Progression of aortic stenosis in elderly patients over long-term follow up

Evidence That Anemia Accelerates AS Progression Via Shear-Induced TGF-β1 Activation: Heyde's Syndrome Comes Full Circle

The severity of aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) and gastrointestinal bleeding, leading to anemia (Heyde's syndrome). We investigated how anemia is linked with AS and AVWS using the LA100 mouse model and patients with AS. Induction of anemia in LA100 mice increased transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 activation, AVWS, and AS progression. Patients age >75 years with severe AS had higher plasma TGF-β1 levels and more severe anemia than AS patients age <75 years, and there was a correlation between TGF-β1 and anemia. These data are compatible with the hypothesis that the blood loss anemia of Heyde's syndrome contributes to AS progression via WSS-induced activation of platelet TGF-β1 and additional gastrointestinal bleeding via WSS-induced AVWS.

Asymptomatic Severe and Moderate Aortic Stenosis: Time for Appraisal of Treatment Indications

Over the last decades, we have witnessed considerable improvements in diagnostics and risk stratification of patients with significant aortic stenosis (AS), paralleled by advances in operative and anesthetic techniques. In addition, accumulating evidence points to the potential benefit of early valve replacement in such patients prior to the onset of symptoms. In parallel, interventional randomized trials have proven the benefit of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in comparison to a surgical approach to valve replacement over a broad risk spectrum in symptomatic patients with AS. This article reviews contemporary management approaches and scrutinizes open questions regarding timing and mode of intervention in asymptomatic patients with severe AS. We also discuss the challenges surrounding the management of symptomatic patients with moderate AS as well as emerging dilemmas related to the concept of a life-long treatment strategy for patients with AS.

Managing Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis

Current guidelines recommend that clinical surveillance for patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) may be considered if there is an indication for coronary revascularization. Recent observational studies, however, have shown that moderate AS is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Whether the increased risk of adverse events is caused by associated comorbidities, or to the underlying moderate AS itself, is incompletely understood. Similarly, which patients with moderate AS need close follow-up or could potentially benefit from early AVR is also unknown. In this review, the authors provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature on moderate AS. They first provide an algorithm that helps to diagnose moderate AS correctly, especially when discordant grading is observed. Although the traditional focus of AS assessment has been on the valve, it is increasingly acknowledged that AS is not only a disease of the aortic valve but also of the ventricle. The authors therefore discuss how multimodality imaging can help to evaluate the left ventricular remodeling response and improve risk stratification in patients with moderate AS. Finally, they summarize current evidence on the management of moderate AS and highlight ongoing trials on AVR in moderate AS.

Factors Affecting Rate of Progression of Aortic Stenosis and Its Impact on Outcomes

The rate of aortic stenosis (AS) progression in patients with moderate AS is unclear. This study examined the risk factors of progression from moderate to severe AS and its impact on clinical outcomes. A total of 954 patients with moderate AS (valve area >1.0 and ≤1.5 cm²) and follow-up echocardiograms were included. AS progressed to severe (valve area <1.0 cm¹) in 589 patients (61.7%) over a median follow-up of 2.46 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.29 to 3.91) years. Of those who progressed to severe AS, patients were subdivided into Slow (n = 294, over 3.91 [IQR 3.11 to 5.10] years) versus Fast (n = 295, over 1.29 [IQR 0.85 to 1.85] years) Progressors, according to the median time between the 2 echocardiograms. The correlates of fast AS progression and its impact on cumulative survival and freedom from valve intervention were evaluated. On multivariate analysis, age, thickened left ventricle posterior wall, severe renal impairment, and aortic valve area were significantly associated with fast AS progression. Over a median follow-up of 6.34 (IQR 4.05 to 9.55) years, 228 patients (38.7%) died. Despite similar aortic valve intervention rates, Fast Progressors had worse 5-year survival (61.2% vs 81.9%, log-rank p <0.001) and event-free (valve intervention and all-cause mortality) survival rates (16.2% vs 55.9%, log-rank p <0.001). On multivariable Cox analysis, shorter progression to severe AS (in years) was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.37, p <0.001), or combined aortic valve intervention and death (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.38 to 1.55, p <0.001). In conclusion, fast progression from moderate to severe AS is associated with worse outcomes.

