Electrical stimulation–based evaluation for functional modification of renal autonomic nerve activities induced by catheter ablation

Aorticorenal ganglion ablation for blood pressure lowering in canine models

Studies have shown that renal denervation (RDN) can lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with refractory hypertension, but issues such as renal sympathetic nerve reinnervation and suboptimal BP reduction remain unresolved. In this study, we identified the aorticorenal ganglion (ARG) in canines by observing ambulatory BP responses following electrical stimulation of the ARG. We injected cholera toxin subunit B combined with Alexa Fluor™ 555, a nerve tracer, into the identified ARG and confirmed its innervation of the renal artery and kidney by observing fluorescence in adjacent tissues. Twelve experimental canines were divided equally into an intervention group, which received ARG ablation using 95% ethanol, and a sham control group, which received normal saline. Our results demonstrated that ARG ablation significantly reduced systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, with minimal impact on heart rate. Additionally, ARG ablation lowered plasma and renal cortex norepinephrine levels, and reduced tyrosine hydroxylase expression in the renal cortex. No adverse events were observed during the 3-month follow-up period. These findings suggest that the ARG may serve as a novel target for RDN and could offer a therapeutic alternative for patients who do not respond to or experience elevated BP after RDN.

Efficacy and safety of sympathetic mapping and ablation of renal nerves for the treatment of hypertension (SMART): 6-month follow-up of a randomised, controlled trial

Background

Previous trials of renal denervation (RDN) have been designed to investigate reduction of blood pressure (BP) as the primary efficacy endpoint using non-selective RDN without intraoperatively verified RDN success. It is an unmet clinical need to map renal nerves, selectively denervate renal sympathetic nerves, provide readouts for the interventionalists and avoid futile RDN. We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of renal nerve mapping/selective renal denervation (msRDN) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) and determine whether antihypertensive drug burden is reduced while office systolic BP (OSBP) is controlled to target level (＜140 mmHg).

Methods

We conducted a randomized, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, sham-controlled trial. The study combined two efficacy endpoints at 6 months as primary outcomes: The control rate of patients with OSBP ＜140 mmHg (non-inferior outcome) and change in the composite index of antihypertensive drugs (Drug Index) in the treatment versus Sham group (superior outcome). This design avoids confounding from excess drug-taking in the Sham group. Antihypertensive drug burden was assessed by a composite index constructed as: Class N (number of classes of antihypertensive drugs) × (sum of doses). 15 hospitals in China participated in the study and 220 patients were enrolled in a 1:1 ratio (msRDN vs Sham). The key inclusion criteria included: age (18-65 years old), history of essential HTN (at least 6 months), heart rate (≥70 bpm), OSBP (≥150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM, 24-h SBP ≥130 mmHg or daytime SBP ≥135 mmHg or nighttime SBP ≥120 mmHg), renal artery stenosis (＜50%) and renal function (eGFR ＞45 mL/min/1.73 m2). The catheter with both stimulation and ablation functions was inserted in the distal renal main artery. The RDN site (hot spot) was selected if SBP increased (≥5 mmHg) by intra-renal artery (RA) electrical stimulation; an adequate RDN was confirmed by repeated electronic stimulation if no increase in BP otherwise, a 2nd ablation was performed at the same site. At sites where there was decreased SBP (≥5 mmHg, cold spot) or no BP response (neutral spot) to stimulation, no ablation was performed. The mapping, ablation and confirmation procedure was repeated until the entire renal main artery had been tested then either treated or avoided. After msRDN, patients had to follow a predefined, vigorous drug titration regimen in order to achieve target OSBP (＜140 mmHg). Drug adherence was monitored by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis using urine. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02761811) and 5-year follow-up is ongoing.

