Early acute antibody-mediated rejection of a negative flow crossmatch 3rd kidney transplant with exclusive disparity at HLA-DP

Allele and haplotype frequencies of 11 HLA loci in Koreans by next-generation sequencing

Data on HLA genotype distribution, including DQA1 and DPA1, in the Korean population are limited. We aimed to investigate the allele and haplotype frequencies of 11 HLA loci in 339 Korean subjects using next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based HLA typing. A total of 339 samples from unrelated healthy subjects were genotyped for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5, -DQB1, -DQA1, -DPB1, and -DPA1 using two different NGS-based HLA typing kits (166 tested using the NGSgo-MX11-3 kit [GenDx, Netherlands] and 173 by the AllType NGS 11 Loci Amplification kit [One Lambda, USA]). PyPop software was used to estimate allele and haplotype frequencies and linkage disequilibrium between the loci. Additionally, a principal component analysis was performed to compare the allele distribution of Koreans with that of other populations. A total of 214 HLA alleles (97 class I and 117 class II alleles) were assigned. The most frequent alleles for each locus were A*24:02:01 (24.78%), B*15:01:01 (10.18%), C*01:02:01 (18.44%), DRB1*04:05:01 (9.59%), DRB3*02:02:01 (13.72%), DRB4*01:03:01 (25.81%), DRB5*01:01:01 (9.0%), DQA1*01:02:01 (16.96%), DQB1*03:01:01 (14.31%), DPA1*01:03:01 (44.4%), and DPB1*05:01:01 (35.1%), respectively. The most frequent haplotypes were A*33:03:01-C*03:02:02-B*58:01:01 for HLA class I (5.01%) and DRB1*04:05:01-DQA1*03:03:01-DQB1*04:01:01-DPA1*02:02:02-DPB1*05:01:01 for HLA class II (6.23%). The total allelic ambiguities by NGS were estimated to be minimal and considerably decreased compared with those by Sanger sequencing. The Japanese population had the most similar allele distribution to Koreans, followed by the Chinese population. Frequency data of 11 HLA loci in Koreans can provide essential data for population genetics and disease association studies.

HLA-DPB1 molecular mismatches are risk factors for acute rejection and low 5-year graft function in first kidney transplants

The study aimed to investigate the impact of HLA-DPB1 allelic and molecular mismatches on the occurrence of acute rejection (AR) and low 5-year graft function (5Y-GF) in first kidney transplant (KT) recipients. This is a single center retrospective study of 130 deceased donor KT recipients transplanted between 2014 and 2016. HLA-DPB1 allelic MM and the following molecular MM (mMM) were analyzed: expression MM with the high expression G allele in the donor; T cell epitope MM (TCE MM); epitope MM (EMM), considering all six hypervariable regions (EMM-ABCDEF HVR), or only ABEF regions (EMM-ABEF HVR); eplet MM (EpMM); antibody-verified eplet MM (AbVer EpMM); and solvent accessible amino acid MM (SAMM). There was no association of allelic MM with AR or 5Y-GF. The variables independently associated (Cox regression analyses) with AR were high donor final creatinine, nonpermissive TCE MM, ABCDEF EMM load ≥6, EpMM load ≥6; SAMM load ≥5, and AbVer EpMM load ≥3. No association between any HLA-DPB1 mMM and 5Y-GF was observed when all 130 transplant recipients were considered. However, when transplants from expanded criteria donors were excluded, independent associations were detected (logistic regression analyses) with AbVerEpMM load ≥2, SAMM load ≥7, cerebro-vascular death, donor age, and AR. To our knowledge, this is the first study that shows that some HLA-DPB1 mMM are associated with AR and low 5Y-GF in a population of exclusively first kidney transplant recipients.

Isolated Pre-existing HLA-DP Donor-Specific Antibodies are Associated With Poorer Outcomes in Renal Transplantation

Introduction

The importance of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in renal transplantation has long been recognized, but the significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DP antibodies remains less clear. We performed a retrospective single center study of renal transplants with pre-existing isolated HLA-DP-DSAs to assess clinical outcomes.

Methods

Twenty-three patients with isolated HLA-DP-DSAs were compared with 3 control groups as follows: standard immunological risk (calculated reaction frequency [cRF] < 85%, no current or historical DSA, no repeat mismatched antigens with previous transplants, n = 46), highly sensitized (cRF > 85%, n = 27), and patients with HLA-DP antibodies that were not donor-specific (n = 18). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed comparing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR)-free and graft survival. Factors in the final multivariable models included patient group, % cRF, B-cell flow crossmatch (BFXM) positivity and regrafts.

