Prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic valve stenosis with candesartan treatment after aortic valve replacement

Angiotensin II receptor blockers are associated with reduced valvular fibrosis in females with aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may slow down the progression of aortic stenosis (AS), through their antifibrotic effect. Females present more valvular fibrosis than males, thus ARBs may have more effect in females. Our aim was to assess the impact of ARBs on the remodeling of the aortic valve in males and females.

METHODS

We included patients who had an aortic valve replacement± coronary bypass grafting between 2006-2013. Patients with missing echocardiographic or histologic data were excluded. Warren-Yong and fibrosis scores of the explanted valves were performed. Patients were divided into four phenotypes according to their Warren-Yong and fibrosis scores: Mild calcification/fibrosis group, Severe calcification/fibrosis group, Predominant fibrosis group, Predominant calcification group.

RESULTS

Among the 1,321 included patients, the vast majority (89%) has severe AS. Patients in the predominant fibrosis group, as compared to the predominant calcium group, were more often females (39 vs 31%, p=0.008), bicuspid valves (44 vs 34%, p=0.002) and they less often used ARBs (25 vs 30%, p=0.046). Female sex was independently associated with being in the predominant fibrosis group (OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.08-1.95], p=0.01), with a significant interaction between female sex and ARBs. Females taking ARBs compared to females not taking ARBs had significantly lower fibrosis score (p<0.001). This difference was not seen in males.

CONCLUSION

In this large series of patients with moderate-severe AS, among females there was a negative association between intake of ARBs and valvular fibrosis. Thus, the possible effects of ARBs may be sex-specific, with a larger therapeutic role in females.

Antihypertensive therapies in moderate or severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hypertension confers a poor prognosis in moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AS), however, antihypertensive therapy (AHT) is often not prescribed due to the perceived deleterious effects of vasodilation and negative inotropes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety outcomes of AHT in adults with moderate or severe AS.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and grey literature were searched without language restrictions up to 9 September 2019.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments from a systematic search of observational studies and randomised controlled trials comparing AHT with a placebo or no AHT in adults with moderate or severe AS for any parameter of efficacy and safety outcomes. Conflicts were resolved by the third reviewer. Meta-analysis with pooled effect sizes using random-effects model, were estimated in R.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality, Left Ventricular (LV) Mass Index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and LV ejection fraction RESULTS: From 3025 publications, 31 studies (26 500 patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis and 24 studies in the meta-analysis. AHT was not associated with mortality when all studies were pooled, but heterogeneity was substantial across studies. The effect size of AHT differed according to drug class. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) were associated with reduced risk of mortality (Pooled HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80, p=0.006), The differences in changes of haemodynamic or echocardiographic parameters from baseline with and without AHT did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

AHT appears safe, is well tolerated. RAASi were associated with clinical benefit in patients with moderate or severe AS.

Medical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis

Untreated, severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis is associated with a dismal prognosis. The only treatment shown to improve survival is aortic valve replacement; however, before symptoms occur, aortic stenosis is preceded by a silent, latent phase characterized by a slow progression at the molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. In theory, specific medical therapy should halt aortic stenosis progression, reduce its hemodynamic repercussions on left ventricular function and remodeling, and improve clinical outcomes. In the present report, we performed a systematic review of studies focusing on the medical treatment of patients with aortic stenosis. Lipid-lowering therapy, antihypertensive drugs, and anticalcific therapy have been the main drug classes studied in this setting and are reviewed in depth. A critical appraisal of the preclinical and clinical evidence is provided, and future research avenues are presented.

Perioperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers for preventing mortality and morbidity in adults

