Recommendations for adult and paediatric cardiologists on obtaining additional qualification in “Adults with Congenital Heart Disease” (ACHD)

Adult congenital heart disease training in Europe: current status, disparities and potential solutions

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the status of training of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) cardiologists in Europe.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to ACHD cardiologists from 34 European countries.

RESULTS

Representatives from 31 of 34 countries (91%) responded. ACHD cardiology was recognised by the respective ministry of Health in two countries (7%) as a subspecialty. Two countries (7%) have formally recognised ACHD training programmes, 15 (48%) have informal (neither accredited nor certified) training and 14 (45%) have very limited or no programme. Twenty-five countries (81%) described training ACHD doctors 'on the job'. The median number of ACHD centres per country was 4 (range 0-28), median number of ACHD surgical centres was 3 (0-26) and the median number of ACHD training centres was 2 (range 0-28). An established exit examination in ACHD was conducted in only one country (3%) and formal certification provided by two countries (7%). ACHD cardiologist number versus gross domestic product Pearson correlation coefficient=0.789 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Formal or accredited training in ACHD is rare among European countries. Many countries have very limited or no training and resort to 'train people on the job'. Few countries provide either an exit examination or certification. Efforts to harmonise training and establish standards in exit examination and certification may improve training and consequently promote the alignment of high-quality patient care.

Paediatric and adult congenital cardiology education and training in Europe

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on training of European paediatric and adult congenital cardiologists.

METHODS

A structured and approved questionnaire was circulated to national delegates of Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology in 33 European countries.

RESULTS

Delegates from 30 countries (91%) responded. Paediatric cardiology was not recognised as a distinct speciality by the respective ministry of Health in seven countries (23%). Twenty countries (67%) have formally accredited paediatric cardiology training programmes, seven (23%) have substantial informal (not accredited or certified) training, and three (10%) have very limited or no programme. Twenty-two countries have a curriculum. Twelve countries have a national training director. There was one paediatric cardiology centre per 2.66 million population (range 0.87-9.64 million), one cardiac surgical centre per 4.73 million population (range 1.63-10.72 million), and one training centre per 4.29 million population (range 1.63-10.72 million population). The median number of paediatric cardiology fellows per training programme was 4 (range 1-17), and duration of training was 3 years (range 2-5 years). An exit examination in paediatric cardiology was conducted in 16 countries (53%) and certification provided by 20 countries (67%). Paediatric cardiologist number is affected by gross domestic product (R² = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Training varies markedly across European countries. Although formal fellowship programmes exist in many countries, several countries have informal training or no training. Only a minority of countries provide both exit examination and certification. Harmonisation of training and standardisation of exit examination and certification could reduce variation in training thereby promoting high-quality care by European congenital cardiologists.

Manual der Arbeitsgruppe Interventionelle Kardiologie (AGIK) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e. V. (DGK)

Dieses Manual zur diagnostischen Herzkatheteruntersuchung (Teil 1) ist eine Anwendungsempfehlung für interventionell tätige Ärzte, die den gegenwärtigen Kenntnisstand unter Berücksichtigung neuester Studienergebnisse wiedergibt. Hierzu wurde in den einzelnen Kapiteln speziell auf die Alltagstauglichkeit der Empfehlungen geachtet, sodass dieses Manual jedem interventionell tätigen Kardiologen als Entscheidungshilfe im Herzkatheterlabor dienen soll. Trotz der von vielen Experten eingebrachten praktischen Hinweise kann dieses Manual dennoch nicht die ärztliche Evaluation des individuellen Patienten ersetzen und damit eine Anpassung der Diagnostik bzw. Therapie ersetzen.

Systematic assessment of health care perception in adults with congenital heart disease in Germany

BACKGROUND

The number of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is steadily rising due to increased survival rate and improved medical resources. Accordingly, more than 330,000 ACHD are currently living in Germany. Almost all of them require lifelong specialized medical follow-up for their chronic heart disease, often accompanied by residua, sequelae, or comorbidities. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are a crucial factor in directing patients to ACHD specialists or specialized institutions, but despite all efforts, the number of ACHD under specialized care is low, the lost-to-follow-up rate is high, and the morbidity and mortality is substantial. The present cross-sectional study was designed to systematically characterize the health care of ACHD from a patient perspective, including (I) use of medical care by ACHD, (II) medical counselling needs, and (III) perceived satisfaction with health care.

