Implementing shared medical appointments for heart failure patients in a community cardiology practice: a pilot study

Determinants of implementation for group medical visits for patients with chronic pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite the critical need for comprehensive and effective chronic pain care, delivery of such care remains challenging. Group medical visits (GMVs) offer an innovative and efficient model for providing comprehensive care for patients with chronic pain. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify barriers and facilitators (determinants) to implementing GMVs for adult patients with chronic pain.

METHODS

The review included peer-reviewed studies reporting findings on implementation of GMVs for chronic pain, inclusive of all study designs. Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched. Studies of individual appointments or group therapy were excluded. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to determine risk of bias. Data related to implementation determinants were extracted independently by two reviewers. Data synthesis was guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

RESULTS

Thirty-three articles reporting on 25 studies met criteria for inclusion and included qualitative observational (n = 8), randomized controlled trial (n = 6), quantitative non-randomized (n = 9), quantitative descriptive (n = 3), and mixed methods designs (n = 7). The studies included in this review included a total of 2364 participants. Quality ratings were mixed, with qualitative articles receiving the highest quality ratings. Common multi-level determinants included the relative advantage of GMVs for chronic pain over other available models, the capability and motivation of clinicians, the cost of GMVs to patients and the health system, the need and opportunity of patients, the availability of resources and relational connections supporting recruitment and referral to GMVs within the clinic setting, and financing and policies within the outer setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-level factors determine the implementation of GMVs for chronic pain. Future research is needed to investigate these determinants more thoroughly and to develop and test implementation strategies addressing these determinants to promote the scale-up of GMVs for patients with chronic pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021231310 .

Using Shared Medical Appointments for Delivering Patient-Centered Care to Cancer Survivors: A Feist-Weiller Cancer Center Pilot Study

Background: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) have shown promise in the care of patients with conditions such as diabetes; however, the impact of lifestyle medicine-based SMAs on the overall health status of cancer survivors remains poorly understood. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional survey of patients was conducted to study the impact of a unique lifestyle medicine-based survivorship program on cancer survivors. Results: A total of 64 patients were telephonically contacted for the survey, out of which 39 (60.9%) patients responded. All patients (39 of 39, 100%) found the program to be helpful in some way; 26 patients (66.7%) found SMAs to be significantly helpful, while 13 patients (33.3%) found SMAs as only somewhat helpful. The majority noted feeling a great sense of support (35 of 39, 89.7%), followed by improvement in appetite (21 of 39, 54%) and improvement in pain (14 of 39, 35.9%). All patients reported at least some improvement in subjective well-being (SWB); patients who attended >3 appointments reported significant/very significant improvement in SWB (P = .03). Conclusion: SMAs offer promise in the effective delivery of lifestyle medicine-focused care to cancer survivors. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Shared medical appointments: Translating research into practice for patients treated with ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

People with atrial fibrillation (AF) have lower reported quality of life and increased risk of heart attack, death, and stroke. Lifestyle modifications can improve arrhythmia-free survival/symptom severity. Shared medical appointments (SMAs) have been effective at targeting lifestyle change in other chronic diseases and may be beneficial for patients with AF.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if perceived self-management and satisfaction with provider communication differed between patients who participated in SMAs compared to patients in standard care. Secondary objectives were to examine differences between groups for knowledge about AF, symptom severity, and healthcare utilization.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected where patients were assigned to either standard care (n = 62) or a SMA (n = 59). Surveys were administered at pre-procedure, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Perceived self-management was not significantly different at baseline (p = 0.95) or 6 months (p = 0.21). Patients in SMAs reported more knowledge gain at baseline (p = 0.01), and higher goal setting at 6 months (p = 0.0045). Symptom severity for both groups followed similar trends.

CONCLUSION

Patients with AF who participated in SMAs had similar perceived self-management, patient satisfaction with provider communication, symptom severity, and healthcare utilization with their counterparts, but had a statistically significant improvement in knowledge about their disease.

Functional gastrointestinal disorders: real-life results of a multidisciplinary non-pharmacological approach based on group-consultations

INTRODUCTION

functional gastrointestinal disorders are prevalent and resource consuming. The use of group-consultations in these diseases is limited and no specific multidisciplinary programs have been developed.

