Esophageal temperature dynamics during high-power short-duration posterior wall ablation

Prevention of esophageal lesions during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation using esophageal temperature monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of esophageal temperature monitoring (ETM) for the prevention of esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is often advocated. However, evidence supporting its use is scarce and controversial. We therefore aimed to review the evidence assessing the efficacy of ETM for the prevention of esophageal injury.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the available literature from inception to December 31, 2022. All studies comparing the use of ETM, versus no ETM, during radiofrequency (RF) AF ablation and which reported the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDELs) were included.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with a total of 1112 patients undergoing RF AF ablation were identified. Of those patients, 627 were assigned to ETM (56%). The overall incidence of EDELs was 9.8%. The use of ETM during AF ablation was associated with a non significant increase in the incidence of EDELs (12.3% with ETM, vs. 6.6 % without ETM, odds ratio, 1.44, 95%CI, 0.49, 4.22, p = .51, I2 = 72%). The use of ETM was associated with a significant increase in the energy delivered specifically on the posterior wall compared to patients without ETM (mean power difference: 5.13 Watts, 95% CI, 1.52, 8.74, p = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ETM does not reduce the incidence of EDELs during RF AF ablation. The higher energy delivered on the posterior wall is likely attributable to a false sense of safety that may explain the lack of benefit of ETM. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive results.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Multicenter prospective comparison of conventional and high-power short duration radiofrequency application for pulmonary vein isolation: the high-power short-duration radiofrequency application for faster and safer pulmonary vein ablation (POWER FAST III) trial

BACKGROUND

Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PV) with high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency application (RFa) may reduce the duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, without compromising the procedural efficacy and safety in comparison with the conventional approach. This hypothesis has been generated in several observational studies; the POWER FAST III will test it in a randomized multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS

It is a multicenter randomized, open-label and non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. AF ablation using 70 W and 9-10 s RFa is compared with the conventional technique using 25-40 W RFa guided by numerical lesion indexes. The main efficacy objective is the incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrences electrocardiographically documented during 1-year follow-up. The main safety objective is the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesions (EDEL). This trial includes a substudy of incidence of asymptomatic cerebral lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ablation.

RESULTS

A randomized clinical trial compares for the first time high-power short-duration and conventional ablation in order to obtain data about the efficacy and safety of the high-power technique in an adequate methodological context.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the POWER FAST III could support the use of the high-power short-duration ablation in clinical practice.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NTC04153747.

Comparison of three different approaches to very high-power short-duration ablation using the QDOT-MICRO catheter

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The QDOT-MICRO™ catheter allows very high-power and short-duration (vHPSD) ablation. This study aimed to investigate lesion characteristics using different ablation settings.

METHODS

Radiofrequency applications (90 W/4 s, temperature-control mode with 55°C or 60°C target) were performed in excised porcine myocardium using three different approaches: single (SA), double nonrepetitive (DNRA), and double repetitive applications (DRA). Applications were performed with an interval of 1 min for DNRA, and without interval for DRA.

RESULTS

A total of 480 lesions were analyzed. Lesion depth and volume were largest for DRA followed by DNRA and SA regardless of catheter direction (depth: 3.8 vs. 3.3 vs. 2.6 mm, p < .001 for all comparisons; volume: 176.6 vs. 145.1 vs. 97.0 mm³ , p < .001 for all comparisons). Surface area was significantly larger for DRA than for SA (45.1 vs. 38.3 mm² , p < .001) and larger for DNRA than for SA (44.5 vs. 38.3 mm² , p < .001), but was similar between DRA and DNRA (45.1 vs. 44.5 mm² , p = .54). Steam-pops more frequently occurred for DRA than for SA (15.6% vs. 4.4%, p = .004) and DNRA (15.6% vs. 6.9%, p = .061), but the incidence was similar between SA and DNRA (4.4% vs. 6.9%, p = 1). Although surface area and lesion volume were larger in lesions with steam-pops than without steam-pops (46.5 vs. 38.1 mm² , p = .018 and 128.3 vs. 96.8 mm³ , p = .068, respectively), lesions were not deeper (pop(+): 2.5 mm vs. pop(-): 2.6 mm, p = .75).

CONCLUSIONS

DNRA produces larger lesions than SA without increasing the risk of steam-pops. DRA produces the largest lesions among the three groups, but with an increased risk of steam-pops. Even with steam-pops, lesions do not become deeper in vHPSD ablation.

High-Power, Short-Duration Ablation under the Guidance of Relatively Low Ablation Index Values for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Long-Term Outcomes and Characteristics of Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in effectiveness and safety of high-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) guided by relatively low ablation index (AI) values and conventional RFA in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients.

METHODS

The HPSD RFA strategy (40-50 W, AI 350-400 for anterior, 320-350 for posterior wall; n = 547) was compared with the conventional RFA strategy (25-40 W, without AI; n = 396) in PAF patients who underwent their first ablation. Propensity-score matching analyses were used to compare the outcomes of the two groups while controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

After using propensity-score matching analysis, the HPSD group showed a higher early recurrence rate (22.727% vs. 13.636%, p = 0.003), similar late recurrence rate, and comparable safety (p = 0.604) compared with the conventional group. For late recurrent atrial arrhythmia types, the rate of regular atrial tachycardia was significantly higher in the HPSD group (p = 0.013). Additionally, the rate of chronic pulmonary vein reconnection and non-pulmonary vein triggers during repeat procedures was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For PAF patients, compared with the conventional RFA strategy, the HPSD RFA strategy at relatively low AI settings had a higher early recurrence rate, similar long-term success rate, and comparable safety.

