Dalbavancin use in an academic medical centre and associated cost savings

Cost evaluation of continuation of therapy with dalbavancin compared to standard-of-care antibiotics alone in hospitalized persons who inject drugs with severe gram-positive infections

PURPOSE

Persons who inject drugs (PWID) are at risk for severe gram-positive infections and may require prolonged hospitalization and intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Dalbavancin (DBV) is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide that may reduce costs and provide effective treatment in this population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of PWID with severe gram-positive infections. Patients admitted from January 1, 2017, to November 1, 2019 (standard-of-care [SOC] group) and from November 15, 2019, to March 31, 2022 (DBV group) were included. The primary outcome was the total cost to the healthcare system. Secondary outcomes included hospital days saved and treatment failure.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were included (37 in the DBV group and 50 in the SOC group). Patients were a median of 34 years old and were predominantly Caucasian (82%). Staphylococcus aureus (82%) was the most common organism, and bacteremia (71%) was the most common type of infection. Compared to the SOC group, the DBV group would have had a median of 14 additional days of hospitalization if they had stayed to complete their therapy (P = 0.014). The median total cost to the healthcare system was significantly lower in the DBV group than in the SOC group ($31,698.00 vs $45,093.50; P = 0.035). The rate of treatment failure was similar between the groups (32.4% in the DBV group vs 36% in the SOC group; P = 0.729).

CONCLUSION

DBV is a cost-saving alternative to SOC IV antibiotics for severe gram-positive infections in PWID, with similar treatment outcomes. Larger prospective studies, including other patient populations, may demonstrate additional benefit.

Dalba Got Back? Use of Dalbavancin for the Treatment of Vertebral Osteomyelitis

Data evaluating dalbavancin use for vertebral osteomyelitis remain limited. In our retrospective cohort, 29 of 34 (85.3%) patients completed their dalbavancin course. Adverse reactions occurred for 6 (17.6%) and infection recurrence in 3 (8.8%) within 90 days. Dalbavancin appears to be safe and well-tolerated for vertebral osteomyelitis.

Dalbavancin Use in Persons Who Use Drugs May Increase Adherence Without Increasing Cost

Background: Dalbavancin (DAL) may obviate concerns regarding misuse of IV access in persons who use drugs (PWUD) completing treatment for infections in an outpatient setting. However, hesitancy to adopt its use exists due to the cost-prohibitive nature of DAL and perceived issues with insurance reimbursement. Our study looks to determine the financial impact of DAL use in actual, measured cost, and health care utilization, data as well as the effect on treatment completion rates. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort comparing cost information and treatment completion rates of patients who received DAL to a random sample of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia prior to the institutional availability of DAL. Results: From June 2020 to January 2022, 29 PWUD received DAL. Dalbavancin use resulted in the completion of intended duration in 19 patients (66%) compared with 11 (55%) without DAL. The contribution margin with DAL use was $7180 compared with $6655 without; this was not statistically significant (P = 0.47). Conclusion: Dalbavancin use in PWUD may increase treatment completion, with no statistically significant difference in contribution margins.

Dalbavancin as salvage therapy in difficult-to-treat patients for diabetes-related foot osteomyelitis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin in treatment of patients with diabetes-related foot osteomyelitis with bone culture confirmation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2019 and December 2021, all consecutive patients receiving at least one 1500 mg dose of dalbavancin for diabetes-related foot osteomyelitis were included in a retrospective study. Remission was defined as absence of relapsing infection or need for surgery at the initial or a contiguous site during 6-month follow-up from the last dose of dalbavancin.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were included. Eleven (85%) patients were surgically treated. Six (46%) patients received dalbavancin as first-line treatment and 7 (54%) as second-line treatment due to adverse events related to previous treatments. One adverse event was reported. At 6-month follow-up, 11 patients were evaluable and 9 (82%) were in remission.

CONCLUSIONS

In the study, dalbavancin was well-tolerated and showed microbiological and clinical efficacy.

Comparison of dalbavancin with standard of care in the management of infective endocarditis: efficacy, safety, and cost analysis

OBJECTIVES

Due to its long half-life, dalbavancin offers benefits for long-duration treatments, especially osteoarticular and infective endocarditis (IE). We evaluated the efficacy and costs of IE treatment, comparing dalbavancin with standard of care (SOC).

