Quality of coronary arterial 320-slice computed tomography images in subjects with chronic atrial fibrillation compared with normal sinus rhythm

Utility of computed tomography in cases of aortic valve stenosis before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been recognized as a useful treatment for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, particularly those with moderate to high risks of open heart surgery. A thorough evaluation of the aortic valve complex, including the size or presence of calcifications of the leaflets and annulus, is important for the selection of appropriate candidates, artificial valve types and approach. Echocardiography is useful for the precise evaluation of aortic valve stenosis severity and aortic valve complex morphology, but it is not useful to evaluate three-dimensional aortic valve anatomy and pathway for the catheter of aortic valve implantation. Electrocardiography (ECG)-gating computed tomography (CT) has recently been recognized as a useful modality for evaluating significant coronary artery stenosis because of its higher spatial and temporal resolution and diagnostic accuracy based on recent studies. ECG-gating CT is also useful for evaluating aortic valve complex morphology, including calcifications and whole aorta and iliac arteries, as the access route of catheter in TAVI. TAVI candidates, who are at high risk of open surgery, tend to be old and require anti-platelet after TAVI; therefore CT, is also useful for screening for non-cardiac diseases including malignant tumors just before TAVI. Therefore, here we introduce the utility of cardiac and whole body CT in cases of severe aortic valve stenosis before and after TAVI.

Low-Dose Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Exposure with Two Different Approaches

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate image quality, coronary interpretability and radiation exposure of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) performed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with the latest scanner generation, comparing two different technical approaches. A new scanner that combines a 0.23 mm spatial resolution, a new generation of iterative reconstruction, fast gantry rotation time and the intracycle motion-correction algorithm to improve the temporal resolution was recently introduced in the clinical field.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 105 consecutive patients with chronic AF who performed CCTA with a whole-heart coverage high-definition CT scanner (16-cm z-axis coverage with 256 detector rows, 0.28 s gantry rotation time). Five of them were excluded for impaired renal function. Patients were randomized between a double acquisition protocol (50 patients, group 1) or a single acquisition protocol (50 patients, group 2). The image quality, coronary segment interpretability and effective dose (ED) of CCTA were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean HR during the scan was 85.6±21 bpm in group 1 vs. 83.7±23 bpm in Group 2, respectively (p < ns). In group 2, overall image quality was high and comparable with that of group 1 (Likert scale =3.2 ± 1.4 vs. 3.3 ± 1.2, p = ns, in group 1 and 2, respectively). Coronary interpretability was high and similar between the two groups (97.5% and 97.1% in group 1 and 2, p = ns, respectively). Mean ED was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (5.3 ± 1.8 mSv vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mSv, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The novel whole-heart coverage CT scanner allows to perform CCTA with a single-acquisition protocol with high image quality and low radiation exposure in AF patients.

Influence of irregular heart rhythm on radiation exposure, image quality and diagnostic impact of cardiac computed tomography angiography in 4,339 patients. Data from the German Cardiac Computed Tomography Registry

BACKGROUND

Coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA) provides non-invasive evaluation of the coronary arteries with high precision for the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD).

AIM

To investigate whether irregular heart rhythm including atrial fibrillation and premature beats during data acquisition influences (i) radiation and contrast media exposure, (ii) number of non-evaluable coronary segments and (iii) diagnostic impact of coronary CTA.

METHODS

Twelve tertiary care centers with ≥64 slice CT scanners and ≥5 years of experience with cardiovascular imaging participated in this registry. Between 2009 and 2014, 4339 examinations were analysed in patients who underwent clinically indicated coronary CTA for suspected CAD. Clinical and epidemiologic data were gathered from all patients. In addition, clinical presentation, heart rate and rhythm during the scan, Agatston score, radiation and contrast media exposure and the diagnostic impact of coronary CTA were systematically analysed.