How far the zone of heat-induced transient block extends beyond the lesion during RF catheter cardiac ablation

PURPOSE

While radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) creates a lesion consisting of the tissue points subjected to lethal heating, the sublethal heating (SH) undergone by the surrounding tissue can cause transient electrophysiological block. The size of the zone of heat-induced transient block (HiTB) has not been quantified to date. Our objective was to use computer modeling to provide an initial estimate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used previous experimental data together with the Arrhenius damage index (Ω) to fix the Ω values that delineate this zone: a lower limit of 0.1-0.4 and upper limit of 1.0 (lesion boundary). An RFCA computer model was used with different power-duration settings, catheter positions and electrode insertion depths, together with dispersion of the tissue's electrical and thermal characteristics.

RESULTS

The HiTB zone extends in depth to a minimum and maximum distance of 0.5 mm and 2 mm beyond the lesion limit, respectively, while its maximum width varies with the energy delivered, extending to a minimum of 0.6 mm and a maximum of 2.5 mm beyond the lesion, reaching 3.5 mm when high energy settings are used (25 W-20s, 500 J). The dispersion of the tissue's thermal and electrical characteristics affects the size of the HiTB zone by ±0.3 mm in depth and ±0.5 mm in maximum width.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the size of the zone of heat-induced transient block during RFCA could extend beyond the lesion limit by a maximum of 2 mm in depth and approximately 2.5 mm in width.

In vivo tissue temperature during lesion size index-guided 50W ablation versus 30W ablation: A porcine study

BACKGROUND

Neither the actual in vivo tissue temperatures reached with lesion size index (LSI)-guided high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation for atrial fibrillation nor the safety profile has been elucidated.

METHODS

We conducted a porcine study (n = 7) in which, after right thoracotomy, we implanted 6-8 thermocouples epicardially in the superior vena cava, right pulmonary vein, and esophagus close to the inferior vena cava. We compared tissue temperatures reached during 50 W-HPSD ablation with those reached during standard (30 W) ablation, both targeting an LSI of 5.0 (5-15 g contact force).

RESULTS

T_max  (maximum tissue temperature when the thermocouple was located ≤5 mm from the catheter tip) reached during HPSD ablation was modestly higher than that reached during standard ablation (58.0 ± 10.1°C vs. 53.6 ± 9.2°C; p = .14) and peak tissue temperature correlated inversely with the distance between the catheter tip and the thermocouple, regardless of the power settings (HPSD: r = -0.63; standard: r = -0.66). Lethal temperature (≥50°C) reached 6.3 ± 1.8 s and 16.9 ± 16.1 s after the start of HPSD and standard ablation, respectively (p = .002), and it was best predicted at a catheter tip-to-thermocouple distance cut point of 2.8 and 5.3 mm, respectively. All lesions produced by HPSD ablation and by standard ablation were transmural. There was no difference between HPSD ablation and standard ablation in the esophageal injury rate (70% vs. 75%, p = .81), but the maximum distance from the esophageal adventitia to the injury site tended to be shorter (0.94 ± 0.29 mm vs. 1.40 ± 0.57 mm, respectively; p = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Actual tissue temperatures reached with LSI-guided HPSD ablation appear to be modestly higher, with a shorter distance between the catheter tip and thermocouple achieving lethal temperature, than those reached with standard ablation. HPSD ablation lasting <6 s may help minimize lethal thermal injury to the esophagus lying at a close distance.

Mitigating Esophageal Injury after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Guided by Ablation Index; CLOSEr to goal

In the ongoing quest to optimize outcomes for atrial fibrillation ablation, efforts continue to balance the reliable creation of durable transmural ablation lesions, while minimizing risk to neighboring sensitive structures. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Calculated parameters of luminal esophageal temperatures predict esophageal injury following conventional and high-power short-duration radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

Luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring is not associated with reduced esophageal injury following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

OBJECTIVE

Detailed analysis of (the temporal and spatial gradients of) LET measurements may better predict the risk for esophageal injury.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and December 2021, LET maxima, duration of LET rise above baseline, and area under the LET curve (AUC) were calculated offline and correlated with (endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound detected) esophageal injury (i.e., mucosal esophageal lesions [ELs], periesophageal edema, and gastric motility disorders) following PVI using moderate-power moderate-duration (MPMD [25-30 W/25-30s]) and high-power short-duration (HPSD [50 W/13s]) radiofrequency (RF) settings.

RESULTS

63 patients (69 ± 9 years old, 32 male, 51 MPMD and 12 HPSD) were studied. The esophageal injury was frequent (40% in both groups), mucosal ELs were more common with MPMD, and edema was frequently observed following HPSD. RF-duration, total RF-energy at the left atrial (LA) posterior wall, and distance between LA and esophagus were not different between patients with/without esophageal injury. In contrast, to LET and LET duration above baseline, AUC was the best predictor and significantly increased in patients with esophageal injury (3422 vs. 2444 K^. s).

