The significance of mucinous metaplasia in Warthin tumor: a frequent occurrence and potential pitfall

The Milan System SUMP Category: 5-Year Diagnostic Performance

BACKGROUND

Salivary gland neoplasms are heterogeneous, with wide cytomorphological overlap. Neoplasms categorized in the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) as salivary gland neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) reflect this diagnostic challenge.

METHODS

All salivary gland fine-needle aspirations (SG-FNA) diagnosed at Fimlab Laboratories over a 5-year period (January 1, 2018-December 31, 2022) that were classified as SUMP were included. Follow-ups were reviewed until May 31, 2024. The SUMP cases were classified into cytomorphological subtypes. The risk of malignancy (ROM), risk of neoplasm, and median timelines of the pathology laboratory workflow and patient management were calculated. In addition, separate analyses of the impact of age and sex were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1157 SG-FNAs were diagnosed over a 5-year period. Of these, 100 SG-FNAs from 52 females and 33 males were classified as SUMP. A total of 69 (69.0%) SUMP cases underwent histological verification. The ROM was 23.2% for all surgical follow-ups, 35.0% for the oncocytic/oncocytoid subtype, and 18.4% for the basaloid subtype. For the male and female groups, the ROMs were 26.9% and 16.2% for all surgical follow-ups, 40.0% and 14.3% for the oncocytic/oncocytoid subtype, and 18.8% and 16.7% for the basaloid subtype, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year analysis of SUMP category performance showed a lower ROM in our practice than the MSRSGC reference value. The oncocytic/oncocytoid subtype presented a higher ROM than the basaloid subtype. The ROMs were highest in the male population and in the age group of 30-69 years.

Interventional cytopathologist perspective on the Milan System Classification: a study on 929 consecutive salivary gland fine-needle aspirations with a focus on challenging diagnostic categories

Background

Although the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) has improved the diagnosis and management of salivary gland lesions, determining the risk of malignancy (ROM) for AUS and SUMP categories remains challenging. We investigated the role of interventional cytopathologists in refining the differential diagnosis of these categories.

Methods

We searched for salivary gland fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) performed at our Institution since the publication of the first edition of MSRSGC. In our Institution, salivary gland FNAs are performed by interventional cytopathologists only. We checked for the availability of histopathology reports to calculate the risk of neoplasm (RON) and ROM. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive values of our FNAs were assessed by focusing on the contribution of the AUS and SUMP categories to our diagnostic accuracy.

Results

929 salivary gland FNA diagnoses were retrieved. 37.02% FNAs had an available surgical follow-up. The ROM for each category was: 6% (ND); 0 (NN); 15.15% (AUS); 1.14% (NB); 24.4% (SUMP); 66.7% (SFM); and 94.74% (M). We observed a high level of concordance between our ROM data and the values proposed by the MSRSGC; higher accuracy (93.17%) and sensitivity (97%) were obtained when the AUS category was considered as a positive index for detecting salivary neoplasms; the best diagnostic accuracy (93.33%) was obtained when the SUMP category was considered as a negative index for malignancy.

Conclusion

Interventional cytopathologists play an important role in salivary gland cytopathology, as demonstrated by the overt concordance between our ROM rates and those recommended by the MSRSGC.

Expanding the cytological and architectural spectrum of mucoepidermoid carcinoma: The key to solving diagnostic problems in morphological variants

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. Varying sized cysts and sheets composed of three cell types (epidermoid, intermediate, and mucous cells) with varying degrees of atypia form the characteristic histological appearance of MEC. MEC frequently contains a wide variety of modified tumor cells and can be entirely cystic or completely solid. Under these circumstances, MEC requires critical differentiation from many mimickers, ranging from simple cysts and benign tumors to high-grade carcinomas. Tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation and sclerotic changes in the stroma also contribute to diagnostic difficulties. Several well-known diagnostically challenging variants (oncocytic, clear cell, spindle cell, and sclerosing) exist in MEC. With the advent of studies on specific CRTC1/3::MAML2 fusion genes in MEC, newly proposed subtypes have emerged, including Warthin-like and non-sebaceous lymphadenoma-like MECs. In addition to the recently defined mucoacinar variant with a serous cell phenotype, MEC devoid of squamous differentiation has also been reported, implying the need to reconsider this basic concept. In this article, we outline the general clinical features and MAML2 status of conventional MEC and review the cytoarchitectural subtypes, with an emphasis on a pitfall in the interpretation of this histologically diverse single entity.

