SGLT2 inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of anaemia and iron deficiency in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to clarify the prevalence and prognostic impact of anaemia and iron deficiency in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of anaemia and iron deficiency in HFmrEF has not yet been clarified.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with HFmrEF were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. Patients with anaemia (i.e. haemoglobin <13 g/dL in males and < 12 g/dL in females) were compared to patients without, respectively patients with or without iron deficiency. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 months (median follow-up), secondary endpoints comprised HF-related rehospitalisation.

RESULTS

Two thousand one hundred and fifty four patients with HFmrEF with a median haemoglobin level of 12.2 g/dL were included. Anaemia was present in 52% of patients with HFmrEF and associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (44% vs. 18%; HR = 3.021; 95% CI 2.552-3.576; p =.001) and HF-related rehospitalisation (18% vs. 8%; HR = 2.351; 95% CI 1.819-3.040; p =.001) at 30 months, which was confirmed after multivariable adjustment. Although iron status was infrequently assessed in anaemics with HFmrEF (27%), the presence of iron deficiency was associated with higher risk of rehospitalisation for worsening HF (25% vs. 15%; HR = 1.746; 95% CI 1.024-2.976; p =.038), but not all-cause mortality (p =.279) at 30 months.

CONCLUSION

Anaemia and iron deficiency are very common in atleast half of patients with HFmrEF and independently associated with adverse long-term prognosis.

Effect of Heart Failure Pharmacotherapies in Patients with Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

OBJECTIVE

The study sought to comprehensively investigate the effect of heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapies in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

BACKGROUND

In the absence of randomized controlled trials, guideline recommendations concerning HF-related therapies in patients with HFmrEF are limited.

METHODS

Consecutive patients hospitalized with HFmrEF were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. The prognostic value of treatment with beta-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, receptor blockers or receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ACEi/ARB/ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was investigated for all-cause mortality at 30 months (median follow-up) and HF-related rehospitalization.

RESULTS

2,109 patients with HFmrEF were included. Treatment with BB (27.0% vs. 35%; HR = 0.737; 95% CI 0.617-0.881; p = 0.001), ACEi/ARB/ARNI (25.9% vs. 37.6%; HR = 0.612; 95% CI 0.517-0.725; p = 0.001) and SGLT2i (11.9% vs. 29.5%; HR = 0.441; 95% CI 0.236-0.824; p = 0.010) was associated with lower risk of 30-months all-cause mortality, which was still demonstrated after multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching. In contrast, MRA treatment was not associated with long-term prognosis. The risk of HF-related rehospitalization was not affected by HF pharmacotherapies. Finally, the lowest risk of long-term all-cause mortality was observed in patients with combined use of BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI and SGLT2i (HR = 0.456; 95% CI 0.227-0.916; p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI and SGLT2i were independently associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with HFmrEF, specifically when applied as combined "HF triple therapy". Randomized studies are needed to investigate the effect of HF-related pharmacotherapies in patients with HFmrEF.

SGLT2 inhibition and three urological cancers: Up-to-date results

OBJECTIVE

To identify the causal role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition on three urological cancers.

METHODS

Six single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with the expression level of SLC5A2, a proxy for SGLT2 inhibition, from a recent publication were extracted. Three common urological cancers, including bladder cancer, prostate cancer and kidney cancer, were analysed. The main cohort of bladder cancer was derived from UK Biobank (1279 cases and 372,016 controls). The prostate cancer cohort was from the Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer Associated Alterations in the Genome (PRACTICAL) consortium (79,148 cases and 61,106 controls). The kidney cancer phenotype was from the UK Biobank cohort of 463,010 individuals (1114 cases and 461,896 controls). Primary and sensitivity analysis were performed to validate the results. In vitro analysis was also incorporated to validate the Mendelian randomisation results.

RESULTS

In primary analysis, SGLT2 inhibition was associated with reduced risk of bladder cancer (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99) per unit lowering of HbA1c level. A protective association was also observed for prostate cancer with odds ratio = 0.31 (95% CI = 0.21-0.47). However, we did not discover a causal relationship between SGLT2 inhibition and kidney cancer (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.99-1.00). Sensitivity analysis and in vitro validation did not support the causal role of SGLT2 inhibition in increasing cancer risk.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find any evidence that SGLT2 inhibition could increase the risk of the three cancers. Even in some analysis, SGLT2 inhibition tended to show protective effects on the three urological cancers.

