Atorvastatin reduces tissue factor expression in adipose tissue of atherosclerotic rabbits

Cardiovascular repair with bone marrow-derived cells

While bone marrow (BM)-derived cells have been comprehensively studied for their propitious pre-clinical results, clinical trials have shown controversial outcomes. Unlike previously acknowledged, more recent studies have now confirmed that humoral and paracrine effects are the key mechanisms for tissue regeneration and functional recovery, instead of transdifferentiation of BM-derived cells into cardiovascular tissues. The progression of the understanding of BM-derived cells has further led to exploring efficient methods to isolate and obtain, without mobilization, sufficient number of cell populations that would eventually have a higher therapeutic potential. As such, hematopoietic CD31⁺ cells, prevalent in both bone marrow and peripheral blood, have been discovered, in recent studies, to have angiogenic and vasculogenic activities and to show strong potential for therapeutic neovascularization in ischemic tissues. This article will discuss recent advancement on BM-derived cell therapy and the implication of newly discovered CD31⁺ cells.

Clinical trials of cardiac repair with adult bone marrow- derived cells

The past decade has witnessed a marked increase in the number of clinical trials of cardiac repair with adult bone marrow cells (BMCs). These trials included patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) as well as chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD) and utilized different types of BMCs with variable numbers, routes of administration, and timings after MI. Given these differences in methods, the outcomes from these trials have been often disparate and controversial. However, analysis of pooled data suggests that BMC injection enhances left ventricular function, reduces infarct scar size, and improves remodeling in patients with acute MI as well as chronic IHD. BMC therapy also improves clinical outcomes during follow-up without any increase in adverse effects. Although the underlying mechanisms of heart repair are difficult to elucidate in human studies, valuable insights may be gleaned from subgroup analysis of key variables. This information may be utilized to design future randomized controlled trials to carefully determine the long-term safety and benefits of BMC therapy.

Endothelial progenitor cells: a novel tool for the therapy of ischemic diseases

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are believed to home to sites of neovascularization, contributing to vascular regeneration either directly via incorporation into newly forming vascular structures or indirectly via the secretion of pro-angiogenic growth factors, thereby enhancing the overall vascular and hemodynamic recovery of ischemic tissues. The therapeutic application of EPCs has been shown to be effective in animal models of ischemia, and we as well as other groups involved in clinical trials have demonstrated that the use of EPCs was safe and feasible for the treatment of critical limb ischemia and cardiovascular diseases. However, many issues in the field of EPC biology, especially in regard to the proper and unambiguous molecular characterization of these cells, still remain unresolved, hampering not only basic research but also the effective therapeutic use and widespread application of these cells. Further, recent evidence suggests that several diseases and pathological conditions are correlated with a reduction in the number and biological activity of EPCs, making the development of novel strategies to overcome the current limitations and shortcomings of this promising but still limited therapeutic tool by refinement and improvement of EPC purification, expansion, and administration techniques, a rather pressing issue.

Stem cells in cardiac repair

Myocardial infarction is the leading cause of death among people in industrialized nations. Although the heart has some ability to regenerate after infarction, myocardial restoration is inadequate. Consequently, investigators are currently exploring the use of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), skeletal myoblasts and adult bone marrow stem cells to limit infarct size. hESCs are pluripotent cells that can regenerate myocardium in infarcted hearts, attenuate heart remodeling and contribute to left ventricle (LV) systolic force development. Since hESCs can form heart teratomas, investigators are differentiating hESCs toward cardiac progenitor cells prior to transplantation into hearts. Large quantities of hESCs cardiac progenitor cells, however, must be generated, immune rejection must be prevented and grafts must survive over the long term to significantly improve myocardial performance. Transplanted autologous skeletal myoblasts can survive in infarcted myocardium in small numbers, proliferate, differentiate into skeletal myofibers and increase the LV ejection fraction. These cells, however, do not form electromechanical connections with host cardiomyocytes. Consequently, electrical re-entry can occur and cause cardiac arrhythmias. Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells contain hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells. In several meta-analyses, patients with coronary disease who received autologous bone marrow cells by intracoronary injection show significant 3.7% (range: 1.9-5.4%) increases in LV ejection fraction, decreases in LV end-systolic volume of -4.8 ml (range: -1.4 to -8.2 ml) and reductions in infarct size of 5.5% (-1.9 to -9.1%), without experiencing arrhythmias. Bone marrow cells appear to release biologically active factors that limit myocardial damage. Unfortunately, bone marrow cells from patients with chronic diseases propagate poorly and can die prematurely. Substantial challenges must be addressed and resolved to advance the use of stem cells in cardiac repair including identifying the optimal stem cell(s) that permit transplantation without requirements for host immune suppression; timing of stem cell transplantation that maximizes chemoattraction of stem cells to infarcts; and determining the optimal technique for injecting stem cells for cardiac repair. Techniques must be developed to enhance survival and propagation of stem cells in the myocardium. These studies will require close cooperation and interaction of scientists and clinicians. Cell-based cardiac repair in the 21st century will offer new hope for millions of patients worldwide with myocardial infarctions who, otherwise, would suffer from the relentless progression of heart disease to heart failure and death.