RESULTS

Of 4339 patients in total, 260 (6.0%) had irregular heart rhythm, whereas the remaining 4079 (94.0%) had stable sinus rhythm. Patients with irregular heart rhythm were older (63.2 ± 12.5yrs versus 58.6 ± 11.4yrs. p < 0.001), exhibited a higher rate of pathologic stress tests before CTA (37.1% versus 26.1%, p < 0.01) and higher heart rates during CTA compared to those with sinus rhythm (62.5 ± 11.6bpm versus 58.9 ± 8.5bpm, p < 0.001). Both contrast media exposure and radiation exposure were significantly higher in patients with irregular heart rhythm (90 mL (95%CI = 80-110 mL) versus 80 mL (95%CI = 70-90 mL) and 6.2 mSv (95%CI = 2.5-11.7) versus 3.3 mSv (95%CI = 1.7-6.9), p < 0.001 for both). Coronary CTA excluded significant CAD less frequently in patients with irregular heart rhythm (32.9% versus 44.8%, p < 0.001). This was attributed to the higher rate of examinations with at least one non-diagnostic coronary segment in patients with irregular heart rhythm (10.8% versus 4.6%, p < 0.001). Subsequent invasive angiography could be avoided in 47.2% of patients with irregular heart rhythm compared to 52.9% of patients with sinus rhythm (p = NS), whereas downstream stress testing was recommended in 3.2% of patients with irregular heart rhythm versus 4.0% of patients with sinus rhythm (p = NS).

CONCLUSION

A significant number of patients scheduled for coronary CTA have irregular heart rhythm in a real-world clinical setting. In such patients, heart rate during coronary CTA is higher, possibly resulting in (i) higher radiation and contrast agent exposure and (ii) more frequent coronary CTA examinations with at least one non-diagnostic coronary artery segment. However, this does not seem to lead to increased downstream stress testing or subsequent invasive procedures.

CT coronary angiography in atrial fibrillation: a comparison of radiation dose and diagnostic confidence with retrospective gating vs prospective gating with systolic acquisition

OBJECTIVE

To compare unmodulated, retrospective electrocardiographic (ECG) gating to prospective ECG gating with systolic acquisition for CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), considering the radiation dose and the diagnostic confidence achieved with each technique.

METHODS

A retrospective service evaluation was conducted before and after prospective gating with systolic acquisition replaced retrospectively gated imaging for patients with AF undergoing CTCA at our institution. 25 consecutive patients were examined in each group. The scan parameters and radiation dose information had been collected in a prospective fashion. The image sets were read by blinded, expert readers who rated their diagnostic confidence using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

The radiation dose received by patients was significantly greater in the retrospectively gated group than those being scanned using prospective gating (21 vs 5.9 mSv, p < 0.01). The prospective gating technique was also associated with greater diagnostic confidence (mean, per-patient score 3.09 vs 3.78, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Prospective gating with systolic acquisition appears to improve diagnostic confidence at a significantly reduced radiation dose compared with retrospective gating in patients with AF.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The use of prospective gating with systolic triggering significantly reduces the radiation exposure to patients in AF undergoing CTCA. The same protocol also appears to improve diagnostic confidence.

Prospectively ECG-Triggered Sequential Dual-Source Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy

Objectives

To evaluate the effects of mean heart rate (HR) and heart rate variation (HRV) on image quality and diagnostic accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered sequential dual-source coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

Eighty-five patients (49 women, 36 men; mean age 62.1±9.5 years) with persistent AF underwent prospectively ECG-triggered sequential second-generation dual-source CCTA. Tube current and voltage were adjusted according to body mass index (BMI) and iterative reconstruction was used. Image quality of coronary segments (four-point scale) and presence of significant stenosis (>50%) were evaluated. Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed in 30 of the 85 patients who underwent additional invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

Results

Only 8 of 1102 (0.7%) segments demonstrated poor image quality. No significant impact on image quality was found for mean HR (94.9±21.8 bpm; r=0.034, p=0.758; F=0.413, p=0.663) or HRV (67.5±22.8 bpm; r=0.097, p=0.377; F=0.111, p=0.895). On per-segment analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 89.7% (26/29), 99.4% (355/357), 92.9% (26/28), and 99.2% (355/358), respectively, with excellent correlation (kappa=0.91) with ICA. Mean effective dose was 3.3±1.0 mSv.

