Nephropathy after administration of iso-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media: evidence from a network meta-analysis

Low-iodine-dose computed tomography coupled with an artificial intelligence-based contrast-boosting technique in children: a retrospective study on comparison with conventional-iodine-dose computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Low-iodine-dose computed tomography (CT) protocols have emerged to mitigate the risks associated with contrast injection, often resulting in decreased image quality.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the image quality of low-iodine-dose CT combined with an artificial intelligence (AI)-based contrast-boosting technique in abdominal CT, compared to a standard-iodine-dose protocol in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 35 pediatric patients (mean age 9.2 years, range 1-17 years) who underwent sequential abdominal CT scans-one with a standard-iodine-dose protocol (standard-dose group, Iobitridol 350 mgI/mL) and another with a low-iodine-dose protocol (low-dose group, Iohexol 240 mgI/mL)-within a 4-month interval from January 2022 to July 2022. The low-iodine CT protocol was reconstructed using an AI-based contrast-boosting technique (contrast-boosted group). Quantitative and qualitative parameters were measured in the three groups. For qualitative parameters, interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and mean values were employed for subsequent analyses. For quantitative analysis of the three groups, repeated measures one-way analysis of variance with post hoc pairwise analysis was used. For qualitative analysis, the Friedman test followed by post hoc pairwise analysis was used. Paired t-tests were employed to compare radiation dose and iodine uptake between the standard- and low-dose groups.

RESULTS

The standard-dose group exhibited higher attenuation, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of organs and vessels compared to the low-dose group (all P-values < 0.05 except for liver SNR, P = 0.12). However, noise levels did not differ between the standard- and low-dose groups (P = 0.86). The contrast-boosted group had increased attenuation, CNR, and SNR of organs and vessels, and reduced noise compared with the low-dose group (all P < 0.05). The contrast-boosted group showed no differences in attenuation, CNR, and SNR of organs and vessels (all P > 0.05), and lower noise (P = 0.002), than the standard-dose group. In qualitative analysis, the contrast-boosted group did not differ regarding vessel enhancement and lesion conspicuity (P > 0.05) but had lower noise (P < 0.05) and higher organ enhancement and artifacts (all P < 0.05) than the standard-dose group. While iodine uptake was significantly reduced in low-iodine-dose CT (P < 0.001), there was no difference in radiation dose between standard- and low-iodine-dose CT (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Low-iodine-dose abdominal CT, combined with an AI-based contrast-boosting technique exhibited comparable organ and vessel enhancement, as well as lesion conspicuity compared to standard-iodine-dose CT in children. Moreover, image noise decreased in the contrast-boosted group, albeit with an increase in artifacts.

Iodixanol as a New Contrast Agent for Cyanoacrylate Embolization: A Preliminary In Vivo Swine Study

N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) is a lipophilic, permanent embolic glue that must be opacified for fluoroscopic guidance. Empirically, lipophilic Lipiodol Ultra Fluid® (LUF) has been added to produce a single-phase physically stable mixture. Varying the dilution ratio allows control of glue polymerization kinetics. LUF is far more costly than water-soluble iodinated contrast agents (ICAs). Our purpose was to evaluate whether a water-soluble nonionic iso-osmolar ICA could be used instead. We embolized both renal arteries of six swine using 1:3 NBCA-LUF or NBCA-iodixanol in 1:1, 1:3, and 1:7 ratios. We used both micro-computed tomography to assess the distality of glue penetration and indexed cast ratio and histology to assess distality, arterial obliteration, vessel-wall damage, and renal-parenchyma necrosis. Glue-LUF produced significantly greater indexed cast ratio and renal-artery ROI values and a significantly shorter cast-to-capsule distance. The injected volume was significantly greater with 1:7 iodixanol than with the other mixtures. No significant differences were found for histological evidence of artery obliteration, vessel-wall damage, or renal-parenchyma necrosis. This is the first study dealing with ICA alone as a contrast agent for cyanoacrylate embolization, compared to LUF. More research is needed to determine whether water-soluble nonionic iodinated agents can be used for human NBCA embolization given the good safety profile, availability, and low cost of ICA.

Evaluation of Different Contrast Agents for Regional Lung Perfusion Measurement Using Electrical Impedance Tomography: An Experimental Pilot Study

Monitoring regional blood flow distribution in the lungs appears to be useful for individually optimizing ventilation therapy. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) can be used at the bedside for indicator-based regional lung perfusion measurement. Hypertonic saline is widely used as a contrast agent but could be problematic for clinical use due to potential side effects. In five ventilated healthy pigs, we investigated the suitability of five different injectable and clinically approved solutions as contrast agents for EIT-based lung perfusion measurement. Signal extraction success rate, signal strength, and image quality were analyzed after repeated 10 mL bolus injections during temporary apnea. The best results were obtained using NaCl 5.85% and sodium-bicarbonate 8.4% with optimal success rates (100%, each), the highest signal strengths (100 ± 25% and 64 ± 17%), and image qualities (r = 0.98 ± 0.02 and 0.95 ± 0.07). Iomeprol 400 mg/mL (non-ionic iodinated X-ray contrast medium) and Glucose 5% (non-ionic glucose solution) resulted in mostly well usable signals with above average success rates (87% and 89%), acceptable signal strength (32 ± 8% and 16 + 3%), and sufficient image qualities (r = 0.80 ± 0.19 and 0.72 ± 0.21). Isotonic balanced crystalloid solution failed due to a poor success rate (42%), low signal strength (10 ± 4%), and image quality (r = 0.43 ± 0.28). While Iomeprol might enable simultaneous EIT and X-ray measurements, glucose might help to avoid sodium and chloride overload. Further research should address optimal doses to balance reliability and potential side effects.

