High-dose intravenous glucocorticoids are effective in the acute management of ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac sarcoidosis: A case series

Cardiac Sarcoidosis and Inherited Cardiomyopathies: Clinical Masquerade or Overlap?

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and inherited cardiomyopathies (inherited CM) are associated with advanced heart failure, cardiac conduction defects, ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Both conditions can have similar clinical presentations. Differentiating between the two disease cohorts is important in delivering specific management to patients, such as immunosuppressive therapy for CS patients and genetic screening for inherited CM. In this review, we examined the existing evidence on the overlap between CS and common inherited CM, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy. In patients where both CS and inherited CM were implicated, CS tended to be diagnosed much later, often when patients presented with complications warranting a workup or cardiac histological confirmation. CS can masquerade as an inherited CM, leading to delays in the instigation of CS therapy. Confirmed dual pathology overlap between inherited CM and CS is rarer. Advanced cardiac imaging, such as cardiovascular magnetic resonance, plays an important role in the clinical workup of both CS and inherited CM. However, findings on cardiac imaging alone often cannot differentiate between the two conditions. Definitive differentiation between CS and inherited CM requires both clinical experience and, at times, a myocardial biopsy.

Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a chronic disease of unknown origin that develops when a genetically susceptible host is exposed to an antigen, leading to an exuberant immune response characterized by granulomatous inflammation. Although lung involvement is almost universal as well as the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, virtually any organ can be affected. In particular, sarcoidosis of the heart, nervous system, and eyes can be devastating, leading to death, debilitation and blindness, and a multidisciplinary approach involving expert specialists is required for prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Sarcoidosis of the skin can be disfiguring, thus posing a substantial psychologic and social impact on the patients. The diagnosis is often straightforward in the presence of compatible clinical manifestations in patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis, but is challenging when extrapulmonary signs/symptoms occur in isolation. Corticosteroids remain the first line therapy, with immunosuppressive or biologic agents being reserved to patients failing or experiencing side effects from steroids or developing refractory disease.

Management of cardiac sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a form of inflammatory cardiomyopathy associated with significant clinical complications such as high-degree atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, and heart failure as well as sudden cardiac death. It is therefore important to provide an expert consensus statement summarizing the role of different available diagnostic tools and emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. By integrating clinical information and the results of diagnostic tests, an accurate, validated, and timely diagnosis can be made, while alternative diagnoses can be reasonably excluded. This clinical expert consensus statement reviews the evidence on the management of different CS manifestations and provides advice to practicing clinicians in the field on the role of immunosuppression and the treatment of cardiac complications based on limited published data and the experience of international CS experts. The monitoring and risk stratification of patients with CS is also covered, while controversies and future research needs are explored.

Role of serial 18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in determining the therapeutic efficacy of immunosuppression and clinical outcome in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Myocardial inflammation and perfusion defects detected by 18F-fludeoxyglucose (FDG) and Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (PET) may be associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). The role of serial quantitative PET in determining the effect of treatment on myocardial inflammation and clinical outcomes is yet to be defined.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed CS patients with active myocardial inflammation (maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) ≥ 2.5) were treated with immunosuppression, then underwent repeat FDG-PET, Rubidium-82, and echocardiographic imaging 6-12 months later. Serial changes in SUVmax, SUVmean, inflammatory extent, perfusion defect (PD) extent, metabolism/perfusion mismatch extent, global cardiac metabolic activity, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, serious VA and heart-failure (HF) hospitalisation. Event data were recorded from the date of the second FDG-PET.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 113 patients (66% male, age: 55 ± 11 years, LVEF: 54 ± 13%). SUVmax reduced from 4.5 (interquartile range: 3.3-7.1) to 2.7 (2.2-3.6). Overall, 94 (83%) patients saw serial reduction in SUVmax, with 42 (37%) demonstrating complete response (SUVmax <2.5). Following a median of 46 (25-57) months, 28 (25%) patients reached the endpoint (8 deaths, 17 VAs, and 3 HF hospitalisations). PD extent (Hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.05; p = 0.035) was a significant predictor of outcome following treatment, even after accounting for LVEF and change in SUVmean. The risk of adverse events was the greatest in those with a pre-treatment or post-treatment PD extent of >10%.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort with active CS, following a treatment-induced reduction in myocardial inflammation, PD extent was the main predictor of adverse events.

Update on cardiac sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis is an inflammatory myocardial disease of unknown etiology. It is characterized by the deposition of non-caseating granulomas that may involve any part of the heart. Cardiac sarcoidosis is often under-diagnosed or recognized partly due to the heterogeneous clinical presentation of the disease. The three most frequent clinical manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis are atrioventricular block, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure. A definitive diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis can be made with histology findings from an endomyocardial biopsy. However, the diagnosis in the majority of cases is based on findings from the clinical presentation and advanced imaging due to the low sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) 2014 expert consensus statement and the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare criteria are the two most commonly used diagnostic criteria sets. This review article summarizes the available evidence on cardiac sarcoidosis, focusing on the diagnostic criteria and stepwise approach to its management.