METHODS

a multidisciplinary approach was used in patients with diverse functional gastrointestinal disorders attending group-consultations (group A). Five two-hour sessions were scheduled over a four-month period. Sessions consisted of a theoretical introduction (Pathophysiology, Low fodmap diet, Over the counter medications, Mediterranean diet, and Laughter therapy workshop) followed by relaxation techniques. This group was compared to a similar group of patients who received written information covering the topics discussed during the group-consultations (group B). Severity of digestive and psychological symptoms, use of drugs and adherence to the diet were the main outcomes measured.

RESULTS

the mean age of participants was 43 (± 1.38) years, 78 % were female and 73 % had at least two functional gastrointestinal disorders. Sixty-two patients were included in group A and 17 in group B. The severity of gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms at baseline was similar in both groups. Globally, there was an improvement in all symptoms in both groups. The proportion of participants with severe baseline gastrointestinal symptoms or pathologic anxiety scores that showed improvement was significantly higher in group A (74 % vs 23 %, p = 0.005; 47 % vs 8 %, p = 0.02, respectively). Symptoms were reassessed at six and 12 months after the intervention in participants from group A who attended ≥ 80 % sessions and a sustained response was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

group-consultations are useful and efficient to alleviate gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

A Retrospective Study Reviewing Interprofessional Advance Care Planning Group Discussions in Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Proof-of-Concept and Feasibility Study

Background:

Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of reflection and discussion wherein a patient, in consultation with a health-care provider, family, and/or loved ones, clarifies values and treatment preferences and establishes goals, including a plan for end-of-life (EOL) care. Advance care planning encompasses appreciating and understanding illness and treatment options, elucidating patient values and beliefs, and identifying a substitute decision maker (SDM) or designating a power of attorney (POA) for personal care. These discussions have proven to be effective in improving patient–family satisfaction, reducing anxiety regarding EOL care in patients and family members, and improving patient-centered care by empowering patients to direct their care at EOL. However, ACP conversations are often difficult to have due to the sensitive nature of such discussions.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to determine whether group facilitation for teaching and discussing ACP enhances participants’ understanding of ACP and allows them to feel comfortable and supported when discussing these sensitive issues.

Methods:

Patients who were registered in North York General Hospital’s (NYGH) pulmonary rehabilitation program from June 2016 until August 2017 were given the opportunity to attend two 1-hour sessions related to ACP. The first session was dedicated to educating patients on ACP, explaining the hierarchy of the SDM and the role of the POA for personal care. The second session, provided a short time later, was devoted to discussions of values, wishes, fears, and trade-offs for future medical and EOL care. These discussions led by the supportive care nurse practitioner and a physician who are members of the NYGH Freeman Palliative Care Team were held in a group-facilitated format. Anonymous feedback forms, including both qualitative and quantitative feedback, were completed by the participants and analyzed.

Participants:

Analysis of a sample of 30 participants who attended 1 or 2 of the ACP sessions revealed that 21 identified as female and 9 identified as male. The average age of the participants was 76 years.

Findings:

Participants felt the content was relevant to their needs and were comfortable asking questions with all feedback averages ranging from good to very good. Participants appreciated the opportunity to share their thoughts in an open and interactive format.

Conclusion:

Discussing issues relevant to ACP, including providing information about ACP, sharing fears, wishes, and tradeoffs, were well-received in a group-support environment. Future studies should assess the impact of ACP group discussion on the individual, such as identifying a POA, having discussions regarding wishes and values with the SDM/POA, and examining the clinical impact of such sessions.

