Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical correlation in sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors: possible roles of utrophin and cyclin D1 in malignant progression

UTRN inhibits melanoma growth by suppressing p38 and JNK/c-Jun signaling pathways

Background

Utrophin (UTRN), as a tumor suppressor gene, is involved in various cancer progression. The function of UTRN in the melanoma process and the related molecular mechanisms are still unclear. Herein, we studied the function of UTRN in melanoma growth and the relevant molecular mechanisms.

Methods

Using the GEO database and UCSC Xena project, we compared the expression of UTRN in non-cancerous and melanoma tissues. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining, qRT-PCR and Western Blot (WB) were performed to evaluate UTRN expression in clinical samples. A total of 447 cases with UTRN expression data, patient characteristics and survival data were extracted from TCGA database and analyzed. After stable transduction and single cell cloning, the proliferation ability of A375 human melanoma cells was analyzed by Cell Counting Kit‑8 (CCK) and 5‑ethynyl‑2′‑deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation assays. GSEA was performed to predict the mechanism by which UTRN regulated melanoma growth. Then WB analysis was used to assess the protein expression levels of pathway signaling in overexpression (EXP) melanoma cells. Epac activator 8-pCPT-2′-O-Me-cAMP was then used to evaluate the proliferation ability by activation of p38 and JNK/c-Jun signaling pathways.

Results

Data from GEO and UCSC Xena project indicated that UTRN expression was decreased in melanoma. Experiment on clinical samples further confirmed our finding. TCGA results showed that a reduced expression of UTRN in 447 melanoma samples was associated with advanced clinical characteristics (T stage, Clark level, ulceration), shorter survival time and poorer prognosis. In addition, up-regulated UTRN expression inhibited melanoma cell proliferation when compared to control group. MAPK signaling pathway was presented in both KEGG and BioCarta databases by using GSEA tool. WB results confirmed the down-regulated expression of p38, JNK1 and c-Jun in EXP group when compared to control group. Epac activator 8-pCPT-2′-O-Me-cAMP treatment could partially rescue proliferation of tumor cells.

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that reduced UTRN predicted poorer prognosis and UTRN inhibited melanoma growth via p38 and JNK1/c-Jun pathways. Therefore, UTRN could serve as a tumor suppressor and novel prognostic biomarker for melanoma patients.

Ki-67 prognostic and therapeutic decision driven marker for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs): A systematic review

BACKGROUND

We systematically evaluate the current evidence regarding Ki-67 as a prognostic factor in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms to evaluate the differences of this marker in primary tumors and in distant metastases as well as the values of Ki-67 obtained by fine needle aspiration and by histology.

METHODS

The literature search was carried out using the MEDLINE/PubMed database, and only papers published in the last 10 years were selected.

