Prospective evaluation of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with interatrial block

AF Inducibility Is Related to Conduction Abnormalities at Bachmann's Bundle

We investigated whether patterns of activation at Bachmann’s bundle are related to AF inducibility. Epicardial mapping of Bachmann’s bundle during sinus rhythm was performed prior to cardiac surgery (192 electrodes, interelectrode distances: 2 mm). Compared to non-inducible patients (N = 20), patients with inducible AF (N = 34) had longer lines of conduction block (18(2–164) mm vs. 6(2–28) mm, p = 0.048), prolonged total activation time (55(28–143) ms vs. 46(24–73) ms, p = 0.012), multiple wavefronts entering Bachmann’s bundle more frequently (64% vs. 37%, p = 0.046) and more often areas of simultaneous activation (conduction velocity > 1.7 m/s, 45% vs. 16%, p = 0.038). These observations further support a relation between conduction abnormalities at Bachmann’s bundle and AF inducibility. The next step is to examine whether Bachmann’s bundle activation patterns can also be used to identify patients who will develop AF after cardiac surgery during both short- and long-term follow-up.

Amplified sinus-P-wave reveals localization and extent of left atrial low-voltage substrate: implications for arrhythmia freedom following pulmonary vein isolation

AIMS

Presence of arrhythmogenic left atrial (LA) low-voltage substrate (LVS) is associated with reduced arthythmia freedom rates following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that LA-LVS modifies amplified sinus-P-wave (APW) characteristics, enabling identification of patients at risk for arrhythmia recurrences following PVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ninety-five patients with persistent AF underwent high-density (>1200 sites) voltage mapping in sinus rhythm. Left atrial low-voltage substrate (<0.5 and <1.0 mV) was quantified in a 10-segment LA model. Amplified sinus-P-wave-morphology and -duration were evaluated using digitized 12-lead electrocardiograms (40-80 mm/mV, 100-200 mm/s). 12-months arrhythmia freedom following circumferential PVI was assessed in 139 patients with persistent AF. Left atrial low-voltage substrate was most frequently (84%) found at the anteroseptal LA. Characteristic changes of APW were related to the localization and extent of LA-LVS. At an early stage, LA-LVS predominantly located to the LA-anteroseptum and was associated with APW-prolongation (≥150 ms). More extensive LA-LVS involved larger areas of LA-anteroseptum, leading to morphological changes of APW (biphasic positive-negative P-waves in inferior leads). Severe LA-LVS involved the LA-anteroseptum, roof and posterior LA, but spared the inferior LA, lateral LA, and LA appendage. In this advanced stage, widespread LVS at the posterior LA abolished the negative portion of P-wave in the inferior leads. The delayed activation of the lateral LA and LA appendage produced the late positive deflections in the anterolateral leads, resulting in the "late-terminal P"-pattern. Structured analysis of APW-duration and -morphology stratified patients to their individual extent of LA-LVS (Grade 1: mean LA-LVS 4.9 cm2 at <1.0 mV; Grade 2: 28.6 cm2; Grade 3: 42.3 cm2; P < 0.01). The diagnostic value of APW-duration for identification of LA-LVS was significantly superior to standard P-wave-amplification (c-statistic 0.945 vs. 0.647). Arrhythmia freedom following PVI differed significantly between APW-predicted grades of LA-LVS-severity [hazard ratio (HR) 2.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-4.83; P = 0.015 for Grade 1 vs. Grade 2; HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.00-3.21, P = 0.049 for Grade 2 vs. Grade 3). Arrhythmia freedom 12 months after PVI was 77%, 53%, and 33% in Grades 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Localization and extent of LA-LVS modifies APW-morphology and -duration. Analysis of APW allows accurate prediction of LA-LVS and enables rapid and non-invasive estimation of arrhythmia freedom following PVI.

Reduction of Conduction Velocity in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

It is unknown to what extent atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes affect intra-atrial conduction velocity (CV) and whether regional differences in local CV heterogeneities exist during sinus rhythm. This case-control study aims to compare CV assessed throughout both atria between patients with and without AF. Patients (n = 34) underwent intra-operative epicardial mapping of the right atrium (RA), Bachmann’s bundle (BB), left atrium (LA) and pulmonary vein area (PVA). CV vectors were constructed to calculate median CV in addition to total activation times (TAT) and unipolar voltages. Biatrial median CV did not differ between patients with and without AF (90 ± 8 cm/s vs. 92 ± 6 cm/s, p = 0.56); only BB showed a CV reduction in the AF group (79 ± 12 cm/s vs. 88 ± 11 cm/s, p = 0.02). In patients without AF, there was no predilection site for the lowest CV (P₅) (RA: 12%; BB: 29%; LA: 29%; PVA: 29%). In patients with AF, lowest CV was most often measured at BB (53%) and ranged between 15 to 22 cm/s (median: 20 cm/s). Lowest CVs were also measured at the LA (18%) and PVA (29%), but not at the RA. AF was associated with a prolonged TAT (p = 0.03) and decreased voltages (P₅) at BB (p = 0.02). BB was a predilection site for slowing of conduction in patients with AF. Prolonged TAT and decreased voltages were also found at this site. The next step will be to determine the relevance of a reduced CV at BB in relation to AF development and maintenance.

