Risk factors for atrioventricular block after occlusion for perimembranous ventricular septal defect

Case report: Recovery of long-term delayed complete atrioventricular block after minimally invasive transthoracic closure of ventricular septal defect

INTRODUCTION

Long-term delayed complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) is a serious complication of ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure treatment. Thus, cardiac surgeons have made significant efforts to explore its causes and reduce its incidence. In recent years, minimally invasive transthoracic closure (MITC) of VSD has been used widely and successfully in China as it is easy to repeat, ensures individualized closure, and can be debugged repeatedly. Theoretically, the possibility of the recurrence of CAVB is lower than that with transcatheter closure. Although the incidence of CAVB after MITC of VSD is inevitable, long-term delayed CAVB has rarely been reported.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Herein, we report a case of delayed CAVB that occurred 2 years and 5 months after performing MITC of a perimembranous VSD. The cardiac rhythm recovered after the occluder was removed surgically.

CONCLUSION

The findings of our case report emphasize that since delayed CAVB may occur in the long term after MITC of VSD, the safety of MITC of VSD should be reassessed, the indications for MITC should be strictly followed, and long-term follow-up, including lifelong follow-up, is recommended for patients postoperatively. In addition, the occluder should be removed surgically in patients with CAVB as it may restore normal heart rhythm.

Update on percutaneous and perventricular device closure of congenital ventricular septal defect

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular septal defect is the most common congenital heart defect. Surgical repair has been standard therapy for symptomatic ventricular septal defects since the 1950's. Catheter-based device closure of ventricular septal defects emerged in the 1980's and has become a safe and effective alternative in select patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on patient selection and procedural techniques for device closure of ventricular septal defects, including percutaneous and hybrid perventricular approaches. The available devices used for these procedures, and outcomes of their use, are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Percutaneous and perventricular device closure of ventricular septal defects is safe and effective in select patients. However, the majority of ventricular septal defects requiring closure continue to be managed with conventional surgery. Further development and investigation of transcatheter and hybrid surgical approaches for closing ventricular septal defects is required.

Predictors and long-term outcomes of heart block after transcatheter device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect

Background

Heart block is the most common and concerning complication associated with transcatheter device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect (pmVSD) and its occurrence remains a great challenge for device closure.

Methods

Between June 2002 and June 2020, 1076 pediatric patients with pmVSD, who successfully underwent transcatheter device closure in our center, were enrolled in this cohort study, with a median follow-up of 64 months (range: 1 to 19 years).

Results

Of 1076 patients, 234 (21.8%) developed postprocedural heart block, with right bundle branch block being the most common (74.8%), followed by left bundle branch block (16.2%), and atrioventricular block (5.6%). Complete atrioventricular block occurred in 5 cases, including 3 cases with permanent pacemaker implantation, 1 case with recovery to normal sinus rhythm, and 1 case with sudden cardiac death. Most patients (97.9%) developed heart block within 1 week of procedure. Finally, 138 cases returned to normal cardiac conduction. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that thin-waist occluders (odds ratio [OR]: 1.759; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.023 to 3.022; P = 0.041), and oversized devices (OR: 1.809; 95% CI: 1.322 to 2.476; P < 0.001) were independently associated with occurrence of postprocedural heart block. Moreover, heart block was less likely to occur when the left disk of occluder was placed within the aneurysmal tissue (OR: 0.568; 95% CI: 0.348 to 0.928; P = 0.024).

Conclusion

The outcome of postprocedural heart block is favorable in most cases. Oversized devices and thin-waist occluders should be avoided. Placement of the left disk of the device should into the aneurysmal tissue is highly recommended.