Effect of the dual sodium-glucose co-transporter-1 and -2 inhibitor sotagliflozin on renal outcomes in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM

To investigate the renal safety profile of sotagliflozin, a novel sodium-glucose co-transporter-1 and -2 inhibitor, in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, with or without renal impairment, as well as its efficacy in decreasing the risk of further renal events, with an emphasis on those with previous renal impairment.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, CENTRAL and Scopus were searched from their inception until 24 April 2023 for randomized controlled trials that reported estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary albumin excretion or composite renal events (CRE). The Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool was used. Mean difference, relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated (PROSPERO: CRD42023425583).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included in this review (n = 17 574 participants; intervention n = 9312, control n = 8262). The median follow-up was 24.5 (Q1 = 15.25, Q3 = 28) months. Four studies recruited participants with renal impairment; baseline eGFR ranged from 23.8 to 50.5 mL/min/1.73m2 . The change in eGFR for studies (n = 6) with a follow-up of 52 weeks or longer was -1.23 (-1.45, -1.01) mL/min/1.73m2 . Sotagliflozin did not significantly alter urinary albumin excretion. No change was observed in the risk of CRE (n = 6 studies; RR = 0.82 [0.61, 1.12]), including in participants with renal impairment. High risk of bias was a limitation of this review.

CONCLUSIONS

Sotagliflozin did not adversely affect renal function or change the risk of key renal outcomes, including for participants with pre-existing renal impairment. Therefore, sotagliflozin was safe; however, further research is needed to determine its efficacy in reducing the risk of diabetic kidney disease.

Prognostic Implications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the characterization and outcomes of diabetics with heart failure with a mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is scarce. This study investigates the prevalence and prognostic impact of type 2 diabetes in patients with HFmrEF.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with HFmrEF (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction 41-49% and signs and/or symptoms of HF) were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. Patients with type 2 diabetes (dia-betics) were compared to patients without (i.e., non-diabetics). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 months. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox regression analyses and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 2169 patients with HFmrEF were included. The overall prevalence of type 2 diabetes was 36%. Diabetics had an increased risk of 30-months all-cause mortality (35.8% vs. 28.6%; HR = 1.273; 95% CI 1.092-1.483; p = 0.002), which was confirmed after multivariable adjustment (HR = 1.234; 95% CI 1.030-1.479; p = 0.022) and propensity score matching (HR = 1.265; 95% CI 1.018-1.572; p = 0.034). Diabetics had a higher risk of HF-related rehospitalization (17.8% vs. 10.7%; HR = 1.714; 95% CI 1.355-2.169; p = 0.001). Finally, the risk of all-cause mortality was increased in diabetics treated with insulin (40.7% vs. 33.1%; log-rank p = 0.029), whereas other anti-diabetic pharmacotherapies had no prognostic impact in HFmrEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2 diabetes is common and independently associated with adverse long-term prognosis in patients with HFmrEF.

GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors and noncardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: Insights from a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Type-2 diabetes (T2D) poses a higher risk of noncardiovascular mortality in addition to the burden of cardiovascular mortality. The well-established cardiovascular benefits of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) could solely explain their apparent effects on all-cause mortality in T2D. The present meta-analysis aims to pool their effects on noncardiovascular mortality in T2D and summarize the recent evidence on plausible pathways mediating these effects.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ≥1-year duration in adults with T2D reporting both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in treatment versus placebo arms (PROSPERO: CRD42022337559). Noncardiovascular mortality was calculated by subtracting cardiovascular mortality events from all-cause mortality and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated. Random-effects meta-analysis was done. GRADE framework was used to assess evidence quality.

RESULTS

We identified 17 eligible RCTs pooling data retrieved from 109,892 patients. Randomization to GLP-1 RA treatment versus placebo was associated with reduced noncardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.90; 95%CI: 0.81-0.99; I2 = 0 %; p < 0.05), consistent with their effects on cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.88; 95%CI: 0.81-0.95; I2 = 0 %; p < 0.01) in T2D. Compared to placebo, SGLT2i significantly reduced noncardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.90; 95%CI: 0.82-0.99; I2 = 0 %; p < 0.05) along with cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.84; 95%CI: 0.77-0.92; I2 = 28 %; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed no significant effects of heart failure or renal function on treatment benefits of SGLT2i on noncardiovascular mortality (p value > 0.2 for subgroup differences).

