1
|
Abu-Ayyad M, Lad YS, Aguilar D, Karami K, Attaluri A. Model predictive control (MPC) applied to a simplified model, magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia (MNPH) treatment process. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2024; 10:045012. [PMID: 38692266 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad460a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia (MNPH) has emerged as a promising cancer treatment that complements conventional ionizing radiation and chemotherapy. MNPH involves injecting iron-oxide nanoparticles into the tumor and exposing it to an alternating magnetic field (AMF). Iron oxide nanoparticles produce heat when exposed to radiofrequency AMF due to hysteresis loss. Minimizing the non-specific heating in human tissues caused by exposure to AMF is crucial. A pulse-width-modulated AMF has been shown to minimize eddy-current heating in superficial tissues. This project developed a control strategy based on a simplified mathematical model in MATLAB SIMULINK®to minimize eddy current heating while maintaining a therapeutic temperature in the tumor. A minimum tumor temperature of 43 [°C] is required for at least 30 [min] for effective hyperthermia, while maintaining the surrounding healthy tissues below 39 [°C]. A model predictive control (MPC) algorithm was used to reach the target temperature within approximately 100 [s]. As a constrained MPC approach, a maximum AMF amplitude of 36 [kA/m] and increment of 5 [kA/m/s] were applied. MPC utilized the AMF amplitude as an input and incorporated the open-loop response of the eddy current heating in its dynamic matrix. A conventional proportional integral (PI) controller was implemented and compared with the MPC performance. The results showed that MPC had a faster response (30 [s]) with minimal overshoot (1.4 [%]) than PI controller (115 [s] and 5.7 [%]) response. In addition, the MPC method performed better than the structured PI controller in its ability to handle constraints and changes in process parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ma'Moun Abu-Ayyad
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Science, Engineering, and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg, Middletown, PA 17057, United States of America
| | - Yash Sharad Lad
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Science, Engineering, and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg, Middletown, PA 17057, United States of America
| | - Dario Aguilar
- Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Science, Engineering, and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg, Middletown, PA 17057, United States of America
| | - Kiana Karami
- Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Science, Engineering, and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg, Middletown, PA 17057, United States of America
| | - Anilchandra Attaluri
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Science, Engineering, and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg, Middletown, PA 17057, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sebeke LC, Rademann P, Maul AC, Yeo SY, Castillo Gómez JD, Deenen DA, Schmidt P, de Jager B, Heemels WPMH, Grüll H, Heijman E. Visualization of thermal washout due to spatiotemporally heterogenous perfusion in the application of a model-based control algorithm for MR-HIFU mediated hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia 2021; 38:1174-1187. [PMID: 34374624 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1933616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This article will report results from the in-vivo application of a previously published model-predictive control algorithm for MR-HIFU hyperthermia. The purpose of the investigation was to test the controller's in-vivo performance and behavior in the presence of heterogeneous perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS Hyperthermia at 42°C was induced and maintained for up to 30 min in a circular section of a thermometry slice in the biceps femoris of German landrace pigs (n=5) using a commercial MR-HIFU system and a recently developed MPC algorithm. The heating power allocation was correlated with heat sink maps and contrast-enhanced MRI images. The temporal change in perfusion was estimated based on the power required to maintain hyperthermia. RESULTS The controller performed well throughout the treatments with an absolute average tracking error of 0.27 ± 0.15 °C and an average difference of 1.25 ± 0.22 °C between T10 and T90. The MPC algorithm allocates additional heating power to sub-volumes with elevated heat sink effects, which are colocalized with blood vessels visible on contrast-enhanced MRI. The perfusion appeared to have increased by at least a factor of ∼1.86 on average. CONCLUSIONS The MPC controller generates temperature distributions with a narrow spectrum of voxel temperatures inside the target ROI despite the presence of spatiotemporally heterogeneous perfusion due to the rapid thermometry feedback available with MR-HIFU and the flexible allocation of heating power. The visualization of spatiotemporally heterogeneous perfusion presents new research opportunities for the investigation of stimulated perfusion in hypoxic tumor regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Christian Sebeke
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.,Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Pia Rademann
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Experimental Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexandra Claudia Maul
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Experimental Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sin Yuin Yeo
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.,Profound Medical GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Juan Daniel Castillo Gómez
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel A Deenen
- Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Control Systems Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Schmidt
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bram de Jager
- Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Control Systems Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - W P M H Heemels
- Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Control Systems Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Holger Grüll
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.,Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Heijman
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.,Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|