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter cohort study of adult patients with Gram-positive cocci definite IE. Dalbavancin was used as a sequential therapy before discharge. Efficacy was a combined variable of clinical cure and absence of recurrence in 12-month follow-up. Length of hospital stay and the associated costs were analyzed in both groups of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients received dalbavancin and 47 SOC. The efficacy was similar between the groups (dalbavancin 18 [72%] vs SOC 44 [94%], P = 0.198). Hospital stay was shorter in the dalbavancin group (dalbavancin 22 days [16-34] vs SOC 37 days [23-49], P = 0.001), especially in those with E. faecalis IE (dalbavancin 30 days [20-36] vs SOC 65 days [46-74], P <0.001). A reduction of cost was observed between both groups (dalbavancin, 12,206 € [8998-17,283] vs SOC 16,249 € [11,496-22,367], P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Dalbavancin could be a safe and effective option in the sequential treatment of patients with IE. Also, a cost reduction was detected, due to a significant shortness of hospital stay.

Cost analysis of dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in two Italian hospitals

Objectives

Thanks to its long half-life, dalbavancin qualifies as an optimal drug for saving costs. We aimed to assess the cost and effectiveness of dalbavancin versus the standard of care (SoC).

Patients and methods

We conducted a multicentre retrospective study, including all hospitalized or outpatients diagnosed with ABSSSIs at Padua University Hospital, Padua and San Paolo Hospital, Milan (1 January 2016 to 31 July 2020). We compared patients according to antibiotic treatment (dalbavancin versus SoC), the number of lines of dalbavancin treatment, and monotherapy or combination (dalbavancin in association with other antibiotics). Primary endpoints were direct medical costs and length of hospital stay (LOS) associated with ABSSSI management; Student's t-test, chi-squared test and one-way ANOVA were used.

Results

One hundred and twenty-six of 228 (55.3%) patients received SoC, while 102/228 (44.7%) received dalbavancin. Twenty-seven of the 102 (26.5%) patients received dalbavancin as first-line treatment, 46 (45.1%) as second-line, and 29 (28.4%) as third- or higher-line treatment. Most patients received dalbavancin as monotherapy (62/102; 60.8%). Compared with SoC, dalbavancin was associated with a significant reduction of LOS (5 ± 7.47 days for dalbavancin, 9.2 ± 5.59 days for SoC; P < 0.00001) and with lower mean direct medical costs (3470 ± 2768€ for dalbavancin; 3493 ± 1901€ for SoC; P = 0.9401). LOS was also reduced for first-line dalbavancin, in comparison with second-, third- or higher-line groups, and for dalbavancin monotherapy versus combination therapy. Mean direct medical costs were significantly lower in first-line dalbavancin compared with higher lines, but no cost difference was observed between monotherapy and combination therapy.

Conclusions

Monotherapy with first-line dalbavancin was confirmed as a promising strategy for ABSSSIs in real-life settings, thanks to its property in reducing LOS and saving direct medical costs.

Cost analysis of disease including treatment with dalbavancin in a Spanish hospital: ECODAL ANALYSIS

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Dalbavancin is an antibiotic with activity against gram-positive bacteria that allows early discharge of patients requiring intravenous therapy. Outpatient treatment helps offset hospitalisation costs associated with standard intravenous treatment. Our objective was to assess the cost of disease management, including treatment with dalbavancin, in a Spanish hospital for 1 year, and the hypothetical costs associated with treatment with other therapeutic alternatives to dalbavancin.

METHODS

A single-centre, observational, retrospective post-hoc analysis was conducted based on electronic medical records analysing all patients who received dalbavancin treatment for 1 year; cost analysis was performed for the whole process. In addition, three scenarios designed on the basis of real clinical practice by clinical experts were hypothesised: (i) individual therapeutic alternative to dalbavancin, (ii) all patients treated with daptomycin, and (iii) all days of dalbavancin as outpatient treatment transformed into hospital stay. Costs were obtained from the hospital.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were treated with dalbavancin; their mean age was 57.9 years, and 70.6% were men. The main reasons for dalbavancin use were outpatient management (61.7%, n = 21) and ensuring treatment adherence (26.5%, n = 9). The main indications were: osteoarticular infection (32.4%) and infective endocarditis (29.4%). One-half (50%) of the infections were due to Staphylococcus aureus (23.5% were methicillin resistant). All patients achieved clinical resolution, and no costs associated with dalbavancin-associated adverse events or re-admissions were reported. The mean total cost of treatment was 22,738€per patient, with the greatest expenditures in interventions (8,413€) and hospital stay (6,885€). The mean cost of dalbavancin treatment was 3,936€; without dalbavancin, this cost could have been increased to 3,324-11,038€depending on the scenario, mainly due to hospital stays.

MAIN LIMITATION

Limited sample size obtained from a single centre.

CONCLUSION

The economic impact of the management of these infections is high. The cost of dalbavancin is offset by the decreased length of stay.