CONCLUSION

For both ablation strategies, AUC of the LET curves best predicted esophageal injury. HPSD is associated with similar rates of esophageal injury when (mostly subclinical) periesophageal alterations (that are of unclear clinical relevance) are included. Whether integration of these calculated LET parameters is useful to prevent esophageal injury remains to be seen.

Preoperative Personalization of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Strategy to Prevent Esophageal Injury: Impact of Changes in Esophageal Position

INTRODUCTION

Due to changes in esophageal position, preoperative assessment of the esophageal location may not mitigate the risk of esophageal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess esophageal motion and its impact on AF ablation strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ninety-seven AF patients underwent 2 computed tomography (CT) scans. The area at risk of esophageal injury (AAR) was defined as the left atrial surface ≤3 mm from the esophagus. On CT1, ablation lines were drawn blinded to the esophageal location to create 3 ablation sets: individual pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA), and WACA with linear ablation (WACA+L). Thereafter, ablation lines for WACA and WACA+L were personalized to avoid the AAR. Rigid registration was performed to align CT1 onto CT2, and the relationship between ablation lines and the AAR on CT2 was analyzed. The esophagus moved by 3.6 [2.7 to 5.5] mm. The AAR on CT2 was 8.6 ± 3.3 cm² , with 77% overlapping that on CT1. High body mass index was associated with the AAR mismatch (standardized β 0.382, P <0.001). Without personalization, AARs on ablation lines for individual PVI, WACA, and WACA+L were 0 [0-0.4], 0.8 [0.5-1.2], 1.7 [1.2-2.0] cm² . Despite the esophageal position change, the personalization of ablation lines for WACA and WACA+L reduced the AAR on lines to 0 [0-0.5] and 0.7 [0.3-1.0] cm² (P <0.001 for both).

CONCLUSION

The personalization of ablation lines based on a preoperative CT reduced ablation to the AAR despite changes in esophageal position. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Preventing esophageal complications from atrial fibrillation ablation: A review

Atrioesophageal fistula is a life-threatening complication of ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation. Methods to reduce the risk of esophageal injury have evolved over the last decade, and diagnosis of this complication remains difficult and therefore challenging to treat in a timely manner. Delayed diagnosis leads to treatment occurring in the context of a critically ill patient, contributing to the poor prognosis associated with this complication. The associated mortality risk can be as high as 70%. Recent important advances in preventative techniques are explored in this review.

Preventative techniques used in current clinical practice are discussed, which include high-power short-duration ablation, esophageal temperature probe monitoring, cryotherapy and laser balloon technologies, and use of proton pump inhibitors. A lack of randomized clinical evidence for the effectiveness of these practical methods are found. Alternative methods of esophageal protection has emerged in recent years, including mechanical deviation of the esophagus and esophageal temperature control (esophageal cooling). Although these are fairly recent methods, we discuss the available evidence to date. Mechanical deviation of the esophagus is due to undergo its first randomized study. Recent randomized study on esophageal cooling has shown promise of its effectiveness in preventing thermal injuries. Lastly, novel ablation technology that may be the future of esophageal protection, pulsed field ablation, is discussed.

The findings of this review suggest that more robust clinical evidence for esophageal protection methods is warranted to improve the safety of atrial fibrillation ablation.

Esophageal temperature during atrial fibrillation ablation poorly predicts esophageal injury: An observational study

Background

Esophageal injury (EI) remains a concern when performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the high-power short-duration (HPSD) technique.

Objective

We aim to indicate that high esophageal temperature during HPSD PVI does not correlate with positive esophageal endoscopy (EGD) findings.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was performed on 43 patients undergoing PVI using HPSD (50 W for 6–7 seconds per lesion) at Tulane Medical Center from July 2020 to January 2021. Esophageal temperature was monitored throughout the procedure using a temperature probe and patients underwent EGD the following day. Small ulcers, nonbleeding erosions, erythema, and/or esophagitis were considered positive EGD findings.

Results

Mean age was 64.9 years; 46.5% of the patients were female. Eleven patients had positive EGD findings (group 1) and 32 patients had normal EGD (group 2). There was no statistical difference in mean esophageal peak temperature between group 1 and group 2 (43.9°C ± 2.9°C and 42.5°C ± 2.3°C, respectively, P = .17). There was no association between positive EGD results and esophageal temperature during PVI. Mean baseline esophageal temperature was similar in both groups (36.1°C, P = .78). Average contact force (P = .53), ablation time (P = .67), age (P = .3096), sex (P = .4), body mass index (P = .14), and other comorbidities did not correlate with positive endoscopy results. We found positive correlation between the distance of the left atrium (LA) to esophagus and positive EGD (P = .0001).

Conclusion

EI during HPSD PVI does not correlate to esophageal temperature changes during ablation. However, esophageal injury does correlate to a shorter proximity of the esophagus to the LA.

