Increase in QT/QTc dispersion after low energy cardioversion of chronic persistent atrial fibrillation

An Improved QT Correction Method for use in Atrial Fibrillation and a Comparison with the Assessment of QT in Sinus Rhythm

BACKGROUND

Conventional QT corrections may be inappropriate inatrial fibrillation (AF) due to RR variability and QT lag. Existing formulashave been modified by the formula RRmod to account for this lag. Wedeveloped a novel correction formula for use in AF (QTAF) based onthe slope ∆QT/∆RRmod and report its performance in AF.We also compare QTAF obtained in AF with rate-independentcorrections in NSR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 3063 RR/QT pairs from 28 patients with AFwere measured, 22 of whom also had measurements during sinus rhythm. QTc (theBazett equation), QTLC (the Framingham linear correction), and QTAFwere calculated utilizing RRmod, and the rate-independence of eachformula in AF tested. Mean QTAF values in AF were compared to QTintervals corrected with QTLC in normal sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

∆QTc/∆RRmod and∆QTLC/∆RRmod slopes were significantlynon-zero whereas ∆QTAF/∆RRmod was not. QTLCand QTc corrections were imperfect at extremes of RRmod whileQTAF was constant. QTAF corrections in AF were shorterthan QTc or QTLC corrections in NSR.

CONCLUSIONS

QTAF is a novel QT correction with adefined relationship to correction in NSR that performs better than existingstrategies.

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks Increase T-Wave Alternans

INTRODUCTION

While implantable defibrillator shocks save lives, shock can lead to ventricular arrhythmias. However, the mechanism of shock-related proarrhythmia remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of ICD shock on repolarization instability, a factor associated with ventricular arrhythmogenesis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with ICDs underwent ambulatory ECG monitoring during defibrillation testing 3 months postimplant. TWA was analyzed continuously in the time domain during baseline, sedated, and post-shock states. RR, QRS, and QT intervals and catecholamines were also measured continuously. Adequate pre- and post-shock Holter data were recorded in 55 patients, 48 male, mean 64 +/- 12 years, 50 with coronary disease, 48 with prior spontaneous or induced arrhythmia. TWA significantly increased after shock, from 9.6 +/- 0.5 to 11.9 +/- 0.6 microV, as did QRS duration, epinephrine, and norepinephrine levels, compared with sedated and baseline states. RR intervals decreased minimally. TWA changes with shock were not associated with RR or QRS duration changes, but were associated with changes in epinephrine.

CONCLUSIONS

ICD shock, even in the sedated state, increases repolarization instability as measured by TWA, an effect mediated in part by sympathetic stimulation. This association between shock and TWA may have important mechanistic and clinical implications for optimization of defibrillation therapy.

QT dispersion significantly increases after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether QT dispersion (QTd), a noninvasive electrocardiographic parameter of ventricular tachyarrhythmia risk assessment, is changed by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks delivered during implantation process, to analyze the duration of these changes, and to further evaluate the effect of amiodarone on these parameters.

METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive patients who are scheduled to undergo ICD implantation for aborted sudden cardiac death or documented symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia were enrolled into the study. A simultaneous 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded after the ICD implantation just before starting the testing shock when the patients were under general anesthesia (baseline record) and at 1st, 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th, and 30th minutes after the successful shocks. RR interval, QT interval, corrected QT interval (QTc), QTd, and corrected QTd (QTcd) were all measured and calculated on ECG.

RESULTS

At 1st minute after the successful shock, an abrupt increase (from 67.0 +/- 13.8 ms to 94.8+/-21 ms, P < 0.0001) was observed in QTcd, which was followed by a gradual return to the preshock values at 20th minute. Analysis of patients with and without long-term oral amiodarone treatment showed that in amiodarone-pretreated patients QTcd returned to the baseline value earlier than in patients without amiodarone treatment (15 minutes vs 20 minutes, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

ICD shocks cause an increase in QTcd lasting for up to 20th minute, which may predominate in some important clinical problems like electrical storm. Amiodarone, with the desirable effect on QTcd, may reduce the proarrhythmic effects of ICD shocks.

Beat-to-beat QT dynamics in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

QT dynamics parameters are used only in sinus rhythm. However, because many patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergo antiarrhythmic treatment that changes QT, developing methods for measuring QT dynamics during atrial fibrillation is important.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether QT dynamics in atrial fibrillation can be measured more reliably if additional RR intervals are included in the QT calculation.

METHODS

QT and RR intervals were measured in 15 patients with atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm on the same 24-hour Holter recording. Full QT adaptation is not instantaneous but lags behind over several beats. To correct for this lag, we adapted a weighted average method using five successive RR intervals. Linear regression was performed on (QT, RR) and (QT, RR(modified)) pairs. Variability ratio (standard deviation of all QT intervals/standard deviation of all RR intervals) and modified variability ratio (standard deviation of all QT intervals/modified standard deviation of all RR intervals) were calculated.

RESULTS

QT-RR slope was reduced in atrial fibrillation compared with sinus rhythm (0.076 +/- 0.009 vs 0.113 +/- 0.0013, P = .0005). When correcting for lag, using the QT-RR(modified) slope, the slope in atrial fibrillation became similar to the slope in sinus rhythm (0.126 +/- 0.013 vs 0.126 +/- 0.013, P = .9547). The variability ratio was reduced in atrial fibrillation compared with sinus rhythm (0.175 +/- 0.017 vs 0.240 +/- 0.031, P = .009), but when correcting for the lag, the modified variability ratio was similar in atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm (0.262 +/- 0.029 vs 0.267 +/- 0.038, P = .80).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate that QT dynamics can be measured reliably in atrial fibrillation using 24-hour Holter recordings.