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and its contemporary prevention

The complexity and application range of interventional and diagnostic procedures using contrast media (CM) have recently increased. This allows more patients to undergo procedures that involve CM administration. However, the intrinsic CM toxicity leads to the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). At present, effective therapy of CI-AKI is rather limited. Effective prevention of CI-AKI therefore becomes crucially important. This review presents an in-depth discussion of CI-AKI incidence, pathogenesis, risk prediction, current preventive strategies, and novel treatment possibilities. The review also discusses the difference between CI-AKI incidence following intraarterial and intravenous CM administration. Factors contributing to the development of CI-AKI are considered in conjunction with the mechanism of acute kidney damage. The need for ultimate risk estimation and the prediction of CI-AKI is stressed. Possibilities of CI-AKI prevention is evaluated within the spectrum of existing preventive measures aimed at reducing kidney injury. In particular, the review discusses intravenous hydration regimes and pre-treatment with statins and N-acetylcysteine. The review further focuses on emerging alternative imaging technologies, alternative intravascular diagnostic and interventional procedures, and new methods for intravenous hydration guidance; it discusses the applicability of those techniques in complex procedures and their feasibility in current practise. We put emphasis on contemporary interventional cardiology imaging methods, with a brief discussion of CI-AKI in non-vascular and non-cardiologic imaging and interventional studies.

Risk of acute kidney injury after contrast-enhanced computerized tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 propensity score-matched cohort studies

OBJECTIVES

Intravenous application of contrast media is part of a wide spectrum of diagnostic procedures for better imaging quality. Clinical avoidance of contrast-enhanced imaging is an ever-present quandary in patients with impaired kidney function. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk for acute kidney injury (AKI), dialysis and mortality among patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT compared to propensity score-matched controls (i.e. contrast-unenhanced CT). Selected cohort studies featured high-risk patients with advanced kidney disease and critical illness.

METHODS

This review was designed to conform to the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed was searched from August 2021 to November 2021 for all-language articles without date restriction. A random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles were included, comprising data of 169,455 patients. The overall risk of AKI was similar in the contrast-enhanced and unenhanced groups (OR: 0.97 [95% CI: 0.85; 1.11], p = 0.64), regardless of baseline renal function and underlying disease. Substantial heterogeneity was detected (I² = 90%, p ≤ 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression identified hypertension (p = 0.03) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.0001) as factors associated with greater risk of post-contrast AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on propensity score-matched pairs obtained from 21 cohort studies, we found no evidence for increased risk for AKI, dialysis or mortality after contrast-enhanced CT among patients with eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m². In congruence with the emerging evidence in the literature, caution should be exercised in patients with hypertension and eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m².

KEY POINTS

• The application of contrast media for medical imaging is not associated with higher odds for AKI, induction of renal replacement therapy, or mortality. Many comorbidities traditionally associated with greater risk for acute kidney injury do not appear to predispose for renal decline after contrast media exposure. • Underlying hypertension and eGFR less than or equal to 30 mL/min/1.73 m² seem to predispose for post-contrast acute kidney injury. • Propensity score matching cannot account for unmeasured influences on AKI incidence, which needs to be addressed in the interpretation of results.

Iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the VA CART Program

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether contrast media type is associated with outcomes in veterans undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty about the impact of iso-osmolar contrast medium (IOCM) versus low-osmolar contrast medium (LOCM) on acute kidney injury (AKI) and other major adverse renal or cardiovascular events (MARCE) after PCI. We assessed the association between contrast media type and MARCE in patients who underwent PCI within the Veterans Administration Healthcare System.

METHODS

We reviewed PCIs performed between 2009 and 2019 using data from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. The primary endpoint was MARCE, a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause death, AKI, and dialysis onset at 30 days.

RESULTS

The analysis cohort consisted of 50,389 patients of whom 25,555 received LOCM and 24,834 received IOCM. There was significant variation in contrast type across sites. After adjustment for comorbidities, no significant association between contrast media type and MARCE was observed in both site-unadjusted (odds ratio [OR] for IOCM: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.08; p = 0.97) and site-adjusted (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.95-1.18; p = 0.30) analyses. Similar results were obtained when contrast volume was imputed or the data was subset to individuals with available contrast volume.