The Prognostic Value of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis Without Heart Failure: Insights From ILLUMINATE-CS

Background The prognostic role of BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis without evident heart failure is unknown. Methods and Results This is a post hoc analysis of ILLUMINATE-CS (Illustration of the Management and Prognosis of Japanese Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis), a multicenter, retrospective, and observational study that evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. We analyzed patients with cardiac sarcoidosis without evident heart failure at the time of diagnosis. The association between baseline BNP levels and prognosis was investigated. The primary end point was the combined end point of all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, and fatal ventricular arrhythmia. In total, 238 patients (61.0±11.1 years, 37% men) were analyzed, and 61 primary end points were observed during a median follow-up period of 3.0 (interquartile range, 1.7-5.8) years. Patients with high BNP (BNP above the median value of BNP) were older and had a lower renal function and left ventricular ejection fraction than those with low BNP values. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis indicated that high BNP levels were significantly associated with a high incidence of primary end points (log-rank P=0.004), and this association was retained even in multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.19-3.55]; P=0.010). Log-transformed BNP as a continuous variable was associated with the primary end point (hazard ratio, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.31-3.43]; P=0.002). Conclusions High baseline BNP level was an independent predictor of future adverse events in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis without heart failure at the time of diagnosis. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/english/; Unique Identifier: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000034974.

Controversies in the Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

There are many challenging aspects of the management of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive therapy (IST). First, it is not always clear who will benefit from therapy or when to initiate treatment. Secondly, there are no randomized controlled trials or large prospective studies to guide what medications to use, at what doses, and for how long. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of sarcoidosis makes a strong recommendation for the use of immuno-suppressive therapy in CS patients with functional cardiac abnormalities, including heart blocks, dysrhythmias, or cardiomyopathy where patients are considered at-risk of adverse outcomes. Corticosteroids are the first line immunosuppressive therapy in CS however, early initiation of second-line steroid sparing medications has been advocated and there is data to suggest that concomitant initiation of therapy may be more beneficial. The use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents (including infliximab and adalimumab) considered beneficial third-line anti-sarcoidosis treatment agents in other severe refractory manifestations of disease remains controversial.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis: When and How to Treat Inflammation

Sarcoidosis is a complex, multisystem inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous clinical spectrum. Approximately 25% of patients with systemic sarcoidosis will have cardiac involvement that portends a poorer outcome. The diagnosis, particularly of isolated cardiac sarcoidosis, can be challenging. A paucity of randomised data exist on who, when and how to treat myocardial inflammation in cardiac sarcoidosis. Despite this, corticosteroids continue to be the mainstay of therapy for the inflammatory phase, with an evolving role for steroid-sparing and biological agents. This review explores the immunopathogenesis of inflammation in sarcoidosis, current evidence-based treatment indications and commonly used immunosuppression agents. It explores a multidisciplinary treatment and monitoring approach to myocardial inflammation and outlines current gaps in our understanding of this condition, emerging research and future directions in this field.

Clinical Presentation and Treatment of High-Risk Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease of unknown cause with heterogeneous clinical manifestations and variable course. Spontaneous remissions occur in some patients, whereas others have progressive disease impacting survival, organ function, and quality of life. Four high-risk sarcoidosis phenotypes associated with chronic inflammation have recently been identified as high-priority areas for research. These include treatment-refractory pulmonary disease, cardiac sarcoidosis, neurosarcoidosis, and multiorgan sarcoidosis. Significant gaps currently exist in the understanding of these high-risk manifestations of sarcoidosis, including their natural history, diagnostic criteria, biomarkers, and the treatment strategy, such as the ideal agent, optimal dose, and treatment duration. The use of registries with well-phenotyped patients is a critical first step to study high-risk sarcoidosis manifestations systematically. We review the diagnostic and treatment approach to high-risk sarcoidosis manifestations. Appropriately identifying these disease subgroups will help enroll well-phenotyped patients in sarcoidosis registries and clinical trials, a necessary step to narrow existing gaps in understanding of this enigmatic disease.

Critical Care of Patients With Cardiopulmonary Complications of Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease defined by the presence of aberrant granulomas affecting various organs. Due to its multisystem involvement, care of patients with established sarcoidosis becomes challenging, especially in the intensive care setting. While the lungs are typically involved, extrapulmonary manifestations also occur either concurrently or exclusively within a significant proportion of patients, complicating diagnostic and management decisions. The scope of this review is to focus on what considerations are necessary in the evaluation and management of patients with known sarcoidosis and their associated complications within a cardiopulmonary and critical care perspective.