CONCLUSION

The impact of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i on mortality in people with T2D extends beyond their cardiovascular benefits.

Heterogeneity in cardiorenal protection by Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure across the ejection fraction strata: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gliflozins or Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are relatively novel antidiabetic medications that have recently been shown to represent favorable effects on patients' cardiorenal outcomes. However, there is shortage of data on potential disparities in this therapeutic effect across different patient subpopulations.

AIM

To investigate differential effects of SGLT2i on the cardiorenal outcomes of heart failure patients across left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) levels.

METHODS

Literature was searched systematically for the large randomized double-blind controlled trials with long enough follow up periods reporting cardiovascular and renal outcomes in their patients regarding heart failure status and LVEF levels. Data were then meta-analyzed after stratification of the pooled data across the LVEF strata and New York Heart Associations (NYHA) classifications for heart failure using Stata software version 17.0.

RESULTS

The literature search returned 13 Large clinical trials and 13 post hoc analysis reports. Meta-analysis of the effects of gliflozins on the primary composite outcome showed no significant difference in efficacy across the heart failure subtypes, but higher efficacy were detected in patient groups at lower NYHA classifications (I2 = 46%, P = 0.02). Meta-analyses across the LVEF stratums revealed that a baseline LVEF lower than 30% was associated with enhanced improvement in the primary composite outcome compared to patients with higher LVEF levels at the borderline statistical significance (HR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.60 to 0.79 vs 0.81, 95%CI: 0.75 to 0.87; respectively, P = 0.06). Composite renal outcome was improved significantly higher in patients with no heart failure than in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (HR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.49 to 0.72 vs 0.94, 95%CI: 0.74 to 1.13; P = 0.04). Acute renal injury occurred significantly less frequently in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction who received gliflozins than in HFpEF (HR: 0.67, 95%CI: 51 to 0.82 vs 0.94, 95%CI: 0.82 to 1.06; P = 0.01). Volume depletion was consistently increased in response to SGLT2i in all the subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Heart failure patients with lower LVEF and lower NYHA sub-classifications were found to be generally more likely to benefit from therapy with gliflozins. Further research are required to identify patient subgroups representing the highest benefits or adverse events in response to SGLT2i.

Efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan and SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sacubitril-valsartan (SV) monotherapy has been shown to help patients with Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but whether adding a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) improves treatment results even more is unknown.

HYPOTHESIS

The goal of this study was to look at the efficacy of SV with additional SGLT2i in HFrEF patients.

METHODS

For this study, several databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, were searched. A coherent search approach was used for data extraction. Review Manager 5.2 and MedCalc were used for conducting the meta-analysis and bias analysis. A meta-regression study correlates patient mean age with primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven trials totaling 16 100 patients were included in this meta-analysis. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and improvement in mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were the study's major objectives, while hospitalization for heart failure (HF) was calculated to be its secondary outcome. Our analysis showed that HFrEF patients receiving the combination of SV and SGLT2i had better treatment outcomes than the standard SV monotherapy, with risk ratios of 0.76 (0.65-0.88) for all-cause mortality, 0.65 (0.49-0.86) for cardiovascular mortality, 1.41 (-0.59 to 3.42) for change in mean LVEF, and 0.80 (0.64-1.01) for hospitalization for HF. According to the regression analysis, older HFrEF patients have higher rates of hospitalization, cardiovascular disease, and overall death.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of SV and SGLT2i may have a greater cardiovascular protective effect and minimize the risk of death or hospitalization due to heart failure in HFrEF.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in heart failure: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To investigate the cardiovascular effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with concomitant mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use in heart failure (HF) regardless of ejection fraction (EF) and explore the risk of MRA-associated adverse events in individuals randomized to SGLT2i vs. placebo.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials/post-hoc analyses evaluating SGLT2i in HF with or without MRA use (PROSPERO: CRD42023397129). The main outcomes were composite of first hospitalization or urgent visit for HF/cardiovascular death (HHF/CVD), HHF, and CVD. Others were all-cause mortality, composite renal and safety outcomes. Hazard ratios (HR)/risk ratios were extracted. Fixed-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Five eligible studies were included, pooling data from 21 947 people with HF (type 2 diabetes mellitus, n = 10 805). Compared to placebo, randomization to SGLT2i showed a similar reduction in HHF/CVD and HHF in people who were or were not using MRAs [HHF/CVD: hazard ratio (HR) 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.81 vs. HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.72-0.86; P-interaction = .43; HHF: HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.67-0.83 vs. HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.63-0.80; P-interaction = .53], with a suggestion of greater relative reduction in CVD in chronic HF people randomized to SGLT2i and using MRAs irrespective of EF (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.72-0.91 vs. HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.86-1.13; P-interaction = .034). SGLT2i reduced all-cause mortality (P-interaction = .27) and adverse renal endpoints regardless of MRA use (P-interaction = .73) despite a higher risk of volume depletion with concomitant MRAs (P-interaction = .082). SGLT2i attenuated the risk of mild hyperkalaemia (P-interaction < .001) and severe hyperkalaemia (P-interaction = .051) associated with MRA use.