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of veterans undergoing PCI, we found considerable site variation in the type of contrast media used but no significant association between contrast media type and the incidence of MARCE, both before and after adjustment for the site.

Effects of a High Dose of the Contrast Medium Iodixanol on Renal Function in Patients Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Iodixanol is associated with lower rates of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). However, the effects of high volumes of iodixanol on renal function after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been fully elucidated. This study evaluates the effects of high-dose (>300 mL) iodixanol on renal function within 72 hours of PCI. We retrospectively reviewed 676 consecutive patients who received high-dose (>300 mL) iodixanol during PCI between October 2015 and December 2017 in 4 centers. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant independent predictors for CI-AKI. The incidence of CI-AKI was 3.5% (23/651). In patients administered 300 to 500 mL and >500 mL iodixanol, the incidence of CI-AKI was 3.9% and 1.7%, respectively. In patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m², the incidence of CI-AKI was 2.6%. In high-risk and very high-risk patients, stratified by the Mehran risk score, the incidence of CI-AKI was 3.3% and 4.3%, respectively. In patients received high-dose iodixanol (>300 mL), logistic regression analysis demonstrated that female sex, chronic kidney disease, and eGFR were independent risk factors for CI-AKI, but contrast volume was not. The administration of high (300-500 mL) and very high (>500 mL) dose of iodixanol is associated with low rates of CI-AKI.

Contrast Media-Different Types of Contrast Media, Their History, Chemical Properties, and Relative Nephrotoxicity

History of contrast dates back to the 1890s, with the invention of the radiograph. Nephrotoxicity has been a main limitation in ideal contrast media (CM). High-osmolar contrast media no longer are in clinical use due to overwhelming evidence supporting greater nephrotoxicity with these CM compared with current CM. Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) remains a common cause of in-hospital acute kidney injury. The choice contrast agent is determined mainly by cost and institution practice. This review focuses on the history, chemical properties, and experimental and clinical studies on the various groups of CM and their role in CIN.

The efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy among patients undergoing coronary angiography or intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Numerous trials have investigated the effect of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in preventing contrast‐induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients receiving contrast medium (CM). This meta analysis aims to validate the role of RIC in preventing CIN.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before April 27, 2019. Two investigators independently extracted basic characteristics from each study. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to examine the treatment effect.

Results

A total of 18 studies comprising 2,503 patients were included in our meta‐analysis. Compared with conventional therapy, RIC significantly reduced the risk of CIN (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.56, p < .05). Subgroup analyses showed that the protective effect of RIC was stronger in the low‐osmolar contrast media group (OR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.45, p < .05) and the nondiabetic group (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.53 p < .05). RIC also significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events within the first 6 months (OR = 0.39; p < .05), but the influence was not present after long‐term follow‐up.

Conclusions

Our meta‐analysis showed that RIC could effectively reduce CIN risk and decrease the short‐term incidence of relevant adverse events. Furthermore, the effects of CIN are more pronounced in nondiabetic patients and with the use of low‐osmolar contrast medium. This meta‐analysis of small trials suggests a possible protective effect of RIC on contrast‐induced nephropathy and favors the performance of a large randomized trial to further investigate this strategy.

Contrast-induced nephropathy: A dilemma between loss of neurons or nephrons in the setting of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke

PURPOSE

The aim is to report the incidence and risk factors of contrast-induced nephropathy after the use of iodine-based contrast for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures in a center over a period of 22 months were analysed retrospectively. Contrast-induced nephropathy was determined by an increase in serum creatinine level of >25% of baseline or an absolute increase in serum creatinine level of at least 44 µmol/L (0.50 mg/dL) occurring after intravascular administration of contrast media without alternative explanation. The primary outcome measure of this study was the presence of contrast-induced nephropathy in these treated patients. Continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical data as frequencies or percentages. The comparison was made using Student's t-test or Fisher's test. Logistic regression was performed to find independent contrast-induced nephropathy predictors. All statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-nine patients undergoing endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Twenty cases of the total cohort (n = 189) presented contrast-induced nephropathy (10.58%). Only diabetes and creatinine levels between 1.3 and 2.5 mg/dL were associated with contrast-induced nephropathy. No patient was treated with dialysis.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-induced nephropathy is a relatively common complication after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke and is associated with worse outcome in patients with this condition. However, there is no increase in the frequency of hemodialysis after the use of iodinated contrast medium.

Rate of major adverse renal or cardiac events with iohexol compared to other low osmolar contrast media during interventional cardiovascular procedures

Objective

This study assessed the rate of major adverse renal or cardiac events (MARCE) when iohexol is used during interventional cardiovascular procedures compared to other low osmolar contrast media (LOCMs).

Background

Interventional cardiovascular procedures are often essential for diagnosis and treatment, the risk of MARCE should be considered.

