Pressure-dependent hemodynamic effect of continuous positive airway pressure in severe chronic heart failure: a case series

Phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of central sleep apnea in patients with heart failure

Objective

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to explore the effectiveness of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) on CSA in patients with HF.

Methods

This was a prospective and non-randomized study. The stimulation lead was inserted into the right brachiocephalic vein and attached to a proprietary neurostimulator. Monitoring was conducted during the implantation process, and all individuals underwent two-night polysomnography.

Results

A total of nine subjects with HF and CSA were enrolled in our center. There was a significant decrease in the apnea–hypopnea index (41 ± 18 vs 29 ± 25, p = 0.02) and an increase in mean arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) (93% ± 1% vs 95% ± 2%, p = 0.03) after PNS treatment. We did not observe any significant differences of oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and SaO2 < 90% (T90) following PNS. Unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation might also categorically improve the severity of sleep apnea.

Conclusion

In our non-randomized study, PNS may serve as a therapeutic approach for CSA in patients with HF.

Continuous positive airway pressure improves work of breathing in pediatric chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is common in adults with chronic heart failure (CHF), but its prevalence in children remains unclear. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of SDB but deleterious hemodynamic effects have been reported.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed SDB in children with CHF and the effect of CPAP on work of breathing (WOB) and cardiac index (CI). Children aged 6 months to 18 years old with CHF due to: 1) dilated cardiomyopathy (DM) with an ejection fraction < 45%, 2) functional single ventricle (SV) or 3) aortic or mitral valve disease awaiting surgery (VD) were eligible for the study. A polysomnography (PSG), measurement of WOB and CI during spontaneous breathing (SB) and CPAP (6, 8 and 10 cmH₂O) were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with mean age of 6.4 ± 5 years were included (16 DM 16, 10 SV, 4 LV). Twenty (73%) patients had a normal sleep efficiency. Median apnoeas hypopnea index (IAH) was within normal range at 1.6 events/h (0, 14) events/hour. Only one patient had central sleep apnoeas, none had Cheyne-Stokes respiration, and 3 patients had an obstructive AHI between 5 and 10 events/hour. Optimal CPAP level decreased WOB (p = 0.05) and respiratory rate (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe SDB was uncommon in children with CHF. However, CPAP may be beneficial by decreasing WOB and respiratory rate without deleterious effects on CI.

Patterns of adaptive servo-ventilation settings in a real-life multicenter study: pay attention to volume! : Adaptive servo-ventilation settings in real-life conditions

Backgrounds

To explain the excess cardiovascular mortality observed in the SERVE-HF study, it was hypothesized that the high-pressure ASV default settings used lead to inappropriate ventilation, cascading negative consequences (i.e. not only pro-arrythmogenic effects through metabolic/electrolyte abnormalities, but also lower cardiac output). The aims of this study are: i) to describe ASV-settings for long-term ASV-populations in real-life conditions; ii) to describe the associated minute-ventilations (MV) and therapeutic pressures for servo-controlled-flow versus servo-controlled-volume devices (ASV-F Philips®-devices versus ASV-V ResMed®-devices).

Methods

The OTRLASV-study is a cross-sectional, 5-centre study including patients who underwent ASV-treatment for at least 1 year. The eight participating clinicians were free to adjust ASV settings, which were compared among i) initial diagnosed sleep-disordered-breathing (SBD) groups (Obstructive-Sleep-Apnea (OSA), Central-Sleep-Apnea (CSA), Treatment-Emergent-Central-Sleep-Apnea (TECSA)), and ii) unsupervised groups (k-means clusters). To generate these clusters, baseline and follow-up variables were used (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), initial diagnosed Obstructive-Apnea-Index, initial diagnosed Central-Apnea-Index, Continuous-Positive-Airway-Pressure used before ASV treatment, presence of cardiopathy, and presence of a reduced left-ventricular-ejection-fraction (LVEF)). ASV-data were collected using the manufacturer’s software for 6 months.