METHODS

The German-wide analysis was based on a 25-item questionnaire designed to address different aspects of medical status and health issues of ACHD from their own perspective, performed between May of 2017 and July of 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 4,008 ACHD (52% female; mean age 41.9±17.2 years) completed the questionnaire. The majority of ACHD (3,524, 87.9%) reported, that they consulted their PCP for non-cardiac health problems, and 49.7% (n=1,991) consulted their PCP also for medical problems associated with the underlying CHD. Almost all ACHD reported a need for medical advice concerning exercise capacity and daily life activities, occupational skills, pregnancy, rehabilitation, genetic counselling, insurance, and retirement. A total of 1,840 (45.9%) patients were not aware of the existence of certified ACHD specialists or centers. Moreover, 2,552 (67.6%) of those surveyed were uninformed about patient organizations for ACHD.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that ACHD are largely uninformed about the ACHD care structures available nationwide, although the patients have a great need for specialized follow-up, advice, and care.

Facts about the General Medical Care of Adults with Congenital Heart Defects: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center

Background: Due to the increase in survival rates for congenital heart disease (CHD) in the last decades, over 90% of patients today reach adulthood. Currently, there are more than 300,000 adults with CHD (ACHD) living in Germany. They have an increased need for specialized medical care, since almost all ACHD have chronic heart disease and suffer from specific chronic symptoms, risks, and sequelae. Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a crucial role in referring patients to ACHD specialists or specialized institutions. This cross-sectional study is intended to clarify the real-world care of ACHD from the PCP’s perspective. Methods: This analysis, initiated by the German Heart Centre Munich, was based on a 27-item questionnaire on actual ACHD health care practice in Germany from the PCP’s perspective. Results: In total, 767 questionnaires were considered valid for inclusion. The majority of the PCPs were general practitioners (95.9%), and 84.1% had cared for ACHD during the past year. A majority (69.2%) of the PCPs had cared for patients with simple CHD, while 50.6% and 33.4% had cared for patients with moderate and severe CHD, respectively, in all age groups. PCPs treated almost all typical residual symptoms and sequelae, and advised patients regarding difficult questions, including exercise capacity, pregnancy, genetics, and insurance matters. However, 33.8% of the PCPs did not even know about the existence of certified ACHD specialists or centers. Only 23.9% involved an ACHD-specialized physician in their treatment. In cases of severe cardiac issues, 70.8% of the PCPs referred patients to ACHD-certified centers. Although 52.5% of the PCPs were not sufficiently informed about existing structures, 64.2% rated the current care situation as either “very good” or “good”. Only 26.3% (n = 190) of the responding physicians were aware of patient organizations for ACHD. Conclusions: The present study showed that the majority of PCPs are not informed about the ACHD care structures available in Germany. The need for specialized ACHD follow-up care is largely underestimated, with an urgent need for optimization to reduce morbidity and mortality. For the future, solutions must be developed to integrate PCPs more intensively into the ACHD care network.

Opinions of general and adult congenital heart disease cardiologists on care for adults with congenital heart disease in Belgium: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The growing adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population requires efficient healthcare organisation. It has been suggested that clinically appropriate care be provided for individual patients on the least complex level possible, in order to alleviate saturation of special care programmes.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 10 general and 10 adult CHD cardiologists were conducted to elucidate opinions on healthcare organisation in Belgium. A particular focus was placed on the potential role of general cardiologists. The software program NVivo 12 facilitated thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A discrepancy existed between how general cardiologists thought about congenital care and what adult CHD cardiologists considered the minimum knowledge required to adequately treat patients. Qualitative data were categorised under the following themes: knowledge dissemination, certification, (de)centralisation of care, the role of adult CHD cardiologists, the role of dedicated nurse specialists, and patient referral. It appeared to be pivotal to organise care in such a way that providing basic care locally does not impede the generation of sufficient patient volume, and to continue improving communications between different care levels when there is no referral back. Moreover, practical knowledge is best disseminated locally. Cardiologists' opinions on certification and on the role of dedicated nurse specialists were mixed.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the results, we propose five recommendations for improving the provision of care to adults with CHD. A multidimensional approach to defining the role of different healthcare professionals, to improving communication channels, and to effectively sensitising healthcare professionals is needed to improve the organisation of care.

Is having a job a protective factor? Employment status and state of medical care as subjectively perceived by adults with CHD in Germany

BACKGROUND

Most patients born with CHD nowadays reach adulthood, and thus quality of life, life situation, and state of medical care aspects are gaining importance in the current era. The present study aimed to investigate whether patients' assessment depends on their means of occupation. The findings are expected to be helpful in optimising care and for developing individual treatment plans.

METHODS

The present study was based on an online survey conducted in cooperation with patient organisations. Participants were recruited from the database of the German National Register for Congenital Heart Defects. In total, 1828 individuals (777 males, 1051 females) took part. Participants were asked to rate aspects such their state of health on a six-tier scale (1=worst specification). Response behaviour was measured against the background of occupational details.