REDS study: Retrospective effectiveness study of dalbavancin and other standard of care of the same IV antibiotic class in patients with ABSSSI

OBJECTIVES

Acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a common source of morbidity in both the community and hospital settings. The current standard of care (SoC) requires multiple-dose intravenous (IV) regimens, which are associated with high hospitalisation rates, concomitant event risks and costs. Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide, long-acting antibiotic that is effective against Gram-positive microorganisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Dalbavancin allows treatment of ABSSSIs with a single-shot IV administration or once weekly for 2 weeks, enabling clinicians to treat patients in an outpatient setting or to shorten the length of hospital stay.

METHODS

This multicentre, observational, retrospective study compared hospitalised patients who received dalbavancin and patients treated with the three most used IV antibiotics of the same or similar class: vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin. The primary outcome was the time to discharge after starting the study antibiotics.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint, time to discharge from the study therapy start, was measured for both groups: the median number of days was 6.5 in the dalbavancin group vs. 11.0 days in the SoC group. Moreover, in subpopulations of patients receiving one or more concomitant antibiotics active for Gram-positives, MRSA and patients with the most prevalent comorbidity (i.e., diabetes), the advantage of dalbavancin in terms of length of stay was confirmed, with a halved time to discharge or more. Safety data on dalbavancin were consistent with data collected in clinical trials. No serious adverse drug reactions related to dalbavancin were reported and most of them were classified as skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. One serious ADR was reported for daptomycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the analysis was only descriptive, it can be concluded that dalbavancin may enable a remarkable reduction in length of hospital stay, also confirming the clinical effectiveness and good safety profile demonstrated in clinical trials in a real-world setting.

Tackling Extended Hospital Stays in Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

Hospitalisation rates for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) are rising and represent a large pharmacoeconomic burden as treatment may involve an extended number of days of antibiotic therapy. This article first aims to provide a review of treatment challenges associated with ABSSSIs in both hospital and outpatient settings, and shows that while more traditionally treatment has been conducted in a hospital setting, for a number of patients, a variety of considerations, including pharmacoeconomics, infection control, and patient preference, has led to the development of recommendations to assess the eligibility of patients for early discharge from hospital to complete their antibiotic regimen in the outpatient setting. However, such patients require monitoring for drug adherence to oral regimens or complications associated with daily intravenous administration, such as injection site reactions and infection. This review also focuses on one of a number of new antibiotics for ABSSSI, dalbavancin, as the long-acting glycopeptide with the most clinical experience to date. This antibiotic has been shown to be as effective as a daily/twice daily regimen with similar safety profiles. Health economic analysis of dalbavancin is also presented. It has shown that in some, though not all, clinical settings a reduction in the overall treatment cost is evident as, despite a higher medication cost, the lower hospitalisation time can lead to greater cost savings. In conclusion, while the burden of ABSSSI is rising, new treatment options provide additional therapeutic choice, although pharmacoeconomic considerations might limit use in some cases.

Dalbavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure and other infections: a safety evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Dalbavancin is a second-generation lipoglycopeptide that was approved since 2014 to treat acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSI). Dalbavancin is characterized by Gram-positive activity and novel pharmacokinetic properties that result in a prolonged terminal half-life, allowing once weekly dosing in adults. A good safety profile was reported by randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses.

AREAS COVERED

Dalbavancin safety and tolerability data from trials and post-marketing studies were reviewed. While most trials included predominantly ABSSSI, 2 clinical trials and recent observational studies have explored the use of dalbavancin for off-label indications, mainly including bloodstream and osteoarticular infections.

EXPERT OPINION

The occurrence of drug-related adverse effects (AE) was similar between dalbavancin and comparators in clinical trials enrolling patients with ABSSSI. Most common AE included gastrointestinal symptoms, infusion reaction, and hypersensitivity. Low rates of drug discontinuation and serious AE were reported across studies. In the past 5 years, several observational studies have reported safety data on the use of dalbavancin, confirming its favorable safety profile. Nevertheless, data from dalbavancin off-label use often derived from prolonged (> 2 weeks) treatments with variable dosing regimens, were mainly retrospective, and lacked comparators. Further research is required to allow a reliable analysis of short- and long-term dalbavancin-related AE in non-ABSSSI.

Beta-lactam resistance and the effectiveness of antimicrobial peptides against KPC-producing bacteria

Bacterial resistance is a problem that is giving serious cause for concern because bacterial strains such as Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are difficult to treat and highly opportunistic. These bacteria easily acquire resistance genes even from other species, which confers greater persistence and tolerance towards conventional antibiotics. These bacteria have the highest death rate in hospitalized intensive care patients, so strong measures must be taken. In this review, we focus on the use of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as an alternative to traditional drugs, due to their rapid action and lower risk of generating resistance by microorganisms. We also present an overview of beta-lactams and explicitly explain the activity of AMPs against carbapenemase-producing bacteria as potential alternative agents for infection control.

