Nationwide treatment and outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers comprise a heterogeneous collection of malignancies usually described as cholangiocarcinoma of the intra- or extrahepatic bile duct, including perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer.

METHODS

A review of pertinent parts of the ESSO core curriculum for the UEMS diploma targets (Fellowships exam, EBSQ), based on updated and available guidelines for diagnosis, surgical treatment and oncological management of cholangiocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Following the outline from the ESSO core curriculum we present the epidemiology and risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma, as well as the rationale for the current diagnosis, staging, (neo-)adjuvant treatment, surgical management, and short- and long-term outcomes. The available guidelines and consensus reports (i.e. NCCN, BGS and ESMO guidelines) are referred to. Recognition of biliary tract cancers as separate entities of the intrahepatic biliary ducts, the perihilar and distal bile duct as well as the gallbladder is important for proper management, as they each provide distinct clinical, molecular and treatment profiles to consider.

CONCLUSION

Core competencies in knowledge to the diagnosis, management and outcomes of biliary tract cancers are presented.

Advancements in Locoregional Therapies for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with rising incidence and poor outcomes. This review examines recent advancements in locoregional therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, focusing on external beam radiotherapy, transarterial radioembolization (TARE), hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy, and liver transplantation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy and proton beam therapy have shown promise in achieving local control and improving survival. TARE, with personalized dosimetry, has demonstrated encouraging results in select patient populations. HAIP chemotherapy, primarily studied using floxuridine, has yielded impressive survival outcomes in phase II trials. Liver transplantation, once contraindicated, is now being reconsidered for carefully selected patients with localized disease. While these locoregional approaches show potential, randomized controlled trials comparing them to standard systemic therapy are lacking. Patient selection remains crucial, with factors such as liver function, tumor burden, and molecular profile influencing treatment decisions. Ongoing research aims to optimize treatment sequencing, explore combination strategies with systemic therapies, and refine phenotype identification and patient selection criteria. As the landscape of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma management evolves, a multidisciplinary approach is essential to tailor treatment strategies and improve outcomes for patients with this challenging disease.

Resectability and survival outcome in real world practice of 720 cholangiocarcinoma patients: intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an adenocarcinoma of the hepatobiliary system, which can be classified into intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA). Surgical resection is the curative treatment for all subtypes of CCA. This study evaluates patients with CCA who underwent surgery and determines factors that impact their survival.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 720 patients diagnosed with CCA from October 2013 to December 2018. Patients were categorized into iCCA (n = 398), pCCA (n = 237), and dCCA (n = 85) based on tumor location. Data including demographic information, clinical presentation, treatment modalities, and survival statistics were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall resectability rate was 78.3%, with resectability highest in pCCA patients (83.5%). Overall median survival time (MST) was 11.6 months and varied among subtypes: iCCA 10.9 months, pCCA 11.2 months, and dCCA 15.4 months. Patients underwent curative-intent resection significantly improved survival compared to those with palliative resection or unresectable disease in all subtypes. R0 resection patients had better overall survival (OS) than R1 resection patients: 5-year survival rate of 20.2% vs. 4.3% in all CCA (p < 0.001), 21.4% vs. 7% in iCCA (p < 0.001), 17.2% vs. 0% in pCCA (p < 0.001), and 23.1% vs. 0% in dCCA (p = 0.105), respectively. Positive resection margin was an independent prognostic factor for OS in pCCA and iCCA.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is the only cure for CCA. Curative-intent resection is more effective than palliative resection in improving survival rates. When performing curative-intent resection, the goal is R0 resection. This is because it improves overall survival over R1 resection.

Improving postoperative survival in cholangiocarcinoma: development of surgical strategies with a screening program in the epidemic region

BACKGROUND

The Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP) has been launched since 2013 to detect early-stage cholangiocarcinoma and reduce the disease death. However, the clinical utility of the CASCAP remains unclear. To compare survival outcomes between two time periods: before and after 2013, when significant changes in treatment strategies were implemented, and to evaluate the efficacy of the ultrasound-based screening program, in an Asian region endemic for cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was conducted in curative-intended resection cholangiocarcinoma from 2002 to 2021. Patents characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between 2002 and 2013 (early period) and 2014 to 2021 (later period).

RESULTS

A total of 1091 patients with intrahepatic (n = 624) or perihilar (n = 467) cholangiocarcinoma was included (early period, n = 658; later period, n = 433). Of 66 (15.2%) patients in the later period were referred by the CASCAP. The incidence of early-staged disease (Stage 0 and 1) was lower in early period compared to later period 16.0% versus 29.1% (p < 0.001); that of positive surgical margin was higher in early period 53.7% versus 40.0% (p < 0.001). A median survival time (MST) was 14 months in early and 40 months in later period (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by tumor location, the MST was 13 versus 60 months in early and late periods for intrahepatic tumor (p < 0.001), respectively. While MST in perihilar tumor was 18 versus 31 months in early and late periods(p < 0.001), respectively. By presentation, the MST was 51 vs. 38 months, respectively, with screening and usual presentation (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative survival in CCA patients improved more than doubled during the study period. Moreover, the late period demonstrated enhanced early-stage detection, a higher rate of negative surgical margins, and improved survival outcomes.

Proceedings of the 28th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society

The 2023 Joint International Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS), the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA), and the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe (LICAGE) held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, marked a significant recovery milestone for the liver transplant community after COVID-19. With 1159 participants and a surge in abstract submissions, the event focused on "Liver Disorders and Transplantation: Innovations and Evolving Indications." This conference report provides a comprehensive overview of the key themes discussed during the event, encompassing Hepatology, Anesthesia and Critical Care, Acute Liver Failure, Infectious Disease, Immunosuppression, Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Transplant Oncology, Surgical Approaches, and Machine Perfusion. The congress provided a platform for extensive discussions on a wide range of topics, reflecting the continuous advancements and collaborative efforts within the liver transplant community.

Management of patients with rare adult solid cancers: objectives and evaluation of European reference networks (ERN) EURACAN

About 500,000 patients with rare adult solid cancers (RASC) are diagnosed yearly in Europe. Delays and unequal quality of management impact negatively their survival. Since 2017, European reference networks (ERN) aim to improve the quality of care of patients with rare disease. The steering committee of EURACAN, including physicians, researchers and patients review here the previous actions, present objectives of the ERN EURACAN dedicated to RASC. EURACAN promoted management in reference centres, and equal implementation of excellence and innovation in Europe and developed 22 clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Additionally, fourteen information brochures translated in 24 EU languages were developed in collaboration with patient advocacy groups (ePAGs) and seventeen training session were organized. Nevertheless, connections to national networks in the 26 participating countries (106 centres), simplification of cross-border healthcare, international multidisciplinary tumour boards, registries and monitoring of the quality of care are still required. In this Health Policy, evaluation criteria of the performances of the network and of health care providers are proposed.