RESULTS

The pancreatic tissue suitable for Ki-67 evaluation was obtained from surgical specimens in the majority of the studies. There was a concordance of 83% between preoperative and postoperative Ki-67 evaluation. Pooling the data of the studies which compared the Ki-67 values obtained in both cytological and surgical specimens, we found that they were not related. The assessment of Ki-67 was manual in the majority of the papers considered for this review. In order to eliminate manual counting, several imaging methods have been developed but none of them are routinely used at present. Twenty-two studies also explored the role of Ki-67 utilized as a prognostic marker for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and the majority of them showed that Ki-67 is a good prognostic marker of disease progression. Three studies explored the Ki-67 value in metastatic sites and one study demonstrated that, in metachronous and synchronous liver metastases, there was no significant variation in the index of proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ki-67 is a reliable prognostic marker for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Immunohistochemical and clinicopathological correlation of the metastasis-associated gene 1 (MTA1) expression in benign and malignant pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors are rare tumors with unpredictable clinical behavior. No histological features or immunohistochemical markers reliably predict malignant progression and the molecular basis of progression of pancreatic endocrine tumors remains unknown. The metastasis-associated gene 1 is thought to play a role in transcription repression and estrogen receptor interaction and is overexpressed in several human cancers, including endocrine neoplasms. The purpose of this study was to analyze the expression of metastasis-associated gene 1 in pancreatic endocrine tumors for its possible role in malignant progression. Twenty-seven pancreatic endocrine tumors were identified from our archive. The mean age at presentation was 57 years (range 28-86); the male/female ratio was 1.25 to 1, and the mean size was 4.5 cm (0.1-18 cm). The clinical follow-up data were examined and tumors were classified according to the 2004 World Health Organization criteria as benign behavior (WHO 1.1), uncertain behavior (WHO 1.2), well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma (WHO 2), and poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma (WHO 3). Histopathological and immunohistochemical stains were evaluated and metastasis-associated gene 1 expression scored semiquantitatively as absent (1+), weak (2+), moderate (3+), or strong (4+). Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance with a significance level of 0.05. Metastasis-associated gene 1 expression was significantly higher in malignant tumors (n=17) with a mean staining intensity of 3.8 compared with 2.9 in benign tumors (n=10, P=0.046). The expression levels were significantly associated with WHO class (P=0.028), as well as size of tumor (P=0.029), and mitotic rate (P=0.035). Metastasis-associated gene 1 expression was associated with local invasion with borderline significance (0.062). We show that metastasis-associated gene 1 expression is significantly associated with malignant behavior in pancreatic endocrine tumors. This may suggest a potential role for metastasis-associated gene 1 in the malignant progression and metastasis and its use as biomarker for malignant pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Endocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: pathologic and genetic features

CONTEXT

Pancreatic endocrine neoplasms (PENs) are diagnostically challenging tumors whose natural history is largely unknown. Histopathology allows the distinction of 2 categories: poorly differentiated high-grade carcinomas and well-differentiated neoplasms. The latter include more than 90% of PENs whose clinical behavior varies from indolent to malignant and cannot be predicted by their morphology.

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature and report on additional primary material about the clinicopathologic features, classification, staging, grading, and genetic features of PENs.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institution.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of PEN is generally easy, but unusual features may induce misdiagnosis. Immunohistochemistry solves the issue, provided that the possibility of a PEN has been considered. Morphology allows the distinction of poorly differentiated aggressive carcinomas from well-differentiated neoplasms. The World Health Organization classification criteria allow for the discernment of the latter into neoplasms and carcinomas with either benign or uncertain behavior. The recently proposed staging and grading systems hold great promise for permitting a stratification of carcinomas into clinically significant risk categories. To date, inactivation of the MEN1 gene remains the only ascertained genetic event involved in PEN genesis. It is inactivated in roughly one-third of PENs. The degree of genomic instability correlates with the aggressiveness of the neoplasm. Gene silencing by promoter methylation has been advocated, but a formal demonstration of the involvement of specific genes is still lacking. Expression profiling studies are furnishing valuable lists of mRNAs and noncoding RNAs that may advance further the research to discover novel markers and/or therapeutic targets.

Update on the molecular pathogenesis of pancreatic tumors other than common ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Although ductal adenocarcinoma is the most common and well known pancreatic tumor type, other distinct epithelial neoplasms affecting the pancreas that show different symptoms, biological behaviors and outcomes are becoming more frequently recognized and documented. Pancreatic epithelial tumors may be separated into ductal and nonductal neoplasms. The former group includes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor, mucinous cystic tumor and serous cystic tumor. The latter group includes pancreatic endocrine tumor, pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma, pancreatoblastoma and solid-pseudopapillary tumor. The aim of this review is to summarize recently acquired knowledge regarding the molecular characterization of these uncommon pancreatic epithelial neoplasms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular studies of uncommon pancreatic epithelial tumors suggest that the different morphological entities are associated with distinct molecular profiles, highlighting the involvement of different molecular pathways leading to the development of each subtype of pancreatic neoplasm.

CONCLUSION

The correct classification of rare pancreatic epithelial tumors and the identification of their characteristic molecular aspects is the fundamental starting point in identifying novel diagnostic molecular tools and new targets for innovative therapeutic strategies.