Case report: The diagnostic pitfall of Warthin-like mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Warthin-like mucoepidermoid carcinoma (WL-MEC) is a newly reported variant of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Its histological feature is easy to confused with metaplastic Warthin Tumor, and its relationship with Warthin tumor in histogenesis is controversial. In this study, we presented two cases of WL-MEC, discussing their clinicopathological and molecular features. Notably, one case was initially misdiagnosed during the first onset of the tumor. Case 1 was a 60-year-old female with a mass in the right parotid gland. Case 2 featured a 29-year-old male who developed a lump at the original surgical site 6 months after a "Warthin tumor" resection from the submandibular gland. Histologically, both tumor exhibited a prominent lymphoid stroma and cystic pattern, accompanied by various amounts of epithelial nests composed of squamoid cells, intermediate cells and mucinous cells. The characteristic eosinophilic bilayer epithelium of Warthin tumor was not typically presented in either case. Both cases tested positive for MAML2 gene rearrangement. To contextualize our findings, we conducted a comprehensive review of forty-eight WL-MEC cases documented in the English literature, aiming to synthesizing a reliable differential diagnostic approach. WL-MEC is a rare yet clinically relevant variant, posing a diagnostic pitfall for pathologists. Our study underscores the importance of a meticulous evaluation of both clinical and histological features, coupled with the detection of MAML2 rearrangement, as a credible method for distinguishing WL-MEC from other benign and malignant lesions, particularly metaplastic Warthin tumor.

New Trends of Warthin Tumor Management: A Systematic Review of Nonsurgical Modalities

Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of nonsurgical approaches for the management of Warthin's tumors (WTs) and evaluate their safety and efficacy as alternatives to surgical intervention. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases using specific keywords related to WT and nonsurgical treatments. Studies published before 2012, non-English publications, and mixed methodology articles were excluded. The selection process involved title and abstract screening, followed by a thorough assessment of the remaining articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data regarding study characteristics, participants, interventions, and outcomes were collected. Results: A total of 1582 records were analyzed, and 6 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated different nonsurgical interventions for WT management, including microwave ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and ultrasound-guided ethanol sclerotherapy. The findings demonstrated that microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation led to a significant reduction in tumor size and improved cosmetic appearance. Ultrasound-guided ethanol sclerotherapy also resulted in a notable decrease in tumor size without complications. The included studies supported the safety and efficacy of these nonsurgical options for the treatment of WTs. Conclusion: Nonsurgical approaches, such as microwave ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and ultrasound-guided ethanol sclerotherapy, have emerged as viable alternatives to surgical intervention for the management of WTs. These interventions offer promising outcomes in terms of tumor size reduction and cosmetic improvement. Further research with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up is warranted to validate these findings and establish standardized protocols for nonsurgical management of WTs.

Cystic Salivary Gland Neoplasms: Diagnostic Approach With a Focus on Ancillary Studies

Cystic salivary gland cytology can be challenging due to the fact that a cystic mass can be the clinical presentation of both non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions. Neoplastic lesions consist of both benign and malignant neoplasms. The cytomorphologic features of these entities can overlap and the cystic background may additionally contribute to the complexity of these lesions and their interpretation. Ancillary studies have been reported in several studies to be beneficial in further characterization of the cellular components and subsequent diagnosis of the cystic lesions of the salivary gland. Fluorescence in situ hybridization, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing are now being utilized to detect molecular alterations in salivary gland neoplasms. MALM2 rearrangement is the most common gene fusion in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. PLAG1 rearrangement is present in more than half of pleomorphic adenomas. AKT1:E17K mutation is the key diagnostic feature of the mucinous adenocarcinoma. NR4A3 overexpression is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acinic cell carcinoma. MYB fusion is noted in adenoid cystic carcinoma. ETV6:NTRK3 fusion is helpful in diagnosis of secretory carcinoma. p16 and human papillomavirus (HPV) studies differentiate HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma from non-HPV-related neoplasms with overlapping features. NCOA4:RET fusion protein is the main fusion in intraductal carcinoma.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: Analysis of 76 cytologic cases and correlation with histologic grade

BACKGROUND

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common salivary gland (SG) malignancy. In this study, the author undertook analysis of a large collection of MEC cytologic cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cytopathology files were searched for MEC cases with histopathologic confirmation. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) smears used standard technique.