Description and outcomes of patients with substance use disorder with serious bacterial infections who had a multidisciplinary care conference

Background

Patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) and severe bacterial infections requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy represent a significant challenge to providers due to complexity of care coordination required to ensure safe and effective treatment. Our institution developed a patient-centered multidisciplinary discharge planning conference, OPTIONS-DC, to address this challenge.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review to evaluates parameters between patients who received an OPTIONS-DC and those who did not.

Results

We identified 73 patients receiving an OPTIONS-DC and 100 who did not. More patients with an OPTIONS-DC were < 40 years of age (76.7% versus 61.0%, OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.1-4.7, p = 0.02), had positive HCV antibody testing (58.9% versus 41.0%, OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1-3.8, p = 0.02), injection drug use (93.2% versus 79.0%, OR = 3.6 95% CI = 1.3-10.1, p = 0.01), used methamphetamines (84.9% versus 72.0%, OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.0-4.8, p = 0.04), and started inpatient SUD treatment (80.8% versus 63%, OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.2-5.0, p = 0.04) compared with those without a conference. The OPTIONS-DC group was more likely to be diagnosed with bacteremia (74.0% versus 57.0%, OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1-4.1, p = 0.02), endocarditis (39.7% versus21.0%, OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.3-4.9, p = 0.03), vertebral osteomyelitis (45.2% versus 15.0%, OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 2.3-9.6, p < 0.01), and epidural abscess (35.6% versus 10.0%, OR = 5.0, 95% CI = 2.2-11.2, p < 0.01) and require 4 weeks or more of antibiotic treatment (97.3% versus 51.1%, OR = 34.1, 95% CI = 7.9-146.7, p = 0.01). Patients with an OPTIONS-DC were also more likely to be admitted between 2019 and 2020 than between 2018 and 2019 (OR = 4.1, 95% CI = 2.1-7.9, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Patients with an OPTIONS-DC tended to have more complicated infections and longer courses of antibiotic treatment. While further research on outcomes is needed, patients receiving an OPTIONS-DC were able to successfully complete antibiotic courses across a variety of settings.

Dalbavancin in Real Life: Economic Impact of Prescription Timing in French Hospitals

INTRODUCTION

The extended half-life of dalbavancin justifies a once-a-week dosing schedule and is supposed to favour early discharge. These advantages may therefore compensate for the cost of dalbavancin, but no real-life assessment has been conducted to date. We aimed to assess the real-life budget impact of dalbavancin through its impact on the length of stay in French hospitals.

METHODS

A multicentre cohort based on the French registry of dalbavancin use in 2019 was compared to the French national discharge summary database. Lengths of stay and budget impact related to the infection type, the time of introduction of dalbavancin, the type of catheter and patient subgroups were assessed. An early switch was defined when dalbavancin was administered as the first or second treatment and within less than 11 days of hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients were identified in the registry, and 154 were included in our study. Dalbavancin was mostly used for bone and joint infections (56.0%), infective endocarditis (19.0%) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (6.0%). When compared to the data for similar patients in the national database, the length of stay was almost always shorter for patients treated with dalbavancin (up to a reduction of 13 days). The budget impact for dalbavancin was heterogeneous but frequently generated savings (up to 2257.0 €). Early switching (within less than 11 days) was associated with savings (or lesser costs), with even greater benefits within 7 days of hospitalization. Patients who required a deep venous catheter as well as the most severe patients benefited the most from dalbavancin.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that dalbavancin is associated with early discharge, which can offset its cost and generate savings. The greatest benefit is achieved with an early switch.

Outcomes in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Treated with Dalbavancin in Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

Dalbavancin is a long-acting, bactericidal, lipoglycopeptide antibiotic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in adults, with potent activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Here we describe the clearance and clinical outcomes of patients with S. aureus bacteremia in five clinical trials of skin and skin structure infections or catheter-related bloodstream infections that evaluated the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin.

METHODS

Patients with uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia identified in blood cultures drawn at baseline (before study drug) with at least one follow-up blood culture are described from four phase 3 trials in skin and skin structure infections and one phase 2 catheter-related infection study. Dalbavancin was administered as a single-dose (1500 mg intravenous [IV]) or a two-dose regimen (1000 mg IV on day 1, 500 mg IV on day 8). Comparators included vancomycin IV or linezolid IV/oral for 10-14 days.