Determinants of Aortic Stenosis Progression in Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves

Background

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with a faster progression of aortic stenosis (AS). Whether the determinants of AS progression are the same or different in patients with BAV vs tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) is unknown. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with the progression of AS in patients with BAV vs patients with TAV.

Methods

Patients with AS were prospectively recruited in the Metabolic Determinants of the Progression of Aortic Stenosis (PROGRESSA) study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01679431). The haemodynamic progression rate of AS was assessed by the annualized progression rate of peak aortic jet velocity (Vpeak). Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to identify the factors associated with a faster progression of AS in patients with BAV vs patients with TAV.

Results

There were 79 patients with BAV and 208 patients with TAV. The baseline severity of AS was similar between the 2 groups of patients as well as the annualized progression rate of AS. In patients with BAV, obesity (β = 0.25, P = 0.04), diabetes (β = 0.26, P = 0.02), and BAV with right-noncoronary cusp fusion (β = 0.29, P = 0.01) were found to be independently associated with a faster progression of AS, whereas in patients with TAV, AS baseline severity (baseline Vpeak, β = 0.14, P = 0.04) and chronic kidney disease (β = 0.16, P = 0.02) were significantly associated with AS progression.

Conclusion

Factors associated with progression rate of AS are different in BAV and TAV. The main factors associated with a faster progression of AS appear to be obesity, diabetes, right-noncoronary cusp fusion in patients with BAV vs chronic kidney disease in patients with TAV.

Moderate aortic stenosis: culprit or bystander?

Non-rheumatic aortic stenosis (AS) is among the most common valvular diseases in the developed world. Current guidelines support aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe symptomatic AS, which carries high morbidity and mortality when left untreated. In contrast, moderate AS has historically been thought to be a benign diagnosis for which the potential benefits of AVR are outweighed by the procedural risks. However, emerging data demonstrating the substantial mortality risk in untreated moderate AS and substantial improvements in periprocedural and perioperative mortality with AVR have challenged the traditional risk/benefit paradigm. As such, an appraisal of the contemporary data on morbidity and mortality associated with moderate AS and appropriate timing of valvular intervention in AS is warranted. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of moderate AS, including the epidemiology, current surveillance and management guidelines, clinical outcomes, and future studies.

Moderate Aortic Stenosis: What is it and When Should We Intervene?

Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis in the presence of symptoms or a left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. However, patients with less than severe aortic stenosis may also experience symptoms and recent literature suggests that the prognosis is not as benign as previously reported. There are no recommendations for patients with moderate aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction, despite the high associated morbidity and mortality. There is also some evidence that these patients may benefit from early aortic valve intervention. It is recognised that aortic stenosis not only affects the valve but also has a complex myocardial response. This review discusses the natural history of moderate aortic stenosis along with the role of multimodality imaging in risk stratification in these patients.

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis, bicuspid aortic valves and moderate aortic stenosis in heart failure: New indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Aortic stenosis (AS) remains one of the most common valvular heart diseases, with enormous impact on patient survival. Over the past years, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a reality worldwide, offering a less invasive method to treat AS. Apart from the classical indications for aortic valve disease, recent studies tried to address unanswered questions for TAVI - asymptomatic severe AS, bicuspid aortic valves and moderate AS in patients with heart failure. This review discusses the rationale of those possible indications, pitfalls and current evidence in the medical literature.

Proteinuria is an independent predictor of rapid progression of mild to moderate aortic stenosis in patients with preserved renal function

Although proteinuria is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular disease, its relationship with the progression of aortic stenosis (AS) has not been established. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between proteinuria (detected by urine dipstick test) and AS progression (assessed by the annualized reduction rate of aortic valve area [AVA]). A total of 460 patients with mild to moderate AS (defined by a peak velocity of 2.0-4.0 m/s) without end-stage renal disease who underwent two echocardiograms at least 3 months apart were included. The progression of AS was significantly faster in patients with proteinuria than those without (108 patients vs. 352 patients; annualized reduction rate of AVA, - 7.7 ± 13.5% vs. - 4.5 ± 11.6%; p = 0.017). The relationship between the presence of proteinuria and the accelerated progression of AS was significant among patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (- 11.0 ± 17.5% vs. - 4.2 ± 10.0%; p < 0.001), but not among those with eGFR 15-60 mL/min/1.73 m² (- 5.8 ± 10.3 vs. - 5.3 ± 14.8%; p = 0.822). When stratified by the presence of diabetes, the association of proteinuria with AS progression was only significant in patients without diabetes (- 8.1 ± 12.0% vs. - 8.1 ± 15.7%; p = 0.018). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified that the presence of proteinuria was an independent predictor of AS progression. The progression of AS was accelerated in patients with mild to moderate AS and proteinuria, particularly among those with preserved renal function and no diabetes.