Results

One hundred seventy-seven patients (87.57% male) were analysed with a median (IQ_25–75) initial Apnea-Hypopnea-Index of 50 (38–62)/h, an ASV-treatment duration of 2.88 (1.76–4.96) years, 61.58% treated with an ASV-V. SDB groups did not differ in ASV settings, MV or therapeutic pressures. In contrast, the five generated k-means clusters did (generally described as follows: (C1) male-TECSA-cardiopathy, (C2) male-mostly-CSA-cardiopathy, (C3) male-mostly-TECSA-no cardiopathy, (C4) female-mostly-elevated BMI-TECSA-cardiopathy, (C5) male-mostly-OSA-low-LVEF). Of note, the male-mostly-OSA-low-LVEF-cluster-5 had significantly lower fixed end-expiratory-airway-pressure (EPAP) settings versus C1 (p = 0.029) and C4 (p = 0.007). Auto-EPAP usage was higher in the male-mostly-TECSA-no cardiopathy-cluster-3 versus C1 (p = 0.006) and C2 (p < 0.001). MV differences between ASV-F (p = 0.002) and ASV-V (p < 0.001) were not homogenously distributed across clusters, suggesting specific cluster and ASV-algorithm interactions. Individual ASV-data suggest that the hyperventilation risk is not related to the cluster nor the ASV-monitoring type.

Conclusions

Real-life ASV settings are associated with combinations of baseline and follow-up variables wherein cardiological variables remain clinically meaningful. At the patient level, a hyperventilation risk exists regardless of cluster or ASV-monitoring type, spotlighting a future role of MV-telemonitoring in the interest of patient-safety.

Trial registration

The OTRLASV study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02429986). 1 April 2015.

Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: A Pooled Cohort Analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Early evidence with transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) demonstrates improved disease severity and quality of life (QOL) in patients with central sleep apnea (CSA). The goal of this analysis is to evaluate the complete prospective experience with PNS in order to better characterize its efficacy and safety, including in patients with concomitant heart failure (HF).

METHODS

Using pooled individual data from the pilot (n = 57) and pivotal (n = 151) studies of the remedē System in patients with predominant moderate to severe CSA, we evaluated 12-month safety and 6- and 12-month effectiveness based on polysomnography data, QOL, and cardiac function.

RESULTS

Among 208 combined patients (June 2010 to May 2015), a remedē device implant was successful in 197 patients (95%), 50/57 pilot study patients (88%) and 147/151 pivotal trial patients (97%). The pooled cohort included patients with CSA of various etiologies, and 141 (68%) had concomitant HF. PNS reduced apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) at 6 months by a median of -22.6 episodes/h (25th and 75th percentile; -38.6 and -8.4, respectively) (median 58% reduction from baseline, P < .001). Improvement in sleep variables was maintained through 12 months of follow-up. In patients with HF and ejection fraction ≤ 45%, PNS was associated with improvement in systolic function from 27.0% (23.3, 36.0) to 31.1% (24.0, 41.5) at 12 months (P = .003). In the entire cohort, improvement in QOL was concordant with amelioration of sleep measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvenous PNS significantly improves CSA severity, sleep quality, ventricular function, and QOL regardless of HF status. Improvements, which are independent of patient compliance, are sustained at 1 year and are associated with acceptable safety.

[Transvenous neurostimulation in central sleep apnea associated with heart failure]

Sleep-related breathing disorders can be classified as either obstructive (OSA) or central sleep apnea (CSA). Whereas there is substantial knowledge about the pathophysiology and sound recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of OSA, the origin of CSA is still incompletely understood, patient identification is difficult and the necessity for specific treatment is under debate. CSA often accompanies heart failure and is associated with an adverse prognosis. Optimized heart failure treatment reduces CSA and is thus the cornerstone of CSA treatment. In contrast to OSA, noninvasive ventilation does not lead to prognostic improvement in CSA and ASV ventilation may even lead to an increase in mortality. Transvenous neurostimuation of the phrenic nerve is currently under clinical investigation as a new therapeutic modality for CSA. Early results demonstrate positive effects on sleep parameters and quality of life without any evidence for a negative impact on mortality. However, these results await confirmation in larger studies before this new approach can be advocated for routine clinical use.