Atorvastatin neutralises the thrombin-induced tissue factor expresion in endothelial cells via geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate

Statins may have beneficial effects in atherogenesis given their antithrombotic properties involving non-lipid mechanisms that modify endothelial function of tissue factor induction by thrombin. In this study, we investigate the effect of atorvastatin on tissue factor (TF) activity in thrombin-stimulated endothelial cells and its regulation through mevalonate or its derivatives. First subculture of human umbilical endothelial cells was used for this study. Cells were treated with thrombin and atorvastatin for different time intervals and dosage. Tissue factor activity was measured as Factor Xa generation induced by Tissue Factor-Factor VIIa complex on confluent cells. Our results show that atorvastatin prevents the thrombin-induced up-regulation of tissue factor activity in a concentration-dependent manner. Mevalonate and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate reversed this inhibitory effect of atorvastatin on tissue factor activity, while the presence of farnesyl pyrophosphate did not prevent the atorvastatin effect on thrombin-induced tissue factor activity. Rho-kinase inhibitor did not affect the thrombin stimulation of tissue factor activity. High amount of hydrophobic isoprenoid groups decreases the thrombin-induced TF activity and may promote endothelial cell anti-thrombotic action. Rho kinase pathways do not have a major role in the thrombin-mediated TF activity. The inhibitory effect of atorvastatin on thrombin-induced TF activity was partially reversed by MVA and GGPP but not FPP.

Cell therapy for heart failure: the need for a new therapeutic strategy

Improvements in the treatment of ischemic heart disease have led to a significant growth in the numbers of patients with systolic heart failure secondary to myocardial injury. Current therapies fail to address the loss of contractile tissue due to myocardial injury. Cell therapy is singular in its promise of primarily treating this underlying issue through salvage of viable myocardium or generation of new contractile tissue. Multiple cell types have been used to target acute myocardial infarction, chronic ischemic heart disease and heart failure due to infarction. Bone marrow mononuclear cells have been used to increase myocardial salvage after acute infarction. Randomized trials of over 800 patients have demonstrated no safety issues, and meta-analyses have suggested an improvement in left ventricular function in treated patients with trends toward improvements in hard cardiac end points. Cell therapy for chronic ischemic heart disease with bone marrow angiogenic progenitors has shown similar safety and trends toward improvement in function. While these therapies have targeted patients with viable myocardium, myoblasts have been used to treat patients with left ventricular dysfunction secondary to transmural infarction. Cell types with cardiomyogenic potential, including induced pluripotent stem cells and cardiac progenitor cells, offer the promise of true myocardial regeneration. Future studies with these cells may open the door for true myocardial regeneration.

Intracoronary blood- or bone marrow-derived cell transplantation in patients with ischemic heart disease

Soon after the first experimental scientific investigations of cell transplantation in various animal models of myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction, a growing number of clinical trials evaluated the effects of intracoronary injection of peripheral blood- or bone marrow-derived cells in patients with myocardial infarction or chronic ischemic heart disease. In most of these trials, changes in parameters of left ventricular remodeling over time, such as left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction or infarct size, were used as trial end points, whereas information on mortality and morbidity after cell transplantation is sparse. Several meta-analyses, each including various sets of studies, estimated that intracoronary cell therapy was associated with small reductions in left ventricular end-systolic volumes and a moderate increase in left ventricular ejection fraction of 2.9–6.1% over time compared with control patients. As most of the clinical trials included a limited number of patients, results vary substantially between different studies. When evaluating whether effects of intracoronary cell transplantation on parameters of left ventricular remodeling may be transferable to meaningful consequences in terms of clinical outcome, the following aspects appear to be imperative. Robust data on mortality and clinical events based on a sufficient number of patients are required. Furthermore, effects of cell therapy must be compared with established therapeutic concepts for the treatment of myocardial infarction, such as reperfusion therapy or pharmacological interventions aiming at favorably influencing the remodeling process. Moreover, the potential effects of cell therapy must be evaluated as treatment options additive to established therapeutic strategies.

Cardiac repair with adult bone marrow-derived cells: the clinical evidence

On the basis of strong evidence from animal studies, numerous clinical trials of cardiac repair with adult bone marrow-derived cells (BMC) have been completed. These relatively smaller studies employed different BMC types with highly variable numbers, routes, and timings of transplantation, and included patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD), as well as ischemic cardiomyopathy. Although the outcomes have been predictably disparate, analysis of pooled data indicates that BMC therapy in patients with acute MI and chronic IHD results in modest improvements in left ventricular function and infarct scar size without any increase in untoward effects. However, the precise mechanisms underlying these benefits remain to be ascertained, and the specific advantages of one BMC type over another remain to be determined. The long-term benefit and safety issues with different BMC types are currently being evaluated critically in larger randomized controlled trials with a view to applying this novel therapeutic strategy to broader patient populations. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available clinical evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of therapeutic cardiac repair with different types of adult BMCs, and to discuss the key variables that need optimization to further enhance the benefits of BMC therapy.