RESULTS

All 39 patients (100%) who received dalbavancin, including 8 patients on the single-dose regimen, had clearance of bacteremia versus 19/20 patients (95%) treated with comparators (vancomycin or linezolid). At end of treatment, 33/36 dalbavancin-treated patients (92%) achieved clinical success versus 18/23 patients (78%) treated with comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

All 39 patients with uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia treated with dalbavancin (single- or two-dose regimen) and with follow-up blood cultures had clearance of their bloodstream infection. Clinical response rates were similar to daily comparator therapy for 10-14 days.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DISCOVER 1, NCT01339091; DISCOVER 2, NCT01431339; DUR001-303, NCT02127970; VER001-9; VER001-4, NCT00057369.

Biofilm-Related Infections in Gram-Positive Bacteria and the Potential Role of the Long-Acting Agent Dalbavancin

Infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria are a major public health problem due to their increasing resistance to antibiotics. Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species' resistance and pathogenicity are enhanced by their ability to form biofilm. The biofilm lifestyle represents a significant obstacle to treatment because bacterial cells become highly tolerant to a wide range of antimicrobial compounds normally effective against their planktonic forms. Thus, novel therapeutic strategies targeting biofilms are urgently needed. The lipoglycopeptide dalbavancin is a long-acting agent for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections caused by a broad range of Gram-positive pathogens. Recent studies have shown promising activity of dalbavancin against Gram-positive biofilms, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE), and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci. This review outlines the mechanisms regulating biofilm development in Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species and the clinical impact of biofilm-related infections. In addition, it discusses the clinical implications and potential therapeutic perspectives of the long-acting drug dalbavancin against biofilm-forming Gram-positive pathogens.

Role or oritavancin and dalbavancin in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and other potential indications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the currently available evidence about the use oritavancin and dalbavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and for other potential indications.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we briefly summarize the available data on efficacy (from randomized controlled trials) and on effectiveness and cure rates (from observational studies) pertaining to the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin either for ABSSSI or for other indications.

SUMMARY

Oritavancin and dalbavancin are valid options for outpatient therapy and early discharge in patients with ABSSSI, especially when adherence to oral therapy cannot be guaranteed or no oral choices are available. Furthermore, it is worth noting that a non-negligible portion (sometimes the majority) of oritavancin and dalbavancin use in available real-life experiences is for indications other than ABSSSI, especially for Gram-positive osteomyelitis and endocarditis. The number of studies on the use of long-acting lipoglycopeptides for these currently off-label indications is rapidly increasing and will help to further optimize the use of these peculiar antibiotics in the forthcoming future.

Real-World Use of Dalbavancin in the Era of Empowerment of Outpatient Antimicrobial Treatment: A Careful Appraisal Beyond Approved Indications Focusing on Unmet Clinical Needs

Dalbavancin is a novel, long-acting lipoglycopeptide characterized by a long elimination half-life coupled with excellent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-positives. Although it is currently approved only for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, an ever-growing amount of evidence supports the efficacy of dalbavancin as a long-term therapy in osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infections, endocarditis, and bloodstream infections. This article provides a critical reappraisal of real-world use of dalbavancin for off-label indications. A search strategy using specific keywords (dalbavancin, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, long-term suppressive therapy, bloodstream infection, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile) until April 2021 was performed on the PubMed-MEDLINE database. As for other novel antibiotics, a conundrum between approved indications and potential innovative therapeutic uses has emerged for dalbavancin as well. The promising efficacy in challenging scenarios (i.e., osteomyelitis, endocarditis, prosthetic joint infections), coupled with the unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, makes dalbavancin a valuable alternative to daily in-hospital intravenous or outpatient antimicrobial regimens in the treatment of long-term Gram-positive infections. This makes dalbavancin valuable in the current COVID-19 scenario, in which hospitalization and territorial medicine empowerment are unavoidable.

Dalbavancin for the management of osteomyelitis: a major step forward?

Osteomyelitis is one of the most challenging infectious diseases to treat and is associated with a significant burden to healthcare systems. There are limited available therapeutic options to treat osteomyelitis caused by Gram-positive pathogens and these are not without limitations. Dalbavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide, approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections caused by designated susceptible strains of Gram-positive microorganisms. It demonstrated promising pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and safety data to be considered for the treatment of bone infections. However, information on the effectiveness and safety of dalbavancin in the treatment of invasive Gram-positive infections, such as osteomyelitis, is very limited. In this review, we describe the novel characteristics and potential utility of dalbavancin in the treatment of osteomyelitis and summarize its long-term clinical outcomes from published case reports, series and comparative studies.