Methods

Data were derived from the Premier Hospital Database January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2015. Patient encounters with an inpatient primary interventional cardiovascular procedure with a single LOCM (iohexol, ioversol, ioxilan, ioxaglate, or iopamidol) were included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of MARCE, which included: renal failure with dialysis, acute kidney injury (AKI) with or without dialysis, contrast induced AKI, acute myocardial infarction, angina, stent occlusion/thrombosis, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or death. Multivariable regression analysis was performed using the hospital fixed‐effects specification to assess the relationship between MARCE and iohexol compared to other LOCMs, while controlling for patient demographics, comorbid conditions and reason for hospitalization. As a sensitivity analysis, direct comparisons of iohexol were made to other LOCMs.

Results

A total of 458,091 inpatient encounters met inclusion criteria of which 26% used iohexol and 74% used other LOCMs. Results of multivariable modeling revealed no differences in MARCE rates between iohexol and other LOCMs. When direct comparisons of iohexol vs. ioversol and iopamidol were modeled, no differences in MARCE nor the renal component of MARCE were found.

Conclusions

In this retrospective multicenter study, there were no differences in MARCE events with iohexol compared to other LOCMs during inpatient interventional cardiovascular procedures.

Comparative Efficacy of Statins for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a common complication of iodinated contrast medium administration during cardiac catheterization. Statin treatment has been shown to be associated with reduced risk of CI-AKI; however, the results are inconsistent, especially for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Thus, we conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of statins in the prevention of CI-AKI. We systematically searched several databases (including, Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov ) from inception to January 31, 2018. The primary outcome was occurrence of CI-AKI in patients with CKD undergoing cardiac catheterization. Both pairwise and network meta-analysis were performed. Finally, 21 randomized controlled trials with a total of 6385 patients were included. Results showed that statin loading before contrast administration was associated with a significantly reduced risk of CI-AKI in patients with CKD undergoing cardiac catheterization (odds ratio: 0.46; P < .05). Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin administered at high dose may be the most effective treatments to reduce incidence of CI-AKI, with no difference between these 2 agents.

Contrast media-induced nephropathy: how has Italy contributed in the past 30 years? A systematic review

Background and objective

The use of contrast media in Italy has exponentially increased in the past 3 decades. However, it is unknown whether there has been an increase in clinical research evaluating the risks associated with contrast media usage, especially regarding contrast-induced nephropathy. To fill this gap in knowledge, we performed a systematic review.

Study eligibility criteria

Meta-analyses, observational studies, and clinical trials assessing contrast media-induced nephropathy as the safety outcome, in which at least one author was affiliated with an Italian university/health care structure, were eligble.

Data sources

Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Methodology Register, and Web of Science were screened.

Participants

Men and women exposed to contrast media.

Results

In total, 60 original articles were retrieved with an incremental trend between 1990 and 2017. Cohort studies were the most common study design represented. In total, 45 of 60 (75.0%) studies were monocenter studies and 41 of 60 (68.3%) received no funding. In all, 91.7% of studies disclosed no conflicts of interest and 81.7% had no external collaboration. Most of the studies provided a level of evidence of III-2 (32/60; 53.3%) and II (23/60; 38.3%). In total, 50 of 60 studies (83.3%) were published in a scientific journal ranked in the first quartile of their subject area.

Conclusion

There was an increased number of studies evaluating contrast-induced nephropathy in Italy during the last three decades. These studies covered procedures to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy or aimed to identify risk factors, biomarkers, and scores, and their related prognosis.

Could Vitamin E Prevent Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Several clinical studies have proposed a protective role for vitamin E (α-tocopherol) against contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI). The aim of study was to assess the effects of vitamin E for the prevention of CIAKI. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the effects of vitamin E on CIAKI development and measurements of renal function were included. Four trials including 623 participants were analyzed in the meta-analysis. All participants received intravenous hydration in addition to vitamin E or placebo. The incidence of the vitamin E group (5.8%) was lower than that of the control group (15.4%). Compared with the control, vitamin E significantly reduced the risk ratio (RR) of CIAKI by 62% (0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22, 0.63; P < 0.010). In addition, vitamin E reduced serum creatinine (SCr) increase after contrast administration (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.27; 95% CI, -0.49, -0.06; P = 0.010). However, changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after contrast administration were not significantly different between vitamin E and the control group (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, -0.01, 0.43; P = 0.060). Heterogeneity within the available trials was not observed. Our meta-analysis provides evidence that vitamin E plus hydration significantly reduced the risk of CIAKI in patients with renal impairment compared with hydration alone.

