Pattern of exercise-induced ST change is related to coronary flow reserve in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiogram

Assessment of coronary flow reserve using a combination of planar first-pass angiography and myocardial SPECT: Comparison with myocardial (15)O-water PET

Coronary flow reserve (CFR), defined as the ratio of maximum coronary flow increase from baseline resting blood flow, is one of the most sensitive parameters to detect early signs of coronary arteriosclerosis at the microvascular level. Myocardial perfusion PET is a well-established technology for CFR measurement, however, availability is still limited. The aim of this study is to introduce and validate myocardial flow reserve measurement by myocardial perfusion SPECT.

METHODS

Myocardial perfusion SPECT at rest and ATP stress (0.16mg/Kg/min) was performed in 10 patients with known coronary artery disease. Immediately after the injection of Tc-99m sestamibi (MIBI), left ventricular (LV) dynamic planar angiographic data were obtained for 90s. Coronary flow reserve index as measured by MIBI SPECT (CFRMIBI) was calculated as follows: CFRMIBI=CmsSbmb/CmbSbms, where subscripts b, s, Cm, and Sbm indicate baseline, during stress, myocardial counts with MIBI SPECT, and integral of LV counts with first pass angiography, respectively. Additionally, standard stress/rest (15)O-water PET to estimate CFR was performed in all patients as standard of reference.

RESULTS

CFRMIBI increased in conjunction with CFR, but underestimated blood flow at high flow rates. The relationship between CFRMIBI (Y) and CFRPET (X) was well fitted as follows: Y=1.40x(1-exp(1.79/x)) (r=0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

The index of CFRMIBI reflects the CFR by (15)O-water PET but underestimates flow at high flows, maybe as a reflection of pharmacokinetic limitations of MIBI.

Evaluation of microvascular angina with TIMI frame count using nitroprusside induced hyperemia

TIMI frame count (TFC) provides a quantitative index of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Previous studies suggested the degree of frame count reserve (FCR) and slow coronary flow (SCF) correlated with microvascular dysfunction. We investigated the clinical implication of FCR and SCF for the evaluation of microvascular angina (MA). We included consecutive 77 patients with the complaint of chest pain, who subsequently had normal coronary angiography. TFC was obtained from left anterior descending artery. Intracoronary nitroprusside (15 μg) was infused to induce hyperemia, and repeat angiogram was performed after 30s. FCR was calculated by dividing basal TFC by hyperemic TFC. SCF was defined as being present when TFC was more than 28. All patients underwent a treadmill test without medication after angiography. After the treadmill test, patients were divided into a MA group (40 patients) and a control group (37 patients). FCR was similar in both groups (2.0±1.0 and 2.1±0.9, MA and control group, respectively). However, hyperemic TFC induced by nitroprusside was significantly higher in the MA group (10.9±4.7) than in the control group (9.0±3.5, p<0.05). Patients who showed SCF had a significantly greater incidence of MA (78.5%; 11/14 patients) than that with normal coronary flow (46.0%; 29/63 patients, p<0.05). The higher hyperemic TFC and presence of SCF were found to have a diagnostic value for MA.

Coronary flow reserve is a comprehensive indicator of cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with chest pain and normal coronary angiogram

