable disease, and metabolic non-responder groups. The metabolic responder group (83.0 months) had longer median overall survival than the metabolic stable disease (51.0 months, p = .013) and metabolic non-responder (32.0 months, p = .002) groups. In addition, being metabolic responders (vs. non-responders) was an independent predictor of low recurrence rates (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.46 [0.23-0.91]; p = .026) and achieving pathologic complete response (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 13.39 [1.61-300.77]; p = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic response during preoperative chemotherapy has predictive power for post-resection prognosis and residual tumor status.

Prognostic factors in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy and resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prognostic markers for overall survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are well established but remain unclear following neoadjuvant therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine factors associated with overall survival following neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from January 2010 until May 2024. Studies that reported univariable and multivariable hazard ratios were included if patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy and resection for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Study quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using generic inverse-variance random-effects models.

RESULTS

Among 2208 unique articles identified by the search, 92 were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 85 were of "good" and 7 of "poor" quality. The neoadjuvant therapy regimen was described in 84 studies of which 62 included patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. Margin status, nodal disease, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T-stage, and normalization of cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) after neoadjuvant therapy were prognostic for overall survival, whereas age, sex, perineural invasion, baseline tumor size, and baseline CA19-9 were not. The test for subgroup differences between ypN substages was not statistically significant in the multivariable model. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with better survival than other regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis identified margin status, nodal disease, AJCC T-stage, and normalization of CA19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy as prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with resected localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy.

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and S-1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Effects on nutritional status and pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes

BACKGROUND

With the advent of improved chemotherapy options, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has gained acceptance as a multidisciplinary treatment approach for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to clarify whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 influences preoperative nutritional status and postoperative outcomes, particularly in patients undergoing highly invasive pancreatic resection.

METHODS

Patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy as upfront surgery or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 between January 2015 and December 2022 were assessed. In addition to perioperative surgical outcomes, preoperative nutritional status was evaluated using serum albumin, controlling nutritional status, and prognostic nutritional index.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients who underwent upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy and 119 who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 before pancreaticoduodenectomy were evaluated. Preoperative nutritional assessments (serum albumin, controlling nutritional status score, and prognostic nutritional index) showed no significant differences between groups, either at the initial consultation or immediately before surgery. No significant differences were observed in postoperative outcomes, including blood loss, operation time, and morbidity. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 group had a significantly greater rate of negative tumor margins (R0 resection rate 86% vs 74%, P = .018), and improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.67, P < .001) compared with the upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 does not adversely impact preoperative nutritional status and enhances the effectiveness of pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, leading to improved pathologically curative resection rates and overall survival.

Textbook Neoadjuvant Experience: Defining a Novel Composite Outcomes Measure for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly used for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Disease progression, toxicity, and failure to undergo surgical resection are common during NT, yet little research has focused on efforts to optimize care delivery. We sought to define and validate a novel composite outcomes metric that characterizes the successful delivery of NT.

STUDY DESIGN

All patients with localized PDAC receiving NT in an intention-to-treat fashion between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. A textbook neoadjuvant experience (TNE) was defined as the absence of mortality, disease progression, or hospital admission during NT as well as the completion of all intended NT and successful surgical resection.

RESULTS

Among 306 patients with localized PDAC, the median age was 66 years and 58.5% were men. Overall, only 85 (28%) experienced a TNE which was more common among patients with potentially resectable (45 of 96, 47%) than borderline resectable (33 of 112, 29%) or locally advanced (7 of 98, 7%) disease. Patients with a TNE experienced greater overall survival than those individuals without a TNE (median not reached vs 16.4 months [95% CI 14.9 to 17.9 months], p < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, a TNE was the strongest predictor of improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.54, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A TNE is infrequently achieved among patients with PDAC undergoing NT but is significantly associated with improved long-term outcomes. Future research aimed at optimizing outcomes of NT delivery should incorporate this novel composite metric that may more accurately reflect patient and provider expectations of treatment.

Advances in Vaccine-Based Therapies for Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal cancers, with a 5-year survival rate that has improved only marginally over the past 30 years, despite numerous clinical trials. PDAC poses several unique challenges, including early metastatic spread and a predilection for liver metastasis. It is also highly resistant to anti-tumor immunity and immunotherapy due to its dense and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, low immunogenicity, and systemic immune suppression. PDAC has a low mutational burden, defective antigen presentation, and immune checkpoint molecule upregulation, which reduce immune recognition. Together, these factors leave PDAC as an "immune cold" tumor with minimal cytotoxic T-cell activity. Novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed to reinvigorate anti-tumor immunity. Recent advances, such as adjuvant personalized mRNA neoantigen vaccines and mutant-KRAS targeted vaccines, have demonstrated sustained vaccine-induced T cell responses that are associated with improved recurrence-free survival in surgically resected PDAC. Combining different vaccine approaches with optimal sequencing of chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and other immunotherapies may further enhance outcomes. PDAC vaccines represent a promising strategy for overcoming PDAC's resistance to conventional therapies, with ongoing trials exploring their potential to improve long-term survival.

