Early and mid-term results of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting

Strategies and pitfalls during minimally invasive total coronary artery revascularization via left anterior minithoracotomy: a promising future

For many years up to date coronary artery bypass surgery has been performed via sternotomy as a gold standard approach. However recently there has been alternative approaches for coronary artery bypass grafting in minimal invasive ways to reduce complications associated with sternotomy such as sternal wound infections, impared pulmonary functions and cosmetic related problems. Most of these minimal invasive procedures have been associated with long learning curve, high costs and sophiscated instruments used during surgery. Minimal invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior mini-thoracotomy is equally effective as a gold standard sternotomy with the same principles of suturing techniques and provides a great comfort in many aspects as sternotomy. It is safe and does not require sophiscated tools which require long learning curve and high expanses. This type of surgery requires the use of novel strategies, especially in patients who hold the highest potential for postoperative morbidity. In this paper, we will highlight the strategies and pitfalls associated with minimally invasive total coronary revascularization via left anterior minithoracotomy.

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS)-CABG is a technique that at its core has patient comfort, early return to routine activities, meeting patient expectations for less invasive options, and maintaining the highest possible standards of care and outcomes. The technique requires not only surgical dexterity but also integration of significant technological advancements in patient care. At a time when percutaneous interventions are often prescribed on the pretext of increased patient comfort and demand, minimally invasive myocardial revascularization becomes even more relevant. Minimally invasive myocardial revascularization is ever evolving and encompasses both small-incision open techniques as well as endoscopic-assisted procedures. The success of the procedure depends not only on the learning curve and familiarity with the technology but also on appropriate patient selection. Mere feasibility of the technique is not sufficient, and the results have to be comparable with the long-established techniques of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting both in terms of early morbidity and mortality as well as long-term outcomes. In this review, we discuss patient selection and technical aspects of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. We also provide an evidence-based comparison to early and long-term outcomes with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. Finally, we review the uptake and outcomes of minimally invasive revascularization in the Indian subcontinent.

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass as a safe method of surgical revascularization. The step towards hybrid procedures

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery disease is nowadays responsible for approximately 15% of hospitalizations in Poland. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) represents an attractive alternative to a sternotomy, and at the same time provides better life quality and facilitates quick rehabilitation.

AIM

To evaluate whether MIDCAB can be performed with similar early and mid-term results as off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and therefore can be considered as a safe stage in hybrid revascularization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 73 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery) between 2013 and 2016 in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow. Thirty-eight (52.1%) MIDCAB and 35 (47.9%) OPCAB patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

Short-term results did not significantly differ between groups and similar 30-day mortality was observed (MIDCAB 2.6% vs. OPCAB 2.9%, p = 1). The median follow-up period was 21 months. There were no statistical differences in terms of overall survival or cardiac mortality between groups (94.7% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.42; 2.6% vs. 2.9%, p = 1, respectively). The rate of hospitalization due to cardiac causes was similar in both groups (7.9% vs. 5.1%, p = 1) and there were no differences in current exacerbation of angina or heart failure, with median NYHA class I and CCS class I in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite higher technical difficulty, MIDCAB procedures can be performed with similar safety results as OPCAB procedures. No differences in terms of mortality, repeat revascularization or recurrent angina are observed.

Minimally invasive compared to conventional approach for coronary artery bypass grafting improves outcome

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive (MI) cardiac surgery is a rapidly gaining popularity, globally as well as in India. We aimed to compare the outcome of MI to the conventional approach for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS

This prospective, comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care cardiac surgical center. All patients who underwent CABG surgery via MI approach (MI group) from July 2015 to December 2015 were enrolled and were compared against same number of EuroSCORE II matched patients undergoing CABG through conventional mid-sternotomy approach (CON group). Demographic, intra- and post-operative variables were collected.

RESULTS

In MI group, duration of the surgery was significantly longer (P = 0.029). Intraoperative blood loss lesser (P = 0.002), shorter duration of ventilation (P = 0.002), shorter Intensive Care Unit stay (P = 0.004), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.003), lesser postoperative analgesic requirements (P = 0.027), and lower visual analog scale scores on day of surgery (P = 0.032) and 1 st postoperative day (P = 0.025). No significant difference in postoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, or duration of inotrope requirement observed. There was no conversion to mid-sternotomy in any patients, 8% of patients had desaturation intraoperatively. There was no operative mortality.

CONCLUSION

MI surgery is associated with lesser intraoperative blood loss, better analgesia, and faster recovery.

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting with an improved rib spreader and a new-shaped cardiac stabilizer: results of 200 consecutive cases in a single institution

Background

Performing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting via small chest incisions on a beating heart is challenging. We report our experiences of MIDCAB with the utilization of both an improved rib spreader to harvest the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and a new-shaped cardiac stabilizer to facilitate LIMA-left anterior descending (LAD) coronary anastomosis.

Methods

Between May 2012 and June 2104, a total of 200 patients who were consecutively operated on in this period were enrolled in this study. Data reported included demographic information, preoperative clinical and cardiac status, LIMA harvest time, postoperative in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day mortality.

Results

The average LIMA harvest time was 43 min. The mean age was 62.59 ± 10.19 years, and 45 of the 200 were females. The 30-day mortality was 0.5 % (one patient) due to perioperative myocardial infarction. Duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in intensive care unit was 9.27 ± 7.65 and 24.27 ± 17.85 h, respectively. The unit of packed RBC transfusion was 0.79 ± 1.58. Postoperative atrial fibrillation was observed in 14 (7 %) patients. There was no postoperative stroke, renal failure, or incision complication.

Conclusion

Performing MIDCAB with the improved retractor and stabilizer utilized in this study showed favorable outcomes in terms of harvesting the LIMA, postoperative morbidities, and 30-day mortality.

Exposures of Lateral and Inferior Cardiac Surface for Coronary Anastomosis during Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Exposure of the lateral and inferior surface of the heart during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with some degree of cardiac instability during recovery with completion of grafting. Exposure of lateral and posterior surfaces by currently available equipment is difficult in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG) owing to limited exposure. We describe an effective variation of often-used technique of pericardial stitch in exposure of cardiac surfaces during MICABG. This technique was used in 24 patients undergoing multivessel MICABG. Deep pericardial sutures were used to manipulate the exposure of cardiac surfaces. Left anterior descending artery was grafted in all 24 cases. Obtuse marginal artery was grafted in 20 cases and posterior descending artery in 12 cases. Average grafts were 2.3 per patient. There was no conversion to median sternotomy. Use of deep pericardial suture is simple technique for exposure of lateral and inferior surface during multivessel MICABG. This offers adequate exposure and operating space for easy maneuverability.