What is the real recurrence rate after cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation? Lessons from rhythm follow-up based on implanted cardiac devices with continuous atrial monitoring

The future of long-term monitoring following catheter and surgical intervention for atrial fibrillation

Monitoring following catheter or surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is an essential tool used to assess outcomes for research purposes and help guide clinical decision making. The most commonly used methods to monitor for postintervention AF include a variety of ambulatory external electrocardiogram monitors, cardiac implantable electronic devices, and more recently, direct to consumer digital health technologies. The traditional metric of ablation success, recurrence > 30 s at 1 year, is below the detection capabilities of almost all monitoring techniques yet still undervalues the efficacy of AF interventions. Measures of AF burden reduction and duration give a more complete assessment of the impact of AF surgeries and ablation. As it is increasingly being recognized that AF burden and duration is related to stroke risk, long-term, inexpensive, noninvasive monitoring methods are needed. Smart phones and watches with AF-detecting capabilities, which are increasingly being used by the majority of U.S. adults, have emerged as viable options to achieve this goal, shifting the paradigm of AF monitoring to a more patient-centered approach.

Keeping it Simple: Balloon Devices for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Therapy

Atrial fibrillation is a common disease of increasing prevalence. Catheter ablation has evolved into an established therapeutic option that mainly aims to electrically isolate the pulmonary veins from atrial myocardium. The traditional method comprises point-by-point radiofrequency current ablation guided by electroanatomical mapping and has proven to be effective and safe in experienced hands. However, this approach is technically highly demanding and associated with a long learning curve, limiting its widespread utilization. To address these shortcomings, simplified ablation tools for pulmonary vein isolation are needed. In this context, balloon devices promise to ease the procedure by approaching the entire orifice of a targeted pulmonary vein in a single maneuver. This requires less catheter manipulation in the left atrium and often allows ablation of a large volume of tissue with a single application of ablative energy. Two balloon devices-one using cryoenergy, the other laser energy-have already been established in clinical routine and have demonstrated noninferiority when compared with radiofrequency ablation in large randomized trials. More balloon devices are on the verge of being introduced into clinical practice and bear the potential to expand the interventional electrophysiologist's armamentarium when treating atrial fibrillation. The authors review the use of the established balloon devices available for atrial fibrillation ablation and provide a detailed outlook on upcoming balloon technologies, including 3 different balloons utilizing radiofrequency energy as well as a novel cryoballoon.

A modified fluoroscopy protocol to minimize radiation exposure during pulmonary vein isolation with second-generation cryoballoon

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) is considered to be safe and effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Reported radiation exposure during PVI with CB2 is higher if compared with other technologies. We investigated acute and mid-term effects of a modified fluoroscopy protocol to minimize radiation exposure during CB2 PVI with regard to safety and efficacy.

METHODS

The study comprised 180 consecutive patients undergoing CB2 PVI. In the first 100 patients, PVI was performed using conventional fluoroscopy settings (group 1), while the following 80 patients (group 2) received PVI with a modified protocol. The protocol consisted of (a) general reduction of fluoroscopy frame rate to 3/s, (b) avoidance of cine runs and selective PV angiograms, and (c) enhanced radiation awareness. Retrospective data analysis was performed in respect to dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and freedom from AF during a 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Group 2 patients had lower DAP (426 ± 433 vs 3334 ± 2271 cGycm² ), fluoroscopy time (13.8 ± 6.3 vs 16.7 ± 5.6 minutes), LA dwell time (49.3 ± 15.5 vs 61.6 ± 16.2 minutes), and procedure time (85.5 ± 22.9 vs 94.9 ± 23.6 minutes); P < .01 for all. One-year freedom from AF was comparable between both groups (71% group 1 vs 73% group 2, ns).

CONCLUSION

Radiation exposure and procedure time during CB2 PVI can be significantly reduced by using a modified fluoroscopy protocol and increased radiation awareness without compromising acute and 1-year freedom from AF if performed by experienced operators.

Atrial fibrillation ablation success defined by duration of recurrence on cardiac implantable electronic devices

INTRODUCTION

Ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has emerged as an effective method of rhythm control. This exploratory analysis aimed to determine how various measures of recurrence would influence the definition of treatment success.