Proactive esophageal cooling protects against thermal insults during high-power short-duration radiofrequency cardiac ablation

BACKGROUND

Proactive cooling with a novel cooling device has been shown to reduce endoscopically identified thermal injury during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation using medium power settings. We aimed to evaluate the effects of proactive cooling during high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation.

METHODS

A computer model accounting for the left atrium (1.5 mm thickness) and esophagus including the active cooling device was created. We used the Arrhenius equation to estimate the esophageal thermal damage during 50 W/ 10 s and 90 W/ 4 s RF ablations.

RESULTS

With proactive esophageal cooling in place, temperatures in the esophageal tissue were significantly reduced from control conditions without cooling, and the resulting percentage of damage to the esophageal wall was reduced around 50%, restricting damage to the epi-esophageal region and consequently sparing the remainder of the esophageal tissue, including the mucosal surface. Lesions in the atrial wall remained transmural despite cooling, and maximum width barely changed (<0.8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Proactive esophageal cooling significantly reduces temperatures and the resulting fraction of damage in the esophagus during HPSD ablation. These findings offer a mechanistic rationale explaining the high degree of safety encountered to date using proactive esophageal cooling, and further underscore the fact that temperature monitoring is inadequate to avoid thermal damage to the esophagus.

Procedural time reduction associated with active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

Active esophageal cooling is increasingly utilized as an alternative to luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring for protection against thermal injury during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) when treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Published data demonstrate the efficacy of active cooling in reducing thermal injury, but impacts on procedural efficiency are not as well characterized. LET monitoring compels pauses in ablation due to heat stacking and temperature overheating alarms that in turn delay progress of the PVI procedure, whereas active esophageal cooling allows avoidance of this phenomenon. Our objective was to measure the change in PVI procedure duration after implementation of active esophageal cooling as a protective measure against esophageal injury.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review under IRB approval of patients with AF undergoing PVI between January 2018 and February 2020. For each patient, we recorded age, gender, and total procedure time. We then compared procedure times before and after the implementation of active esophageal cooling as a replacement for LET monitoring.

RESULTS

A total of 373 patients received PVI over the study period. LET monitoring using a multi-sensor probe was performed in 198 patients, and active esophageal cooling using a dedicated device was performed in 175 patients. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between groups (mean age of 67 years, and gender 37.4% female). Mean procedure time was 146 ± 51 min in the LET-monitored patients, and 110 ± 39 min in the actively cooled patients, representing a reduction of 36 min, or 24.7% of total procedure time (p < .001). Median procedure time was 141 [IQR 104 to 174] min in the LET-monitored patients and 100 [IQR 84 to 122] min in the actively cooled patients, for a reduction of 41 min, or 29.1% of total procedure time (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of active esophageal cooling for protection against esophageal injury during PVI was associated with a significantly large reduction in procedure duration.

Relationship between luminal esophageal temperature and volume of esophageal injury during RF ablation: In silico study comparing low power-moderate duration vs. high power-short duration

OBJECTIVE

To model the evolution of peak temperature and volume of damaged esophagus during and after radiofrequency (RF) ablation using low power-moderate duration (LPMD) versus high power-short duration (HPSD) or very high power-very short duration (VHPVSD) settings.

METHODS

An in silico simulation model of RF ablation accounting for left atrial wall thickness, nearby organs and tissues, as well as catheter contact force. The model used the Arrhenius equation to derive a thermal damage model and estimate the volume of esophageal damage over time during and after RF application under conditions of LPMD (30 W, 20 s), HPSD (50 W, 6 s), and VHPVSD (90 W, 4 s).

RESULTS

There was a close correlation between maximum peak temperature after RF application and volume of esophageal damage, with highest correlation (R²  = 0.97) and highest volume of esophageal injury in the LPMD group. A greater increase in peak temperature and greater relative increase in esophageal injury volume in the HPSD (240%) and VHPSD (270%) simulations occurred after RF termination. Increased endocardial to esophageal thickness was associated with a longer time to maximum peak temperature (R²  > 0.92), especially in the HPSD/VHPVSD simulations, and no esophageal injury was seen when the distances were >4.5 mm for LPMD or >3.5 mm for HPSD.

CONCLUSION

LPMD is associated with a larger total volume of esophageal damage due to the greater total RF energy delivery. HPSD and VHPVSD shows significant thermal latency (resulting from conductive tissue heating after RF termination), suggesting a requirement for fewer esophageal temperature cutoffs during ablation.

Impact of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation on Esophageal Temperature Dynamic

BACKGROUND

High-power short-duration (HP-SD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proposed as a method for producing rapid and effective lesions for pulmonary vein isolation. The underlying hypothesis assumes an increased resistive heating phase and decreased conductive heating phase, potentially reducing the risk for esophageal thermal injury. The objective of this study was to compare the esophageal temperature dynamic profile between HP-SD and moderate-power moderate-duration (MP-MD) RFA ablation strategies.

METHODS

In patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation, RFA juxtaposed to the esophagus was delivered in an alternate sequence of HP-SD (50 W, 8-10 s) and MP-MD (25 W, 15-20 s) between adjacent applications (distance, ≤4 mm). Esophageal temperature was recorded using a multisensor probe (CIRCA S-CATH). Temperature data included magnitude of temperature rise, maximal temperature, time to maximal temperature, and time return to baseline. In swine, a similar experimental design compared the effect of HP-SD and MP-MD on patterns of esophageal injury.