Results

Over a median follow-up of 1197 days, 65% of HLA-DP-DSA patients had ABMR on indication biopsies, and 30% of HLA-DP-DSA patients lost their graft. Pre-existing HLA-DP DSAs remained the single factor associated with ABMR after multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.578, P = 0.012). Patients with HLA-DP DSAs had increased microvascular scores (P = 0.0346) and worse transplant glomerulopathy (P = 0.015) on biopsy compared with the standard immunological risk group. Furthermore, flow crossmatch (FXM) positivity did not help inform on the risk of graft failure or ABMR in patients with preformed DP-DSA.

Conclusion

Transplants with pre-existing HLA-DP-DSAs should be considered high risk. Routine laboratory tests are unable to further risk stratify these patients. Recipients should be considered for intensified immunosuppression and closely monitored.

Misidentification of preformed anti-HLA-DP antibodies leads to antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection: a case report

Background

Patients who are HLA-sensitized are at high risk for early antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and worse outcomes. Therefore, it is crucial to detect the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) using pretransplant antibody identification and crossmatch assays. An error in antibody identification can lead to disastrous clinical outcomes. We present a case of acute AMR associated with preformed HLA-DPα and HLA-DPβ DSAs that were not identified before transplantation.

Case presentation

A 27-year-old woman received a second kidney transplant from a deceased donor. Her pretransplant panel-reactive antibody level was 94%. The complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative for T and B cells at the time of transplantation. She experienced early acute AMR proven by a kidney biopsy. Single antigen bead testing of the patient’s serum at the time of rejection as well as the pre-second transplant serum revealed strong antibodies against the DPA1*01:03 and DPB1*02:01 alleles in the second donor. These antibodies were not identified by phenotypic bead assay during the patient’s time on the waiting list. The patient was treated with plasmapheresis and anti-thymocyte globulin. However, she experienced abdominal pain on day 37 post-transplantation. Surgical exploration revealed a laceration on the transplanted kidney, which was then repaired. Subsequently, infected hematoma was suspected and the transplanted kidney was removed.

Conclusion

The present case highlights the clinical significance of preformed HLA-DPα and HLA-DPβ DSAs. Accuracy in determination of HLA antibodies before transplantattion is critical for transplant outcome. HLA-DP typing and single antigen bead testing are recommended for a precise antibody interpretation, especially in highly sensitized patients. Careful interpretation of antibody testing results is essential for the success of organ transplantation.

Determination of unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches in kidney transplant recipients

With the introduction of the virtual allocation crossmatch in the Eurotransplant (ET) region in 2023, the determination of unacceptable antigen mismatches (UAM) in kidney transplant recipients is of utmost importance for histocompatibility laboratories and transplant centers. Therefore, a joined working group of members from the German Society for Immunogenetics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Immungenetik, DGI) and the German Transplantation Society (Deutsche Transplantationsgesellschaft, DTG) revised and updated the previous recommendations from 2015 in light of recently published evidence. Like in the previous version, a wide range of topics is covered from technical issues to clinical risk factors. This review summarizes the evidence about the prognostic value of contemporary methods for HLA antibody detection and identification, as well as the impact of UAM on waiting time, on which these recommendations are based. As no clear criteria could be determined to differentiate potentially harmful from harmless HLA antibodies, the general recommendation is to assign all HLA against which plausible antibodies are found as UAM. There is, however, a need for individualized solutions for highly immunized patients. These revised recommendations provide a list of aspects that need to be considered when assigning UAM to enable a fair and comprehensible procedure and to harmonize risk stratification prior to kidney transplantation between transplant centers. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

A simple electronic tool for assessing amino acid sequence polymorphisms within exon-2 of HLA-DPB1 alleles

In November 2014, the OPTN/UNOS Board of Directors mandated that HLA-DPB1 typing be performed for all deceased donors. Currently, there are over 1,000 known HLA DPB1 alleles, yet fewer than 30 are represented on commonly used single antigen bead (SAB) solid phase antibody assays. Moreover, the official World Health Organization (WHO) nomenclature for the DPB1 locus does not permit assessment of structural relationships between alleles based on their names. Thus, for donor DPB1 alleles lacking a corresponding SAB, determining the compatibility between a donor-recipient pair when the recipient possesses DPB1 antibodies currently requires the use of manual sequence alignments. Multiple studies have reported that DPB1 alleles can be classified into serological-defined categories based on shared protein sequence motifs residing in distinct hypervariable regions. To date, six such motifs have been recognized. To address this problem, we developed a computer-assisted tool to compare donor and recipient DPB1 allele sequences, specifically those defined by DPB1 hypervariable region motifs located in exon 2 (http://dpreport.hlatools.org). This tool quickly identifies mismatched DPB1 motifs, and easily permits the identification of motif-based donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to DPB1.