Is Intravenous Administration of Iodixanol Associated with Increased Risk of Acute Kidney Injury, Dialysis, or Mortality? A Propensity Score-adjusted Study

Purpose To compare the rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), emergent dialysis, and short-term mortality between patients who underwent intravenous administration of the iso-osmolar contrast material (IOCM) iodixanol 320 and patients who underwent a noncontrast computed tomography (CT) examination. Materials and Methods Study design and implementation were overseen by an institutional review board and conformed to HIPAA guidelines on patient data integrity. All patients who underwent an iodixanol-enhanced (IOCM group) or a noncontrast (noncontrast group) CT examination from January 2003 to December 2014 were identified. Patients were subdivided into subgroups of those with stage 1-2 chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m²), those with stage 3 CKD (eGFR, 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m²), and those with stage 4-5 CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²) and separately underwent propensity score stratification and matching. Rates of AKI, emergent dialysis, and mortality were compared between IOCM and noncontrast groups. Additional analyses incorporating intravenous fluid administration, including additional CT studies at other sites within a single institution, and a paired analysis of patients who underwent both IOCM and noncontrast CT studies during the study time frame, were also performed. Results A total of 5758 patients (1538 with stage 1-2 CKD, 2899 with stage 3 CKD, and 1321 with stage 4-5 CKD) were included in the study. After propensity score adjustment, rates of AKI, dialysis, and mortality were not significantly higher in the IOCM group compared with the noncontrast group for all CKD subgroups (AKI odds ratios [ORs], 0.74-0.91, P = .16-0.69; dialysis ORs, 0.74-2.00, P = .42-.76; mortality ORs, 0.98-1.24, P = .39-.88). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Conclusion Among patients at the highest perceived risk of postcontrast AKI, intravenous administration of iodixanol for contrast material enhanced CT was not an independent risk factor for AKI, dialysis, or mortality. ^© RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Carbon dioxide angiography and arterial embolization could successfully control postpartum uterine hemorrhage for the patient with hypersensitivity to iodine compound

Transcatheter arterial embolization has become a common management option for intractable postpartum uterine hemorrhage. Iodinated contrast agents are commonly used for embolotherapy but cannot be used in patients with renal dysfunction or iodine allergy. A 37-year-old woman spontaneously delivered a healthy girl but developed severe postpartum uterine hemorrhage, probably due to placenta accrete. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed extravasation of the iodinated contrast agent into the uterine cavity. The patient subsequently developed allergic reaction to this agent. After recovery from the allergic reaction with appropriate treatment, we performed carbon dioxide angiography and found that the extravasation originated from the right uterine artery. Embolization of the right internal iliac artery was performed, and hemostasis was verified. Based on this experience, we suggest carbon dioxide angiography and arterial embolization can be used for treating intractable postpartum hemorrhage in patients with iodinated contrast media allergy or renal dysfunction.

Subjective and objective image differences in pediatric computed tomography cardiac angiography using lower iodine concentration

BACKGROUND

Several recent studies showed the optimal contrast enhancement with a low-concentration and iso-osmolar contrast media in both adult and pediatric patients. However, low contrast media concentrations are not routinely used due to concerns of suboptimal enhancement of cardiac structures and small vessels.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of using iso-osmolar contrast media containing a low iodine dose for CT cardiac angiography at 80 kilovolts (kVp) in neonates and infants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The iodixanol 270 group consisted of 79 CT scans and the iopromide 370 group of 62 CT scans in patients ≤1 year old. Objective measurement of the contrast enhancement was analyzed and contrast-to-noise ratios of the ascending aorta and left ventricle were calculated. Regarding subjective measurement, a four-point scale system was devised to evaluate degrees of contrast enhancement, image noise, motion artifact and overall image quality of each image set. Reader performance for correctly differentiating iodixanol 270 and iopromide 370 by visual assessment was evaluated.

RESULTS

Group objective and subjective measurements were nonsignificantly different. Overall sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for correctly differentiating iodixanol 270 and iopromide 370 by visual assessment were 42.8%, 59%, and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The application of iodixanol 270 achieved optimal enhancement for performing pediatric cardiac CT angiography at 80 kVp in neonates and infants. Objective measurements of contrast enhancement and subjective image quality assessments were not statistically different in the iodixanol 270 and iopromide 370 groups.

Efficacy of alprostadil for preventing of contrast-induced nephropathy: A meta-analysis

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has become the third-leading cause of hospital-acquired acute renal injury. Although alprostadil has been proposed as an effective preventative measure, this conclusion remains inconsistent. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of the published studies on this topic to evaluate the preventative effect of alprostadil on CIN. Databases, including PubMed, the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, the China Biological Medicine Database (SinoMed) and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched. Nineteen clinical trials involving 2267 individuals were identified. We utilized a random or a fixed effect model to calculate the pooled odd ratios (ORs) and the standardized mean differences (SMD), respectively. Compared to the control group, the CIN risk decreased significantly in the alprostadil group (P < 0.00001, OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.21-0.39). In the subgroup of coronary angiography patients, the use of alprostadil also decreased the risk of CIN (P < 0.00001, OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.19-0.39). In conclusion, Alprostadil might be associated with a significant reduction in postcontrast Scr, BUN and CysC level and decrease the incidence of CIN.

Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research

Clinical decision-making requires synthesis of evidence from literature reviews focused on a specific theme. Evidence synthesis is performed with qualitative assessments and systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, typically covering statistical pooling with pairwise meta-analyses. These methods include adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and mixed-treatment comparison. These tools allow synthesis of evidence and comparison of effectiveness in cardiovascular research.