Predictive value of inter-atrial block for new onset or recurrent atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Inter-atrial block (IAB) is characterized by a delay of inter-atrial conduction and is defined electrocardiographically by a P-wave duration (PWD)>120ms. Several studies have implicated IAB in the development of new onset atrial fibrillation (AF), whereas others have reported no significant associations. Moreover, there has been no systematic evaluation of the predictive value of IAB in AF recurrence. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether IAB predicts new onset AF or AF recurrence.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched through 30th July 2017 for studies investigating the relationship between IAB and AF.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 260 studies, of which 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. This meta-analysis included 18,204 patients (mean age 56±13, 48% male) with a mean follow-up period of 15.1years. IAB significantly predicted new onset AF (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44 to 4.07, P=0.001; 84%). For partial IAB, the risk of new onset AF did not reach statistical significance (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.85 to 2.34; P=0.18; I²=13%). Contrastingly, advanced IAB was a significant predictor of new onset AF with a pooled HR of 2.58 (95% CI: 1.35 to 4.96; P<0.01; I²=67%). IAB also predicted AF recurrence after ablation (HR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.35 to 4.96; P<0.01; I²=67%).

CONCLUSIONS

IAB is a significant predictor of both new onset AF and AF recurrence.

Relevance of Conduction Disorders in Bachmann's Bundle During Sinus Rhythm in Humans

BACKGROUND

Bachmann's bundle (BB) is considered to be the main route of interatrial conduction and to play a role in development of atrial fibrillation (AF). The goals of this study are to characterize the presence of conduction disorders in BB during sinus rhythm and to study their relation with AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

High-resolution epicardial mapping (192 unipolar electrodes, interelectrode distance: 2 mm) of sinus rhythm was performed in 185 patients during coronary artery bypass surgery of whom 13 had a history of paroxysmal AF. Continuous rhythm monitoring was used to detect postoperative AF during the first 5 postoperative days. In 67% of the patients, BB was activated from right to left; in the remaining patients from right and middle (21%), right, central, and left (8%), or central (4%) site. Mean effective conduction velocity was 89 cm/s. Conduction block was present in most patients (75%; median 1.1%, range 0-12.8) and was higher in patients with paroxysmal AF compared with patients without a history of AF (3.2% versus 0.9%; P=0.03). A high amount of conduction block (>4%) was associated with de novo postoperative AF (P=0.02). Longitudinal lines of conduction block >10 mm were also associated with postoperative AF (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

BB may be activated through multiple directions, but the predominant route of conduction is from right to left. Conduction velocity across BB is around 90 cm/s. Conduction is blocked in both longitudinal and transverse direction in the majority of patients. Conduction disorders, particularly long lines of longitudinal conduction block, are more pronounced in patients with AF episodes.

[Interatrial block as anatomical-electrical substrate for supraventricular arrhythmias: Bayés syndrome]

In this article we aimed to establish that interatrial block exists as an anatomical-electrical entity, which should be considered a true block. Interatrial block presents with different degrees as other blocks in the conduction system. It shows a correlation with the left atrium size, however, it can be seen in patients with normal atrial size too. Interatrial block is strongly associated with atrial arrhythmias and it could be considered a predictor of cardioembolic stroke. Interatrial block is an expression of atrial electrical remodeling and dysfunction. IAB can be transient and in certain clinical circumstances, may be reversible. The contribution of endocardial mapping has increased our knowledge of the anatomy and pathophysiology of interatrial block. Magnetocardiography could be a possible non-invasive procedure to further investigate this entity. The interatrial block classification should include first, second and third degree or alternatively, in order to simplify the terminology: partial or advanced. The P wave morphology should always be taking into consideration when diagnosing this condition. Finally, without the initial description of interatrial block made by Dr. Bayés de Luna, it would be impossible to understand interatrial block as an anatomical and electrical substrate for atrial arrhythmias. It is our opinion that this represents a major contribution to the knowledge of electrocardiography and electrophysiology, and makes commendable that this arrhythmic syndrome should be called «Bayés' syndrome»

Paradoxical effects of interatrial conduction delay in a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patient in the long-term: time is a great healer

We present a unique case where early proarrhythmic and late antiarrhythmic characteristics of interatrial conduction delay were observed during the long-term progression of HCM. Occurrence of AT constantly increased as the interatrial conduction delay became more prominent, while the P-wave width in sinus rhythm and the AT cycle length both showed an instantaneous increase in parallel. As the interatrial delay reached a critical point, the right and left atrial P-wave became virtually separated, as demonstrated by the findings of ECGs and echocardiography. This phenomenon resulted in the complete cessation of tachycardias.

Differences in treadmill exercise tolerance parameters between patients with partial and advanced interatrial depolarization abnormality

Advanced interatrial block (aIAB) is considerably much less common than partial interatrial block (pIAB), occuring in <2% of the elderly hospitalized population. Less is, therefore, known of the true clinical burden of aIAB, particularly in relation to graded exercise. Therefore, 12 patients with aIAB and 30 patients with pIAB who performed a baseline exercise tolerance test and had a repeat test performed > or = 2 years later were included in the study. Exercise tolerance, echocardiographic findings, and major adverse cardiovascular events were compared. Left atrial size progressed at a significantly faster rate in those with aIAB. In addition, Duke Prognostic Treadmill scores were significantly lower on follow-up in those patients with aIAB. Overall, patients with aIAB had significantly greater left atrial size (48.3 +/- 9 vs 42.8 +/- 4 mm, p < 0.01) and significantly lower Duke Prognostic Treadmill scores than those with pIAB (-0.2 +/- 5 vs 4.1 +/- 4, p < 0.05). There were, however, no significant differences in the occurence of major adverse cardiovascular events. In conclusion, left atrial size progressed at a significantly faster rate but Duke Prognostic Treadmill scores were significantly lower in those with aIAB compared with patients with pIAB after > or = 2 years of follow-up. Further study is required to determine whether patients with aIAB require follow-up echocardiography and/or exercise tolerance tests for optimal risk stratification.