Dalbavancin for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Narrative Review

Dalbavancin (DAL) is a lipoglycopeptide with bactericidal activity against a very wide range of Gram-positive microorganisms. It also has unique pharmacokinetic properties, namely a prolonged half-life (around 181 h), which allows a convenient weekly dosing regimen, and good diffusion in bone tissue. These features have led to off-label use of dalbavancin in the setting of bone and joint infection, including prosthetic joint infections (PJI). In this narrative review, we go over the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of DAL, along with published in vitro and in vivo experimental models evaluating its activity against biofilm-embedded bacteria. We also examine published experience of osteoarticular infection with special attention to DAL and PJI.

Dalbavancin Efficacy and Impact on Hospital Length-of-Stay and Treatment Costs in Different Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections

Background and Objectives

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of dalbavancin therapy on both hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and treatment-related costs, as well as to describe the clinical outcome, in a retrospective cohort of patients with diverse Gram-positive bacterial infections, hospitalized in different specialty Units.

Methods

From July 2017 to July 2019, clinical and sociodemographic data were collected for all hospitalized patients switched to dalbavancin for the treatment of Gram-positive infections. LOS and treatment-related costs were assessed and compared to a hypothetical scenario where the initial standard antimicrobial therapy would have been administered in hospital for the same duration as dalbavancin.

Results

A total of 50 patients were enrolled. The observed infections were: acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs, 12 patients), complicated ABSSSIs (eight patients), osteoarticular infections (18 patients), vascular graft or cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections (12 patients). After a median of 14 [interquartile range (IQR) 7–28] days, the in-hospital antimicrobial therapy was switched to dalbavancin 1500 mg. When appropriate, considering the site and the clinical course of the infection, 1500 mg doses were repeated every 14 days until recovery. Overall, 49/50 (98%) patients reported clinical success at the end of therapy. No relapses were observed in 37 patients for whom a median follow-up of 150 (IQR 30–180) days was available. By switching to dalbavancin, a median of €8,259 (IQR 5644–17,270) and 14 hospital days (IQR 22–47) per patient were saved.

Conclusions

In this experience, the use of dalbavancin contributed to shorten LOS and treatment-related costs, especially in difficult Gram-positive infections requiring prolonged therapy.

Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Bone and Joint Infections

Background: The long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin possess excellent microbiologic activity against gram-positive bacteria and provide prolonged tissue exposure at sites of infection. Moreover, these antibiotics are well tolerated and do not require therapeutic drug monitoring. Methods: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic experiments ascertained that one to two doses of these long-acting agents can provide an extended period (≥6 weeks) of antimicrobial therapy. Results: Clinical studies subsequently found that microbiologic and clinical response rates with these agents were comparable to standard antibiotic agents used in the treatment of bone and joint infections. In addition, pharmacoeconomic analyses have discovered cost savings with the use of these antimicrobial agents in the treatment of serious deep-seated bacterial infections. Conclusions: Thus, these long-acting lipoglycopeptides offer potential for cost-effective outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy of difficult to treat infections, such as osteomyelitis.

Surgical Infection Society 2020 Updated Guidelines on the Management of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Background: The Surgical Infection Society (SIS) Guidelines for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) were published in October 2009 in Surgical Infections. The purpose of this project was to provide a succinct update on the earlier guidelines based on an additional decade of data. Methods: We reviewed the previous guidelines eliminating bite wounds and diabetic foot infections including their associated references. Relevant articles on the topic of complicated SSTIs from 2008-2020 were reviewed and graded individually. Comparisons were then made between the old and the new graded recommendations with review of the older references by two authors when there was disparity between the grades. Results: The majority of new studies addressed antimicrobial options and duration of therapy particularly in complicated abscesses. There were fewer updated studies on diagnosis and specific operative interventions. Many of the topics addressed in the original guidelines had no new literature to evaluate. Conclusions: Most recommendations remain unchanged from the original guidelines with the exception of increased support for adjuvant antimicrobial therapy after drainage of complex abscess and increased data for the use of alternative antimicrobial agents.

Comparison of dalbavancin to standard-of-care for outpatient treatment of invasive Gram-positive infections

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin compared to standard-of-care (SOC) or vancomycin and daptomycin in invasive infections due to suspected or confirmed Gram-positive organisms.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of adults who received dalbavancin or SOC on discharge or as an outpatient from 12/2016 to 11/2019. Indications were osteoarticular infection (OAI), infective endocarditis (IE), or other bloodstream infection (BSI). Primary endpoint was 90-day infection-related readmission (IRR); secondary endpoints included time-to-IRR, frequency of adverse drug events (ADEs), and all-cause readmission and mortality.