RESULTS

In 20 patients (68.9±5.8 years old; 60% persistent atrial fibrillation), 55 paired HP-SD and MP-MD applications were analyzed. The esophageal temperature dynamic profile was similar between HP-SD and MP-MD ablation strategies. Specifically, the magnitude of temperature rise (2.1 °C [1.4-3] versus 2.0 °C [1.5-3]; P=0.22), maximal temperature (38.4 °C [37.8-39.3] versus 38.5 °C [37.9-39.4]; P=0.17), time to maximal temperature (24.9±7.5 versus 26.3±6.8 s; P=0.1), and time of temperature to return to baseline (110±23.2 versus 111±25.1 s; P=0.86) were similar between HP-SD and MP-MD ablation strategies. In 6 swine, esophageal injury was qualitatively similar between HP-SD and MP-MD strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal temperature dynamics are similar between HP-SD and MP-MD RFA strategies and result in comparable esophageal tissue injury. Therefore, when using a HP-SD RFA strategy, the shorter application duration should not prompt shorter intervals between applications.

Actual tissue temperature during ablation index-guided high-power short-duration ablation versus standard ablation: Implications in terms of the efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Actual in vivo tissue temperatures and the safety profile during high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation have not been clarified.

METHODS

We conducted an animal study in which, after a right thoracotomy, we implanted 6-8 thermocouples epicardially in the superior vena cava, right pulmonary vein, and esophagus close to the inferior vena cava. We recorded tissue temperatures during a 50 W-HPSD ablation and 30 W-standard ablation targeting an ablation index (AI) of 400 (5-15 g contact force).

RESULTS

Maximum tissue temperatures reached with HSPD ablation were significantly higher than that reached with standard ablation (62.7 ± 12.5 vs. 52.7 ± 11.4°C, p = 0.033) and correlated inversely with the distance between the catheter tip and thermocouple, regardless of the power settings (HPSD: r = -0.71; standard: r = -0.64). Achievement of lethal temperatures (≥50°C) was within 7.6 ± 3.6 and 12.1 ± 4.1 s after HPSD and standard ablation, respectively (p = 0.003), and was best predicted at cutoff points of 5.2 and 4.4 mm, respectively. All HPSD ablation lesions were transmural, but 19.2% of the standard ablation lesions were not (p = 0.011). There was no difference between HPSD and standard ablation regarding the esophageal injury rate (30% vs. 33.3%, p > 0.99), with the injury appearing to be related to the short distance from the catheter tip.

CONCLUSIONS

Actual tissue temperatures reached with AI-guided HPSD ablation appeared to be higher with a greater distance between the catheter tip and target tissue than those with standard ablation. HPSD ablation for <7 s may help prevent collateral tissue injury when ablating within a close distance.

High-power, short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation: Pros and cons

This article reviews and compares the rationale and evidence supporting high-power, short-duration radiofrequency (RF) ablation with those of conventional-power, conventional-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). The pros and cons of each approach, biophysics of ablation, pre-clinical studies informing clinical utilization, and the accumulated clinical evidence are presented. Both conventional-power, conventional-duration RF ablation and high-power, short-duration ablation are similarly safe, and effective approaches for AF ablation. Theoretical advantages of high-power, short-duration ablation, including greater procedure efficiency and limited conductive heating of collateral structures, must be weighed against the narrower safety margin related to rapid energy delivery during high power ablation.

[Pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency ablation]

Catheter ablation represents the primary treatment for most arrhythmias. The effectiveness of catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation is superior to drug therapy. Therefore, catheter ablation has been established as an increasingly common procedure in clinical routine. In this context, the electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVI) constitutes the cornerstone of the interventional therapy of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. This article describes the procedure of pulmonary vein isolation utilizing radiofrequency point-by-point ablation. It shall be a practical guide for the staff in the electrophysiological laboratory. This article continues a series of manuscripts focusing on interventional electrophysiology topics in the course of EP (electrophysiology) training.This article describes the procedure of pulmonary vein isolation utilizing radiofrequency point-by-point ablation. It shall be a practical guide for the staff in the electrophysiological laboratory. This article continues a series of manuscripts dealing with topics of interventional electrophysiology in the course of EP training.

Esophageal luminal temperature rise during atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with lower radiofrequency electrode distance and baseline impedance

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a life-threatening complication. We sought to measure the association of esophageal temperature attenuation with radiofrequency (RF) electrode impedance, contact force, and distance from the esophagus.

METHODS

The retrospective study cohort included 35 patients with mean age 64 ± 10 years, of whom 74.3% were male, and 40% had persistent AF. All patients had undergone preprocedural cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) followed by AF ablation with luminal esophageal temperature monitoring. Lesion locations were co-registered with CMR image segmentations of left atrial and esophageal anatomy. Luminal esophageal temperature, time matched RF lesion data, and ablation distance from the nearest esophageal location were collected as panel data.