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to analyze the parameters related to baseline coronary flow velocity (CFV) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) using Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and to assess their associations with components of the Framingham risk score (FRS), which estimates 10-year risk of coronary heart disease, in subjects with chest pain and a normal coronary angiogram.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 354 individuals (mean age: 55+/-11 years, M:F ratio =186:168) with angina or angina-like chest pain and a normal coronary arteriogram were enrolled. CFR, using TTE and adenosine or dipyridamole, was measured within 2 weeks after coronary angiogram. The clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and laboratory parameters related to baseline CVF and CFR were analyzed, and CFR was compared with FRS. There was an inverse correlation between baseline CFV and CFR (r=-0.374, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis the fulfilling of left ventricular hypertrophy criteria on electrocardiography was an independent predictor of baseline CFV for the upper 75% quartile (23.2> or =cm/s; odds ratio (OR) = 2.840, 95% confidence interval (CI) =1.155-6.983, P=0.023). On multivariate analysis hemoglobin A(1c) level was independently related to a CFR <2.0 (OR = 2.195, 95%CI = 0.920-1.005, P=0.013). CFR had an inverse correlation with FRS (r=-0.222, P<0.001). On multiple regression analysis among the components of the FRS system (FRSS), independent factors related to a CFR <2.0 included age (OR =1.033, 95%CI =1.000-1.067, P=0.041), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level (OR = 0.961, 95%CI = 0.933-0.991, P=0.012) and smoking status (OR = 2.461, 95%CI =1.078-5.618, P=0.033), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CFR can be a comprehensive indicator of cardiovascular risk factors, including parameters of the FRSS, in subjects with chest pain and a normal coronary angiogram.

Lack of correlation between noninvasive stress tests and invasive coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Despite a nonobstructive coronary angiogram, many patients may still have an abnormal coronary vasomotor response to provocation and to myocardial demand during stress. The ability of noninvasive stress tests to predict coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease who had invasive coronary vasomotor assessment and a noninvasive stress test (exercise ECG, stress echocardiography, or stress nuclear imaging) within 6 months of the cardiac catheterization with provocation at our institution were identified (n=376). Coronary vasomotor dysfunction was defined as a percentage increase in coronary blood flow of <or=50% to intracoronary acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent dysfunction) and/or a coronary flow reserve ratio of <or=2.5 to intracoronary adenosine (endothelium-independent dysfunction). We determined the sensitivity and specificity of various noninvasive stress tests to predict coronary vasomotor dysfunction in these patients. On invasive testing, 233 patients (63%) had coronary vasomotor dysfunction, of which 187 patients (51%) had endothelium-dependent dysfunction, 109 patients (29%) had endothelium-independent dysfunction, and 63 patients (17%) had both. On noninvasive stress testing, 157 (42%) had a positive imaging study and 56 (15%) a positive ECG stress test. The noninvasive stress tests had limited diagnostic accuracy for predicting coronary vasomotor dysfunction (41% sensitivity [95% CI, 34 to 47] and 57% specificity [95% CI, 49 to 66]), endothelium-dependent dysfunction (41% sensitivity [95% CI, 34 to 49] and 58% specificity [95% CI, 50 to 65]), or endothelium-independent dysfunction (46% sensitivity [95% CI, 37 to 56] and 61% specificity [95% CI, 54 to 67]). The exercise ECG test was more specific but less sensitive than the imaging tests.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that a negative noninvasive stress test does not rule out coronary vasomotor dysfunction in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. This underscores the need for invasive assessment or novel more sensitive noninvasive imaging for these patients.

The non-invasive documentation of coronary microcirculation impairment: role of transthoracic echocardiography

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic-derived coronary flow reserve is an useful hemodynamic index to assess dysfunction of coronary microcirculation. Isolated coronary microvascular abnormalities are overt by reduced coronary flow reserve despite normal epicardial coronary arteries. These abnormalities may occur in several diseases (arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, syndrome X, aortic valve disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy). The prognostic role of impaired microvascular coronary flow reserve has been shown unfavourable especially in hypertrophic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathies. Coronary flow reserve reduction may be reversible, for instance after regression of left ventricular hypertrophy subsequent to valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis, after anti-hypertensive treatment or using cholesterol lowering drugs. Coronary flow reserve may increase by 30% or more after pharmacological therapy and achieve normal level >3.0. In contrast to other non invasive tools as positron emission tomography, very expensive and associated with radiation exposure, transthoracic Doppler-derived coronary flow reserve is equally non invasive but cheaper, very accessible and prone to a reliable exploration of coronary microvascular territories, otherwise not detectable by invasive coronary angiography, able to visualize only large epicardial arteries.