CONCLUSIONS

MRAs did not influence SGLT2i effects on the composite of HHF/CVD, HHF or all-cause mortality; however, findings hinted at a more pronounced relative reduction in CVD in chronic HF patients regardless of EF who were randomized to SGLT2i and receiving an MRA compared to those randomized to SGLT2i and not receiving MRAs. SGLT2i attenuated the risk of MRA-associated treatment-emergent hyperkalaemia. These findings warrant further validation in well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Serum uric acid lowering and effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on gout: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

To pool the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on gout and to investigate the association of these effects with baseline serum uric acid (SUA), SUA lowering, and underlying conditions, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)/heart failure (HF).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and clinical trial registry websites were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or post hoc analyses (≥1-year duration; PROSPERO:CRD42023418525). The primary outcome was a composite of gouty arthritis/gout flares and commencement of anti-gout drugs (SUA-lowering drugs/colchicine). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using a generic inverse-variance method with a random-effects model. Mixed-effects model univariate meta-regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Five RCTs involving 29 776 patients (T2DM, n = 23 780) and 1052 gout-related events were identified. Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitor use was significantly associated with reduced risk of composite gout outcomes (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45-0.67; I2  = 61%, P < 0.001). Treatment benefits did not differ between trials being conducted exclusively in baseline HF versus those conducted in patients with T2DM (P-interaction = 0.37), but were greater with dapagliflozin 10 mg and canagliflozin 100/300 mg (P < 0.01 for subgroup differences). Sensitivity analysis excluding trials that evaluated the effects of empagliflozin 10/25 mg (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57-0.81; I2  = 0%) accentuated the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors with no between-trial heterogeneity (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.39-0.55; I2  = 0%). Univariate meta-regression found no impact of baseline SUA, SUA lowering on follow-up, diuretic use, or other variables on their anti-gout effects.

CONCLUSION

We found that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of gout in individuals with T2DM/HF. Lack of an association with SUA-lowering effects suggests that metabolic and anti-inflammatory effects of SGLT2 inhibitors may predominantly mediate their anti-gout benefits.

Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: an overview of 36 systematic reviews

The recently published randomized trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in heart failure with mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) led researchers to perform a plethora of systematic reviews (SRs), often providing contradictory conclusions. This overview of reviews was aimed at summarizing the evidence of these SRs, quantifying the overlap, re-analyzing the evidence in case new studies that were identified, and mapping knowledge gaps. Literature search was conducted through Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane until March 22, 2023. Overall, 36 SRs synthesizing results from 18 RCTs were identified. A substantial overlap was identified among the SRs synthesizing large heart failure or cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs). Regarding the composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) mortality or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), all authors reported a significant favorable effect. A beneficial effect was also noted for CV and all-cause mortality, albeit not significant. Our meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS, MD = 1.97, p < 0.001), Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS, MD = 2.29, p < 0.001), Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS, MD = 1.59, p < 0.001), and the 6-min walking distance (MD = 10.78 m, p = 0.032). Regarding safety, SGLT2i were associated with a significantly lower risk of serious adverse events compared to placebo (RR = 0.94, p = 0.002). The use of SGLT2i in HFpEF is both efficient and safe. Further research is required to clarify the impact of SGTL2i on different subphenotypes of HFpEF and the cardiorespiratory capacity of these patients.