Findings

Between July 8, 2016 and February 23, 2022, 611 patients were consented, 220 patients were enrolled in the study who received standardized antihypertensive drug treatments (at least two drugs) for at least 28 days, presented OSBP ≥150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg and met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. In left RA and right RA, mapped sites were 8.2 (3.0) and 8.0 (2.7), hot/ablated sites were 3.7 (1.4) and 4.0 (1.6), cold spots were 2.4 (2.6) and 2.0 (2.2), neutral spots were 2.0 (2.1) and 2.0 (2.1), respectively. Hot, cold and neutral spots was 48.0%, 27.5% and 24.4% of total mapped sites, respectively. At 6 M, the Control Rate of OSBP was comparable between msRDN and Sham group (95.4% vs 92.8%, p = 0.429), achieved non-inferiority margin -10% (2.69%; 95% CI -4.11%, 9.83%, p ＜ 0.001 for non-inferiority); the change in Drug Index was significantly lower in msRDN group compared to Sham group (4.37 (6.65) vs 7.61 (10.31), p = 0.010) and superior to Sham group (-3.25; 95% CI -5.56, -0.94, p = 0.003), indicating msRDN patients need significantly fewer drugs to control OSBP ＜140 mmHg. 24-hour ambulatory SBP decreased from 146.8 (13.9) mmHg by 10.8 (14.1) mmHg, and from 149.8 (12.8) mmHg by 10.0 (14.0) mmHg in msRDN and Sham groups, respectively (p < 0.001 from Baseline; p > 0.05 between groups). Safety profiles were comparable between msRDN and Sham groups, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of renal mapping/selective RDN to treat uncontrolled HTN.

Interpretation

The msRDN therapy achieved the goals of reducing the drug burden of HTN patients and controlling OSBP <140 mmHg, with only approximately four targeted ablations per renal main artery, much lower than in previous trials.

Funding

SyMap Medical (Suzhou), LTD, Suzhou, China.

Rationale and Design of Sympathetic Mapping/Ablation of Renal Nerves Trial (SMART) for the Treatment of Hypertension: a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized and Sham Procedure-Controlled Study

Renal denervation (RDN) is proposed as a durable and patient compliance independent treatment for hypertension. However, 20-30% non-responder after RDN treatment weakened the therapeutic effect, which may be due to blind ablation. The renal nerve mapping/selective ablation system developed by SyMap Medical Ltd (Suzhou), China, has the function of mapping renal sympathetic/parasympathetic nerve sites and selectively removing renal sympathetic nerves and is expected to meet the urgent unmet clinical need of targeted RDN. The "Sympathetic Mapping/Ablation of Renal Nerves Trial" (SMART) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, sham procedure-controlled trial, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of targeted renal sympathetic denervation in patients with essential and uncontrolled hypertension. The study is the first clinical registry trial using a targeted RDN for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension; the dual-endpoint design can answer the question of how many antihypertensive drugs can be reduced in patients after RDN. The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT02761811.

Renal nerve stimulation: complete versus incomplete renal sympathetic denervation

PURPOSE

Blood pressure (BP) reduction after renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is highly variable. Renal nerve stimulation (RNS) can localize sympathetic nerves. The RNS trial aimed to investigate the medium-term BP-lowering effects of the use of RNS during RDN, and explore if RNS can check the completeness of the denervation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-four treatment-resistant hypertensive patients were included in the prospective, single-center RNS trial. The primary study endpoint was change in 24-h BP at 6- to 12-month follow-up after RDN. The secondary study endpoints were the acute procedural RNS-induced BP response before and after RDN; number of antihypertensive drugs at follow-up; and the correlation between the RNS-induced BP increase before versus after RDN (delta [Δ] RNS-induced BP).

RESULTS

Before RDN, the RNS-induced systolic BP rise was 43(±21) mmHg, and decreased to 9(±12) mmHg after RDN (p < 0.001). Mean 24-h systolic/diastolic BP decreased from 147(±12)/82(±11) mmHg at baseline to 135(±11)/76(±10) mmHg (p < 0.001/<0.001) at follow-up (10 [6-12] months), with 1 antihypertensive drug less compared to baseline. The Δ RNS-induced BP and the 24-h BP decrease at follow-up were correlated for systolic (R = 0.44, p = 0.004) and diastolic (R = 0.48, p = 0.003) BP. Patients with ≤0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response after RDN had a significant lower mean 24-h systolic BP at follow-up compared to the patients with >0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response (126 ± 4 mmHg versus 135 ± 10 mmHg, p = 0.04). 83% of the patients with ≤0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response had normal 24-h BP at follow-up, compared to 33% in the patients with >0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

The use of RNS during RDN leads to clinically significant and sustained lowering of 24-h BP with fewer antihypertensive drugs at follow-up. RNS-induced BP changes were correlated with 24-h BP changes at follow-up. Moreover, patients with complete denervation had significant lower BP compared to the patients with incomplete denervation.