RESULTS

Seventy-six cases (63 patients [M:F = 1:1; age range, 23-87 years; mean age, 58 years]) met inclusion criteria. Aspirates were primary (54 [71%]), metastatic (18 [24%]), and locally recurrent (4 [5%]). FNA sites included parotid gland (49 [64%]), regional lymph nodes (11 [14%]), submandibular gland (5 [7%]), inner canthus of eye (2 [3%]), and lung (2 [3%]); and single specimens from palate, jaw, shoulder, paranasal sinus, floor of mouth, ear canal, and effusion. Cytologic diagnoses included MEC (30 cases [39%]), suspicious for MEC (16 [21%]), non-MEC carcinoma (9 [12%]), suspicious for malignancy (SM) (2 [3%], malignant (M) (1 [1%]), SG and/or suspicious SG neoplasm (7 [8%]), atypical (3 [5%]), nonneoplastic (5 [6%]), nondiagnostic (2 [3%]), and benign SG neoplasm (1 [1%]). A total of 26% of low-grade (LG) cases were diagnosed as malignant in contrast to 87% malignant in high-grade (HG) cases. Cytomorphology depended on tumor grade. LG MEC contained intra- and/or extra-cellular mucin and more uniform cell and/or nuclear morphology, whereas cytologic atypia, anisonucleosis, and keratotic cells were more typical of HG tumors.

CONCLUSION

A malignant (M) or suspicious for malignancy (SM) cytologic interpretation was made in 76% of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) cases. In contrast to high-grade MEC (97% identified as M/SM), only 59% of low-grade (LG) MEC cases were interpreted as such, illustrating the continued diagnostic challenge posed by LG MEC using fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

The Milan System classification of Warthin tumor: A large institutional study of 124 cases highlighting cytologic features that limit definitive interpretation

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is highly accurate for the diagnosis of Warthin tumor (WT). However, there is a minor subset of WT cases that are more challenging to interpret. The goal of this study is to identify factors that limit definitive diagnosis of WT on FNA.

METHODS

All WT surgical specimens diagnosed during a 6.5-year study period were retrospectively identified and the preceding cytologic specimen diagnostic categories were analyzed. Of particular interest were WT cases with indeterminate or malignant interpretations. Cases that noted squamous or mucinous change in either the surgical or cytologic reports were also reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 157 WT surgical specimens were identified, with 124 (79.0%) having prior FNAs. The distribution of cytologic diagnostic categories was 12 (9.7%) nondiagnostic, 10 (8.1%) nonneoplastic, 13 (10.5%) atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 82 (66.1%) neoplasm: benign, 4 (3.2%) salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP), 2 (1.6%) suspicious for malignancy, and 1 (0.8%) malignant. Of the 20 cases in indeterminate/malignant categories, a majority noted either squamoid (9 of 20) or mucinous (2 of 20) changes. The remainder noted scant cellularity as a limiting factor to interpretation. Additionally, 27 cases mentioned squamous or mucinous change in the surgical or cytology report, with a wide spectrum of cytologic categorization including 2 (7.4%) nondiagnostic, 2 (7.4%) nonneoplastic, 7 (25.9%) AUS, 8 (29.6%) neoplasm: benign, 4 (14.8%) SUMP, 2 (7.4%) suspicious for malignancy, and 1 (3.7%) malignant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified 2 key causes for indeterminate or misclassification of WT on FNA: specimen hypocellularity and metaplastic changes. Recognition of the potential for squamous and mucinous metaplastic changes combined with observance of some helpful diagnostic clues such as the presence of crystalloids may aid in preventing diagnostic pitfalls.