Is gender still a predisposing factor in contrast-media associated adverse drug reactions? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of gender as a risk factor for developing contrast media-associated adverse drug reactions (CM-ADRs) by comparing the incidence of CM-ADR between male and female patients according to study design, ADR type, and computed tomography (CT) examination.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We systematically searched three electronic databases for eligible studies. In the studies included (n=18), we assessed effect estimates of the relative incidence of CM-ADR, analysed by experimental design, ADR type and CT examination. This was calculated by using a random effects model if clinical conditions showed heterogeneity; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used.

RESULTS

We identified 10,776 patients administered CM. According to the designs, studies were classified into randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Results were as follows: risk ratio (RR)=1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-1.46, P=0.66) for RCTs, and RR=0.77 (95% CI: 0.58-1.04, P=0.09) for observational studies. The results of analysis according to ADR type and for undergoing CT demonstrated that the incidence of CM-ADR did not differ between males and females.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference in the incidence of CM-ADRs between male and female patients according to study design, ADR type, or CT examination. Future studies to determine why gender has shown different roles as a risk factor between CM-ADRs and non-CM ADRs are needed.

Histopathological Evaluation of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Rodent Models

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) can occur in 3–25% of patients receiving radiocontrast material (RCM) despite appropriate preventive measures. Often patients with an atherosclerotic vasculature have to receive large doses of RCM. Thus, animal studies to uncover the exact pathomechanism of CI-AKI are needed. Sensitive and specific histologic end-points are lacking; thus in the present review we summarize the histologic appearance of different rodent models of CI-AKI. Single injection of RCM causes overt renal damage only in rabbits. Rats and mice need an additional insult to the kidney to establish a clinically manifest CI-AKI. In this review we demonstrate that the concentrating ability of the kidney may be responsible for species differences in sensitivity to CI-AKI. The most commonly held theory about the pathomechanism of CI-AKI is tubular cell injury due to medullary hypoxia. Thus, the most common additional insult in rats and mice is some kind of ischemia. The histologic appearance is tubular epithelial cell (TEC) damage; however severe TEC damage is only seen if RCM is combined by additional ischemia. TEC vacuolization is the first sign of CI-AKI, as it is a consequence of RCM pinocytosis and lysosomal fusion; however it is not sensitive as it does not correlate with renal function and is not specific as other forms of TEC damage also cause vacuolization. In conclusion, histopathology alone is insufficient and functional parameters and molecular biomarkers are needed to closely monitor CI-AKI in rodent experiments.

Cellular internalization and morphological analysis after intravenous injection of a highly hydrophilic octahedral rhenium cluster complex - a new promising X-ray contrast agent

The octahedral cluster compound Na₂ H₈ [{Re₆ Se₈ }(P(C₂ H₄ CONH₂ )(C₂ H₄ COO)₂ )₆ ] has been shown to be highly radio dense, thus becoming a promising X-ray contrast agent. It was also shown that this compound had low cytotoxic effect in vitro, low acute toxicity in vivo and was eliminated rapidly from the body through the urinary tract. The present contribution describes a more detailed cellular internalization assay and morphological analysis after intravenous injection of this hexarhenium cluster compound at different doses. The median lethal dose (LD₅₀ ) of intravenously administrated compound was calculated (4.67 ± 0.69 g/kg). Results of the study clearly indicated that the cluster complex H_n [{Re₆ Se₈ }(P(C₂ H₄ CONH₂ )(C₂ H₄ COO)₂ )₆ ]^n-10 was not internalized into cells in vitro and induced only moderate morphological alterations of kidneys at high doses without any changes in morphology of liver, spleen, duodenum, or heart of mice. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Renal Safety of Iodinated Contrast Media Depending on Their Osmolarity - Current Outlooks

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) are commonly administered pharmaceutical agents. Most often they are used intravenously and intraarterially. Although iodinated contrast agents are relatively safe and widely used, adverse events occur and questions remain about their use, safety, and interactions. The most important adverse effects of contrast media include hypersensitivity reactions, thyroid dysfunction, and contrast-induced nephropathy. Radiologists must be aware of the risk factors for reactions to contrast media. Nonionic iodinated contrast agents can be divided into monomeric, low-osmolar, and dimeric, iso-osmolar classes. The osmotic characteristics of contrast media have been a significant focus in many investigations of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy for patients receiving intravenous vs. intra-arterial iodixanol administration

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) for intravenous vs. intra-arterial administration of iodixanol, compared to non-administration.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 650 patients who had intravenous iodixanol-enhanced CT, 695 with intra-arterial iodixanol cardiac catheterization, 651 with unenhanced CT, and those who also had baseline and follow-up serum creatinine within 5 days of the exam. From the medical records, we recorded the gender, age, baseline and follow-up serum creatinine/eGFR; underlying renal injury risk factors; indication for imaging; contrast material administration volume, concentration, and route of administration; and use of pre-imaging prophylactic measures for CIN. Univariate and multivariate models were used to determine predictors of CIN.

