Is it possible to predict which patients need distal protection during primary angioplasty?

Prevention of no-reflow phenomenon in culprit lesions involving a large side branch

No-reflow/slow-flow phenomenon (NF) is a poor prognostic factor in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Distal protection devices (DPDs) prevent myocardial injury due to microembolic debris. When the target lesion involves a large side branch, DPDs can only protect the main vessel but not the side branch. In the present report, we describe the use of a two-step deflation in kissing-balloon technique for preventing NF in 4 patients (M/F = 4/0, 65 ± 6 years) in which the culprit lesions with NF risk involved a bifurcation. The procedures were uneventful and the 4 patients were discharged ≤24 h without ECG change and elevation of serum level of creatine kinase. The sequential deflation of kissing-balloon technique may constitute a possible solution for the NF related with the side branch on bifurcation lesions.

The results of a new distal protection method in intervention for chronic total occlusion of the superficial femoral artery

Aims. To determine the efficacy of a new distal protection method in SFA CTO interventions. Methods and Results. From June 2003 to February 2009, ninety-two consecutive, chronic total occlusions of superficial femoral arteries were treated with catheter-based intervention using a bidirectional approach. Nine of these cases were managed with our original, distal protection method, based on symptoms, angiographic images, wire resistance, and intravascular ultrasound images. The average age was 73 years; eight patients were male. The mean occlusion length was 17.1 cm. A distal protection balloon was inserted from the retrograde sheath in the popliteal artery and placed distal to the occluded lesion after successful wire crossing. Lesion dilatation with a balloon was performed antegradely and debris was removed by 6Fr. guiding catheter. Debris was retrieved from all lesions, consisting mainly of thrombus. Where we decided not to use the distal protection method, there was no distal thromboembolism. Conclusion. In SFA-CTO intervention, the risk of distal embolization is 10%, which can be anticipated and eliminated by the distal protection method.