RESULTS

215 patients were included: 70 (33%) receiving dalbavancin, and 145 (67%) receiving SOC. Indications were OAI (47%), IE (27%), and other BSI (26%). OAI was more common in patients on dalbavancin compared with those receiving SOC (70% vs. 37%, P<0.001). Dalbavancin patients had shorter median (interquartile range [IQR]) length of stay (LOS) prior to drug initiation compared with those receiving SOC (10 [7-17] vs. 13 [9-19], P=0.021). IRR incidence was 17% for dalbavancin patients and 28% for SOC patients. Dalbavancin use was independently associated with lower IRR (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.31). There was longer median (IQR) time-to-IRR in the dalbavancin group (43 [30-87] vs. 23 [11-63] days, P=0.039), but no differences in all-cause readmission or mortality. Treatment-related ADE incidence was 3% and 14% for the dalbavancin and SOC groups, respectively (P=0.013). Infusion reactions (1/2) and catheter-related complications (1/2) were the most common dalbavancin ADEs; catheter-related complications (14/21), nephrotoxicity (3/21), rhabdomyolysis (2/21), and rash (2/21) were the most common SOC ADEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin use was associated with lower 90-day IRR, a shorter hospital LOS prior to therapy, and longer time-to-IRR compared with SOC.

Financial Analysis of Dalbavancin for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections for Self-Pay Patients

Introduction

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) are an increasing cause of admission in the self-pay population. We previously reported that patients with ABSSSI discharged to receive dalbavancin showed a decreased length of stay (LOS) and total direct costs without increasing 30-day readmission rate. For patients who are financially eligible, a dalbavancin vial replacement program can offset costs. The objective of this study was to determine cost differences in treating ABSSSI in self-pay inpatients discharged to receive dalbavancin compared to standard of care (SOC).

Methods

This retrospective cohort within a community health system compared self-pay adult inpatients with ABSSSI from February 3, 2016 to August 5, 2019 discharged to receive dalbavancin at an outpatient infusion center with SOC intravenous antibiotics. Patients were included with cellulitis, abscess, or postoperative wound infections diagnoses on the basis of International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Excluded populations were patients without dalbavancin vial replacement performed, pregnant, infections caused exclusively by gram-negative bacteria or fungi, or ICD-10 codes not consistent with ABSSSI. The primary outcome was direct cost of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates, adverse events (AE), and indirect hospital costs. On the basis of previous studies, a one-sided Student’s t test was performed on financial data.

Results

Twelve dalbavancin and 263 SOC patients met inclusion criteria. Direct cost ($2758 vs $4010, p = 0.105) and indirect hospital cost ($2913 vs $3646 , p = 0.162) per patient were less in the dalbavancin group. There was no significant difference between median LOS (4 vs 4, p = 0.888), AE (0% vs 14.8%), and 30-day readmission rates for dalbavancin vs SOC group (8.3% vs 7.2%, p = 0.604).

Conclusion

Self-pay patients with ABSSSI discharged to receive dalbavancin with vial replacement resulted in decreased direct and indirect costs per patient with similar 30-day readmission rates, AE, and LOS. More studies targeted toward this population are warranted to determine ultimate benefit.

Dalbavancin in the Treatment of Bacteremia and Endocarditis in People with Barriers to Standard Care

Introduction: Dalbavancin is an antibiotic administered by intravenous infusion weekly or bi-weekly and is currently FDA-approved only for treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. It has shown promise, but is not considered the standard of care, for bacteremia and infective endocarditis (IE), which typically require outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) for prolonged durations. People who inject drugs (PWID) with bacteremia or IE are often perceived as having barriers to OPAT and standard daily-administered antibiotics, prompting off-label use of dalbavancin in this population. Methods: A retrospective review of adult patients receiving at least one dose of dalbavancin for bacteremia or IE was conducted between 1 November 2017 and 31 October 2019. Outcomes and reasons for use of dalbavancin were recorded, including specific barriers to standard therapy. Results: Stated reasons for dalbavancin use in the 18 patients identified included active injection drug use (50%), inability to arrange standard OPAT due to patient adherence or inability to place in skilled nursing facility (SNF) (22%), risk for additional infections or other morbidity with OPAT (22%), and patient preference (6%). In 11 patients (61%) SNF placement was not attempted due to behavioral issues or patient declination. There were five patients who did not complete their intended course of treatment (28%). At 90 days, eight patients (44%) achieved a clinical or biologic cure, six (33%) failed treatment, and four (22%) were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Dalbavancin may have a role as salvage therapy in the treatment of IE and bacteremia in PWID who have significant barriers to standard treatment.

Efficacy and safety of dalbavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and other infections in a real-life setting: data from an Italian observational multicentric study (DALBITA study)

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin in ABSSSI and 'other sites' infections' (OTA).