RESULTS

Luminal esophageal temperature changes corresponding to 3667 distinct lesions, delivered with mean power 27.9 ± 5.5 W over a mean duration of 22.2 ± 10.5 s were analyzed. In multivariable analyses, clustered per patient, examining posterior wall lesions only, and adjusted for lesion power and duration as set by the operator, lesion distance from the esophagus (-0.003°C/mm, p < .001), and baseline impedance (-0.015°C/Ω, p < .001) were associated with changes in luminal esophageal temperature.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal luminal temperature rises are associated with shorter lesion distance from esophagus and lower baseline impedance during RF lesion delivery. When procedural strategy requires RF delivery near the esophagus, selection of sites with higher baseline impedance may improve safety.

Reduced esophageal heating in high-power short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation in the contact force catheter era

BACKGROUND

 Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is alternative treatment to medical therapy. Most feared complication is atrioesophageal fistula METHODS: Observational, retrospective analysis of consecutive 355 patients undergoing first AF ablation. Low-power long-duration (LPLD) group contained 158 patients, with 121 (76.58%) having paroxysmal AF who underwent ablation with power 20/30W (anterior and posterior left atrial wall), 17 mL/min flow, and a contact force of 10-30 g for 30 s. High-power short-duration group (HPSD) contained 197 patients, with 113 (57.36%) having paroxysmal AF who underwent ablation at 45/50W of power with a contact force of 8-15 g/10-20 g and a 35 mL/min flow rate for 6-8 s on the anterior and the posterior left atrial wall, respectively. Both groups had pulmonary veins isolated and atrial flutter was ablated when needed. For patients not in sinus rhythm, cardioversion was performed before ablation RESULTS: There were no complications. LPLD group: Left atrial time 118.74 min, total 145.32 min, radiofrequency time 4317.99s, X-ray 13.42 min, and elevation of luminal esophageal temperature (LET) in 132 (84.53%) patients. HPSD group: Left atrial time 72.16 min, total 93.76 min, radiofrequency time 1511.29s, X-ray 7.6 min, and LET elevation in only 75 (38.07%) patients. A markedly higher rate of first-pass isolation was observed in HPSD compared to LPLD, 77.16% versus 13.29%, respectively. Recurrence occurred in 64 (40.50%) and 32 (16.24%) in 28.45 and 22.35 months in LPLD and HPSD patients, respectively. In LPLD, 10 patients were submitted to endoscopy, and one (10%) had mild erythema and in HPSD, 13 performed the endoscopy, with two (15.38%) patients showing mild erythema CONCLUSION: HPSD technique compared to the LPLD technique showed significant reduced radiofrequency and fluoroscopy times, higher rate of first-pass isolation, lower recurrence rate, and esophageal temperature elevation and may also have a protective effect avoiding incidental esophageal injury due to these findings.

Efficiency, Safety, and Efficacy of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF). Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is performed using a point-by-point method to achieve durable PVI. However, this procedure remains complex and time-consuming, and the long-term clinical outcomes are still not satisfactory. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the clinical application of high-power short-duration (HPSD) approaches in the field of RFCA. HPSD ablation, distinguishing it from the conventional ablation strategy, delivers RF energy at a high power and saves the dwell time at each site. It is unknown whether the HPSD approach can bring some gratifying changes in the field of RF energy ablation. A number of experimental studies and clinical studies have been conducted regarding this topic. The review aimed to summarize the research findings and evaluate the procedural efficiency, safety, and clinical outcomes of the HPSD approach based on the evidence available to date.

Protection of the esophagus during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Esophageal injury still occurs with high frequency during ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study is to provide a review of methods to protect the esophagus from injury during AF ablation. Despite advances in imaging and ablation, the potential risk of esophageal injury during AF ablation remains an important concern with a high occurrence of esophageal injury (≈15%). There have been numerous studies evaluating varied techniques for esophageal protection including active cooling and displacement of the esophagus. These techniques are reviewed in this manuscript as well as the role of esophageal protection in managing patients undergoing AF ablation procedure.

Temperature monitoring and temperature-driven irrigated radiofrequency energy titration do not prevent thermally induced esophageal lesions in pulmonary vein isolation: A randomized study controlled by esophagoscopy before and after catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDELs) are common following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and may progress to atrioesophageal fistula (AEF).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to study (1) the benefit of luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring and (2) the impact of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in detecting EDEL and defining pre-existing lesions. The primary endpoint was the number of ablation-induced lesions.

METHODS

Patients with atrial fibrillation were randomized to PVI with LET monitoring (LET[+]) or without LET monitoring (LET[-]). All patients underwent EGD before and after PVI. Ablation power at the left atrial (LA) posterior wall was limited to 25 W in all patients and was titrated to a minimum of 10 W guided by esophageal temperature in the LET[+] group.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients (age 67 ± 10 years; 57% male) were included (44 LET[+], 42 LET[-]). PVI was achieved in all, and additional linear LA lesions were done in 50%. Eight patients developed EDEL (6 LET[+], 2 LET[-]; P = NS). Whereas LET <41°C did not differentiate with regard to EDEL formation, temperature overshooting ≥42°C was associated with a higher risk for new EDEL. Two-thirds of patients showed incidental findings (esophagitis, gastric ulcer) on preprocedural EGD; 8 esophageal lesions were pre-existing. Four patients in the LET[+] group developed epistaxis following insertion of the probe.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring of LET does not prevent ablation-induced esophageal lesions. Patients without temperature surveillance were not at higher risk, but temperatures ≥42°C were associated with increased likelihood of mucosal lesions.