RESULTS

Training for or pursuing a profession was found to be significantly associated with participants' rating of five of the six examined aspects (p<0.05). Sex seemed to play an important part in four of the six aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

An optimal treatment plan for adults with CHD should always consider aspects such as sex and employment status. To work out such an optimal and individual treatment plan for each adult CHD patient, an objective tool to measure patients' actual CHD-specific knowledge precluding socially accepted response bias would be very useful.

Transition in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease in Germany: Results of a Nationwide Patient Survey

BACKGROUND

A growing number of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) pose a particular challenge for health care systems across the world. Upon turning into 18 years, under the German national health care system, ACHD patients are required to switch from a pediatric to an adult cardiologist or an ACHD-certified provider. To date, reliable data investigating the treatment situation of ACHD patients in Germany are not available.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey was conducted in collaboration with patient organizations to address the life situation and the conditions of health care provision for ACHD patients in Germany. ACHD patients were recruited from the database of the National Register for Congenital Heart Defects (NRCHD) and informed about the survey via email, websites, and social networks. A total of 1,828 ACHD patients (1,051 females) participated in this study. The mean age was 31.7 ± 11.7 years. Participants were surveyed about treating physicians and the institution mainly involved in the treatment of their CHD. In addition, participants were asked questions to assess the level of trust toward their treating physician and their familiarity with the term "ACHD-certified provider."

RESULTS

Among the surveyed patients, 25.4% stated that they attended a specific ACHD clinic at a heart center regularly, 32.7% were treated in a private practice setting by a pediatric cardiologist, 32.4% in a private practice (adult) cardiology setting, and 9.5% were treated by an "other physician." Only 24.4% of the male and 29.7% of the female ACHD patients were familiar with the term "ACHD-certified provider."

CONCLUSION

The transfer from pediatric cardiology to ACHD care requires further attention as many adult patients have not transferred to certified ACHD providers. The question of whether ACHD patients in Germany are offered consistent and adequate care should also be investigated in more detail. The answers regarding the ACHD certification are particularly disappointing and indicative of a large information gap and inadequate education in clinical practice.

A Case of Severe Unicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: Valve Repair With Tricuspidization in an Adult

A 33-year-old male was referred to our institute with acute heart failure. The patient was found to have a unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) and severe aortic stenosis. He had been followed at a local university hospital during childhood. However, he stopped visiting the outpatient clinic after becoming an adult. His condition subsequently worsened, and he ultimately presented to our hospital with cardiogenic shock. In Japan, some adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients continue to be followed by pediatric cardiologists, though the patterns of practice are variable. This report describes the case of a patient who became lost to follow-up in early adulthood. We thus focus on this ACHD case as an example of the effects of inadequate communication among doctors and the need to establish better ACHD management protocols for treating this patient population.

[Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects: innovative research for a young patient group]

BACKGROUND

Congenital heart disease is the most frequent congenital malformation in humans and affects almost 1 % of all newborns. Thanks to advances in diagnostics and treatment, over 90 % of those affected reach adulthood today. Patient numbers are therefore growing constantly. The majority of those affected, however, remain chronically ill throughout life and require continuous specialized care. The spectrum of different clinical pictures is vast. Since this is a relatively young patient group, both research and care are lacking relevant knowledge and experience.

OBJECTIVE

The Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects (CNCHD) was founded in 2003 to tackle the challenge of heterogeneity and accordingly small sample sizes by means of networked research. The following article offers an overview of the network and its mode of operation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Germany-wide research network involves all relevant levels of research, public health care, the patient community and the general public. On the basis of a complex and flexible database infrastructure, it facilitates multicenter and interdisciplinary research in the field of congenital heart disease.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The CNCHD succeeded in establishing research on congenital heart disease throughout Germany by providing a powerful research network and a suitable infrastructure. Scientists from across Germany and all over the world use this basis to jointly find answers to burning questions in the field of congenital heart disease.

A welcome to the new journal, International Journal of Cardiology - Heart and Vessels (IJC-H + V)

A new journal has been launched: IJC - Heart and Vessels [1]. It builds upon the success of the main journal International Journal of Cardiology. As an introduction to the new journal we will be publishing a series of summaries of the topics to be covered, highlighting the most important papers in the field that have been published recently in the main journal, International Journal of Cardiology. This article describes a topic review of congenital heart disease. IJC has become one of the most important sources of quality papers in this field and many excellent publications have been published in the main journal. The expansion of space occasioned by the launch of IJC - Heart and Vessels will allow us to publish more high quality papers in the expanding field of congenital heart disease.