RESULTS

Baseline eGFR was lower for patients undergoing unenhanced CT than intravenous or intra-arterial patients (68 vs. 74.6 and 72.2, respectively, p < 0.01) and not different between intravenous and intra-arterial patients (p = 0.735). Simple logistic regression did not show a difference in the rate of CIN in patients who received intravenous vs. intra-arterial iodixanol (28 of 650, 4%, vs. 28 of 695, 4%, respectively, p = 0.798), nor a higher rate of CIN than seen with unenhanced CT (45 of 651, 7%, p = 0.99 and p = 0.98 by one-sided t test). Multivariate regression modeling showed that only elevated baseline creatinine or decreased eGFR and low hematocrit/hemoglobin were associated with CIN incidence (odds ratio 1.28 and 2.5; p < 0.023 and <0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevation in serum creatinine due to intravenous and intra-arterial iodixanol administration is infrequent and is not more common than after unenhanced CT scans.

The Effect of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade Medications on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is the main complication of contrast media administration (CM) in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There are inconsistent results in the literature regarding the effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEIs] and angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) on CIN. We evaluated the association between the administration of ACEI/ARBs and CIN, as well as the effect of ACEI/ARBs on post-procedural changes in renal function index, in patients undergoing CAG.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies. The primary search generated 893 potentially relevant articles. A total of 879 studies were excluded because they did not meet the selection criteria. Finally, 14 studies were eligible for inclusion. There were 7,288 patients that received ACEI/ARBs and 8,159 patients that received placebo or naive to ACEI/ARBs in the study. A random or a fixed effect model was used to calculate the pooled odd ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

The risk of CIN was significantly increased in the ACEI/ARBs group compared to the control group (OR= 1.50, 95%CI: 1.03-2.18, P =0.03). The magnitude of association was significantly reinforced in the observational studies (OR=1.84, 95%CI 1.19-2.85, P=0.006) but not in the randomized controlled trials (OR=0.88, 95%CI 0.41-1.90 P=0.74). The summary adjusted OR of 4 observational studies was 1.56 (95%CI 1.25-1.94, P<0.0001) and was weaker than the unadjusted OR.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is some evidence to suggest that the administration of RAAS blockers was associated with the increased risk of CIN in patients undergoing CAG, the robustness of our study remains weak. The results are based on small observational studies and need further validation.

Significant perturbation in renal functional magnetic resonance imaging parameters and contrast retention for iodixanol compared with iopromide: an experimental study using blood-oxygen-level-dependent/diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in rats

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the renal changes after intravenous administration of a high dose of either iodixanol or iopromide using functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the institutional committee on animal research. Seventy-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 5 cohorts, comprising normal saline (NS), iopromide, iopromide + NS, iodixanol, and iodixanol + NS. Intravenous contrast was administrated at 8 g iodine/kg of body weight. Renal CT, quantitative functional MRI of blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and histologic examinations were performed for 18 days after contrast administration. Statistical analysis was performed by using 1-way analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney test, and regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the renal cortex, BOLD showed persistent elevation of R2* and DWI showed persistent suppression of apparent diffusion coefficient after iodixanol administration for 18 days. Compared with iopromide, adjusted ΔR2* (ΔR2*adj) was significantly higher in the iodixanol group from 1 hour to 18 days (P < 0.04) after contrast; adjusted ΔADC (ΔADCadj) was significantly more pronounced at day 6 (P = 0.01) after contrast. The iodixanol cohort also exhibited persistently higher attenuation in the renal cortex on CT and more severe microscopic renal cortical vacuolization up to 18 days. Intravenous hydration decreased the magnetic resonance changes in both groups but more markedly with iodixanol.

CONCLUSIONS

At high doses, iodixanol induced greater changes in renal functional MRI (BOLD and DWI) relative to iopromide. Combined with longer contrast retention within the kidney, this suggests that iodixanol may produce more severe and longer-lasting contrast-induced renal damage.

Contrast Medium-Induced Acute Kidney Injury

Contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a predominant cause of hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. With an increasing number of contrast medium-enhanced radiological procedures being performed in a rapidly increasing ageing population in the Western world, it is imperative that more attention is given to understand the aetiology of CI-AKI to devise novel diagnostic methods and to formulate effective prophylactic and therapeutic regimens to reduce its incidence and its associated morbidity and mortality. This article presents high-yield information on the above-mentioned aspects of CI-AKI, primarily based on results of randomised controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews and international consensus guidelines.

Network meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: what is it and why is it posed to dominate cardiovascular decision making?

Clinical decision-making requires synthesis of an often complex evidence base. Novel tools have been developed building upon the historical approach of reviewing the literature focusing on a specific topic. Stemming from qualitative reviews, systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, typically encompassing statistical pooling with pairwise meta-analysis, have been devised and are now considered one of the uppermost ladders in the hierarchy of clinical evidence. In the last decade, the exponential growth in randomized trials and the introduction of original computational methods have created the novel opportunity to compare indirectly competing treatments, as well as combining effect estimates stemming from head-to-head trials with those obtained by indirect comparisons. These methods include adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and mixed treatment comparison. While still the focus of intense research and debate, they represent a powerful tool for evidence synthesis and comparative effectiveness in cardiovascular research, and thus are likely to become increasingly popular and impactful in shaping research agenda and clinical practice. This is clearly highlighted by a number of recent landmark network meta-analyses on smoking cessation therapies, coronary stents, and management of patent foramen ovale in patients with history of cryptogenic stroke.

Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) represents an important adverse effect of contrast media (CM) administration. Contrast-induced nephropathy is associated with prolonged hospitalization as well as increased cardiovascular morbidity, renal morbidity, and all-cause mortality. Several risk factors may predict CIN incidence, and various scores and ratios have been proposed to identify high-risk patients. Novel biomarkers may provide an earlier diagnosis of CIN. A multifactorial approach is required for CIN prevention including hydration, administration of low- or iso-osmolar CM, minimizing CM volume, and statin administration. Renal function may deteriorate after CM administration, even in the absence of CIN. Therefore, this deterioration may not be an “all or none” phenomenon; it may well occur in many patients receiving CM, with/without CIN, and may prove to be an underestimated risk factor. Patients should be followed up for longer periods as outpatients after CM exposure to assess kidney function and predict subsequent increased morbidity and mortality.

A network meta-analysis on randomized trials focusing on the preventive effect of statins on contrast-induced nephropathy

Contrast-induced nephropathy is a common complication of iodinated contrast administration. Statins may reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy, but data remain inconclusive. We summarized the evidence based on statins for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with a network meta-analysis. Randomized trials focusing on statins were searched and pooled with random-effect odds ratios. A total of 14 trials (6,160 patients) were included, focusing on atorvastatin (high/low dose), rosuvastatin (high dose), simvastatin (high/low dose), and placebo or no statin therapy before contrast administration. The risk of contrast-induced nephropathy was reduced by atorvastatin high dose and rosuvastatin high dose, with no difference between these two agents. Results for atorvastatin low dose and simvastatin (high/low dose) in comparison to placebo were inconclusive. Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin administered at high doses and before iodinated contrast administration have a consistent and beneficial preventive effect on contrast-induced nephropathy and may actually halve its incidence.

Does intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography cause acute kidney injury? Protocol of a systematic review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury is a common cause of iatrogenic acute kidney injury (AKI). Most of the published estimates of AKI after contrast use originate from the cardiac catheterization literature despite contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans being the more common setting for contrast use. This systematic review aims to summarize the current evidence about (1)the risk of AKI following intravenous (IV) contrast-enhanced CT scans and(2) the risk of clinical outcomes (i.e. death, hospitalization and need for renal replacement therapy) due to IV contrast-enhanced CT scans.

METHODS/DESIGN

A systematic literature search for published studies will be performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and The COCHRANE Library databases. Unpublished studies will be identified by searching through grey literature. No language restriction will be applied.The review will consider all studies that have examined the association between IV contrast media and AKI. To be selected, the study should include two arms: one group of exposed patients who received IV contrast material before CT scans and one group of unexposed group who did not receive contrast material before CT scans. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts obtained from electronic databases, extract data and will assess the quality of the studies selected using the Cochrane's 'Risk of Bias' assessment tool for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. A random-effects meta-analysis will be performed if there is no remarkable heterogeneity between studies.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review will provide synthesis of current evidence around the effect of IV contrast material on AKI and other clinical outcomes. Results will be helpful for making evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for clinical and radiologic settings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42013003799.

Renal protection: preconditioning for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy

As the numbers of interventional procedures are rising exponentially, identification of those patients at risk for renal complications has become even more important. Renal complications have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality after interventions. Risk factors have been studied to help identify those patients at increased risk for developing contrast-induced nephropathy. Hydration and medications have been studied as protective measures to decrease risk of renal complications. Preconditioning patients with intravenous hydration has been found to be the most helpful in circumventing postprocedural contrast-induced nephropathy.

Side effects of radiographic contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention

Radiocontrast media (RCM) are medical drugs used to improve the visibility of internal organs and structures in X-ray based imaging techniques. They may have side effects ranging from itching to a life-threatening emergency, known as contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). We define CIN as acute renal failure occurring within 24-72 hrs of exposure to RCM that cannot be attributed to other causes. It usually occurs in patients with preexisting renal impairment and diabetes. The mechanisms underlying CIN include reduction in medullary blood flow leading to hypoxia and direct tubule cell damage and the formation of reactive oxygen species. Identification of patients at high risk for CIN is important. We have reviewed the risk factors and procedures for prevention, providing a long list of references enabling readers a deep evaluation of them both. The first rule to follow in patients at risk of CIN undergoing radiographic procedure is monitoring renal function by measuring serum creatinine and calculating the eGFR before and once daily for 5 days after the procedure. It is advised to discontinue potentially nephrotoxic medications, to choose radiocontrast media at lowest dosage, and to encourage oral or intravenous hydration. In high-risk patients N-acetylcysteine may also be given.