Low interatrial septal pacing: A simple method

Actual conditions of atrial septal lead implantation and the factors related to successful implantation

BACKGROUND

Pacemaker leads were originally implanted into the right atrial appendage (RAA) and right ventricular apex, but septal pacing, which is more physiological, is becoming increasingly popular. The usefulness of atrial lead implantation in the RAA or atrial septum is inconclusive, and whether or not atrial septum implantation is accurate has not yet been verified.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pacemaker implantation between January 2016 and December 2020 were included. The success rate of atrial septal implantation was validated using thoracic computed tomography performed for any reason postoperatively. We examined factors related to the successful implantation of the atrial lead in the atrial septum.

RESULTS

Forty-eight people were included in this study. Lead placement was performed with a delivery catheter system (SelectSecure MRI SureScan; Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in 29 cases and a conventional stylet in 19 cases. The mean age was 74 ± 12 years old, and 28 (58%) were male. Successful atrial septal implantation was performed in 26 patients (54%), with only 4 (21%) successful implantations in the stylet group. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pacing P wave axis, duration, or amplitude between the atrial septal implantation group and non-septal groups. The only significant difference was for delivery catheter use [22 (85%) vs. 7 (32%), p < 0.001]. In multivariate logistic analysis, the use of a delivery catheter was independently associated with successful septal implantation [odds ratio (OR): 16.9, 95% confidence interval 3.0-90.9] after adjusting for the age, gender, and BMI.

CONCLUSION

The success rate of atrial septal implantation was very low at 54%, and only the use of a delivery catheter was associated with successful septal implantation. However, even with a delivery catheter, the success rate was 76%, so further investigations are warranted.

Patient with sick sinus syndrome and implanted dual-chamber pacemaker with reduced P-wave duration following low interatrial septal pacing: Case report

INTRODUCTION

A dual-chamber pacemaker (DDD/R) for a sinus node disease is sometimes referred to as a physiological pacemaker as it maintains atrioventricular synchrony, however several clinical trials have proved its inferiority to a nonphysiological single-chamber ventricular back-up pacing.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A subject of the study is a 74-year-old woman with a sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and a previously implanted physiological DDD/R pacemaker. The SSS was diagnosed because of patient's very slow sinus rhythm of about 36 bpm, and due to several episodes of dizziness. After the DDD/R implantation the percentage of atrial pacing approached 100%, with almost none ventricular pacing.

DIAGNOSES

Sick sinus syndrome, complete Bachmann's bundle block, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was previously implanted with a physiological DDD/R pacemaker. Several years after the implantation, the atrial fibrillation was diagnosed and the pulmonary vein isolation was then performed by cryoablation. During the follow-up after pulmonary vein isolation, the improvement of mitral filling parameters was assessed using echocardiography. Shortly thereafter the patient developed the persistent paroxysm of a typical atrial flutter which was successfully terminated using a radiofrequency ablation. No recurrence thereof has been observed ever since (24 months).

OUTCOMES

The atrial electrode of the pacing system was implanted within the low interatrial septal region that resulted in a reduced P-wave duration compared to native sinus rhythm P-waves. The said morphology was deformed because of the complete Bachmann bundle block. That approach, despite a nonphysiological direction of an atrial activation, yielded relatively short P-waves (paced P-wave: 179 ms vs intrinsic sinus P-wave: 237 ms). It also contributed to a significantly shorter PR interval (paced PR: 204 ms vs sinus rhythm PR: 254 ms).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors took into consideration different aspects of alternative right atrial pacing sites. This report has shown that in some patients with a sinus node disease, low interatrial septal pacing can reduce the P-wave duration but does not prevent from the development of atrial arrhythmias.