The role of HLA-DP mismatches and donor specific HLA-DP antibodies in kidney transplantation: a case series

BACKGROUND

The impact of HLA-DP mismatches on renal allograft outcome is still poorly understood and is suggested to be less than that of the other HLA loci. The common association of HLA-DP donor-specific antibodies (DSA) with other DSA obviates the evaluation of the actual effect of HLA-DP DSA.

METHODS

From a large multicenter data collection, we retrospectively evaluated the significance of HLA-DP DSA on transplant outcome and the immunogenicity of HLA-DP eplet mismatches with respect to the induction of HLA-DP DSA. Furthermore, we evaluated the association between the MFI of HLA-DP antibodies detected in Luminex assays and the outcome of flowcytometric/complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches.

RESULTS

In patients with isolated pretransplant HLA-DP antibodies (N = 13), 6 experienced antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and 3 patients lost their graft. In HLAMatchmaker analysis of HLA-DP mismatches (N = 72), HLA-DP DSA developed after cessation of immunosuppression in all cases with 84DEAV (N = 14), in 86% of cases with 85GPM (N = 6/7), in 50% of cases with 56E (N = 6/12) and in 40% of cases with 56A mismatch (N = 2/5). Correlation analysis between isolated HLA-DP DSA MFI and crossmatches (N = 90) showed negative crossmatch results with HLA-DP DSA MFI <2000 (N = 14). Below an MFI of 10,000 CDC crossmatches were also negative (N = 33). Above these MFI values both positive (N = 35) and negative (N = 16) crossmatch results were generated.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated HLA-DP DSA are rare, yet constitute a significant risk for AMR. We identified high-risk eplet mismatches that can lead to HLA-DP DSA formation. We therefore recommend HLA-DP typing to perform HLA-DP DSA analysis before transplantation. HLA-DP DSA with high MFI were not always correlated with positive crossmatch results.

HLA-Epitope Matching or Eplet Risk Stratification: The Devil Is in the Details

“Epitope matching” became a trending topic in organ transplantation. In fact, discussions on clinical implementation and utilization of this approach in organ allocation algorithms are currently on-going. More recently, the term “eplet mismatch load” was introduced in publications. While the terms are often used synonymously, they are NOT equivalent. This short overview is meant to emphasize the differences between the terms epitope matching and eplet mismatching (or mismatch load) as well as to provide perspective on different approaches for interpretation of immune compatibility between the donor of an organ transplant and the recipient. It highlights some of the less explored qualities of HLA-epitopes, and stresses the need to understand the differences between donor and recipient in terms of immunogenicity and ability to initiate an immune response. While the field of “epitope matching” shows enormous promise, it is still in its infancy. What is sorely missing is understanding of EPITOPE COMPATIBILITY rather than matching. Further work is required before new approaches can be introduced into routine clinical practice and organ allocation schemes.

Clinically relevant interpretation of solid phase assays for HLA antibody

Purpose of review

Accurate and timely detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are critical for pre-transplant and post-transplant immunological risk assessment. Solid phase immunoassays have provided increased sensitivity and specificity, but test interpretation is not always straightforward. This review will discuss the result interpretation considering technical limitations; assessment of relative antibody strength; and the integration of data for risk stratification from complementary testing and the patient's immunological history.

Recent findings

Laboratory and clinical studies have provided insight into causes of test failures – false positive reactions because of antibodies to denatured HLA antigens and false negative reactions resulting from test interference and/or loss of native epitopes. Test modifications permit detection of complement-binding antibodies and determination of the IgG subclasses. The high degree of specificity of single antigen solid phase immunoassays has revealed the complexity and clinical relevance of antibodies to HLA-C, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DP antigens. Determination of antibody specificity for HLA epitopes enables identification of incompatible antigens not included in test kits.

Summary

Detection and characterization of HLA antibodies with solid phase immunoassays has led to increased understanding of the role of those antibodies in graft rejection, improved treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, and increased opportunities for transplantation. However, realization of these benefits requires careful and accurate interpretation of test results.

Are We Ready for Epitope-Based HLA Matching in Clinical Organ Transplantation?

This overview describes recent developments demonstrating the significance of epitopes in HLA antibody responses and matching for organ transplantation. HLA epitopes are defined by molecular modeling and amino acid comparisons between HLA alleles and the HLAMatchmaker algorithm considers eplets as essential components. Each allele represents a distinct string of eplets and matching is done by aligning donor and recipient strings. Evidence is summarized how mismatched eplet loads affect antibody responses and transplant outcomes. Epitope-based matching has been applied not only to identify acceptable mismatches for sensitized transplant candidates but also to identify more suitably mismatched donors for nonsensitized patients. Three recently proposed theories will further our understanding of the immunogenicity of individual HLA eplets.It has become apparent that epitope-based matching is superior to antigen matching; we should be ready soon to apply this principle in the clinical transplant setting very soon.