The role of national population-based registries in pancreatic cancer surgery research

Research and innovation are critical for advancing the multidisciplinary management of pancreatic cancer. Registry-based studies (RBSs) are a complement to randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Compared with RCTs, RBSs offer cost-effectiveness, larger sample sizes, and representation of real-world clinical practice. National population-based registries (NPBRs) aim to cover the entire national population, and studies based on NPBRs are, compared to non-NPBRs, less prone to selection bias. The last decade has witnessed a dramatic increase in NPBRs in pancreatic cancer surgery, which has undoubtedly added invaluable knowledge to the body of evidence on pancreatic cancer management. However, several methodological shortcomings may compromise the quality of registry-based studies. These include a lack of control over data collection and a lack of reporting on the quality of the source registry or database in terms of validation of coverage and data completeness and accuracy. Furthermore, there is a significant risk of double publication from the most commonly used registries as well as the inclusion of historical data that is not relevant or representative of research questions addressing current practices.

Tumor-intrinsic and Cancer-associated Fibroblast Subtypes Independently Predict Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of tumor-intrinsic and cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and overall survival (OS).

BACKGROUND

PDAC remains a deadly disease with limited treatment options, and both the tumor as well as the microenvironment play an important role in pathogenesis. Gene expression-based tumor-intrinsic subtypes (classical and basal-like) have been shown to predict outcomes, but tumor microenvironment subtypes are still evolving.

METHODS

RNA-sequencing was performed on 114 deidentified resected PDAC tumors. Clinical data were collected by retrospective chart review. Single sample classifiers were used to determine classical and basal-like subtypes as well as tumor-permissive permCAF and tumor-restraining restCAF subtypes. Survival was analyzed using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Patients who received NAT had an increase in OS, with a median survival of 27.9 months compared with 20.1 months for those who did not receive NAT, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio: 0.64, P =0.076). Either tumor-intrinsic or CAF subtypes alone were associated with OS regardless of NAT or no NAT, and patients with classical or restCAF subtypes had the best outcomes. When evaluated together, patients with the classical-restCAF subtype had the best OS and basal-permCAF the worst OS ( P <0.0001). Patients undergoing NAT with the classical-restCAF subtype demonstrated the longest OS compared with the other groups ( P =0.00041).

CONCLUSIONS

CAF subtypes have an additive effect over tumor-intrinsic subtypes in predicting survival with or without neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in PDAC. Molecular subtyping of both tumor and CAF compartments of PDAC may be important steps in selecting first-line systemic therapy.

Disparities in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement

Background

Multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) has been linked with improved survival for locally advanced (LA) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the existence of disparities in its utilization remains to be elucidated.

Methods

All adults with PDAC were tabulated from the 2011-2017 Nationwide Cancer Database. Tumor vascular involvement was determined using the clinical T stage and CS_EXTENSION variables. The significance of temporal trends was calculated using Cuzick's non-parametric test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the impact of NAT utilization on hazard of two-year mortality. A logistic regression model was developed to determine factors associated with receipt of NAT.

Results

Of 3811 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 50.8 % received NAT. NAT utilization significantly increased over the study period, from 31.7 % in 2011 to 81.1 % in 2017 (p < 0.001). NAT was associated with significantly reduced two-year mortality (Hazards Ratio 0.34, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.18-0.67).After adjustment, younger (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 0.97/year, CI 0.96-0.98) and Black (AOR 0.65, CI 0.48-0.89; ref: White) patients demonstrated reduced odds of NAT. Furthermore, patients with Medicare (AOR 0.73, CI 0.59-0.90; ref: Private) or Medicaid insurance (AOR 0.67, CI 0.46-0.97; ref: Private) had lower odds of NAT, as did those treated at non-academic institutions (Community: AOR 0.42, CI 0.35-0.52, Integrated: 0.68, CI 0.54-0.85) or in the lowest education quartile (AOR 0.52, CI 0.29-0.95; ref: Highest).

Conclusions

We identified increasing utilization of NAT for BR/LA pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite being linked with significantly reduced two-year mortality, socioeconomic disparities affect odds of NAT.

ASO Practice Guidelines Series: Management of Resectable, Borderline Resectable, and Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease marked by high rates of both local and distant failure. In the minority of patients with potentially resectable disease, multimodal treatment paradigms have allowed for prolonged survival in an increasingly larger pool of well-selected patients. Therefore, it is critical for surgical oncologists to be abreast of current guideline recommendations for both surgical management and multimodal therapy for pancreas cancer. We discuss these guidelines, as well as the underlying data supporting these positions, to offer surgical oncologists a framework for managing patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Literature Review and Our Experience of NAC-GS

In addition to established evidence of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), evidence of the effects of neoadjuvant treatments (NATs), including chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, has also been accumulating. Recent results from prospective studies and meta-analyses suggest that NATs may be beneficial not only for borderline resectable PDAC, but also for resectable PDAC, by increasing the likelihood of successful R0 resection, decreasing the likelihood of the development of lymph node metastasis, and improving recurrence-free and overall survival. In addition, response to NAT may be informative for predicting the clinical course after preoperative NAT followed by surgery; in this way, the postoperative treatment strategy can be revised based on the effect of NAT and the post-neoadjuvant therapy/surgery histopathological findings. On the other hand, the response to NAT and AC is also influenced by the tumor biology and the patient's immune/nutritional status; therefore, planning of the treatment strategy and meticulous management of NAT, surgery, and AC is required on a patient-by-patient basis. Our experience of using gemcitabine plus S-1 showed that this NAT regimen achieved tumor shrinkage and decreased the levels of tumor markers but failed to provide a survival benefit. Our results also suggested that response/adverse events to NAT may be predictive of the efficacy of AC, as well as survival outcomes.