Rapidly progressed aortic stenosis in a patient with previous diagnosis of polycythemia vera and post‐polycythemia vera myelofibrosis

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative disease that is often complicated with thromboembolism. However, aortic stenosis (AS) could be a manifestation of the cardiovascular complications of PV possibly through shear stress and atherosclerosis. We report a rare case of rapidly progressed AS in a patient with PV.

Aortic valve calcification in 499 consecutive patients referred for computed tomography

INTRODUCTION

Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is the most common cause of aortic stenosis. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of aortic valve, coronary artery and aortic calcifications and to evaluate the correlation between calcification of the aortic valve, coronary arteries and aorta.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 499 patients aged 60 years and over who underwent coronary computed tomography because of chest pain. Beside coronary artery calcium score (CAC), we evaluated AVC and ascending aorta calcifications (AAC).

RESULTS

Aortic valve calcification was found in 144 subjects (28.9% of the whole study population). Prevalence of CAC and AAC was higher than AVC and amounted to 73.8% and 54.0%. Prevalence of AVC, CAC and AAC was significantly lower in the group of patients ≤ 70 years than in the group of patients > 70 years of age (p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). Aortic valve calcification was more often observed in men than women (34.7% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.02). Degree of aortic valve calcification was also significantly higher among men than women (median score 4 vs. 0, p = 0.01). Similar observations were true for CAC and AAC, where both prevalence and degree of calcification was higher among men than women. In the whole study population no correlation was noted between AVC and CAC or AAC (p = 0.34, p = 0.85). There was a significant correlation between AAC and CAC (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some similarities in pathological mechanism and risk factors, a degenerative defect of the aortic valve could be independent of atheromatous lesions in the coronary arteries and aorta.

Effect of correction of anemia on echocardiographic and clinical parameters in patients with aortic stenosis involving a three-cuspid aortic valve and normal left ventricular ejection fraction

The objective of the study is to investigate the impact of anemia (defined as hemoglobin concentration of <12 g/dl in women and 13 g/dl in men) on prognosis and to study the effect of recovery from anemia on echocardiographic and clinical parameters in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). This was a prospective study in 315 patients with moderate or severe AS. Patients with anemia received oral iron (ferrous sulfate with mucoproteose, 160 mg iron/day) and erythropoietin, if needed, or intravenous iron, if necessary. The following tests were performed before and after normalization of hemoglobin values: echocardiogram, 6-minute walk test, N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide, and measures of depression, cognitive impairment, and dependence. Patient mean age was 74 years (SD 9). Mean follow-up was 25 months (SD 8). Anemia prevalence in the overall group was 22% (n = 70). Patients who are anemic had a higher rate of complications at follow-up (mortality, hospital admission, or need for valve procedure; 80% vs 62%, p = 0.009). In total, 89% of patients recovered from anemia, with a mean time to recovery of 4.6 weeks (SD 1.4). Improvements were observed on echocardiographic parameters of peak velocity (4.1 to 3.7 m/s, p = 0.02) and mean gradient (44 to 35 mm Hg, p = 0.02). Performance on the 6-minute walk test improved from 235 to 303 m (p <0.001). Median N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide value decreased from 612 to 189 pg/dl (p <0.001). In conclusion, patients with AS and anemia have a worse prognosis than those without anemia. Resolution of anemia is associated with improvements in echocardiographic parameters and functional status, suggesting that treatment of iron deficiency is a relevant option in the management of patients with AS, particularly in nonoperable cases.

The global burden of aortic stenosis

Degenerative, calcific valvular aortic stenosis (AS), caused by an active process of atherosclerosis, calcification and ossification, is the most common cause of AS in industrialized nations. The prevalence of calcific AS is age-dependent, and thus is expected to increase due to demographic aging of the global population. It is well recognized that severe AS carries a poor prognosis if left untreated. Despite this recognition, many patients are inappropriately denied surgery because of perceived risk. This article will examine the etiology, prevalence, and current trends in the treatment of degenerative AS focusing on indications for surgical aortic valve replacement.