Characteristics and Components of Medical Group Visits for Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Scoping Review

Objectives: Chronic health conditions are a major challenge to the health care system. Medical Group Visits (MGVs) are a valuable health care delivery model used in a variety of medical settings and patient populations. We conducted a systematic scoping review of MGV research literature for chronic health conditions to summarize the characteristics and individual components of MGVs in the United States of America and Canada. Design: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses scoping review methodology and searched five databases using nine widely used MGV-related terms. Subjects: We included studies conducted in the United States and Canada, whose participants were >18 years old and attended an MGV conducted in a medical setting by a billable health care provider. We excluded groups related to diabetes, pregnancy, and cancer. Results: Of 3777 studies identified, we found 55 eligible studies of which 9 are randomized controlled trials and 46 are observational studies. The majority of studies were conducted in academic medical centers, were observational in design, and recruited patients using physician referrals. The three most frequently studied groups include a combination of several chronic conditions (n = 12), chronic pain conditions (n = 10), and cardiovascular disease (n = 9). Curriculum components included didactics (n = 55), experiential activities (n = 27), and socializing components (n = 12). Didactic areas include (1) medical topics such as symptoms management (n = 27) of which 14 included pain management, and (2) lifestyle/educational component (n = 33) that comprised of talks on nutrition (n = 29), exercise (n = 20), stress (n = 16), and sleep (n = 10). The top integrative medicine (IM) modalities (n = 13) included: mindfulness techniques (n = 8), meditation (n = 6), and yoga (n = 5). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the recruitment, implementation, curriculum components, and outcomes reported. Conclusion: The MGV is a model of patient-centered care that has captured the attention of researchers. IM modalities are well represented in the curriculum components of MGVs. Further investigation into the components identified by this study, may help in better targeting of group interventions to patients and contexts, where it is most likely to be effective.

Shared Medical Appointments in Preoperative Joint Replacement: Assessing Patient and Healthcare Member Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Shared medical appointments (SMAs) have proven to be effective in improving patient access and education while augmenting productivity. In shifting from a traditional visit model, patient and interdisciplinary healthcare team (IHCT) member satisfaction is imperative. Predominantly seen in primary care, SMA use in orthopedics is limited. After identification of access and productivity concerns, the SMA was implemented as a quality improvement project in a rural clinic. The lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) population was chosen because of multiple preoperative appointments and costs on the healthcare system.

PURPOSE

To assess patients' and IHCT members' satisfaction levels in using an SMA for the preparation of LEJR.

RELEVANCE TO HEALTHCARE QUALITY

The SMA is an effective model offering an efficient, cost-effective methodology aligning with the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Triple Aim.

RESULTS

Twenty SMAs were conducted. Sixty-three patients and 14 ICHT members participated. Mean (M) satisfaction rating for SMA patients (M = 4.90, SD 0.26) was significantly higher than mean for traditional patients (M = 4.03, SD 0.39). Interdisciplinary healthcare team members' attitudes toward SMAs revealed a mean score of 4.58. Incidentally, cycle times improved as did lengths of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower extremity joint replacement patients and IHCT members reported high satisfaction with SMAs.

Preparation for and Implementation of Shared Medical Appointments to Improve Self-Management, Knowledge, and Care Quality Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in adults and is associated with an increased risk of stroke, heart failure, and death. Therapy for this pervasive arrhythmia is complex, involving multiple options that chiefly manage symptoms and prevent stroke. Current therapeutic strategies are also of limited efficacy, and can present potentially life-threatening side effects and/or complications. Emerging research suggests that the burden of AF can be reduced by improving patient understanding of the arrhythmia and teaching patients to adopt and maintain lifestyle and behavior changes. Shared medical appointments (SMAs) have been successfully used to deliver education and develop patient coping and disease management skills for patients with complex needs, but there is a paucity of studies examining the use of SMAs for managing AF. Moreover, few studies have examined strategies for implementing SMAs into routine clinical care. We detail our approach for (1) adapting a patient-centered SMA curriculum; (2) designing an evaluation comparing SMAs to routine care on patient outcomes; and (3) implementing SMAs into routine clinical practice. We conclude that evaluation and implementation of SMAs into routine clinical practice requires considerable planning and continuous engagement from committed key stakeholders, including patients, family members, schedulers, clinical staff, nurse educators, administrators, and billing specialists.