BACKGROUND

Perioperative hypertension requires careful management. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) have shown efficacy in treating hypertension associated with surgery. However, there is lack of consensus about whether they can prevent mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically assess the benefits and harms of administration of ACEIs or ARBs perioperatively for the prevention of mortality and morbidity in adults (aged 18 years and above) undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the current issue of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2014, Issue 12), Ovid MEDLINE (1966 to 8 December 2014), EMBASE (1980 to 8 December 2014), and references of the retrieved randomized trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing perioperative administration of ACEIs or ARBs with placebo in adults (aged 18 years and above) undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia. We excluded studies in which participants underwent procedures that required local anaesthesia only, or participants who had already been on ACEIs or ARBs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs with a total of 571 participants in the review. Two of the seven trials involved 36 participants undergoing non-cardiac vascular surgery (infrarenal aortic surgery), and five involved 535 participants undergoing cardiac surgery, including valvular surgery, coronary artery bypass surgery, and cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. The intervention was started from 11 days to 25 minutes before surgery in six trials and during surgery in one trial. We considered all seven RCTs to carry a high risk of bias. The effects of ACEIs or ARBs on perioperative mortality and acute myocardial infarction were uncertain because the quality of the evidence was very low. The risk of death was 2.7% in the ACEIs or ARBs group and 1.6% in the placebo group (risk ratio (RR) 1.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 5.85). The risk of acute myocardial infarction was 1.7% in the ACEIs or ARBs group and 3.0% in the placebo group (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.14 to 2.26). ACEIs or ARBs may improve congestive heart failure (cardiac index) perioperatively (mean difference (MD) -0.60; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.50, very low-quality evidence). In terms of rate of complications, there was no difference in perioperative cerebrovascular complications (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.18 to 1.28, very low-quality evidence) and hypotension (RR 1.95; 95% CI 0.86 to 4.41, very low-quality evidence). Cardiac surgery-related renal failure was not reported. ACEIs or ARBs were associated with shortened length of hospital stay (MD -0.54; 95% CI -0.93 to -0.16, P value = 0.005, very low-quality evidence). These findings should be interpreted cautiously due to likely confounding by the clinical backgrounds of the participants. ACEIs or ARBs may shorten the length of hospital stay, (MD -0.54; 95% CI -0.93 to -0.16, very low-quality evidence) Two studies reported adverse events, and there was no evidence of a difference between the ACEIs or ARBs and control groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this review did not find evidence to support that perioperative ACEIs or ARBs can prevent mortality, morbidity, and complications (hypotension, perioperative cerebrovascular complications, and cardiac surgery-related renal failure). We found no evidence showing that the use of these drugs may reduce the rate of acute myocardial infarction. However, ACEIs or ARBs may increase cardiac output perioperatively. Due to the low and very low methodology quality, high risk of bias, and lack of power of the included studies, the true effect may be substantially different from the observed estimates. Perioperative (mainly elective cardiac surgery, according to included studies) initiation of ACEIs or ARBs therapy should be individualized.

Angiotensin receptor blockers: Focus on cardiac and renal injury

Angiotensin II, an important component of renin angiotensin system, is a potent vasopressor and its actions are mostly mediated via angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and role of AT2R in counterbalancing the actions of AT1R stimulation are under extensive research. In addition to its physiological actions, angiotensin II plays important roles in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, and heart failure. The effects of angiotensin II can be blocked by either suppressing its production by blocking angiotensin converting enzyme or by antagonizing its actions on AT1R using angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Instead of the extensive use of ARBs in the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases, proper selection of a particular ARB is crucial as the clinical condition of individual patient is different and also their economic status would play an essential role in medication compliance. Thus a critical review of the proven and promising actions of ARBs against various pathological conditions will be of great importance for the clinicians as well as for the researchers.

Preoperative tissue Doppler imaging-derived atrial conduction time can predict postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery and may result in stroke or heart failure and poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate a novel index of total atrial conduction time derived from the P-wave onset (lead II) to the peak A' wave on tissue Doppler imaging (PA-TDI duration). The PA-TDI duration was compared with previously reported predictors of POAF, and the optimal cutoff value of PA-DTI was calculated in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) for AV stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 63 patients undergoing isolated AVR. They underwent transthoracic echocardiography with TDI preoperatively and were monitored postoperatively with continuous electrocardiographic telemetry for 7 days. The hospital stay was significantly longer in the 41 patients with POAF than in the 22 without POAF (33.8±19.7 vs. 24.1±8.1 days, P=0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that PA-TDI duration (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.13; P=0.0072) and age (OR, 1.14; CI, 1.03-1.28; P=0.016) were significant independent predictors of POAF. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed the optimal cutoff values of PA-TDI duration and age were 147.3 ms and 74 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The PA-TDI duration was an independent predictor of POAF after AVR for AS. Patients with PA-TDI duration >147 ms should be considered high risk and treated appropriately to improve outcomes.