Neck posture is influenced by anticipation of stepping

Does neck flexion improve performance? Effects on reaction time depend on whether responses are expected

This research investigates the limitations of the apparent paradox in which neck flexion, which is associated with poor inhibition and neck pain, seems to facilitate performance in some tasks. We compared the effect of a flexed neck on performance in a reaction time and go-nogo task using a novel method of fixing neck posture. We hypothesize that using a flexed neck posture speeds response time for tasks with high prepotency (when participants are biased toward responding), but not for tasks with low prepotency (when participants are more likely to withhold a response). Previous findings demonstrated the effect of neck flexion on reaction time with a harness. In this study, participants complete both simple reaction time and go-nogo tasks with neck angles fixed in neutral or forward positions with tape. We found that simple reaction times were 10 ms faster in the forward neck position than in neutral; this facilitation was not seen in the go-nogo task. We conclude that using tape to induce a flexed neck posture facilitates reaction time during tasks that always require a response and does not affect reaction time on a task which may require withholding a response.

Sustained activation in basal ganglia and cerebellum after repetitive movement in a non-task-specific dystonia

We previously observed sustained fMRI BOLD signal in the basal ganglia in focal hand dystonia patients after a repetitive finger tapping task. Since this was observed in a task-specific dystonia, for which excessive task repetition may play a role in pathogenesis, in the current study we asked if this effect would be observed in a focal dystonia (cervical dystonia [CD]) that is not considered task-specific or thought to result from overuse. We evaluated fMRI BOLD signal time courses before, during, and after the finger tapping task in CD patients. We observed patient/control differences in post-tapping BOLD signal in left putamen and left cerebellum during the non-dominant (left) hand tapping condition, reflecting abnormally sustained BOLD signal in CD. BOLD signals in left putamen and cerebellum were also abnormally elevated in CD during tapping itself and escalated as tapping was repeated. There were no cerebellar differences in the previously studied FHD cohort, either during or after tapping. We conclude that some elements of pathogenesis and/or pathophysiology associated with motor task execution/repetition may not be limited to task-specific dystonias, but there may be regional differences in these effects across dystonias, associated with different types of motor control programs.

Posture biofeedback increases cognitive load

Attention may be important for actively maintaining posture during computer tasks, resulting in a dual-task tradeoff, where maintaining posture through extrinsic feedback imposes cognitive load. Mindfulness may make intrinsic postural feedback (which imposes less cognitive load) more available. Therefore, we hypothesized that the use of biofeedback would improve posture and negatively impact game performance; additionally, higher levels of mindfulness would be associated with lower game performance costs in the biofeedback condition. Healthy young adult participants played a challenging computer game for 10 min with and without neck length biofeedback, in a counterbalanced repeated-measures design. For each condition, we assessed posture using neck shrinkage (percentage of best), and task performance (computer game score). Neck length was better retained and game performance was worse with biofeedback than without, consistent with the hypothesis that posture biofeedback imposed a cognitive load. In addition, participants with the most neck shrinkage suffered the greatest performance decrements from using biofeedback, and neck length retention during the task without biofeedback was associated with lower self-reported daily neck pain and higher self-reported mindfulness. Thus, those with the greatest need for postural feedback suffer the greatest performance decrements from extrinsic feedback. The results are consistent with the idea that mindfulness enables people to use intrinsic feedback to maintain posture without imposing a dual-task cost.