Conclusions

Prospectively ECG-triggered sequential dual-source CCTA provides diagnostic image quality and good diagnostic accuracy for detection of coronary stenosis in AF patients without significant influence by HR or HRV.

Detection of coronary artery disease using coronary flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography versus multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of calcium score

BACKGROUND

There have been no clinical data specifying the degree of calcium deposition at which coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurement using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography surpasses 320-row multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) in detecting obstructive coronary artery disease.

METHODS

One hundred seventy patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography, transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, and CTCA were prospectively enrolled. Coronary artery stenosis was defined as percentage diameter stenosis ≥ 50% on invasive coronary angiography. CFVR < 2.0 and narrowing ≥ 50% measured with CTCA were the thresholds indicating the presence of coronary artery stenosis. The degree of coronary artery calcification was also assessed using the Agatston calcium score method by computed tomography.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (89%) were classified as having either high or intermediate pretest probability of coronary artery disease. Significant coronary artery stenoses by invasive coronary angiography were found in 71 patients and 104 vessels. Although the overall diagnostic performance of CTCA was comparable with that of CFVR measurement for detecting coronary artery stenosis, only the diagnostic performance of CTCA was negatively affected by the extent of a patient's coronary artery calcification. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that only CFVR measurement is diagnostically accurate when calcium scores are >319 in the patient-based assessment, 189 for the left anterior descending coronary artery, 98 for the left circumflex coronary artery and 282 for the right coronary artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and 320-row multidetector CTCA successfully diagnosed significant coronary artery stenosis with high feasibility and accuracy. However, only the diagnostic performance of CTCA was negatively affected by the extent of a patient's coronary artery calcification, and therefore the diagnostic performance of CFVR measurement for detecting coronary artery stenosis surpassed that of CTCA when the calcium score exceeded specified cutoff values.

Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to review the recent literatures on the diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography (CTA) for detection of coronary artery stenosis, with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference standard.

METHODS

A PubMed and EMBASE cross-search of the literatures on use of 320-slice CTA compared with ICA for detection of coronary artery stenosis, with publication date limited to January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012. Individual and pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated at the patient-, vessel- and segment-level. A positive result was defined as greater than or equal to 50%-diameter stenosis.

RESULTS

A total of ten studies were included in the present meta-analysis, examining 1088 patients, 1629 vessels and 12,406 segments. The meta-analysis at the patient-level indicated a pooled sensitivity of 93% (95%CI: 91%-95%), specificity of 86% (95%CI: 82%-89%), PPV of 90% (95%CI: 87%-92%) and NPV of 90% (95%CI: 87%-93%). At the vessel-level, the pooled sensitivity was 92% (95%CI: 89%-94%), specificity 95% (95%CI: 94%-96%), PPV 87% (95%CI: 83%-90%), and NPV 97% (95%CI: 96%-98%). At the segment-level, the pooled sensitivity was 78% (95%CI: 76%-80%), specificity 98% (95%CI: 97%-98%), PPV 82% (95%CI: 80%-84%), and NPV 97% (95%CI: 97%-97%).

CONCLUSIONS

320-CTA can effectively identify the majority of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The high NPV makes it as an effective noninvasive alternative to ICA for the exclusion of stenosis.