Detection of HLA Antibodies in Organ Transplant Recipients - Triumphs and Challenges of the Solid Phase Bead Assay

This review outlines the development of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody detection assays and their use in organ transplantation in both antibody screening and crossmatching. The development of sensitive solid phase assays such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique, and in particular the bead-based technology has revolutionized this field over the last 10-15 years. This revolution however has created a new paradigm in clinical decision making with respect to the detection of low level pretransplant HLA sensitization and its clinical relevance. The relative sensitivities of the assays used are discussed and the relevance of conflicting inter-assay results. Each assay has its advantages and disadvantages and these are discussed. Over the last decade, the bead-based assay utilizing the Luminex® fluorocytometer instrument has become established as the "gold standard" for HLA antibody testing. However, there are still unresolved issues surrounding this technique, such as the presence of denatured HLA molecules on the beads which reveal cryptic epitopes and the issue of appropriate fluorescence cut off values for positivity. The assay has been modified to detect complement binding (CB) in addition to non-complement binding (NCB) HLA antibodies although the clinical relevance of the CB and NCB IgG isotypes is not fully resolved. The increase sensitivity of the Luminex® bead assay over the complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch has permitted the concept of the "virtual crossmatch" whereby the crossmatch is predicted to a high degree of accuracy based on the HLA antibody specificities detected by the solid phase assay. Dialog between clinicians and laboratory staff on an individual patient basis is essential for correct clinical decision making based on HLA antibody results obtained by the various techniques.

Antibodies against HLA-DP recognize broadly expressed epitopes

HLA matching and avoidance of pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies are important in selection of donors for solid organ transplant. Solid phase testing with single antigen beads allows resolution of antibody reactivity to the level of the allele. Single antigen bead testing results at a large transplant center were reviewed to identify selective reactivity patterns of anti-HLA antibodies. Many HLA-DP antibodies were identified in the context of other HLA antibodies, but some sera had antibodies against only HLA-DP. B cell flow crossmatch testing was positive for 2 out of 9 sera with HLA-DP antibodies. Many patterns of reactivity corresponded to epitopes in hypervariable regions C and F of DPB1, but some matched epitopes in other regions or DPA1. Through analysis of single antigen bead testing from a large number of patients, we report that anti-HLA-DP antibodies predominantly recognize broadly cross-reactive epitopes. The United Network for Organ Sharing has mandated HLA-DP typing on all deceased kidney donors, and HLA-DP epitopes should be considered as the major antigens for avoidance of pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies.

Successful kidney transplantation after desensitization in a patient with positive flow crossmatching and donor-specific anti-HLA-DP antibody: A Case report

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, the presence of antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-C and DP was considered to be associated with only a low risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in kidney transplantation (KT), because the antigenicities of these proteins are weak. However, the clinical effects of HLA-C and -DP donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSHAs) have recently been reevaluated.

METHODS

Here, we report the case of a retransplant patient with positive flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) and high level of HLA-DP DSHA who was desensitized using rituximab, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin.

RESULTS

The epitope-based antibody reactivity was identified that the positive B-cell FCXM in our patient was attributable to the specific epitope. The patient underwent a successful retransplantation and has continued to do well for 10 month after KT.

CONCLUSION

If an HLA-DP DSHA is present, it is important to detect any mismatched HLA-DP epitope pretransplantation and to monitor HLA-DP levels carefully. According to previous reports, anti-HLA-DP DSHA can induce ABMR soon after transplantation, but such ABMR can be prevented by pretransplantation desensitization and careful monitoring of DSHA levels.

Soluble HLA technology as a strategy to evaluate the impact of HLA mismatches

HLA class I incompatibilities still remain one of the main barriers for unrelated bone marrow transplantation (BMT); hence the molecular understanding of how to mismatch patients and donors and still have successful clinical outcomes will guide towards the future of unrelated BMT. One way to estimate the magnitude of polymorphisms within the PBR is to determine which peptides can be selected by individual HLA alleles and subsequently presented for recognition by T cells. The features (structure, length, and sequence) of different peptides each confer an individual pHLA landscape and thus directly shape the individual immune response. The elution and sequencing of peptides by mass spectrometric analysis enable determining the bona fide repertoire of presented peptides for a given allele. This is an effective and simple way to compare the functions of allelic variants and make a first assessment of their degree of permissivity. We describe the methodology used for peptide sequencing and the limitations of peptide prediction tools compared to experimental methods. We highlight the altered peptide features that are observed between allelic variants and the need to discover the altered peptide repertoire in situations of "artificial" graft versus host disease (GvHD) that occur in HLA-specific hypersensitive immune responses to drugs.