An initial ex vivo evaluation of temperature profile and thermal injury formation on the epiesophageal surface during radiofrequency ablation

INTRODUCTION

Few studies have examined heat transfer and thermal injury on the epiesophageal surface during radiofrequency application, or compared the risk of esophageal thermal injury between standard and high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation. We studied the thermodynamics of HPSD and standard ablation at different tissue interfaces between the left atrium and esophagus, focusing on epiesophageal temperature changes and thermal injury.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fresh porcine heart and esophageal sections were secured to a custom holder and submerged in a temperature-controlled, circulating water bath. During ablation, thermistors recorded temperatures at the catheter tip-atrial interface, epiesophageal-atrial interface, and esophageal lumen. Samples were ablated in triplicate with the following parameters: contact force (15/25g), power (10/20/30 W standard; 40/45/50 W HPSD), and duration (10/20/30 s standard; 5/10/15 s HPSD). Epiesophageal and endoluminal temperature rises were greater in HPSD than in standard ablation (epiesophageal: 5.9 ± 5.6 vs. 2.2 ± 2.0°C, p < .01; endoluminal: 0.7 ± 0.5 vs. 0.4 ± 0.2°C, p < .01). Six of 30 HPSD ablations and 1 of 26 standard ablations caused esophageal injury. The delay between the peak epiesophageal and endoluminal temperatures was greater in HPSD than in standard ablation (24.2 ± 22.1 vs. 13.0 ± 11.0 s, p = .023). Likewise, the peak epiesophageal surface temperature differed more from the concurrent endoluminal temperature in HPSD ablation (5.1 ± 5.3 vs. 1.7 ± 2.0°C, p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Endoluminal temperature underestimates epiesophageal surface temperature substantially during HPSD ablation. Visible epiesophageal injury was associated with a 2.2 ± 2.1°C rise in endoluminal temperature, corresponding to a 10.2 ± 6.5°C rise in epiesophageal temperature.

Lesion Sequence and Catheter Spatial Stability Affect Lesion Quality Markers in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to analyze high-frequency catheter excursion in relation to lesion quality markers in 20 consecutive patients undergoing first-time radiofrequency (RF) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

BACKGROUND

Ablation therapy for AF requires the delivery of durable lesions. The extent to which lesion sequence, catheter spatial stability, and anatomic location influence lesion formation during RF ablation of AF is not well understood.

METHODS

Three-dimensional spatial excursion of the ablation catheter sampled at 60 Hz during pre-specified pairs of RF lesions was extracted from the CARTO3 System (Biosense Webster Inc., Irvine, California) and analyzed by using custom-developed MATLAB software (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts) to define precise catheter spatial stability during RF ablation. Ablation parameters including bipolar electrogram amplitude reduction, impedance decline and transmurality-associated unipolar electrogram (TUE) as evidence of lesion transmurality during lesion placement were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

We collected 437,760 position data points during lesion placement. Ablation catheter spatial stability and lesion formation parameters varied considerably by anatomic location. Lesions placed immediately had similar bipolar electrogram amplitude reduction, smaller impedance decline, but higher likelihood of achieving TUE compared to delayed lesions. Greater catheter spatial stability correlated with lesser impedance decline.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesion sequence, ablation catheter spatial stability, and anatomic location are important modifiers of RF lesion formation. Lesions placed immediately are more likely to exhibit TUE. Greater ablation catheter stability is associated with lesser impedance decline but greater likelihood of TUE.

Incidence of ablation-induced esophageal injury associated with high-power short duration temperature-controlled pulmonary vein isolation using a specialized open-irrigated ablation catheter: A retrospective single-center study

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate short-term efficacy and incidence of ablation-induced endoscopically detected esophageal injury in patients undergoing high-power, short-duration (HPSD) pulmonary vein isolation using a novel irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter and ablation generator setup.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, who underwent AF ablation using an irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter specifically designed for a HPSD ablation approach (50 W, with a target Ablation Index of 350 at posterior wall), received postablation esophageal endoscopy after ablation. In total 45 consecutive patients (67 ± 10 years; 58% male; 42% paroxysmal AF) undergoing AF ablation using a specialized ablation catheter (QDOT) were included in the study. Thirty-one of 45 patients (69%) underwent a first-time pulmonary vein isolation (Group 1, 67 ± 11 years; 55% male; 48% paroxysmal AF). Fourteen patients (31%) underwent a redo AF procedure (Group 2, 66 ± 8 years; 64% male; 29% paroxysmal AF). Patients undergoing first-time pulmonary vein isolation were included in the final analysis. In these patients an endoscopically detected esophageal lesion (EDEL) was detected in 5 of 31 (16%) patients (erosion n = 2, ulcer n = 3). Mean contact force at posterior wall ablation sites was significantly lower in patients with postprocedural EDEL compared with patients without EDEL (11.9 ± 0.8 g vs. 15.6 ± 4.7 g).