Computed tomography coronary angiography with a consistent dose below 2 mSv using double prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience

To evaluate the feasibility and imaging quality of double prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition mode (double flash mode) for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTCA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). 47 patients (11 women, 36 men; mean age 64.5 ± 12.1 years) were enrolled for CTCA examinations using a dual-source CT with 2 × 128 × 0.6 mm collimation, 0.28 s rotation time and a pitch of 3.4. Double flash mode was prospectively triggered first at 60 % and later at 30 % of the R-R interval within two cardiac cycles. Image quality was evaluated using a four-point scale (1 = excellent, 4 = non-assessable). From 672 coronary artery segments, 77.5 % (521/672) was rated as score of 1, 20.8 % (140/672) as score of 2, 1.2 % (8/672) as score of 3 and 0.4 % (3/672) was rated as 'non-assessable'. The average image quality score was 1.25 ± 0.38 on a per segment basis. Mean dose-length product for CTCA was 92.6 ± 28.2 mGy cm, the effective dose was 1.30 ± 0.39 mSv (0.64-1.97 mSv). In patients with AF, double prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition mode could be a feasible and valuable scan mode for CTCA with a consistent dose below 2 mSv as well as diagnostic imaging quality.

Prospective-triggered sequential dual-source end-systolic coronary CT angiography for patients with atrial fibrillation: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Obtaining diagnostic coronary CT angiography with low radiation exposure in patients with irregular heart rhythms such as atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated image quality and inter-reader variability with the use of prospective electrocardiographic (ECG)-triggered sequential dual-source acquisition at end systole for coronary artery disease (CAD) evaluation in patients with AF.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with AF who underwent prospective ECG-triggered sequential dual-source acquisition were evaluated. Images were reconstructed every 50 milliseconds from 250 to 400 milliseconds after the R wave. Two independent, blinded readers evaluated the coronaries for image quality on a 5-point scale (worst to best) and stenosis on 5-point semiquantitative (none to severe) and binary scales (>50% or <50%). Diagnostic image quality was graded for each reconstruction.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (37%) had significant (≥50% stenosis) CAD. Average heart rate was 82 ± 20 beats/min and variability range was 71 ± 22 beats/min. Mean effective radiation dose was 6.5 ± 2.4 mSv. Diagnostic image quality was noted in 97.9% of 304 coronary segments with median image quality of 3.0. The 300-millisecond reconstruction phase provided the highest image quality; 70% of patients showed diagnostic image quality. Combination of all phases (250-400 milliseconds) performed significantly better than single or other phase combinations (P < 0.0005 for all comparisons). Inter-reader variability for stenosis detection was excellent, with 98.4% concordance by using a binary scale (50% stenosis cutoff).

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective ECG-triggered sequential dual-source CT acquisition with the use of end-systolic acquisition provides diagnostic image quality with potentially low radiation doses for evaluation of CAD in patients with AF. Use of multiple end-systolic phases over a 150-millisecond window improves diagnostic image quality.

Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed-tomography for detection of significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with various heart rates and heart rhythms compared with conventional coronary-angiography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice CT for detection of significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with various heart rates (HR) and heart rhythms, including tachycardia and chronic atrial-fibrillation (CAF) compared with conventional-coronary-angiography (CAG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred-six consecutive patients underwent both 320-slice CT and CAG within 3 months (normal-sinus-rhythm [NSR] 91.5%, CAF 8.5%, mean HR 65 ± 15 beats/min). There were no cardiac events between the 2 procedures. Patients were divided in 2 groups: Group 1 (HR <65 with NSR at CT scan, n=62), and Group 2 (HR >64 with NSR or heart rhythm irregularities at CT scan, n=44). Patients with >50% or >75% luminal stenosis on CT were compared with those with >50% or >75% stenosis on CAG, respectively.

RESULTS

In a segment-by-segment analysis, in all patients, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of >50% stenosis on CT for predicting >50% stenosis on CAG were 69, 98, 78, and 97%, respectively, and those of >75% stenosis on CT for predicting >75% stenosis on CAG were 78, 98, 64, and 99%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of >50% and 75% stenosis on CT for predicting >50% and >75% stenosis, respectively, on CAG were comparable. Diagnostic accuracy was essentially the same in both groups.

CONCLUSION

320-slice CT had high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis compared with CAG. Even though the numbers were small, patients with high HR or heart rhythm irregularities might have essentially equivalent results to those with low HR with NSR.