METHODS

Using an electronic health record data set from January 2007 to June 2019 linked with Medtronic cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) data, patients who underwent a first AF ablation procedure following CIED implantation were identified. Data were analyzed for recurrence of AF stratified by varying definitions of successful ablation. The performance of various simulated external AF monitoring strategies was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 665 patients were analyzed including 248 with paroxysmal AF (mean age: 66.2 ± 9.3 years, 73.0% male) and 417 patients with persistent AF (mean age: 67.3 ± 9.0 years, 73.6% male). Among patients with paroxysmal AF, survival free from recurrence at 1 year ranged from 28.2% to 72.1% (>6 min and >23 h thresholds, respectively) with an overall median percentage of time in AF reduction of 99.6%. Among patients with persistent AF, survival free from recurrence at 1 year ranged from 24.9% to 60.0% (>6 min and 7 consecutive days > 23 h thresholds, respectively) with an overall median percentage of time in AF reduction of 99.3%. A single 7-day monitoring strategy had a sensitivity of less than 50% for detecting AF greater than 6 min in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world data set of AF patients with CIEDs undergoing catheter ablation, treatment success varied substantially with different definitions of minimally required AF duration and is significantly impacted by the method of recurrence detection.

Stroke and left atrial thrombi after cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: incidence and predictors. Results from a long-term follow-up

Stroke after catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potential complication with long term consequences. Aim of this study was to determine incidence and potential predictors of stroke and left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi after AF ablation with cryo-energy. Two hundred nine consecutive patients with symptomatic drug refractory AF (65% male; 61 ± 11 yo, 69% paroxysmal AF, mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 2 ± 1.4) were enrolled between October 2012 until December 2015. Long term follow-up was performed with outpatient clinic visits at 6-month intervals. Incidence of stroke after CA was 1.4% (3/209 pts) at long term follow-up. Two out of 3 pts experienced stroke during the first 3 month after CA and one after 36 months. At long term follow-up LAA thrombi were found in two patients (1%) that were on therapeutic oral anticoagulation. Recurrence of AF was found in 4 out of 5 pts with stroke or LAA thrombi. Patients with stroke or LAA thrombi did not differed from those without in term of age, gender, CV risk factors, LA size and AF type. They differed only for EHRA score (2.4 vs 1.3, p = 0.01) before CA. At multivariate analysis after correction for age, gender, LA size, LVEF and AF type, only EHRA score (β 1.92, 95% C.I. 1.3-35 p = 0.02), was an independent predictor of stroke/LAA thrombi. Incidence of stroke after cryoablation is low, with a relative higher prevalence during the first 3 months after CA. Prospective, multicenter long-term registries are needed for a better stroke risk stratification.

Expert opinion on continuous rhythm monitoring of patients with atrial fibrillation for candidates or patients who have already undergone ablation

BACKGROUND

Continuous monitoring by implantable loop recorder (ILR) can provide information relevant to rhythm control and oral anticoagulation (OAC) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but there is little agreement on patients' selection and appropriate management strategy.

METHODS

An expert panel (EP) made up of eight Italian electrophysiologists with expertise in AF ablation, gathered to define an algorithm to guide continuous rhythm monitoring in AF patients who have undergone ablation. The process included a review of the current literature and two EP face-to-face meetings. Between the two meetings, an on-line survey was sent to 50 Italian electrophysiologists practicing AF ablation. Agreement level was considered reached when ≥70% of respondents agreed or were neutral.

RESULTS

Two algorithms were developed to define patients for whom the ILR would be suggested support for (OAC) therapy discontinuation and rhythm management after AF ablation. Thirty-three out of 50 physicians responded to on-line survey (66% response rate). Together with EP members the responders accounted for electrophysiology centers performing about 50% of total yearly Italian AF ablation procedures. Agreement level was reached at the first survey round on all the questions, so the algorithms were not further modified and re-tested.

CONCLUSIONS

EP developed two algorithms for ECG monitoring to guide OAC therapy discontinuation and rhythm management after AF ablation. These suggestions, validated by wide feedback and consensus of physicians performing AF ablations, might support the decision on the choice and the use of ECG monitoring techniques, based on specific patient characteristics.

Second-generation cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation: Lessons from a five-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment has demonstrated encouraging procedural success rates and mid-term results. However, long-term follow-up data on outcome is sparse. The current study is reporting on five-year clinical outcomes following CB2-based PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) and persistent AF (PersAF).