CONCLUSION

PVI using a specialized high-power ablation catheter in conjunction with a HPSD ablation approach results in a 16% incidence of EDEL in first AF ablation candidates. Future studies evaluating high-power short duration ablation strategies should include esophageal endoscopy to estimate the risk of clinically relevant esophageal complications.

Characteristics of Esophageal Injury in Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using a High-Power Short-Duration Setting

BACKGROUND

The mechanism of esophageal thermal injury (ETI; esophageal mucosal injury and periesophageal nerve injury leading to gastric hypomotility) remains unknown when using a high-power short-duration (HP-SD) setting. This study sought to evaluate the characteristics of esophageal injuries in atrial fibrillation ablation using a HP-SD setting.

METHODS

After exclusion of 5 patients with their esophagus at the right portion of left atrium and 21 patients with additional ablations such as box isolation and low voltage area ablation in left atrium posterior wall, 271 consecutive patients (62±10 years, 56 women) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation by radiofrequency catheter ablation were analyzed. In the 101 patients, a HP-SD setting at 45 to 50 W with an Ablation Index module was used (HP-SD group). In the remaining 170 patients before introduction of the HP-SD setting, a conventional power setting of 20 to 30 W with contact force monitoring was used (conventional group). We performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy after pulmonary vein isolation in all patients and investigated the incidence and characteristics of ETI.

RESULTS

Although the incidence of ETI was significantly higher in the HP-SD group compared with the conventional group (37% versus 22%, P=0.011), the prevalence of esophageal lesions did not differ between the groups (7% versus 8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of the HP-SD setting (odds ratio, 6.09, P<0.001), and the parameters that suggest anatomic proximity surrounding the esophagus, were independent predictors of ETI. However, the majority of ETI in the HP-SD group was gastric hypomotility, and the thermal injury was limited to the shallow layer of the periesophageal wall using the HP-SD setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of the HP-SD setting was a strong predictor of ETI, it could avoid deeper thermal injuries that reach the esophageal mucosal layer.

Triple gastrointestinal prophylactic therapy following high-power short-duration posterior left atrial wall ablation

The purpose of this study is to investigate incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms and complications in patients who underwent high-power short-duration (HPSD), posterior left atrial wall isolation during atrial fibrillation ablation and thereafter have received gastrointestinal prophylactic regimen consisting of sucralfate, proton-pump inhibitor and colchicine. Patients were followed and assessed at baseline, up until 6th month following the procedures.Among 115 patients who were included, 5 patients (4.3%) reported gastrointestinal symptoms at follow-up. No complications were diagnosed during the follow-up. In conclusion, the HPSD along with prophylactic regimen has been associated with low incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events.

Oesophageal Probe Evaluation in Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (OPERA): results from a prospective randomized trial

Aims

The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of oesophageal lesions after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) with or without the use of oesophageal temperature probes.

Methods and results

Two hundred patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: the OPERA+ group underwent RFA using oesophageal probes (SensiTherm™); the OPERA− group received RFA using fixed energy levels of 25 W at the posterior wall without an oesophageal probe. All patients underwent post-interventional endoscopy and Holter-electrocardiogram after 6 months. (Clinical.Trials.gov: NCT03246594). One hundred patients were randomized in OPERA+ and 100 patients in OPERA−. The drop-out rate was 10%. In total, 18/180 (10%) patients developed endoscopically diagnosed oesophageal lesions (EDEL). There was no difference between the groups with 10/90 (11%) EDEL in OPERA+ vs. 8/90 (9%) in OPERA− (P = 0.62). Despite the higher power delivered at the posterior wall in OPERA+ [28 ± 4 vs. 25 ± 2 W (P = 0.001)], the average EDEL size was equal [5.7 ± 2.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.7 mm (P = 0.38)]. The peak temperature did not correlate with EDEL size. During follow-up, no patient died. Only one patient in OPERA− required a specific therapy for treatment of the lesion. Cumulative AF recurrence after 6 (3–13) months was 28/87 (32%) vs. 34/88 (39%), P = 0.541.

Conclusion

This first randomized study demonstrates that intraoesophageal temperature monitoring using the SensiTherm™ probe does not affect the probability of developing EDEL. The peak temperature measured by the thermoprobe seems not to correlate with the incidence of EDEL. Empiric energy reduction at the posterior wall did not affect the efficacy of the procedure.

Prevention of left atrium esophagus fistula: Appraisal of existing technologies and strategies

Catheter ablation has emerged as an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare, but feared complication. With increasing utilization of ablation therapy for AF, the understanding of the relationship between AEF and ablation has been improved in recent years. Efforts to reduce the risk of AEF have focused on decreasing the risk of severe esophageal injury (EI) and the presumed subsequent progression from EI to AEF, including esophageal temperature monitoring, esophageal cooling systems, esophageal deviation devices, and decreasing and/or curtailing ablation energy delivery. Periprocedural assessment may help identify higher risk patients and detect early esophageal lesions. This review systematically summarizes and evaluates the current strategies and techniques utilized to reduce the risk of AEF in the clinical workflow for AF ablation. We expect that this review will help clinicians to better understand the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of these methods, and to find suitable strategies using current available tools.