Warthin-Like Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Morphological Spectrum - A Report of 3 Cases with Histological and Cytological Findings and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) showing Warthin's tumor (WT)-like features is a low-grade malignancy which should be differentiated from WT. Morphological features may be distinctly different in each case, causing diagnostic difficulties.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three cases were presented and discussed with their morphologies. All cases that presented with a mass in the parotid gland went to parotidectomy, and all had preoperative fine-needle aspirations (FNAs). Case 1 was a 16-year-old female; FNA was suggestive of WT and initially interpreted as WT histologically. Case 2 was a 27-year-old male; FNA was interpreted as noninformative due to the presence of cyst fluid only. Case 3 was a 53-year-old male and cytologically was found to be suspicious for MEC which contained squamous and goblet cells on a mucoid background. On histopathological examination, case 2 and case 3 were morphologically consistent with low-grade MEC with WT-like features. Prominent lymphoid stroma and the cystic pattern were the characters of these tumors. Case 1 had the classical WT appearance with some mucinous and squamous metaplasia which could only be interpreted as MEC after the detection of MAML2 rearrangement by FISH. The other 2 showed either focal or relatively diffuse usual low-grade MEC findings, and case 3 was also confirmed by MAML2 rearrangement.

CONCLUSION

Cytological and histopathological features revealed a spectrum. Differentiating WT-like MECs from ordinary WTs may be challenging. On the one end of the spectrum, they may look very much like WT, and on the other end, even though usual MEC features are present, still, WT-like appearance may pose diagnostic difficulty. Showing MAML2 rearrangement in these cases is very helpful. The presence of mucinous and squamous cells in an otherwise WT-like looking tumor should be alarming for MEC, and if possible, each case should be analyzed for MAML2 rearrangement.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology of Warthin-like mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A case report with cytological review

Warthin-like mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a novel and rare subtype of MEC and is characterized histopathologically by the presence of abundant lymphocytic infiltration and cystic changes. A small number of cytological reports of this MEC variant is currently available. The present study reported on the sixth cytological case of Warthin-like MEC, reviewed the cytological features of the tumour and discussed the cytological differential diagnosis. A 16-year-old Japanese female presented with a painful mass in the left parotid gland. Fine-needle aspiration for cytological examination of the parotid gland tumour was performed, followed by partial parotidectomy. Cytological examination revealed sheet-like and folded epithelial cell clusters in a mucinous background accompanying abundant lymphocytic infiltration. Epithelial clusters comprised round cells with mildly enlarged round to oval nuclei, polygonal cells with relatively rich cytoplasm and slightly enlarged round to oval nuclei. Certain polygonal cells contained intracytoplasmic mucin. Histopathological examination of the resected parotid gland tumour indicated multiple cystic lesions with abundant lymphocytic infiltration accompanying lymphoid follicle formation. The cysts were lined by intermediate cells with occasional mucinous cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using the surgically resected specimen indicated mastermind-like transcriptional coactivator 2 (MAML2) rearrangement, a characteristic of Warthin-like MEC. Consequently, the patient was diagnosed with Warthin-like MEC. The literature review revealed that the characteristic cytological features of Warthin-like MEC are the presence of intermediate cells and lack of oncocytic cells in the mucinous material under an abundant lymphocytic background. Clinicopathological features may help with a differential diagnosis, particularly from Warthin's tumour, and detection of MAML2 rearrangement is able to improve the accuracy of diagnosis.

Assessing the diagnostic accuracy for pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor by employing the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: An international, multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) has established distinct diagnostic categories for reporting cytopathological findings, and each is associated with a defined risk of malignancy (ROM). However, the ROM is applied at the overall category level and is not specific for particular morphological entities within a category. Here, the diagnostic performance of the MSRSGC for pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and Warthin tumor (WT) is reported.

METHODS

The pathology archives of 11 institutions from 4 countries were retrospectively searched to identify all salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies with a differential or definitive diagnosis of PA or WT and all resection specimens with a diagnosis of PA or WT; only paired cases were included. All FNA diagnoses were retrospectively classified according to the MSRSGC.

RESULTS

A total of 1250 cases met the inclusion criteria, and they included 898 PA cases and 352 WT cases. The ROM in the benign neoplasm category was 3.0% and 1.3% for cases with a differential or definitive diagnosis of PA and WT, respectively. The ROM in the salivary gland neoplasm with uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) category was 2.7% and 18.8% for PA and WT, respectively (P = .0277). The diagnostic accuracy for PA and WT was 95.1% and 96.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy for PA and WT on FNA is high. Furthermore, these findings highlight the difference in the ROMs associated with 2 specific differential diagnoses in the SUMP category: basaloid neoplasms and oncocytoid neoplasms.