METHODS

A total of 139 patients underwent index CB2-based PVI patients (PAF: n = 105, 76% and PersAF: n = 34, 34%) in two electrophysiology centers. Freeze-cycle duration was 240 s. After successful PVI a bonus freeze-cycle of the same duration was applied in the first 71 patients while the bonus-freeze was omitted in 68 following patients. Three patients (2.2%) were lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up duration of 60 months (interquartile range: 46, 72 months) 74/136 (54.4%) patients remained in stable sinus rhythm (PAF: 62/104, 59.6%; PersAF: 15/32, 46.9%). Significant differences were observed concerning 5-year clinical outcome between PAF and PersAF patients (p = 0.0315). After a mean of 1.32 ± 0.6 procedures (2nd and 3rd procedure by radiofrequency ablation) and a median follow-up duration of 60 (37, 68) months 90/136 (66.2%) patients remained in stable sinus rhythm (PAF: 72/104 (69.2%), PersAF: 21/32 (65.6%), p = 0.0276). For the comparison of bonus-freeze vs no-bonus-freeze protocols no differences were observed (53.5% vs 57.4%, p = 0.650).

CONCLUSIONS

The five-year single-procedure success rate for CB2-based PVI was 54.4% and increased to 66.2% following repeat RF-based procedures. No differences were detected comparing bonus-freeze and no-bonus-freeze protocols.

The effect of second-generation cryoablation without electrical mapping in persistent AF using continuous monitoring

BACKGROUND

Second-generation cryoballoon ablation is safe and effective in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study is to report the real long-term AF burden and freedom from AF post-cryoablation using continuous monitoring, and to assess whether intraoperative confirmation of pulmonary vein isolation using electrical mapping is necessary.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients (mean age 75.7 ± 5.6 years, 16 men) with persistent AF who underwent second-generation cryoablation without electrical mapping were reviewed. All patients had a cardiac implantable device and were followed up for a mean of 755 ± 170 days.

RESULTS

AF burden significantly decreased from 67.51% ± 34.90% to 18.28% ± 26.65% at 1-year follow-up, and this reduction was maintained at final follow-up (18.26% ± 23.70%, p < 0.001). Continuous monitoring revealed a freedom from AF rate of 33% and 24% at 1-year and full follow-up, respectively. Patients who remained in persistent AF at final follow-up had a trend towards higher pre-ablation AF burden (81.6% ± 29.7% vs 57.3% ± 36.4%, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Second-generation cryoablation without confirming pulmonary vein isolation using electrical mapping is effective leading to significant reductions in AF burden based on continuous beat-to-beat monitoring at 1-year and long-term follow-up.

Predictors of freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence after cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicenter study

AIMS

We sought to assess (1) clinical outcomes of second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), and (2) the association of baseline and procedural covariates with atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AAR) after ablation.

METHODS

A total of 135 patients (63 ± 11 years, 96 men [71%]) with persistent AF underwent CB ablation at three experienced electrophysiology centers. Freedom from AAR was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to estimate the effects of baseline and procedural covariates on the likelihood of AAR.

RESULTS

Freedom from AAR at 6, 12, and 18 months was estimated at 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86%-96%), 75% (95% CI, 67%-83%), and 53% (95% CI, 43%-65%), respectively. The presence of an implantable cardiac device (Hazard ratio [HR] 3.09; 95% CI, 1.37-7.00; P = .007), a left atrial (LA) diameter > 50 mm (HR 1.69; 95% CI, 1.02-2.79; P = .043), and absence of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy before the ablation procedure (HR 3.12; 95% CI, 1.72-5.64; P < .001) were associated with AAR. A trend toward an increased risk of AAR was revealed for women (HR 1.73; 95% CI, 0.96-3.11; P = .069).

CONCLUSIONS

CB ablation for persistent AF resulted in freedom from AAR about that reported for RF ablation. The presence of an implantable cardiac device, LA size, and absence of AAD therapy at baseline were associated with the risk of AAR.

Advanced Cardiac Signal Recording

Implantable loop recorders allow prolonged and continuous single-lead electrocardiogram recording, with the pivotal addition of remote monitoring. They have significantly shortened time to electrocardiographic diagnosis and appropriate therapy of many bradyarrhythmias/tachyarrhythmias and proved helpful in arrhythmia burden definition, offering invaluable information in the diagnostic workup for syncope and atrial fibrillation. Advanced cardiac signal recording is also possible by transesophageal catheters. They have been used to orient diagnosis during wide and narrow QRS complex tachycardias and also to perform minimally invasive pacing. Intracardiac electrophysiologic study remains, however, essential for diagnosis of several arrhythmias in the perspective of curative catheter ablation.