Group medical visits after heart failure hospitalization: Study protocol for a randomized-controlled trial

A primary goal of this research project is to better understand how shared medical appointments (SMAs) can improve the health status and decrease hospitalization and death for patients recently discharged with heart failure (HF) by providing education, disease state monitoring, medication titration, and social support to patients and their caregivers. We propose a 3-site randomized-controlled efficacy trial with mixed methods to test a SMA intervention, versus usual care. Patients within 12 weeks of a HF hospitalization will be randomized to receive either HF-SMA (intervention arm) with optional co-participation with their caregivers, versus usual care (control arm). The HF-SMA will be provided by a non-physician team composed of a nurse, a nutritionist, a health psychologist, a nurse practitioner and/or a clinical pharmacist and will consist of four sessions of 2-h duration that occur every other week for 8 weeks. Each session will start with an assessment of patient needs followed by theme-based disease self-management education, followed by patient-initiated disease management discussion, and conclude with break-out sessions of individualized disease monitoring and medication case management. The study duration will be 180 days for all patients from the day of randomization. The primary study hypothesis is that, compared with usual care, patients randomized to HF-SMA will experience better cardiac health status at 90 and 180 days follow-up. The secondary hypotheses are that, compared to usual care, patients randomized to HF-SMA will experience better overall health status, a combined endpoint of hospitalization and death, better HF self-care behavior, and lower B-type natriuretic peptide levels.

Nurse-Led Multidisciplinary Heart Failure Group Clinic Appointments: Methods, Materials, and Outcomes Used in the Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The Self-management and Care of Heart Failure through Group Clinics Trial evaluated the effects of multidisciplinary group clinic appointments on self-care skills and rehospitalizations in high-risk heart failure (HF) patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to (1) describe key Self-management and Care of Heart Failure through Group Clinics Trial group clinic interactive learning strategies, (2) describe resources and materials used in the group clinic appointment, and (3) present results supporting this patient-centered group intervention.

METHODS

This clinical trial included 198 HF patients (randomized to either group clinical appointments or to standard care). Data were collected from 72 group clinic appointments via patients' (1) group clinic session evaluations, (2) HF self-care behaviors skills, (3) HF-related discouragement and quality of life scores, and (4) HF-related reshopitalizations during the 12-month follow-up. Also, the costs of delivery of the group clinical appointments were tabulated.

RESULTS

Overall, patients rated group appointments as 4.8 of 5 on the "helpfulness" in managing HF score. The statistical model showed a 33% decrease in the rate of rehospitalizations (incidence rate ratio, 0.67) associated with the intervention over the 12-month follow-up period when compared with control patients (χ(2)1=3.9, P=.04). The total cost for implementing 5 group appointments was $243.58 per patient.

CONCLUSION

The intervention was associated with improvements in HF self-care knowledge and home care behavior skills and managing their for HF care. In turn, better self-care was associated with reductions in HF-related hospitalizations.

Multidisciplinary group clinic appointments: the Self-Management and Care of Heart Failure (SMAC-HF) trial

BACKGROUND

This trial tested the effects of multidisciplinary group clinic appointments on the primary outcome of time to first heart failure (HF) rehospitalization or death.

METHODS AND RESULTS

HF patients (n=198) were randomly assigned to standard care or standard care plus multidisciplinary group clinics. The group intervention consisted of 4 weekly clinic appointments and 1 booster clinic at month 6, where multidisciplinary professionals engaged patients in HF self-management skills. Data were collected prospectively for 12 months beginning after completion of the first 4 group clinic appointments (2 months post randomization). The intervention was associated with greater adherence to recommended vasodilators (P=0.04). The primary outcome (first HF-related hospitalization or death) was experienced by 22 (24%) in the intervention group and 30 (28%) in standard care. The total HF-related hospitalizations, including repeat hospitalizations after the first time, were 28 in the intervention group and 45 among those receiving standard care. The effects of treatment on rehospitalization varied significantly over time. From 2 to 7 months post randomization, there was a significantly longer hospitalization-free time in the intervention group (Cox proportional hazard ratio=0.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.98; P=0.04). No significant difference between groups was found from month 8 to 12 (hazard ratio=1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-4.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary group clinic appointments were associated with greater adherence to selected HF medications and longer hospitalization-free survival during the time that the intervention was underway. Larger studies will be needed to confirm the benefits seen in this trial and identify methods to sustain these benefits.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00439842.