Mapping Renal Innervations by Renal Nerve Stimulation and Characterizations of Blood Pressure Response Patterns

Increased sympathetic nervous activity is one of main contributors to pathogenesis and progression of hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) has been demonstrated as a potential therapy for treatment of hypertension; however, lack of indicators of intra-/post-procedure results in inconsistent clinical outcomes. Renal nerve stimulation (RNS), a simple and promising method, could evoke elevated blood pressure as an intraoperative indicator for RDN. But related researches on patterns of blood pressure responses to RNS are still incomplete. To investigate and categorize the phenotypes of blood pressure response to RNS and heart rate alteration before and after RNS, 24 Chinese Kunming dogs were used to perform RNS from bifurcation to ostium of renal arteries after angiography, and a total of 483 stimulated sites were complete. We identified five different patterns of blood pressure response to RNS in 483 stimulated sites, (1) continuous ascending and finally keeping steady above baseline (26.9%), (2) declining and then rising over baseline (11.8%), (3) declining and then rising but below baseline (14.5%), (4) fluctuating in the vicinity of baseline (39.5%), and (5) continuous declining and finally keeping steady below baseline (7.2%), and found no difference in RR intervals among five blood pressure responses before and after renal nerve stimulation. Renal nerve stimulation could elicit different patterns of blood pressure response, which could potentially assist in distinguishing sympathetic-excitatory sites and sympathetic-inhibitory sites from mixed nerve components, which might help to improve the efficacy of RDN.

Selective Renal Denervation Guided by Renal Nerve Stimulation in Canine

Renal nerve stimulation (RNS) can result in substantial blood pressure (BP) elevation, and the change was significantly blunted when repeated stimulation after ablation. However, whether RNS could provide a meaningful renal nerve mapping for identification of optimal ablation targets in renal denervation (RDN) is not fully clear. Here, we compared the antihypertensive effects of selective RDN guided by two different BP responses to RNS and explored the nerve innervations at these sites in Kunming dogs. Our data indicated that ablation at strong-response sites showed a more systolic BP-lowering effect than at weak-response sites ( P =0.002), as well as lower levels of tyrosine hydroxylase and norepinephrine in kidney and a greater reduction in plasma norepinephrine ( P =0.004 for tyrosine hydroxylase, P =0.002 for both renal and plasma norepinephrine). Strong-response sites showed a greater total area and mean number of renal nerves than weak-response sites ( P =0.012 for total area and P <0.001 for mean number). Systolic BP-elevation response to RNS before RDN and blunted systolic BP-elevation to RNS after RDN were correlated with systolic BP changes at 4 weeks follow-up ( R =0.649; P =0.012 and R =0.643; P =0.013). Changes of plasma norepinephrine and renal norepinephrine levels at 4 weeks were also correlated with systolic BP changes at 4 weeks ( R =0.837, P <0.001 and R =0.927, P <0.001). These data suggest that selective RDN at sites with strong BP-elevation response to RNS could lead to a more efficient RDN. RNS is an effective method to identify the nerve-enriched area during RDN procedure and improve the efficacy of RDN.

Enhanced arrhythmogenic potential induced by renal autonomic nerve stimulation: Role of renal artery catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Renal artery catheter ablation has been reported as a possible therapeutic option for drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) associated with structural heart diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To further clarify its therapeutic background, we examined the relationship between electrical nerve stimulation (ENS)-induced blood pressure (BP) elevation and occurrence of VAs by using an acute canine model of renal artery ablation.

METHODS

Using a decapolar electrode catheter, ENS was successively applied from the distal, mid, and proximal segments of the renal artery in 8 beagles. The same ENS was repeated after accomplishment of radiofrequency ablation at the ostial site of the renal artery by using an irrigation catheter.

RESULTS

Before ablation, ENS increased BP from 140 ± 11/77 ± 11 to 167 ± 20/98 ± 16 mm Hg and heart rate from 100 ± 21 to 131±33 beats/min as well as induced VAs in 20 of the 45 ENS applications. Occurrence of VAs was associated with a greater magnitude of sympathetic nerve augmentation, and VAs were more frequently observed by ENS at the distal (67%) rather than mid/proximal segments of the renal artery (33%). Renal artery ablation was accomplished without any angiographic stenosis, and ENS-induced BP elevation, heart rate acceleration, and VAs occurrence were attenuated not only at the close segment (proximal) but also at the remote segments (mid/distal) of the renal artery.