METHODS

Observational study involving 11 Italian hospitals including patients that received ≥1 dose of dalbavancin in 2016-2019. The outcome was end-of-treatment efficacy and safety in ABSSSI and OTA in a real-life setting.

RESULTS

206 patients enrolled (males 50%, median age 62 [IQR 50-76] years), 60.2% ABSSSI, 39.8% OTA. 69.7% ABSSSI vs 90.7% OTA (p = 0.003) and 46.3% ABSSSI vs 37.2% OTA (p = 0.786) received previous and concomitant antibiotics, respectively. 82.5% reached clinical cure . Eleven (5.4%) patients had non-serious adverse events (AE). OTA patients showed longer hospitalization (13.5 days, 5.5-22 vs 3, 0-11.7; p<0.0001) and received longer previous (18 days, 9-30 vs 11, 7-19; p = 0.007)/concomitant antibiotic treatments (21 days, 14-52 vs 11, 8-14; p < 0.0001), compared to ABSSSI. ABSSSI and OTA showed similar efficacy (85.5% vs 75%, p = 0.459) and safety (no AE: 81.5% vs 64.3%, p = 0.258); efficacy was independent of previous/concomitant therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin demonstrated a success rate of >80%, with similar efficacy/safety in ABSSSI and off-label indications. The preferential use of dalbavancin as second-line or combination therapy would seem to suggest the need for in-depth studies focused on its off-label use.

Adverse reactions to vancomycin and cross-reactivity with other antibiotics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glycopeptide antibiotics such as vancomycin are frequently utilized to treat resistant Gram-positive infections such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The current literature on glycopeptide and lipoglycopeptide structure, hypersensitivity and potential cross-reactivity was reviewed, highlighting implications for safe prescribing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Structurally similar, glycopeptides could theoretically cross-react. Immediate reactions to vancomycin include non-IgE-mediated reactions (e.g. red man syndrome) and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity (e.g. anaphylaxis), sharing clinical features. Vancomycin can activate mast cells via MAS-related G-protein-coupled receptor X2, an IgE-independent receptor implicated in non-IgE reactions. In-vivo and in-vitro testing for suspected IgE-mediated reactions to glycopeptides remain ill-defined. Vancomycin is increasingly recognized to cause severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR), with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) predominantly reported. Vancomycin DRESS has been associated with HLA-A32:-01, with a number needed to prevent of 1 in 74. Data demonstrating cross-reactivity amongst glycopeptides and lipoglycopeptides is limited to case reports/series.

SUMMARY

Further studies and in-vivo/in-vitro diagnostics are required for better differentiation between IgE and non-IgE glycopeptide reactions. Despite its association with vanomycin DRESS, utility of pharmacogenomic screening for HLA-A32: 01 is ill-defined. Although HLA-A32:01 has been associated with vancomycin DRESS, its utility for pharmacogenomic screening is ill defined. Further clinical and immunological cross-reactivity data for glycopeptide/lipoglycopeptide antibiotics is required.

Current trends in the real-life use of dalbavancin: report of a study panel

Dalbavancin is a novel lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with a chemical structure similar to teicoplanin. Dalbavancin has been approved and marketed since 2014 in the USA and 2015 in the European Union for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) caused by Gram-positive cocci. ABSSSIs include infectious syndromes such as erysipelas, cellulitis, major cutaneous abscesses that require incision and drainage, and both surgical and traumatic wound infections. In current clinical practice, dalbavancin is also used for cardiac implantable electronic device-related soft tissue infection and other prosthetic infections, and therefore when the presence of biofilm is a concern. In this review, we aimed to highlight our experience with the use of dalbavancin for some of the most hard-to-treat Gram-positive infections, as well as a promising strategy in terms of pharmacoeconomic effectiveness. We describe our current real-life clinical practice with the use of dalbavancin, depicting a few representative clinical cases in order to share our own practice in the hospital setting.

The role of dalbavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs)

Introduction: Acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSI) are a subgroup of skin and soft tissue infections and are a common source of morbidity in both the community and the hospital setting. The most common cause of ABSSSI is Staphylococcus aureus, which also includes methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), together with beta-hemolytic streptococci, enterococci, and Gram-negative bacteria. Since the emergence of MRSA, the management of ABSSSI has become more challenging. Novel therapies alternative to teicoplanin and vancomycin, intravenous agents commonly used against MRSA and employed in hospitalized patients, and to other antibiotics which are used as standard of care for MRSA infection, with a higher efficacy and safer profile are worth evaluating.Areas covered: This review presents and discusses current evidence on the use of dalbavancin in the treatment of ABSSSI.Expert opinion: Dalbavancin represents a promising therapeutic choice in patients with ABSSSI, thanks to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile, valuable antimicrobial spectrum, and good safety profile.