CONCLUSION

The renal autonomic nerves are considered as one of the therapeutic targets for suppression of frequent VAs because its activation has arrhythmogenic potential and induces premature ventricular beats.

Is renal denervation still a treatment option in cardiovascular disease?

The role of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been the topic of ongoing debate ever since the impressive initial results. The rationale of RDN is strong and supported by non-clinical studies, which lies in uncoupling the autonomic nervous crosstalk between the kidneys and the central nervous system. Since we know that cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension, atrial, ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure (HF) are related to sympathetic (over)activity, modulation of the renal nerve activity appears to be a reasonable and attractive therapeutic target in these patients. This review will focus on the existing evidence and potential future perspectives for RDN as treatment option in cardiovascular disease.

Renal Nerve Stimulation as Procedural End Point for Renal Sympathetic Denervation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as treatment option for hypertension has a strong rationale; however, variable effects on blood pressure (BP) have been reported ranging from non-response to marked reductions in BP. The absence of a procedural end point for RDN is one of the potential factors associated with the variable response. Studies have suggested the use of renal nerve stimulation (RNS) to adequately address this issue. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and experimental data available regarding the effects of RNS in the setting of RDN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Animal studies have shown that high-frequency electrical stimulation of the sympathetic nerves in the adventitia of the renal arteries elicits an increase in BP and leads to an increased norepinephrine spillover as a marker of increased sympathetic activity and these effects of stimulation were attenuated or blunted after RDN. In a human feasibility study using RNS both before and after RDN, similar BP responses were observed. Moreover, in patients with resistant hypertension, RNS-induced changes in BP appeared to be correlated with 24-h BP response after RDN. These data suggest that RNS is a useful tool to identify renal sympathetic nerve fibers in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension undergoing RDN, and to predict the likely effectiveness of RDN treatments. In acute procedural settings both in animal and human models, RNS elicits increase in BP and HR before RDN and these effects are blunted after RDN. Up to now, there is preliminary evidence that the RNS-induced BP changes predict 24-h ABPM outcome at follow-up in patients with resistant hypertension. Of note, studies are small sized and results of large trials comparing conventional RDN to RNS-guided RDN are warranted.

Modulation of renal sympathetic innervation: recent insights beyond blood pressure control

Renal afferent and efferent sympathetic nerves are involved in the regulation of blood pressure and have a pathophysiological role in hypertension. Additionally, several conditions that frequently coexist with hypertension, such as heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation, renal dysfunction, and metabolic syndrome, demonstrate enhanced sympathetic activity. Renal denervation (RDN) is an approach to reduce renal and whole body sympathetic activation. Experimental models indicate that RDN has the potential to lower blood pressure and prevent cardio-renal remodeling in chronic diseases associated with enhanced sympathetic activation. Studies have shown that RDN can reduce blood pressure in drug-naïve hypertensive patients and in hypertensive patients under drug treatment. Beyond its effects on blood pressure, sympathetic modulation by RDN has been shown to have profound effects on cardiac electrophysiology and cardiac arrhythmogenesis. RDN can display anti-arrhythmic effects in a variety of animal models for atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias. The first non-randomized studies demonstrate that RDN may promote the maintenance of sinus rhythm following catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Registry data point towards a beneficial effect of RDN to prevent ventricular arrhythmias in patients with heart failure and electrical storm. Further large randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm the antihypertensive and anti-arrhythmic effects of RDN. Here, we will review the current literature on anti-arrhythmic effects of RDN with the focus on atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias. We will discuss new insights from preclinical and clinical mechanistic studies and possible clinical implications of RDN.

Predictive factors for successful renal denervation: should we use them in clinical trials?

Renal denervation (RDN) is facing various challenges to its initial claimed value in hypertension treatment. Major concerns are the choice of the patients and the technical efficacy of the RDN. Different factors have been described as predicting the capacity of RDN to decrease blood pressure. These factors are related to the patients, the procedure and the tools to confirm successful neural ablation. Their use in future trials should help to improve RDN trials understanding and outcomes. This review summarizes the different predictive factors available and their potential benefits in patient selection and in procedure guidance.